From Busy Work To Business Driver: Task Benchmarking For Smarter Ops
In a world where every business unit is under pressure to do more with less, talent and learning development (L&D) teams can no longer afford to operate like back-office cost centers. To drive performance, teams must become strategic enablers, yet for too many, I see everyday inefficiencies quietly undermining credibility, budget and impact.
A new wave of learning operations (LearnOps) insights reveals that the path to both operational excellence and strategic influence starts with something deceptively simple: task benchmarking. Not just a project management trend, task benchmarking is fast becoming the blueprint for L&D teams looking to cut waste, boost delivery speed and mature their learning operations from reactive to predictive.
How Invisible Tasks Inflate Costs
Across industries, operational expenditures (OPEX) in L&D are bloated not because of major program launches or high-tech purchases—but because of the invisible workload: small tasks like communications, approvals, content development and reviews repeated thousands of times across the organization.
My company's analysis of benchmarking data in a brief titled "The Rise of Learning Operations," and developed in part with Brandon Hall Group, analyzed behavioral data from over 500 learning professionals. It reveals that tasks classified as "quick wins" (those taking under two hours) are the most frequent and the most underestimated. These include:
• Drafting and sending communications
• Reviewing and approving documents
• Simple quality assurance checks
While individually minor, these tasks add up to thousands of hours annually, often performed manually or with inconsistent effort estimates. The result? Projects that run long, cost more and leave business partners frustrated. We've found that failing to automate or benchmark these small tasks can lead to 30% to 50% longer cycle times and 25% higher costs per project.
Why Poor Estimation Breaks Business Alignment
Underestimating task duration is more than a project management faux pas—it's a trust issue.
Take evaluation creation, one of the highest-risk task types. We've found that these tasks are underestimated by 30% on average, leading to last-minute scrambles, missed launches and loss of executive confidence. Approval cycles, too, are notorious for their unpredictability, often derailing timelines without warning.
By building a task-level estimation baseline, teams can finally begin to forecast resourcing needs, set realistic timelines and rebuild trust with business stakeholders.
A tip: Use risk mapping to identify high-variability tasks and pad time appropriately. Implement task benchmarking reviews in your planning process.
Task Benchmarking As A Learning Operations Accelerator
L&D maturity doesn't just happen—it's built, brick by brick, task by task. My company's own learning operations maturity model outlines five levels of operational sophistication:
1. Reactive: Firefighting mode, ad hoc task management
2. Managed: Some structure, but inconsistent execution
3. Strategic: Aligned to business outcomes, predictable performance
4. Predictive: Data-driven and risk-aware task planning
5. Adaptive: AI-assisted, real-time optimization of workflows
Teams stuck at levels one and two often feel overwhelmed by chaos. But those who implement task benchmarking see a clear path forward: from reactive to respected. Task benchmarking is not just an efficiency play—it's a maturity lever. High-maturity teams don't just deliver faster; they're seen as critical enablers of business transformation.
Task Bundle Templates
Benchmarking doesn't have to start from scratch. Standardized task bundles can streamline planning, clarify expectations and improve resource forecasting. Common examples and benchmark goals include:
• Quick Win Communication Tasks: Two hours
• Content Review Tasks: Four hours
• Evaluation Development: Six hours
• LMS Deployment Preparation: Eight hours
These types of task bundle templates serve as operational blueprints—empowering teams to normalize delivery expectations, sharpen capacity planning and forecast labor requirements with surgical precision. By grounding every project in real-world benchmarks, L&D leaders can shift from guesswork to governance.
For example, a "compliance module update" bundle might include stakeholder review (1.5 hours), copy edits (one hour), LMS upload (half an hour) and QA testing (two hours). Embedding bundles into workflows sets data-backed expectations, clarifies scope and aligns resourcing. One common mistake in this process is applying benchmarks too rigidly. Instead, treat them as starting points, adjusting for project complexity or audience needs. Flexibility with discipline is the goal.
And with the emergence of LearnOps AI, the potential grows even further. By combining task benchmarking with intelligent automation, teams can unlock capacity, streamline execution and scale impact—all without adding OPEX or head count.
OPEX Optimization Through Operational Intelligence
The real value of benchmarking comes when effort connects to business impact. By combining task and resource benchmarks with a structured taxonomy, L&D teams can align work to outcomes.
For instance, aligning a leadership training initiative to "improving manager retention" might involve mapping hours spent on cohort design, facilitation and post-program coaching.
At maturity level four, teams gain real-time visibility into resource use, project progress and ROI. One sign of readiness? Consistent intake processes and centralized oversight of budgets, tasks and timelines. This enables the integration of learning, operational and financial data for smarter decisions.
Don't Get Relegated To 'Order Taker'
Organizations that ignore task benchmarking face a future of irrelevance. The consequences can include ballooning OPEX with no clear path to value, longer project timelines, missed opportunities and loss of trust from business stakeholders
Perhaps most critically, L&D remains stuck in a support role instead of becoming a strategic business driver.
The Future Belongs To Those With LearnOps Excellence
It's time to replace the myth that learning transformation starts with big ideas. In reality, it starts at the task level—with clear benchmarks, better forecasting and more intelligent resource allocation.
