
River rafting in Colorado offers climate lessons for Southern California
But even as I reveled in the soothing scenery, I kept thinking about home.
A few miles downstream, the water would reach the Gunnison River. From there, some of the flow — the stuff not diverted to farms and ranches and cities — would continue 180 miles to join the Colorado River at Grand Junction. Then it would meander through Utah's red-rock country, before stopovers at Lake Powell and Lake Mead.
Eventually it would be pumped hundreds of miles across California. A few drops might reach my apartment.
Last week, I rafted the Taylor River; this week, back home from vacation, I may be drinking it.
It's easy to get lost in abstractions. Sure, I know much of my city's drinking water comes from faraway mountain ranges, and much of its electricity from distant power plants. As an environmental journalist, I'm aware the dams and generators built to serve the West's major cities have reshaped communities and ecosystems.
But sitting here in L.A., that's all a thought exercise. For the people and places at the other ends of the aqueducts and power lines, the consequences are extremely tangible.
Take the raft guide who steered me and my friends down the Taylor.
He was in his early 20s and living his best life, having moved to Colorado to be a ski bum before falling for rafting. His goofy, carefree vibes belied a wealth of knowledge. When I asked him about drought, he rattled off cubic-feet-per-second river flows. (They're low this year.) He mentioned a water board meeting happening that night.
Then our raft snagged on some rocks.
'Here we gooooo!' he called, flipping us back around.
I kept asking him about water, my friends long since having accepted that I'll use our hiking trips for newspaper fodder. He told me this year's snowpack wasn't awful, but too many early-season hot days wiped out most of the high-elevation snow. He described an upstream reservoir on the Taylor as a 'saving grace' for rafting, because in dry times the dam can ensure steady water releases.
Still, the Taylor was lower than he'd seen in five years on the job. We kept scraping rocks he'd never encountered.
'For me personally, it's like a new river,' he said.
We didn't talk about the Colorado River water sucked up by front lawns, golf courses or farmers who grow alfalfa to feed cows — cows being a significant driver of climate change, including worsening droughts.
But those water users are all part of the same interconnected system. And partly due to global warming, there's not enough water in the Colorado River Basin to go around. With Lake Mead just 31% full and Lake Powell at 32%, Western states are currently renegotiating who will lose how much water during the inevitable next shortage.
Residents of major cities like L.A., with political clout and diversified water supplies, probably won't see their lives severely disrupted. Rural communities closer to our collective water sources may not fare so well.
That doesn't mean Colorado rafting companies have a higher moral claim to water than, say, low-income families in L.A. I just couldn't help but think, as I floated the Taylor, that Westerners urban and rural, red and blue, actually have a lot in common. We're bound by water, energy and public lands.
My friends and I kept learning that lesson as we traversed Colorado's Western Slope.
At Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park, for instance, we had to change plans and avoid the South Rim — closed due to wildfire. Jonathan P. Thompson, an environmental reporter who grew up in southwest Colorado and writes the Land Desk newsletter, told me he's seen a huge uptick in fire activity in the region.
'Up until 2002, the biggest wildfire in recorded history in Colorado was like 20,000 acres,' he said. 'Now that's not even on the list of the top 10 ... Now the record is closer to 200,000 acres.'
He also mentioned the Dragon Bravo fire, which has burned over 140,000 acres on the Grand Canyon's North Rim and destroyed about 100 properties within the national park. The blaze is still raging.
'It's crazy not how many fires there are, but just the severity and the size of them,' Thompson said.
Indeed, Western wildfires are getting bigger and more destructive due to climate change — a crisis largely fueled by oil, gas and coal combustion. And most of those fossil fuels are being burned by or for urban residents.
I'm not trying to guilt-trip anyone (at least, not too much). Again, we're in this together. If you care about clean air, national parks and having enough water to drink, it shouldn't matter where you live. Westerners rely on the same natural resources. We share the same spaces.
To an extent, the same is true for housing. During our trip last week, my friends and I spent time in mountain ski towns such as Crested Butte and Gunnison, where housing prices have soared as young people are priced out of cities such as L.A., San Francisco and Denver, and as tourism fuels demand for short-term rentals.
Thompson has tracked similar trends in national park gateway towns across the West.
'These are tourist communities. The answer is not to stay away by any means,' he said. 'Just being conscious of what people are going through, who's waiting on you at restaurants and that sort of thing. And the fact that they might have to drive a long way, might have to work several jobs to be able to afford to live there.'
It's good advice, especially with empathy in short supply in a bitterly divided America. Even if we can't all agree on how to divvy up the Colorado River or why it's getting hotter — although God knows the science is crystal clear on climate change — we can still bond over the challenges we share.
I realize that may sound naive. But something has to bring us back together eventually. Right?
One last tidbit from Colorado.
