logo
Guard helo trespassed on Montana ranch to take deer antlers: citation

Guard helo trespassed on Montana ranch to take deer antlers: citation

Yahoo16-05-2025

Three Montana Army National Guard members face trespassing charges after authorities said they landed a Black Hawk helicopter in a mountain pasture on a private ranch to take several elk antlers before flying away.
A witness saw the May 4 landing and the person who owns the property reported it to officials, who tracked down the three guard members, Sweet Grass County Sheriff Alan Ronneberg said Thursday.
The guardsmen had been on a training flight from the city of Billings to Helena, the state capital, said Major Ryan Finnegan with the Montana National Guard. The helicopter landed briefly in the pasture located in the foothills of the Crazy Mountains, where the crew members picked up two individual antlers and an old elk skull with antlers still attached, the sheriff said.
Elk antlers — which grow and drop off male animals annually — are highly prized and can be sold by the pound. They also are collected from the wild as keepsakes.
The antlers and skull taken by the guardsmen were worth a combined $300 to $400, according to Ronneberg. They were later turned over to a state game warden.
Trespassers taking antlers from private land is not uncommon in Montana and other western states.
'This an odd one,' Ronneberg said. 'Usually somebody parks on the side of the road and crosses into private ground and picks up a shed,' he said, referring to an antler that's been shed by an elk.
Citations issued to two of the guardsmen said they 'entered posted private property that was posted as trespassing for the purpose of elk antler removal.' The citation for the third again mentioned trespassing and also that 'subject landed military helicopter on private property.'
The Sweet Grass County Attorney and Sheriff's Office are considering additional charges related to the taking of the antlers themselves but no decision has been made, Ronneberg said. He said those discussions center on whether the antlers were the property of the landowners.
An attorney for one of the guardsmen, Michael Vincent Bray of East Helena, Montana, said Friday that Bray and the others had served their country honorably for many years and were 'innocent until proven guilty.'
'In cases like this that get highly publicized, we all seem to forget that principal,' said the attorney, Nathan Hulling.
Guardsmen Perry Wray Woodland of Great Falls and Deni Lynn Draper of Clancy could not be reached.
They face charges of criminal misdemeanor trespass, which comes with a $185 fine, and do not have to appear in court, said Greg Lemon with Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
Taking antlers from state-owned land is legal in Montana for people with an $8 state conservation license, Lemon said.
Montana National Guard Adjutant General J. Peter Hronek said in a statement he was aware of the case and it was being investigated.
'Appropriate adverse and/or administrative action will take place if the allegations are determined to be true,' Hronek said. 'Misuse of military equipment erodes the trust we strive to uphold with the people of Montana.'
Finnegan said a Montana National Guard representative reached out to the owner of the ranch 'to provide an update and coordinate for an in person return of the items.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Charges filed against three men in connection with armed robbery in Aurora Township
Charges filed against three men in connection with armed robbery in Aurora Township

Chicago Tribune

time19 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Charges filed against three men in connection with armed robbery in Aurora Township

Charges have been filed against three men in connection with an armed robbery in Aurora Township on Monday, the Kane County Sheriff's Office said in a news release on Friday. The Sheriff's Office responded to a report of an armed robbery with shots fired on Monday evening on the 800 block of Konen Avenue in Aurora Township, according to past reporting. According to a preliminary investigation, three people had approached a red Mitsubishi Outlander and demanded its driver, a man from Aurora, give them his money and cell phone. One of the individuals fired a weapon and injured the Aurora man's right leg, officials said. The man was taken to Rush Copley Medical Center in Aurora with non-life-threatening injuries and later released, according to past reporting. The individuals involved ran north from the scene of the incident, the Sheriff's Office previously said. Those who remained at the scene were detained, with one released with no charges and another held for further investigation and questioning, according to past reporting. Police dogs and a drone were deployed to locate evidence and the individuals involved, officials said. Charges have now been filed against three men in connection with the incident – Ellis A. Pryor, 20, 1700 block of Molitor Road in Aurora; Demeir L. Miller, 23, 800 block of North May Street in Aurora; and Francis E. Whitaker, 21, of the 800 block of Konen Avenue in Aurora, according to the press release. All three men face charges including armed robbery with a firearm; armed robbery, discharged firearm causing great bodily harm or death; aggravated battery involving a discharged firearm; armed violence, committing a felony with a Category I weapon; aggravated unlawful restraint; mob action violence; aggravated unlawful possession of a weapon; and unlawful restraint. Whitaker also faces a charge of unlawful possession of a weapon in a vehicle with a previous conviction, the release stated.

