
The Best Bourbons Under $50, According To Bartenders
Pouring whiskey in glass on bar counter.
getty
If you've ever stood in the whiskey aisle staring down a wall of bottles and wondering if that $28 bourbon will make you feel refined or just regretful, you're not alone. Fortunately, good bourbon doesn't have to cost as much as a steak dinner. Some bottles under $50 are not just passable—they're genuinely fantastic, whether you're sipping neat, mixing a Manhattan, or just trying to impress someone without showing them your receipt.
I asked bartenders, beverage directors, and bourbon buffs across the country to share their go-to bottles that over deliver under the $50 mark. The results? A collection of bourbons that taste like you know a guy in Kentucky. Here's what to pour.
Michter's US1 Kentucky Straight Bourbon
Michter's
Smooth operator with butterscotch charm
Michter's is one of those brands that takes its time — and it shows. The US1 expression is small-batch and aged in fire-charred, new American oak barrels, offering a level of polish rarely seen at this price point.
Kristen Love of InterContinental New York Barclay sums it up best: 'Michter's US1 Kentucky Straight Bourbon stands out in its price range for its exceptional smoothness and depth… rich notes of butterscotch, stone fruit, and subtle spice, all wrapped in a silky finish.'
It's the kind of bourbon you reach for when you want to impress someone without looking like you tried too hard. Mix it in an Old Fashioned or sip it neat — either way, you'll look like a seasoned pro.
Wild Turkey Rare Breed
Wild Turkey
The cask strength classic that pulls no punches
This one's not for the faint of heart, but that's the fun of it. Rare Breed is a barrel-proof bourbon — meaning it's not diluted before bottling — with a blend of 6-, 8-, and 12-year-old whiskeys, giving it an unusual level of complexity. 'It shares some of the solid characteristics of older cask strength bourbons without quite as high a price tag,' says Owen Thompson of The Square DC.
Tasting notes? Think deep caramel, toasted pecan, dark cherry, and a pop of cinnamon spice that lingers long after your last sip. It clocks in at around 116.8 proof, but it's surprisingly balanced for its strength. Use it in a Manhattan if you dare — or just enjoy it while contemplating your life choices.
Bardstown Origin Series Wheated Bourbon
Bardstown
For bourbon nerds who like full disclosure and full flavor
This wheated bourbon is a relatively new entrant, but it's already earning a place on shelves and in hearts. Sitting at 96 proof and aged for 6 years, the Bardstown Origin Series Wheated is the kind of bottle that feels like a find.
Corey Hollinger from Serliana in Indianapolis calls it: 'Rich in baked apple, honeyed oak, and subtle cinnamon… rivals far pricier pours.'
The transparency is part of the charm—every detail, from mash bill (68% corn, 20% wheat, 12% malted barley) to distillation and aging, is listed proudly. It drinks like a soft, spiced apple crumble, making it a sweet spot bourbon for those tired of hype-chasing.
Good Trouble Kentucky Straight Bourbon
Good Trouble
A bold pour with a bigger purpose
Named in tribute to the late Congressman John Lewis, Good Trouble Bourbon blends flavor and mission. Bottled at 92 proof, this small-batch Kentucky bourbon delivers well-rounded notes of vanilla, toasted oak, and warm baking spices. Chicago bartender Josh Davis puts it best:
'With its combination of quality craftsmanship, distinctive flavor, and social mission, Good Trouble offers a premium experience at an accessible price point.'
This is the bottle you pull out when you want to taste something good — and feel good about it. Pro tip: try it in a Whiskey Sour to let the caramel and spice play nicely with citrus.
FEW Spirits Bottled-in-Bond Bourbon
FEW Spirits
Craft-made charm from Prohibition's hometown
From Evanston, IL — the birthplace of the temperance movement — comes a rebellious little bourbon that refuses to be boring. FEW's Bottled-in-Bond is aged at least four years and bottled at 100 proof, with a mash bill that leans heavy on rye. Kyle McHugh, a longtime hospitality pro, calls it: 'Rich… dark red cherry and other red fruits, a delicately smoky vanilla note, & lively sumptuous caramel.'
The red fruit really shines here — think cherry cola meets vanilla bean — with a slightly smoky backbone that makes it ideal for late-night sipping or standing out in a whiskey-forward cocktail.
Woodford Reserve Double Oaked
Woodford Reserve
A rich, toasty riff on a bourbon classic
What happens when you take Woodford Reserve and age it again in a second, deeply toasted, lightly charred barrel? You get Double Oaked — a bourbon that somehow feels twice as luxurious while still under $50.
'It drinks bigger than it is,' says Lauren Painter of Scoundrel. Mourad Atiki of The Ritz-Carlton Georgetown adds,'Pleasant hints of caramel and toasted oak… vanilla and chocolate as well.'
