Is a candidate winning an election ‘unopposed' unconstitutional?
Is a candidate winning an election 'unopposed' unconstitutional?
According to Section 53 (2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, if there is only candidate contesting an election, then she can be declared elected unopposed. Now a legal think tank, the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy has filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of this provision.
It cites the 2013 order of the Supreme Court which held that the right to cast a negative vote by choosing 'NOTA' was protected under Article 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution. It argues that this right is independent of how many candidates are contesting – therefore, not holding the election on the grounds that there is only one candidate deprives voters of this right.
Last week, the Supreme Court, while hearing this petition, suggested that in cases where there is only one candidate, there could be a requirement that the candidate should win a prescribed minimum of vote share – be it 20% or 25% or whatever – in order to be declared as elected.
But the Election Commission seems keen to retain the status quo, arguing that cases of candidates winning unopposed are rare and therefore the court should not entertain such a petition.
Is the Election Commission right? What if the phenomenon of candidates standing unopposed becomes more widespread in the future? What happens to the NOTA option then?
Guest: Arghya Sengupta, Founder and Research Director at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, Delhi.
Host: G. Sampath, Social Affairs Editor, The Hindu.
Edited by Shivaraj S and Sharada Venkatasubramnian
Listen to more In Focus podcasts:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BJP minority cell to publicise Operation Sindoor; reach out to Muslims
'The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) minority cell will hold outreach meetings outside religious sites such as dargahs, mosques, madrasas, churches and gurdwaras across the State to publicise the success of Operation Sindoor and welfare schemes for minorities,' a party leader said on Tuesday (June 10, 2025.) 'The party will launch the campaign from tomorrow with distribution of pocket-sized copies of the Constitution to raise awareness among minorities about their rights and duties,' Uttar Pradesh BJP minority cell president Kunwar Basit Ali told PTI. 'Also, conventions under the banner 'Alpsankhyakon ka Paigam, Modi ke Saath Musalman' will be held across all major cities in the State to mark 11 years of the Narendra Modi government,' he said. The first such event will take place on June 12 at the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Convention Centre in Lucknow. Mr. Ali said the cell will also conduct a programme, 'Desh ka Paigam, Pratibha ko Samman,' to felicitate madrasa students who have excelled academically. The party will also felicitate relatives of those who died in the line of duty. "It is a significant step towards building trust-based politics with minorities," he said. The party is slated to organise yoga events in 403 madrasas of Uttar Pradesh on International Yoga Day (June 21). Mr. Ali also drew a contrast between former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's remark "Muslims have the first claim on resources" and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's view that "the poor have the first right on the country's resources." He said the Sachar Committee had exposed the dire socio-economic condition of Muslims, which remained unaddressed under previous governments. "Despite immense poverty in the Muslim community, Prime Minister Modi has ensured the benefits of his welfare schemes reach them. Muslims constitute about 20% of the population, but they account for nearly 40% of the beneficiaries of government welfare programmes," Mr. Ali said.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Left, Dalit groups protest over police torture
Rajamahendravaram: CPI, CPM, CPI (ML) New Democracy, and various Dalit rights organisations organised a protest here on Monday, condemning the police assault on Dalit and minority youth in Tenali. The protest began with floral tributes at the statue of Dr BR Ambedkar, the architect of the Indian Constitution. Speaking at the protest, CPI leader Tatipaka Madhu and CPM leader T Arun recalled past instances of police brutality under the previous YSRCP government, including the cases of Dr Sudhakar and driver Subrahmanyam. They stated that such incidents were a key reason people voted out the YSRCP and elected the alliance government. However, they alleged that despite a change in government, Dalits still remain unprotected, citing the latest Tenali incident as proof. The leaders said that even if the three youths were found using ganja or involved in any wrongdoing, they should have been arrested and produced before the court in accordance with the law. 'Police have no authority to beat people in public. Such acts are unconstitutional and inhuman,' they said. They strongly criticised Home Minister Vangalapudi Anitha for not condemning the incident and instead defending the police action. 