L&D teams that embrace task benchmarking are not just optimizing costs—they're building the operating system for high-maturity performance. Ready to move from busy work to business driver? Start benchmarking. The future of L&D—and your OPEX—depends on it.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia asks Foxconn to suspend work for H20 chip, sources say
BEIJING (Reuters) -Nvidia has asked Foxconn to suspend work on the H20 AI chip, the most advanced product the U.S. company is currently permitted to sell to China, two people briefed on the matter said. Foxconn, formally known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd, handles backend processing work as one of Nvidia's component suppliers for the chip. "We constantly manage our supply chain to address market conditions," Nvidia said in a statement, declining to elaborate further. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
U.S. halts issuing worker visas for commercial truck drivers
The U.S. will stop issuing worker visas for commercial truck drivers, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Thursday. He said the change was effective immediately. "The increasing number of foreign drivers operating large tractor-trailer trucks on U.S. roads is endangering American lives and undercutting the livelihoods of American truckers," Rubio wrote in a post on X. A State Department spokesperson said later Thursday the pause was done "in order to conduct a comprehensive and thorough review of screening and vetting protocols used to determine their qualifications for a U.S. visa." The spokesperson noted it "applies to all nationalities and is not directed at any specific country." The Trump administration in the past months has taken steps to enforce the requirement that truckers speak and read English proficiently. The Transportation Department said the aim is to improve road safety following incidents in which drivers' ability to read signs or speak English may have contributed to traffic deaths. "As we have seen with recent deadly accidents, foreign truckers can pose risks to American lives, U.S. national security, and foreign policy interests," the State Department spokesperson said. "Ensuring that every driver on our roads meets the highest standards is important to protecting the livelihoods of American truckers and maintaining a secure, resilient supply chain." The move comes amid a commercial truck driver shortage in the U.S. According to the American Trucking Association, a trade group, the industry is facing a shortage of about 60,000 drivers. Meanwhile, the Trump administration also said Thursday it is reviewing more than 55 million people who have valid U.S. visas for any violations that could lead to deportation. In a written answer to a question from the Associated Press, the State Department said all U.S. visa holders, which can include tourists from many countries, are subject to "continuous vetting," with an eye toward any indication they could be ineligible for permission to enter or stay in the United States. Should such information be found, the visa will be revoked, and if the visa holder is in the U.S., he or she would be subject to deportation. Since President Trump took office, his administration has focused on deporting migrants illegally in the U.S. as well as holders of student and visitor exchange visas. The State Department's new language suggests that the continual vetting process, which officials acknowledge is time-consuming, is far more widespread and could mean even those approved to be in the U.S. could abruptly see those permissions revoked.
CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
Colorado lawmakers look to repeal, replace controversial artificial intelligence law
A year after Colorado state lawmakers passed the most sweeping artificial intelligence law in the country, they are now racing to repeal and replace it. The law is set to take effect in February 2026 -- one month after the regular legislative session begins. So Gov. Jared Polis directed lawmakers to take it up in a special session. The he called to address a $750 million budget deficit. Artificial intelligence uses algorithms to make decisions about everything from health care and housing to lending to and legal matters, and education and employment. In an effort to prevent discrimination in those decisions, Democratic state Sen. Robert Rodriguez of Denver passed a first-in-the-nation law to regulate how AI is used. "When you're the first one through the glass, you're gonna get a little messed up; Rodriguez told CBS Colorado. Rodriguez has come under fire from not only developers of AI but users such as hospitals and higher education. The law requires them to disclose possible biases and how they're mitigating them, even though they didn't develop the technology. "Everything became onerous and overly complicated," Rodriguez said. With tech companies threatening to pull out of Colorado, Rodriguez went back to the drawing board and introduced a bill in the special session to repeal and replace the law. Democratic state Rep. William Lindstedt from Broomfield did the same. Both bills require companies to disclose when AI is being used, but Rodriguez's bill defines AI much more broadly and requires companies to tell people which characteristics AI used to reach its decision, and if the data is inaccurate fix it. "If we're a leader in innovation and technology, what's wrong with being a leader in safe innovation and technology," Rodriguez continued. "I don't understand why the two can't go together." Lindstedt says he also wants safety and transparency. "Fourteen percent of new job growth is related to AI right now," Lindstedt said. "We have to get this right." Lindstedt's bill uses the federal definition of AI and requires companies to disclose when they use the technology but not how an algorithm arrived at a decision. "It makes sure that these AI companies comply with existing Colorado statutes, so the Consumer Protection Act, the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act," Lindstedt said. "It will also provide needed transparency for consumers, so it clearly distinguishes the role of deployers and the role of these businesses." Tech companies largely support Lindstedt's bill. But tech companies say Rodriguez's remains unworkable. Fiscal analysts also estimated the state would need to spend nearly $7 million a year to comply with his bill's requirements, so Rodriguez amended it to exempt all public entities from having to tell people which of their characteristics AI used to make a decision. Rodriguez says individuals could still file open records requests to get the data. "We're trying to be thoughtful about this bill," Rodriguez said. "I hear that every bill is going to end the world as know it." Both bills passed their first committee.