This is a dessert bourbon in all the right ways — rich, warm, and indulgent, but never cloying. Serve it with pecan pie or just drink it instead of dessert.
Pinhook Straight Bourbon Whiskey
Pinhook
Approachable, bright, and cocktail-ready
Pinhook takes a vintage-by-vintage approach to bourbon, releasing new blends each year. The core straight bourbon expression is light, zesty, and packed with flavor. Ivo Arkulin of The Ritz-Carlton New Orleans says:
'The nose is packed with orange peel and vanilla, with hints of butterscotch and nutmeg.'
It's a natural fit for cocktails like the Paper Plane or a Vieux Carré, where its spice and citrus notes brighten up heavier components. Don't be fooled by the sub-$40 price tag — this one punches well above its weight.
Russell's Reserve 10 Year
Wild Turkey
A decade in oak and a lot to love
Crafted by Jimmy and Eddie Russell of Wild Turkey fame, this small-batch 90 proof bourbon has a well-earned reputation for being reliable, rich, and way too affordable for its age statement. David Orellana of Grand Brasserie says:
'Highly complex with notes of spicy vanilla, caramel, and sweet clove… finishes with a long oak-driven spice and butterscotch sweetness.'
Aged in alligator char barrels, Russell's 10 offers a big, brooding sip that pairs well with cigars, deep thoughts, or slow Sunday afternoons.
Eagle Rare 10 Year
Buffalo Trace
If you see it, don't think — buy
A staple from Buffalo Trace, Eagle Rare is often elusive but never disappointing. David Miller of HEI Hotels says: 'It delivers rich notes of caramel, oak, and dark fruit that rival bourbons twice its price… It does sell out often, so if you can grab a bottle at retail price, do it.'
It's a mellow, aged beauty with flavors of toffee, candied orange peel, leather, and a whisper of cocoa.
Eric LeGrand Bourbon
Eric LeGrand
Smooth sipper with a story to match
Created in partnership with former Rutgers football player and spinal cord injury advocate Eric LeGrand, this bourbon is as meaningful as it is delicious. At around 88 proof, it's approachable yet full-bodied.
Janelly Torres of Strickland's Steakhouse says: 'It's incredibly smooth with rich caramel and oak notes that pair perfectly with our signature cuts.'
Aged in new charred oak and non-chill filtered, it brings butterscotch and toasted almond to the forefront with a soft, velvety finish. Bonus: proceeds support spinal cord injury research and awareness.
Whether you're building your bourbon bar on a budget or just want to find a bottle that impresses without intimidation, this list proves you don't have to spend a fortune to drink like you did. And if anyone rolls their eyes at your under-$50 pick, just pour them a glass and let the bourbon do the talking. Odds are, they'll be asking where you got it by the second sip.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump Is Losing His Trade War
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Donald Trump's trade war is fast turning into a fiasco. When the president started the war, Team Trump advertised it as certain to be fast, easy, and cheap. Trump would impose tariffs. The world would yield to his will. The tariffs would do everything at once. They would protect U.S. industry from foreign competition without raising prices, and generate vast revenues that would finance other tax cuts. Americans could eat their cake, continue to have the cake, and trade the same cake for pie—all at the same time. 'There's not going to be any pain for American workers,' Trump's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, vowed in April. The advertising rapidly proved false. The U.S. economy is slowing because of the Trump tariffs; China's is thriving in spite of them. Team Trump falsely promotes vague five-page outlines with alienated former allies as big deals; China is successfully wooing some of its former rivals, such as Vietnam. America's standing in the world is measurably sinking; China's is measurably rising. Courts are ruling that Trump's tariffs are illegal; public opinion mistrusts the tariffs, regarding them as expensive and unproductive. The promise of huge flows of painless money from tariff revenues is evanescing as the fantasy it always was. Oh, and the country's largest chain of Halloween retailers canceled its traditional summer grand opening because of Trump-caused supply disruptions. What comes next, as things go wrong? Trump's first instinct is to blame the targets of his economic aggression for not cooperating with his wishes. On May 30, Trump accused China of violating an imaginary agreement with him. On June 4, he complained that Xi Jinping was 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' But Trump seldom chooses to quarrel with foreign dictators, saying in the same breath, 'I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will.' Today, in all-caps emphasis, Trump announced that a deal had been done, declaring that his 'RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT' with the Chinese president-for-life. The lack of details in the announcement strongly suggests that Trump yielded more and gained less than his publicity apparatus wants Americans to believe. That's because, in reality, Trump's global trade war has always been subordinate to his domestic culture war. Trump much prefers to vent his rage against enemies within. Get ready for him to blame the failure of his trade war on fellow Americans who did not support him enough. The Trump tariffs will be ballyhooed as an act of patriotism, a necessary sacrifice to be laid on the altar of the nation. One of Trump's television talkers reminded viewers that Americans melted down their pots and pans to win the Second World War. If the president needs to ration dolls and colored