As I walked through Gunnison to mail some cards at the post office — an institution as quintessentially American as the national parks — I stopped to admire a beautiful mural. Reading a sign, I was delighted to learn that a local quarry had supplied the marble used to build the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C.
I've spent a lot of time thinking about Abraham Lincoln since the November election: his courage, his convictions, his role in rescuing the United States from unthinkable crisis. More than half a million people died in the Civil War. But 160 years later, the nation is still here. Slavery is gone. The American democratic experiment continues.
I know talking with raft guides won't solve all our problems. Neither will empathizing with waiters in ski towns, or bonding over a shared love of national parks, or even successfully renegotiating interstate water compacts.
But those sound like reasonable steps toward avoiding much harsher outcomes.
This is the latest edition of Boiling Point, a newsletter about climate change and the environment in the American West. Sign up here to get it in your inbox. And listen to our Boiling Point podcast here.
For more climate and environment news, follow @Sammy_Roth on X and @sammyroth.bsky.social on Bluesky.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
19 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Putin-Trump Summit: What Each Side Wants
The US and Russian presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are to meet at a US air base in Alaska on Friday for talks on the Ukraine war. Expectations are high for the first summit between sitting US and Russian presidents in more than four years, but Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart in their visions on how to end the conflict. It will be Putin's first trip to a Western country since launching his invasion in February 2022, as well as his first US visit in 10 years. Here is a look at what each side hopes to achieve from the talks: For Putin, who has faced years of isolation from the West since the invasion, the summit is an opportunity to press Russia's hardline demands for ending the conflict. In a draft peace plan published in June, Russia called on Ukraine to withdraw its forces from the Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk regions that Moscow claimed to annex in 2022. Ukraine has rejected the idea. Russia has also called on Ukraine to halt its military mobilisation, abandon its NATO ambitions, and for Western countries to immediately stop weapon supplies -- something critics say amounts to capitulation. In addition to territory, Russia wants Ukraine to ensure the "rights and freedoms" of the Russian-speaking population and to prohibit what it calls the "glorification of Nazism". It also wants Western sanctions lifted. Ukraine says Russia's allegations of Nazism are absurd and that it already guarantees rights to Russian speakers. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is not scheduled to take part in the summit, but has said there can be no peace deal without its involvement. He has called the meeting a "personal victory" for Putin. Ukraine has called for an unconditional ceasefire on land, sea and sky as a prerequisite to peace talks. It wants both sides to release all prisoners of war and demanded the return of Ukrainian children it says Russia illegally kidnapped. Ukraine says Russia has forcibly transferred thousands of Ukrainian children into areas under its control since the war began, often adopting them into Russian families and assigning them Russian citizenship. Russia rejects the kidnapping allegations but acknowledges that thousands of children are on its territory. Ukraine says any deal must include security guarantees to prevent Russia from attacking again, and that there should be no restrictions on the number of troops it can deploy on its territory. It says sanctions on Russia can only be lifted gradually and that there should be a way of reimposing them if needed. Trump promised he would end the war within "24 hours" after taking office in January. But eight months on, and even after repeated calls with Putin and several visits to Russia by US envoy Steve Witkoff, he has failed to extract any major concessions from the Kremlin. The summit is his first opportunity to broker a deal in person. The US president, author of the book "Trump: The Art of the Deal" said on Wednesday that Russia would face "very severe consequences" if it did not halt its offensive. The US leader initially said there would be some "land swapping going on" at the talks, but appeared to walk back after speaking with European leaders on Wednesday. Trump has said he would "like to see a ceasefire very, very quickly". But the White House has played down expectations of a breakthrough, describing it as a "listening exercise" for the former reality TV star. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump said, hinting Zelensky could take part in a subsequent summit. Despite providing military support for Ukraine and hosting millions of Ukrainian refugees, European leaders have been sidelined from the peace talks that may affect the region's security architecture in the future. European representatives were neither invited to the past three meetings between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, nor to the Russia-US talks in Riyadh in February. In a statement last week, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the EU Commission warned there could be no meaningful peace without Ukraine's participation. "Territorial questions concerning Ukraine can be, and will be, negotiated only by the Ukrainian president," French President Emmanuel Macron said after speaking with Trump on Wednesday. Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer have signalled they are willing to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine once the fighting ends, an idea Russia has vehemently rejected.


