
Commentary: The reality of 'defunding' Planned Parenthood in Orange County
Congress has passed Trump's budget bill and in doing so, they have jeopardized access to basic healthcare. The Trump administration and Congress have turned their backs on our communities, and the consequences of this bill will echo for generations in Southern California.
One of the central provisions of this bill is 'defunding' Planned Parenthood, by excluding all Planned Parenthood health centers from any Medicaid reimbursement, simply because the organization provides abortion services. Far from being a 'handout' as some characterize it, Medicaid is actually a federal health insurance program that reimburses providers for medical services. By blocking Planned Parenthood from Medicaid, the Trump administration and its Republican allies have unjustly blocked the largest provider of reproductive healthcare in the country from accessing any federal reimbursement for all services, including birth control, STI testing/treatment and cancer screening.
Here's the truth: the government has already prohibited federal funds from being used for abortion since 1977, thanks to the Hyde Amendment. But now, upset that they have not been able to ban abortion outright, Republican lawmakers have chosen to block access to more than 90% of the services we provide each year by excluding us from a major health insurance program enabling millions of low-income Americans to get healthcare.
Republicans have turned misinformation into policy, traded facts for fear — and sacrificed lives for leverage.
Defunding Planned Parenthood is not about balancing the country's budget. This is a blatant attack on healthcare access for people who need it the most, and a backdoor attempt to block people from accessing abortion, birth control, and other medical services that most Americans support and are legally protected in California.
They may operate from hate, but we act from humanity. For Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties (PPOSBC), that means showing up, no matter what.
At PPOSBC, we are exploring every possible budgetary solution to ensure that the more than 130,000 patients who rely on us for care each year can continue to access the medical services they need. Like any health care provider in this country that accepts Medicaid, we receive federal funding as reimbursement for the care we provide. Now we are being forced to make some tough decisions as a result of this targeted and unjust attack on the patients we serve. However, we refuse to let cancers go undetected or let STIs go untreated. We refuse to stand idly by while patients are blocked from accessing birth control, vasectomies, comprehensive sexual health education, and more basic and legally protected healthcare services.
Even as the Trump administration tries to block people from accessing the health care they need, it cannot deter us from our mission. Our patients and communities are relying on us, and we will continue to show up for them with strength, courage, and dignity. Our compassion will always exceed their cruelty.
This fight is not over, but we have difficult days ahead of us. If you're angry, heartbroken, believe in health care access for all, or have ever been to a Planned Parenthood for care, please channel that energy into action. We need everyone in our community to stand with us and help us fight back, because we will not stop fighting for our patients. With your support, we're not going anywhere, and neither is our care.
Krista Hollinger is the President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties. Previously, she held leadership positions at UCI Health and St. Jude Heritage Health Care. She is a resident of Anaheim.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump administration's lawsuit over Chicago's sanctuary city policies tossed by federal judge
A federal judge on Friday dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit challenging sanctuary city policies in Chicago and the state of Illinois. The Justice Department sued Illinois, Cook County and the city of Chicago — along with several state and local officials, including Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson — in February, arguing their sanctuary laws 'interfere' with Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) ability to arrest and deport illegal migrants. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, concluded that sanctuary policies — which prohibit local law enforcement from cooperating with federal authorities on immigration enforcement — are protected by the 10th Amendment. 6 Federal agents detain a protester attempting to block US ICE agents from entering a building housing an immigration court in Chicago, Ill. on June 16, 2025. REUTERS '[T]he Sanctuary Policies reflect Defendants' decision to not participate in enforcing civil immigration law — a decision protected by the Tenth Amendment and not preempted by [federal immigration laws],' Jenkins wrote in her 64-page ruling. 'Finding that these same Policy provisions constitute discrimination or impermissible regulation would provide an end-run around the Tenth Amendment,' the judge continued. 'It would allow the federal government to commandeer States under the guise of intergovernmental immunity — the exact type of direct regulation of states barred by the Tenth Amendment.' Jenkins also determined that the Trump administration lacked standing to sue the 'individual defendants' named in the case, such as Pritzker and Cook. She dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, meaning the Trump administration may amend its complaint if it wishes to continue litigating the issue. In their lawsuit, the Trump administration singled out the Illinois Trust Act and Chicago's Welcoming City ordinance. 