pencils, how dare any true American raise a contrary voice? The coming call for national solidarity with Trump's Great Patriotic War against imported Halloween costumes deserves all the scoffing it will get and more. Trump ordered the nation into economic warfare. He did not do any of the things necessary to create any hope of success in that war. The impending defeat is his personal doing, entirely his own fault. [Jonathan Chait: The good news about Trump's tariffs] Recall the classic Norm Macdonald bit in which the comedian marvels that in the 20th century, Germany decided to go to war with 'the world,' twice. That was meant as a joke. Trump adopted it as his actual strategy. Trump's rationalizers invoke anxiety about China as his justification. Yes, China numbered among the targets of Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs. But so did Australia. So did Brazil. So did Canada. So did Denmark. So did Egypt. And on and on, through the whole alphabet of American allies and trading partners. The United States is by far the planet's strongest national economy, producing slightly more than one-quarter of the planet's goods and services. Including its historic and recent partners, the United States could potentially lead a group of nations sufficiently influential to write economic rules that everybody would need to take into account. That fact underpinned the Trans-Pacific Partnership concept of the Obama years: Form a large-enough and attractive-enough club, and China will have no choice but to comply with the founding members' terms. Trump's alternative concept is for a quarter of the world economy to cut itself off from the other three-quarters, and then wait for the three-quarters to beg for mercy from the one-quarter. Unsurprisingly, that concept is fast proving a stinker. But suppose the president sincerely believed that the U.S. had no choice: The one-quarter must fight the three-quarters as a matter of national survival, or 'liberation,' from the tyranny of foreign goods and services, foreign fruits and vegetables. Crazy, but suppose he did. What would follow? A rational president would grasp that a U.S. economic war against the rest of the world would be a big, protracted, and painful undertaking. Such an enormous commitment would require democratic consent from a large majority of the public, all the more so because the United States is starting the war itself. Trump's trade conflict is very much a war of choice. The president must explain why he chose it. A rational president determined to fight an economic war would try to mobilize broad support from the public and from Congress. He would seek allies in Congress, and not only from his own party. He might, for example, compromise on some of his other goals. If he also wanted to tighten immigration at the same time as waging a global trade war, or to roll back DEI programs, or to cut taxes for the wealthy, or to relax anti-corruption measures, or to pardon the crimes of his violent supporters, or to plan any other ambitious but divisive project, he might think twice about pursuing them. You can't ask your opponents to pay more and do without if you won't forgo even a scrap of your partisan agenda. You can ask anyway, but don't be shocked when they answer with a Bronx cheer. That president would also lead from the front. A president seeking to inspire Americans to endure hardship for the greater good would certainly not throw himself a multimillion-dollar birthday parade at public expense. He would not accept lavish gifts from foreign governments, would not operate a pay-for-access business that collected billions of dollars for himself and his family from undisclosed favor-seekers. While asking other Americans to accept less, he would not brazenly help himself to more. He certainly would not troll, insult, and demean those who may not have voted for him, but whose cooperation he needs now. This president has, of course, done the most egregious version of every item above. His economic war is adjunct to his partisan culture war. He did not seek broad support. He gleefully offends and alienates everyone outside his base. Which works for him as long as times are prosperous, as they were in the first three years of his first administration. Allow things to get tough, though, and it's a different story. Trump cannot ask for patience and trust, because at least half the country has unalterably judged him as untrustworthy and out only for himself. [David Frum: The ultimate bait and switch of Trump's tariffs] Trump bet his presidency on the theory that trade wars are 'good and easy to win,' as he posted during his first term. His second-term trade war, however, is proving not so easy, and not so good, either. He is fighting it alone, without global allies or domestic consent, because that's his nature. It's now also his problem. In the 1983 movie WarGames, a computer thinks its way through dozens of terrifying nuclear scenarios and concludes: 'The only winning move is not to play.' In other words, the only safe way to conduct a nuclear exchange is never to have one. The same could be said of trade wars, at least when fought by one nation, however big and rich, against all the others, all at once. Trump decided he did not care about Americans' support for his economic war. He did not ask for their backing. He did not make any effort to win it. He willfully alienated at least half of the public. Now that he's losing, his supporters want to scold the country because it rejects the whole misbegotten project as stupid and doomed. Don't listen to their reproaches. This is Trump's war, and his alone. The only way to win now is to end Trump's trade war as rapidly as possible. And then end the excessive, unilateral trade powers of a corrupt president who blundered into a pointless and doomed conflict without justification, plan, or consent. Article originally published at The Atlantic


New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
GM doubles down on American manufacturing with $4B investment
General Motors is investing $4 billion in its U.S. plants over the next two years to boost the manufacturing of gas and electric vehicles. With the multibillion-dollar investment, the Michigan-based automaker will be able to assemble more than 2 million vehicles per year in the U.S. The latest investment comes just two weeks after the company announced it earmarked $888 million for its Tonawanda Propulsion plant near Buffalo, New York, to support production of its next-generation V-8 engine. Prior to the investments, the company was producing about 1.7 million vehicles in the U.S. It's just one of many automakers that have pledged to build vehicles in the U.S. and to support American jobs. 'We believe the future of transportation will be driven by American innovation and manufacturing expertise,' said GM CEO Mary Barra. The company's commitments, along with other heavy hitters in the industry, come as President Donald Trump imposes tariffs on imported vehicles to boost domestic auto manufacturing. In April, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on all imported passenger vehicles, followed by a separate 25% tariff on imported auto parts such as engines, transmissions, power-train parts and electrical components in May. 4 With the investment, GM will be able to assemble more than 2 million vehicles per year in the U.S. JHVEPhoto – 4 A worker installs an engine at the General Motors assembly plant in Fort Wayne, Indiana, US, on Tuesday, April 9, 2024. Bloomberg via Getty Images Barra recently backed the administration's automotive tariffs, saying they will pave the way for U.S. automakers to compete more fairly in the international market. There are currently 50 GM manufacturing plants and parts facilities in 19 states, including 11 vehicle assembly plants. Plants in Michigan, Kansas and Tennessee will expand finished vehicle production of several of GM's most popular vehicles. At the Orion Assembly plant in Michigan, the automaker will begin production of gas-powered full-size SUVs and light-duty pickup trucks in early 2027 to help meet continued strong demand. Meanwhile, GM's Factory ZERO in Detroit-Hamtramck, Michigan, will be the dedicated assembly location for the Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Sierra EV, Cadillac Esccalade IQ and GMC Hummer EV pickup and SUV, according to GM. 4 A worker on the trim assembly line at the General Motors assembly plant in Fort Wayne, Indiana, US, on Tuesday, April 9, 2024. Bloomberg via Getty Images 4 The new GM logo is seen on the facade of the General Motors headquarters in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., March 16, 2021. REUTERS At its Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City, Kansas, GM will produce the gas-powered Chevrolet Equinox beginning in mid-2027 after the company saw significant demand for the vehicle. Sales of the recently redesigned Equinox rose more than 30% year over year in the first quarter of 2025. The plant is on track to begin building the 2027 Chevrolet Bolt EV by the end of this year. Future investments in the plant will be geared toward GM's next generation of affordable EVs, according to GM. Meanwhile, GM will produce the gas-powered Chevrolet Blazer, the Cadillac Lyriq and Vistiq EVs, and the Cadillac XT5 at the Spring Hill Manufacturing plant in Tennessee. The company projected that its annual capital spending through 2027 will be in the range of $10 billion to $12 billion due to increased investment in the U.S., the prioritization of key programs and efficiency offsets.


Indianapolis Star
36 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Frito-Lay plant in Rancho Cucamonga shutting down manufacturing operations
A Frito-Lay plant in Southern California is shuttering manufacturing operations after five decades, potentially affecting hundreds of jobs. A statement from PepsiCo Foods U.S., emailed to USA TODAY on June 11, confirmed the "shutdown of manufacturing operations" at Frito-Lay's Rancho Cucamonga site. Although the plant will cease manufacturing operations, its warehouse, distribution, fleet and transportation teams will continue to operate at this location, according to the food, beverage and snack corporation. "We are truly grateful for all the support over the last five decades from our Rancho Cucamonga manufacturing team as well as the local community," PepsiCo Foods U.S.'s statement reads. "We are committed to supporting those impacted through this transition and we are offering pay and benefits to impacted employees." According to Frito-Lay, it has "more than 30 highly advanced manufacturing plants across the country." Is a pricey AI fridge worth it? One woman's rant about hers is going viral. PepsiCo did not disclose how many employees would be affected by the shutdown of the manufacturing plant. It is also unclear when the possible layoffs will occur, as the PepsiCo facility is not in California's Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) database as of June 11. The WARN Act requires employers to give 60 days' notice before a mass layoff, plant closure or relocation. Employees at the plant told KTLA that they were let go, with some not being allowed to transfer to different departments to possibly keep their jobs. The Frito-Lay Rancho Cucamonga facility also once employed Richard Montañez, an American businessman who took credit for inventing Flamin' Hot Cheetos, although the snack brand and PepsiCo have disputed his claims.