
Musk thinks Trump's pal Navarro is a ‘moron'. Who are we supposed to root for here?
I would like to dispel some rumors right up front. One, I did not receive a PhD in business from Harvard Business School. Hopefully this doesn't make you think less of me, but I felt it necessary to be honest. Second, I did not even attend Harvard. I thought about it once; hopefully, thinking about something isn't illegal yet.
My point is that I am no elitist snob begging for your subservience. I'm a simple man, just trying to salvage the last of my meager wealth during the great trade war of 2025. I know absolutely nothing about global economic policy. As such, I must be worth listening to.
I say all of this because Elon Musk, the owner of various companies like Tesla, SpaceX, Weyland-Yutani, OCP, the Tyrell Corporation, etc, has made it abundantly clear that he can't stand Peter Navarro.
Peter Navarro, with his fancy degree from Harvard, is too much of an intellectual for the current zeitgeist that favors a complete lack of knowledge for just about anyone in a position of authority. The secretary of education never taught a single school class, but she has (poorly) received a Stone Cold Stunner. The secretary of Health and Human Services has a problem with pasteurized milk. The secretary of transportation was on Road Rules, so at least he has a basic understanding of motorway etiquette. But for the most part, if you have only a layman's understanding of your role, you are unequivocally qualified to lead.
I am ill-suited to any cabinet position, unless there's a secretary of cocktails, in which case, I make a mean dry gin martini with a twist of lemon. So I am paradoxically the perfect person to run our economic policy, based on the rhetoric of Elon Musk, who deemed Peter Navarro to be a 'moron' because of his advanced degree, and his support for Donald Trump's ruinous tariffs against global trade. Navarro stated that Musk's Tesla plants are a prime example of the world's trade imbalance. 'In many cases, if you go to [Musk's] Texas plant, a good part of the engines that he gets, which in the EV case are the batteries, come from Japan and come from China. The electronics come from Taiwan,' Navarro alleged.
This statement set Musk off, causing him to turn on Navarro – whom he considers 'dumber than a sack of bricks' – and by proxy, Trump's stated aims of bringing manufacturing back to the States through onerous taxation. Musk said on X: 'By any definition whatsoever, Tesla is the most vertically integrated auto manufacturer in America with the highest percentage of US content. Navarro should ask the fake expert he invented, Ron Vara.' The 'Ron Vara' comment is in reference to the allegedly made-up expert that Navarro cited in his 2011 book Death By China, which warns the reader of nefarious Chinese economic policy. When called out about his charming little fib, Navarro said that the use of a fictional figure that is clearly an anagram of his own last name was a fun 'inside joke' between him and … I suppose the basic tenets of ethics.
This is, by any cogent estimation, a battle of the titans: Navarro, the Ivy League-educated garbage man for the current American president, and Musk, who managed to wield his immense wealth to convince said president that having a functioning government was beta-ass behavior, bruh. Is there a winner here? Probably not. We all lose when no one seems to care about anything but their own interests. Navarro is terrified to upset his boss. Musk clearly doesn't want to endanger his own profits by allowing tariffs to squelch the free exchange of goods between nations that like electric cars. The rest of us, the chaff caught between these two gibbering hobbits, can fend for ourselves until they figure it out.
This fight is expensive for us. The stock market, which is too esoteric and costly for most average people to participate in directly, shed trillions of dollars thanks to fears of Trump's tariffs. That value bounced back after the president backed off his threats for a period of 90 days, but the psychological effect of that brinkmanship will be hard to shake. Those fluctuations are video game-like blips for the mega-rich, but they can cause real harm to the retirement funds of the average citizen. A tariff on pharmaceuticals could inhibit people from accessing life-saving medication. To people like Navarro and Musk, these are theoretical concerns, so far removed from their everyday lives that they might as well be the problems of the Klingon Empire on Star Trek. Why should they care, when their own petty squabbles are so near and dear to them?