6 President Donald Trump speaks to reporters outside the White House on July 25, 2025. Ron Sachs/CNP / The Trust Act declares that 'State law does not currently grant State or local law enforcement the authority to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' while the Welcoming City ordinance emphatically states, 'No agency or agent shall: arrest, detain or continue to detain a person solely on the belief that the person is not present legally in the United States.' Pritzker and Johnson celebrated the judge's ruling. 'Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court,' the governor wrote on X. 'Their case challenging the bipartisan TRUST Act was dismissed — unlike the President, we follow the law and listen to the courts.' 6 Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker speaks after a meeting in the governor's office in Chicago on April 7, 2023. Getty Images Meanwhile, Johnson tweeted that the ruling 'affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety.' 'Chicago cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda,' the mayor added. 'Our city is safer when local law enforcement can focus on the needs of Chicagoans.' 6 Lindsay C. Jenkins, US district judge for the Northern District of Illinois nominee, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill on Oct. 12, 2022. REUTERS 6 Protesters hold up a sign opposing President Trump outside Trump Tower in Chicago during a rally on Jan. 20, 2025. AP The ruling is a setback to the Trump administration, which earlier this week sued New York City and Mayor Eric Adams over Gotham's sanctuary city policies — similarly arguing that rules limiting the NYPD's and other law enforcement agencies' cooperation with federal immigration enforcement are unconstitutional. The move came after two illegal migrants allegedly shot an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer in the face in a Manhattan park. Attorney General Pam Bondi filed suit against Chicago and the state of Illinois on her first day on the job at DOJ. 6 Federal agents hold back a protester during an ICE exercise outside an immigration court in Chicago on June 16, 2025. REUTERS Bondi teased that the lawsuit would be the first of several going after sanctuary policies in Democrat-run states and cities. 'If you are a leader of a state or local jurisdiction that obstructs or impedes federal law enforcement, you will be next,' Bondi said in February. The DOJ has since filed lawsuits against New York City, Los Angeles, Newark, Jersey City, Paterson and Hoboken over sanctuary laws. The White House and DOJ did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment.


CNN
10 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump Doesn't Rule Out Pardon For Ghislaine Maxwell - Laura Coates Live - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Trump Doesn't Rule Out Pardon For Ghislaine Maxwell Laura Coates Live 47 mins President Donald Trump denied again today that he was briefed on his name appearing in files tied to the Jeffrey Epstein case, despite reports by CNN and other outlets on the briefing. The administration remains dogged by public criticism over its handling of the case.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Murkowski: Trump administration funding freeze could result in ‘closing schools'
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) fears the Trump administration's multibillion-dollar education funding freeze could cause schools in her state to close as districts struggle to keep employees without the money. The administration originally froze a total of $6 billion in funding to schools, affecting after-school and summer programs, along with classes for adult and English learners. Last week, the president released about $1 billion that was aimed at after-school programs, but $5 billion is still held up. 'Many of our school districts have already made really hard decisions about closing schools,' Murkowski told ABC News. 'Both in Fairbanks and Anchorage, we've seen layoffs,' she continued. 'If your literacy skills are weak, if you're working on your English skills, I mean, these are all things that are keeping people out of the workforce at a time when we're trying to get people into it,' Murkowski added. 'So I am very worried.' She was one of nine Republicans to sign a letter to the Office of Management and Budget last week demanding the funding be released and rejecting the administration's claim the money is going toward 'woke' programs. The letter prompted the office to release the about $1 billion in funding for after-school and summer programming, prompting a sigh of relief for parents. But the rest of the money is still in limbo, with no timeline on when it will be given to schools. 'I'd like to see some of the other programs released, but, you know, we haven't heard one way or the other,' Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( who led the Republican letter, told ABC. While Murkowski is hesitant to say the money is cut, she stresses the funding needs to be released before the school year begins. 'I don't want to call it cuts yet, because my hope is that they're just unpaused and that they are going to materialize,' Murkowski told ABC News. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword