EFF's Omphile Maotwe advocates for 'apartheid tax' to safeguard vulnerable families from VAT hike
EFF treasurer-general Omphile Maotwebhas urged the government to tax the rich more.
EFF Treasurer-General Omphile Maotwe has urged the government to introduce an "apartheid tax" on inherited apartheid-era wealth instead of raising Value Added-Tax (VAT).
Speaking to journalists outside the Western Cape High Court on Tuesday—during the first hearing challenging the legality of the planned VAT hike—Maotwe argued that such a tax reform would not only generate significantly more revenue than the R28 billion shortfall the government seeks to address.
She said this would also ease growing tensions within the Government of National Unity (GNU) over fiscal policy.
She further criticised Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana for lacking the political will to impose taxes on the wealthy, suggesting that the Minister was 'afraid to approach the rich,' and instead opted for a VAT increase that disproportionately impacts the poor.
'That will give you far more money than the R28bn they're looking for. But the easy target is often the poor. We can't afford to put bread on the table. Imagine with the impact of the VAT increase.
'Our people will die from poverty. The triple oppression of poverty, inequality and unemployment is going to get worse,' she said.
The EFF and the DA requested the court to halt tax hikes, arguing that it will cripple the public's pockets. The court is yet to rule.
The hike is expected to come in on May 1.
In his defence, Finance Minister Godongwana emphasised the necessity of the VAT hike to sustain critical public services, including healthcare, education, transportation, and public safety.
Legal submissions from the Treasury argued that the VAT increase is the most viable and sustainable option given current fiscal constraints, limited borrowing capacity, and the risks associated with further budget cuts.
In contrast, Maotwe has advocated for a more progressive taxation approach.
She has called on the government to shift the fiscal burden onto high-net-worth individuals by introducing a wealth tax and closing loopholes that allow trusts and luxury properties to evade fair taxation.
'We are telling him he doesn't need to increase VAT. He needs to tax the rich. Introduce a wealth tax. Many trusts hold luxury properties which are not being taxed, but they use the portfolios to apply for loans at the banks,' she said.
She also proposed an increase in the corporate tax rate from the current 27% to 29%, citing strong profit margins in the private sector.
kamogelo.moichela@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
The ANC has lost power, yet is still committed to constitutionalism
When the Madiba party lost its parliamentary majority in 2024 it formed a government of national unity. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy If there were to be anything to credit the ANC for, what that thing might be or look like? In some circles, there is a consensus that this thing might be its commitment to the ideals of constitutional democracy and the rule of law, albeit working within the constrained space of the government of national unity (GNU). The Madiba party must have felt deeply hurt and hamstrung to have lost their absolute parliamentary majority on 29 May 2024 but, thank goodness, they did not usurp power by military force, using unconventional means, such as setting the army on the people to keep political power intact, almost tongue in cheek, contradicting former president Jacob Zuma's infamous assertion that the ANC would rule the country until the second coming of Jesus Christ. It is historically true that many former liberation movements have faced a decline in popularity due to a number of factors, including unfulfilled promises of changing people's lives for the better, widespread corruption, poor governance and incompetence. In the case of Zimbabwe, Zanu-PF's loss of political power caused a great rift between the ruling party and the populace — a factor that led to state violence and the hounding of perceived 'political enemies'. There were new challenges in the political landscape, including, as happened in Matabeleland, mass killings in which dissidents — those opposed to Robert Mugabe's rule, were executed. They were chillingly butchered in what would be known as Gukurahundi — a series of mass killings of political dissidents in Zimbabwe committed in the 1980s — on the orders of former president Mugabe. Mugabe faced significant challenges in maintaining his party's popularity and power as Zimbabwe experienced economic decline and political repression. Instead of addressing the underlying issues, he and his party employed a range of tactics to suppress dissent and cling to power, including manipulating the electoral system, restricting the media and engaging in violence against opponents. Ultimately, these tactics were ineffective in the long run and contributed to the 2017 coup that led to Mugabe's resignation. Swapo, Namibia's ruling party, has faced declining popularity due to economic challenges, corruption scandals and internal divisions, leading to a shift in political dynamics. While still the dominant force, the party's dominance has weakened and opposition parties are gaining ground, particularly among younger voters. Swapo has responded to these challenges by addressing the root causes of the decline, such as economic issues and corruption, but also by attempting to solidify its support base through various strategies. In essence, Swapo's handling of its declining popularity involves acknowledging and addressing the problems it faces while also employing tactics to maintain its dominance in Namibian politics. Despite the loss of their outright majority in the national elections of 2024, the ANC continues to remain a significant player in the country's political landscape, committed to constitutionalism, democracy and the rule of law. Although disappointed with the loss of the unfettered power it enjoyed between 1994 and 2024, today the ANC has skilfully stitched together 'dependable' partners to run the country. The partnership includes the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania (PAC), whose president, Mzwanele Nyhontso, enjoys less than 1% parliamentary representation, yet President Cyril Ramaphosa has graciously offered him a cabinet position. What can be read into this gesture? The ANC has been walking a political tightrope. In its political calculations it did not think either the Economic Freedom Fighters or the uMkhonto weSizwe party would be a dependable partner in the GNU. The PAC, which was once led by one of the most revered Africanist struggle icons, Robert Mangaliso Sobukwe, remains a credible liberation struggle movement, even with its small parliamentary representation. Nyhontso, whose party is a proponent of land restoration, which the PAC insists must be accompanied by the return of land to the indigenous people — the African people — was given the position of minister of land reform in the GNU. He has committed to fight tooth and nail to have the land returned to the indigenous people. But, with the decline in electoral support, the ANC joins other liberation movements in Africa which, like them, had previously enjoyed strong support as champions of national independence and liberation from colonial rule. This can be attributed to various factors, according to political analysts and other experts, including a change in voter demographics. The younger generations, who didn't experience the harshness of colonialism or apartheid, bring a new dynamic to the political scene, which relates to economic inequality and the need for job creation. For example, the high rate of youth unemployment has become a concern to young prospective voters. In the first quarter of this year, the youth unemployment rate peaked at 46.1%. The youth are not going to put up with this. Politicians' promise that things might look better tomorrow do nothing to calm the anxieties of unemployed young voters. This is exacerbated by allegations of corruption, something that erodes public trust. The ANC, in the past decade, through the leadership of Zuma, experienced a phenomenon in which the country's economic wealth was mortgaged to the Gupta brothers, who are fugitives from justice. Despite the fact that the Zondo commission established in its investigation that multiple incidents of state capture took place in government departments and state-owned enterprises during his presidency, Zuma has stubbornly sought to distance himself from the malfeasance that took place under his watch. Attempting to make sense of the ANC's electoral decline, chief executive officer of the Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflections, Joel Netshitenzhe, wrote in a report: 'Virtually all analyses of the elections converge at the self-evident conclusion that a fundamental shift has occurred in South Africa's body politic. 'But, in large measure, that is where the consensus ends. Among the questions that need further interrogation is whether the plummeting of the ANC's support implies the death of the liberation idea.' The ANC has for a long time been seen as the 'glorious movement of the people'. As the oldest liberation movement in Africa, it is recognised for the pivotal role it played in dismantling apartheid and for leading the country's transition to democracy. Yet, it may not escape criticism for harbouring in its midst leaders such as Zuma, whose presidency allowed corruption to thrive. The ANC is facing new realities. It is no longer the dominant political force. It has to adapt to a more competitive political environment with the renewal project revamped, the decibels of internal wrangles lowered — all of this for the sake of regaining public trust. But, more encouraging, is that it seems the ANC can be trusted as a political party committed to ensuring the country remains a constitutional democracy, despite its own setbacks and the loss of its outright parliamentary majority. Jo-Mangaliso Mdhlela is an independent journalist, a social justice activist, an ex-trade unionist and an Anglican priest.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
How to maximise your tax-free savings account for long-term wealth
Discover how to effectively utilise your Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) to reduce your tax burden and enhance your long-term financial strategy. Image: Freepik Many South Africans are looking to reduce their tax burden and improve overall tax efficiency, and one of the most effective tools available is the Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA). With an annual contribution limit of R36,000 and no tax on interest, dividends, or capital gains, the TFSA offers significant long-term benefits – although it's important to ensure that you align your TFSA with your broader investment strategy. Here's how to get the most from your tax-free savings. Use your tax-free allowance wisely: The TFSA has become a key component of long-term financial planning because all income and growth earned within the structure, including interest, dividends, and capital gains, are tax-free. Note, however, that contributions are made with after-tax income, and no tax deduction is available on contributions such as in the case of retirement fund contributions. While it, therefore, makes sense to first maximise your retirement fund contributions, the TFSA remains an exceptional long-term investment vehicle. Think long-term from the start: The tax benefit in the early years of a TFSA is fairly small, with the compounding tax savings only becoming meaningful after about a decade. With this in mind, a TFSA is best suited to long-term investing and is not ideal for an emergency fund. It can, however, be used to supplement retirement savings or to meet other long-term goals, such as funding a child's tertiary education. Structure your contributions to suit your cash flow: Legislation permits annual TFSA contributions of up to R36,000 with a lifetime limit of R500,000, with most providers allowing flexible contribution options for investors depending on their personal circumstances. For instance, if your income is variable, you can set up a modest debit order and top it up when additional income becomes available, thereby allowing you to consistently build wealth without placing strain on your budget. Understand the implications of withdrawals: While it is possible to withdraw from your TFSA at any time, it's important to understand the consequences because withdrawals can reduce your lifetime contribution capacity. For example, if you've contributed R300,000 towards your TFSA and withdraw R50,000, you may only contribute another R200,000 in the future, regardless of whether you replace the R50,000 later. Importantly, withdrawals not only reduce your tax-free limit but can also interrupt the compounding growth within the investment. Match your investment to your time horizon: When selecting the underlying investment for your TFSA, consider how long you intend to stay invested. If you're investing for your child's education 15 to 20 years from now, or to supplement retirement income, your investment horizon may be long enough to justify growth assets. Having said that, it's important to balance return expectations with your risk tolerance. Also, remember that individuals under 65 already enjoy a tax exemption of R23,800 per year on interest earned (R34,500 if over 65), so using your TFSA to invest in low-yielding interest-bearing assets might not be the most efficient use of your tax-free allowance. Choose an efficient investment platform: There are numerous TFSA providers in South Africa, ranging from banks to investment platforms. While fixed-term accounts and money market funds are available, those with a long investment horizon should consider a more aggressive unit trust portfolio to harness better growth over time. Ideally, select a platform that provides consolidated reporting across your retirement and discretionary investments, so that your TFSA integrates seamlessly into your overall strategy. Avoid over-contributions and penalties: It's important to ensure that you stay within your R36,000 annual limit, as any contributions above this will attract a penalty tax of 40% from Sars, regardless of your personal income tax bracket. If you have more than one TFSA, be sure to track contributions carefully to avoid exceeding the threshold and incurring avoidable penalties. Stay compliant with Sars: Even though no tax is payable within a TFSA, you are still required to disclose the investment on your tax return. Your provider will issue a tax certificate, and it's important to include all TFSA-related information when filing with Sars. Maintaining transparency ensures compliance and helps avoid any administrative issues. A TFSA can be a powerful tool for building long-term wealth, provided it is used strategically, managed consistently, and integrated into your broader financial plan. * Odendaal is an associate financial planner at Crue Invest. PERSONAL FINANCE
Mail & Guardian
5 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Trump and Malema are more similar than they would like to admit
EFF leader Julius Malema. Photo: X The What Trump probably intended as a damning exposé of societal ills in South Africa inadvertently illuminated the bemusing congruence between himself and the very figure he sought to condemn. Despite occupying vastly different ideological poles, Trump and Malema are, in essence, two sides of the same political coin: larger-than-life figures who wield hyperbole and spectacle to bend public discourse to their will. Trump built his brand on disrupting norms, lambasting elites, and speaking in a vernacular that resonated with a segment of the American populace feeling unheard. His rallies are choreographed performances, his pronouncements often designed more for shock value and media capture than for precise policy articulation. Malema, too, is a showman par excellence. From his early days as a firebrand youth leader in the ANC to his role as the self-styled 'commander-in-chief' of the EFF, Malema has consistently pushed boundaries, employing confrontational rhetoric that electrifies his base and forces opponents to react. He thrives on controversy, using provocative statements and symbolic gestures, such as the controversial 'Kill the Boer' chant, to rally support for his vision of radical economic transformation and social justice. Malema is ' The core of their shared political artistry lies in their strategic deployment of hyperbole. For Trump, every challenge is a 'witch hunt,' every unfavorable media report 'fake news' and every policy critique an existential threat to the nation. This exaggerated language simplifies complex realities into digestible narratives of victimhood and heroism, positioning himself as the sole defender against perceived adversaries. Similarly, Malema employs stark, often revolutionary, language to frame South Africa's systemic inequalities as a direct continuation of colonial and apartheid injustices, demanding radical solutions like land expropriation without compensation. While What makes Trump's recent White House stunt so profoundly ironic is that in attempting to expose Malema, he merely exposed his own methods. The 'ambush' of Ramaphosa with a video clip was a calculated act designed to dominate the narrative and assert a particular, unsubstantiated, viewpoint. This is the very essence of both Trump and Malema's political styles: the transformation of political discourse into a dramatic spectacle, where facts are often secondary to emotional impact and media virality. They are both adept at wielding 'alternative facts' and 'dog whistles', using carefully constructed ambiguity to appeal to their base while maintaining a degree of plausible deniability. This mutual reliance on political theatre, despite their opposing ideological agendas, is a critical lens through which to understand contemporary populist movements worldwide. Whether it is the right-wing nationalism espoused by Trump or the radical left-wing populism championed by Malema, the playbook often involves bypassing traditional political discourse, appealing directly to raw emotion, and manufacturing continuous engagement through engineered controversy. They both thrive on being perceived as 'outsiders' challenging a corrupt system, even when they occupy positions of significant power or influence. The political world watched Ramaphosa's composed response to Trump's calculated ambush. Yet, the wider public must scrutinise not only the content of such stunts but also the shared theatrical impulses that drive them. When one larger-than-life, stick-it-to-the-man figure attempts to discredit another by highlighting their provocative rhetoric, it is not merely a diplomatic incident; it is a curtain-drawing moment. It reveals the shared DNA of political personalities who understand that in the age of constant information flow, it is often the most audacious, the most hyperbolic, and the most dramatic performance that captures the public imagination, for better or for worse. The true 'genocide' we face might not be of a specific race, but of nuanced debate and factual integrity, orchestrated by those who understand the formidable power of the political stage. Lindani Zungu is a Mandela Rhodes scholar pursuing a master's in political studies and is the editor-in-chief of the youth-oriented publication, Voices of Mzansi.