But this is the grand thesis of Trump's America. Personal grievance and retribution are paramount. Proving you are superior to your enemy means more than the fate of a stranger, or a neighbor. Why do we get out of bed every morning if not to smite our opponent on the virtual battlefield of social media? It means more to be right than to do right.
In some twisted way, Musk is correct. We do need some manner of global trade to survive, because the global economy is so bloody complicated and ridiculous that we have to keep some semblance of the status quo for now. That his calculus is related to his own personal wealth is an unfortunate aspect of this position. Navarro, on the other hand, understands Musk shouldn't be involved in the economic policy of the entire planet. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, referred to this spat as a benign 'boys will be boys' dust-up, but I think it's more than that. This is Godzilla v Kong, if Godzilla was a sycophantic bureaucrat and Kong appeared to have very expensive hair transplants.
In the aforementioned film, Godzilla and Kong beat the shit out of each other and destroyed an entire city in the process. This real-life fight could actually be more devastating if we do nothing about it.
Dave Schilling is a Los Angeles-based writer and humorist
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US says China's Huawei can't make more than 200,000 AI chips in 2025
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - China's Huawei Technologies [RIC:RIC: is capable of producing no more than 200,000 advanced artificial intelligence chips in 2025, a top U.S. exports controls official told lawmakers on Thursday, warning that though the number is below the company's demand, China is quickly catching up to U.S. capabilities. Since 2019, a slew of U.S. export rules aimed at curbing China's technological and military advancements have limited access by Huawei and other Chinese firms to high-end U.S. chips and the equipment needed to produce them. The issue has become a flashpoint in U.S.-China relations. Facing those restrictions, Huawei aims to ship its Ascend 910C AI chips to Chinese customers as an alternative to those made by the United States' Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, the global leader. "Our assessment is that Huawei Ascend chip production capacity for 2025 will be at or below 200,000 and we project that most or all of that will be delivered to companies within China," Jeffrey Kessler, Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security at the Commerce Department, told a congressional hearing. Kessler said that the U.S. should not take comfort in the figure. "China is investing huge amounts to increase its AI chip production, as well as the capabilities of the chips that it produces. So, it's critical for us not to have a false sense of security, to understand that China is catching up quickly," he told the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs South and Central Asia subcommittee. White House AI Czar David Sacks said on Tuesday that China was only 3-6 months behind the U.S. in AI. The White House later said he was referring to China's AI models, adding that Chinese AI chips are one to two years behind their U.S. counterparts. Huawei's CEO Ren Zhengfei told Chinese state media on Tuesday that the company's chips were a generation behind those of U.S. competitors, but that it invests more than $25 billion annually to improve performance. Nvidia's AI chips are more powerful than Huawei's but Washington's export controls on its most sophisticated chips have caused it to lose market share. The U.S. and China reached a tentative trade truce at talks in London this week after a previous agreement faltered over China's continued curbs on minerals exports. That prompted the Trump administration to apply additional export controls on shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods. Democratic Representative Greg Meeks expressed concern that the Trump administration had conflated U.S. exports controls with broader discussions on trade. "What I will say is export controls have been strong and I'm confident that they will remain strong," Kessler said. Kessler said he was not planning any immediate new restrictions on U.S. semiconductors sold to China, but that the Commerce Department will "remain active in this space." "It's a constantly evolving landscape, and we need to make sure that our controls remain effective," he said.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Harvard researcher is released from federal custody following accusations of smuggling frog embryos