'It is outrageous that Dalit youth were stomped on with boots and beaten up on a road,' they said. Questioning Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu's silence, the leaders said, 'He was quick to respond to remarks made against Amaravati women. Why is he silent now when Dalits are being brutally assaulted?' Dalit organisation leaders Korukonda Chiranjeevi, Jangam Subbarao, and S Vijay Kumar urged the alliance government to respect the Constitution and the rule of law. They reminded that the Supreme Court and human rights bodies have ruled against custodial torture. Chikatla Venkateswara Rao, district assistant secretary of New Democracy, demanded the immediate suspension of the Tenali CI and SI and called for a thorough investigation into the incident. Several prominent leaders, including CPI district assistant secretary K Rambabu, city secretary V Kondala Rao, assistant secretary Sappa Ramana, CPM district leaders B Pavan Poornima Raju, New Democracy leaders K Sattibabu and V Chittibabu, and CPI leaders P Lavanya, K Srinivas, and T Nageswara Rao, participated n this protest.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Trump Vs Newsom: National Guard, Marines Deployed As LA Protests Erupt
US ICE Protests: The city of Los Angeles is facing escalating tensions not just because of protests but also due to the power struggle between United States President Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom. The federal government of the US has taken more than one decision to dial down the agitation; however, the state government seemingly does not appreciate the meddling. The tensions in the city reportedly erupted after protests broke out on Saturday, following the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in LA and multiple arrests. Here are the top 10 key updates so far: 1- An additional 2,000 National Guard Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, Sean Parnell, informed in a post on X that at the order of President Trump, the Department of Defense is mobilising an additional 2,000 California National Guard to be called into federal service. 2- 700 US Marines On the other hand, United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth stated that approximately 700 active-duty U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton are being deployed to LA. In a post on X, he wrote, "Due to increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order." 3- Newsom's Arrest? California Governor Gavin Newsom, on his official X handle, shared a video of Trump speaking to reporters and said that the President "called for the arrest of a sitting Governor." 4- Newsom Files Lawsuit California also filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration amid the ongoing tensions. Newsom alleged on X, "This is a manufactured crisis. He (Trump) is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. Constitution." 5- Cal Guv Lists 4 Points The Governor wrote in a post, "Let's get this straight: 1) Local law enforcement didn't need help. 2) Trump sent troops anyway — to manufacture chaos and violence. 3) Trump succeeded. 4) Now things are destabilized and we need to send in more law enforcement just to clean up Trump's mess." 6- Trump's Defence Commending the work that the National Guard did in LA, Trump, in a post on Truth Social, wrote, "Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest. We have an incompetent Governor (Newscum) and Mayor (Bass) who were, as usual (just look at how they handled the fires, and now their VERY SLOW PERMITTING disaster. Federal permitting is complete!), unable to to handle the task." 7- What Led To Protests? The protests came following the ICE operation in the city and many arrests. ANI reported on Sunday that, according to ICE, a total of 118 arrests were made in LA that week, with 44 of those occurring on Friday. 8- What Happened During Protests? While addressing a press conference Saturday afternoon, Sheriff Robert Luna said that up to 400 people gathered for protests in Paramount, prompting the department to declare an unlawful assembly. Authorities urged them to "disperse peacefully without any violence." Later on Saturday, Protests continued on the border of Paramount and Compton, with hundreds of demonstrators gathering around a burning car in an intersection. Some individuals performed burnouts on their vehicles, while others rode dirt bikes around the fire, waving flags. 9- Trump's Initial Reaction Initially after the protested erupted, Trump on Truth Social had posted, "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" 10- Newsom's Blame On Federal Govt On June 8, the California Governor wrote on X, "As the federal government conducts chaotic immigration sweeps across the country, the state is deploying additional CHP to maintain safety on Los Angeles highways to keep the peace. It's not their job to assist in federal immigration enforcement." On Monday, Trump signed a presidential memorandum deploying the National Guard under Title 10 of the United States Code to protect ICE and federal personnel and property. With this move, the National Guard can report directly to the President, bypassing the Governor.