eNCA
20 minutes ago
- eNCA
Trump vows not to be intimidated ahead of Putin summit
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump insisted Thursday he would not be intimidated by Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the eve of a high-stakes summit and said Ukraine would be involved in any deal on its fate. Putin flies to Alaska on Friday at the invitation of Trump in his first visit to a Western country since he ordered the 2022 invasion of Ukraine that has killed tens of thousands of people. As Russia made gains on the battlefield, the Kremlin said the two presidents planned to meet one-on-one, heightening fears of European leaders that Putin will cajole Trump into a settlement imposed on Kyiv. Trump insisted to reporters at the White House: "I am president, and he's not going to mess around with me." "I'll know within the first two minutes, three minutes, four minutes or five minutes... whether or not we're going to have a good meeting or a bad meeting," Trump said. "And if it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future," said Trump, who gave the summit a one in four chance of failure. Trump has voiced admiration for Putin in the past and faced wide criticism after a 2018 summit in Helsinki where he appeared to accept the Russian's denials of US intelligence on Moscow's meddling in US elections. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was not invited to the Alaska summit, which he has denounced as a reward to Putin, and has refused Trump's calls to surrender territory. Trump promised not to finalise any deal with Putin alone and said he hoped to hold a three-way summit with Zelenskyy, possibly immediately afterwards in Alaska. AFP | Guillermo RIVAS PACHECO, Jean-Michel CORNU "The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal. And I don't want to use the word 'divvy' things up. But you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term," Trump told Fox News Radio. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters any future deal needed also to ensure "security guarantees" for Ukraine. But Trump has previously backed Russia's stance in ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine. - Shifting Trump tone - Trump had boasted that he could end the war within 24 hours of returning to the White House in January. But his calls to Putin - and intense pressure on Zelenskyy to accept concessions - have failed to move the Russian leader and Trump has warned of "very severe consequences" if Putin keeps snubbing his overtures. AFP | Drew ANGERER The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1930 GMT) Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, a major US military installation in Alaska that has been crucial in monitoring Russia. Zelenskyy met in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who vowed solidarity, a day after receiving support in Berlin. Russia has made major gains on the ground ahead of the summit. Ukraine on Thursday issued a mandatory evacuation of families with children from the eastern town of Druzhkivka and four nearby villages near an area where Russia made a swift breakthrough. - Mixed views on diplomacy - Diplomacy since Russia's invasion has largely failed to secure agreements beyond swaps of prisoners. AFP | Drew ANGERER Russia said Thursday it had returned 84 prisoners to Ukraine in exchange for an equal number of Russian POWs. The war has proved divisive in the United States, with a Pew Research Center poll finding that 59 percent of Americans lacked confidence in Trump's wisdom on the issue. Anchorage, nestled under mountains, bore few indications it was the center of global attention except for signs denouncing Putin put up on downtown streets, where people gave mixed opinions of the summit. AFP | James RYBACKI But Kimberly Brown, a 63-year-old retiree from Ohio, said Alaska was a "perfect place" for the summit. "I just think that Trump is the best person to negotiate world peace." By Shaun Tandon


Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Israel unveils new West Bank settlement plan
Photo: Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich attends an inauguration event for Israel's new light rail line for the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, in Petah Tikva, Israel, August 17, 2023/Reuters Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced that work would start on a long-delayed settlement that would divide the West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem, a move his office said would "bury" the idea of a Palestinian state. The Palestinian government, allies and campaign groups condemned the scheme, calling it illegal and saying the fragmentation of territory would rip up peace plans for the region. Standing at the site of the planned settlement in Maale Adumim on Thursday, Smotrich, a settler himself, said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump had agreed to the revival of the E1 development, though there was no immediate confirmation from either. "Whoever in the world is trying to recognise a Palestinian state today will receive our answer on the ground. Not with documents nor with decisions or statements, but with facts. Facts of houses, facts of neighbourhoods," Smotrich said. Asked about his remarks, a US State Department spokesperson said: "A stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration's goal to achieve peace in the region," and referred reporters to Israel's government for further information. The spokesperson said Washington remained primarily focused on ending the war in Gaza. The United Nations urged Israel to reverse its decision to start work on the settlement. "It would put an end to prospects of a two-state solution," UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric told reporters. "Settlements go against international law (and) further entrench the occupation." Israel froze construction plans at Maale Adumim in 2012, and again after they were revived in 2020, amid objections from the US, European allies and other powers who considered the project a threat to any future peace deal with the Palestinians. Restarting the project could further isolate Israel, which has watched some of its Western allies condemn its military offensive in Gaza and announce they may recognise a Palestinian state. Palestinians fear the settlement building in the West Bank - which has sharply intensified - will rob them of any chance to build a state of their own in the area. In a statement headlined "Burying the idea of a Palestinian state," Smotrich's spokesperson said the minister had approved the plan to build 3,401 houses for Israeli settlers between an existing settlement in the West Bank and Jerusalem. Nabil Abu Rudeineh, the Palestinian president's spokesperson, called on the United States to pressure Israel to stop settlement building. "The EU rejects any territorial change that is not part of a political agreement between involved parties. So annexation of territory is illegal under international law," European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper said. Palestinians were already demoralised by the Israeli military campaign which has killed more than 61,000 people in Gaza, according to local health authorities, and fear Israel will ultimately push them out of that territory. About 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, a move not recognised by most countries, but has not formally extended sovereignty over the West Bank.