Kseniia Petrova, a Harvard scientist who was arrested last month on a federal smuggling charge, was released Wednesday from federal custody following a detention hearing in Boston. Petrova, a Russian citizen, was taken into custody in May after prosecutors in Massachusetts accused her of smuggling frog embryos into the United States without properly declaring them. She was released Thursday on conditions agreed to by both sides. A probable cause hearing on the smuggling charge is tentatively set for June 18. Petrova had been in custody since February, when her visa was revoked at Boston Logan International Airport. 'I just want to thank everybody,' Petrova said outside the federal courthouse in Boston after her release. She said letters and messages from supporters helped her feel less alone while in custody. 'It was a huge support without which I won't be able to survive,' she said. Initially held in a Vermont facility, she was transferred to a Louisiana immigration detention center, where she filed a petition arguing that her detention was unlawful and that she feared persecution if returned to Russia because she had participated in protests against the war in Ukraine. She was moved to federal criminal custody in May after being charged with smuggling. At the time of her arrest, Petrova was working at a Harvard lab, where she had developed computer scripts to analyze images from a microscope that scientists say could transform cancer detection. Her colleagues told NBC News that she was the only person on the team with the rare combination of skills needed to interpret the data. 'That was only her. It was only her,' Leon Peshkin, her mentor and a principal research scientist at Harvard, previously said. Petrova described being confused and isolated after her arrest, saying she was held in a cell without contact with her lawyer or colleagues. 'Nobody knew what was happening to me,' she said. 'I didn't have any contact, not to my lawyer, not to Leon, not to anybody.' In late May, a federal judge in Vermont ordered her release from immigration custody citing concerns about the legal basis for her visa revocation and extended detention. She faces another immigration court hearing in July.


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Trump admits why Elon Musk 'doesn't like' him anymore while sticking it to him AND Gavin Newsom with move to 'save' the auto industry
President Donald Trump on Thursday stuck it to both Elon Musk and California Gov. Gavin Newsom with the stroke of a pen. Trump signed a resolution that blocked California's rule that banned the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035 - something supported by Newsom that could have been a boon for Musk's Tesla. The president's signing ceremony included a long-winded speech with some of Trump's greatest hits - voicing his hatred for windmills, sharks and battery powered boats. He also brought up, unprompted, his fallout with Musk, which happened just one week ago. Trump claimed that on his first day in office he ended the 'Green New Scam' and abolished the electric vehicle mandate at the federal level. 'Now we know why Elon doesn't like me so much,' Trump said. 'Which he does actually, he does.' The president said he found it 'very interesting' that the billionaire Tesla head supported him during the 2024 race, knowing that he planned to do away with the Biden-era EV mandates. 'And Elon still endorsed me. And honestly, he never spoke to me about that. And I used to say I'm amazed that he's endorsing me because it can't be good for him,' Trump said. 'He said, "well, as long as it's happening to everybody, I'll be able to compete,"' the president said quoting Musk. Trump said he found this to be 'a very honest answer.' 'After that he got a little bit strange,' the president admitted. Last Thursday, Trump and Musk were throwing bombs at each other over the SpaceX head's criticism of the Republicans' 'big beautiful bill,' which the DOGE leader argued destroyed his efforts of federal cost-cutting. It got so heated that Musk wildly claimed that Trump appeared in pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's files and should be impeached and replaced with 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. Tensions have simmered down since, as Trump has been busy going after a true political rival - Democrat Newsom - amid unrest in downtown Los Angeles over the president's 'mass deportation' policy. During the president's nearly hour and a half appearance in the East Room - which turned into a full-blown press conference, Trump referred to Newsom by his nickname 'Newscum' and also called him as 'Gov. Gavin.' 'Under the previous administration, the federal government gave left-wing radicals in California dictatorial powers to control the future of the entire car industry all over the country - all over the world,' Trump complained. 'They approved Gov. Gavin Newscum's ridiculous plan to impose a 100 percent ban on all new gas-powered cars within a very short period of time,' the president continued. He called the policy 'ridiculous' and then segued into this week's ordeal, where Trump was battling with Newsom over the president's decision to federalize the National Guard and send them to quell the LA protests - against the governor's wishes. 'Los Angeles would be burning down right now. Be burning just like his damn houses burned down,' Trump fumed.