Sheriff SUV deal: $52K deal amid budget crises
Sheriff SUV deal: $52K deal amid budget crises

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sheriff SUV deal: $52K deal amid budget crises

ST. LOUIS – While threatening to cut essential services, the Sheriff's Office made a deal for a luxury buy in silence. It's a brand-new Chevy Tahoe the St. Louis Sheriff's Office has avoided talking about. FOX 2 found it parked in the city lot on Laclede after obtaining the Sheriff's Office buyer's order saying it costs $52,773. This discovery comes after Sheriff Alfred Montgomery had threatened to stop transporting inmates to the hospital because of money problems. On Monday, Alderwoman Daniela Valazquez told the Sheriff, 'We're in a budget hearing because your department doesn't have enough money to–you're in the red.' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now The Sheriff often blamed the media, at one point saying, 'We can't go by news sources. Their job is entertainment.' Alderman Michael Browning answered, 'I would argue the media's job is to inform.' Aldermen questioned the Sheriff's expenditures at the budget meeting, but they did not know at the time about the Tahoe. FOX 2 has found out the possible reasons for that. We've confirmed it was not obtained through traditional means. We've learned it never went before the capital committee to be approved as an expenditure, and we've also confirmed the Comptroller's Office has not signed off on the agreement to buy it. FOX 2 asked the Sheriff's Office about this vehicle more than a week ago when we first got the tip about it. We also made a Missouri Sunshine request for the documentation, and the office said it would answer Tuesday morning, which turned into Tuesday afternoon, but with no answer. Thursday afternoon, the office texted a statement that said in part that their '…fleet is currently eight vehicles short of its allocated need to perform basic responsibilities…' adding quote '…discretionary funds (are) established for the office under Missouri Law…' FOX 2 also learned the vehicle has yet to be paid for, while the purchase contract is dated January 25—which means that as aldermen were pressing the Sheriff for answers about expenditures—the pricey vehicle was parked in the city lot without budget leaders knowing anything about it. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Sacramento DA, sheriff urge changes to state's mental health diversion law
Sacramento DA, sheriff urge changes to state's mental health diversion law

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sacramento DA, sheriff urge changes to state's mental health diversion law

Standing before images of abused toddlers, Sacramento County's law enforcement leaders warned that California's mental health diversion program is allowing too many defendants to escape punishment. At a town hall in south Sacramento attended by about 50 people, Sacramento County Sheriff Jim Cooper and District Attorney Thien Ho urged residents to push lawmakers for more restrictions on the statewide program, which was established in 2018. Under the law, defendants who present a mental health diagnosis usually have their charges dismissed and records cleared after completing a treatment plan. 'Pretty much anybody can qualify for mental health diversion,' Cooper said. The event's panelists — Cooper, Ho, Undersheriff Mike Ziegler and Sheriff's Office Sgt. John Sydow — repeatedly pointed to the wide range of disorders, including erectile dysfunction and caffeine withdrawal, that can justify diversion and the short list of offenses for which the program is off limits. The town hall came five weeks after a bill that would have added several child abuse crimes to that list failed in the Assembly's Public Safety Committee. Cooper had testified in favor of the bill, which was introduced by Assemblymember Maggy Krell, D-Sacramento. AB 433 only mustered two votes in the committee in April and did not move on to the full Assembly. 'That really just — it made me mad,' said Cooper, who added that he hoped the bill could be reintroduced in the next legislative session. 'You have to stand with the children.' But another bill to tighten the mental health diversions — AB 46, introduced by Assemblymember Stephanie Nguyen, D-Elk Grove — passed the Assembly, 56-7, last month. It is now under consideration in the Senate. Under the current law passed in 2018, judges are required to presume that a defendant's diagnosed mental health disorder was a factor that caused them to commit the crime, Ho said. Nguyen's bill removes that presumption in cases where the diagnosis came after the offense or more than five years earlier. It also broadens prosecutors' latitude to argue that a diversion should be denied because the defendant poses a threat to public safety. Sydow, who leads the sheriff's Child Abuse Bureau, spoke about two recent cases, with images of the abused children displayed behind him. In one of them, 1-year-old 'Baby A' had suffered severe injuries including blunt force trauma while in her father's custody, and the father received a mental health diversion in connection with her death, Sydow said. He said he feared an attempt to seek mental health diversion would be the defense attorney's next step in the case of 'Baby R,' a 20-month-old girl who remains under medical care following alleged torture at the hands of her father. The dad and the mother, who was in Florida during the abuse, are charged with child abuse and torture — crimes that authorities said would be eligible for the diversion program. Cooper argued that the law's list of crimes for which defendants are ineligible for mental health diversion — including murder, rape and sex crimes — leaves out other serious offenses. He noted that people who receive treatment instead of potential prison time have their cases wiped from their criminal records, inaccessible to future background checks. 'I choose kids over offenders,' said Cooper, who told ABC 10 on Thursday morning that he would seek a second term as sheriff in 2026. Ho said his office objected to 977 attempts to pursue mental health diversion in 2024, an increase from 144 the year before. 'It's being used as a sword, versus a shield, and it's being used quite regularly by the Public Defender's Office,' Ho said. 'I am all for somebody getting the treatment that they need, but this law needs to be changed because it's being abused.' The Public Defender's Office could not be immediately reached for comment Thursday morning. Keyan Bliss, a member of the activist groups Decarcerate Sacramento and the Anti Police Terror Project, stood at the back of the room, interjecting at one point to challenge the panelists' claims that the diversion program was not working. After the event, Bliss said the Sacramento County Main Jail is overpopulated and failing to adequately treat mentally ill inmates. He called Cooper and Ho's calls to reform the mental health diversion program 'a massive deflection from the reality that most of the people that are inside the jail every day haven't even been before a judge yet.' 'Many of them are struggling with mental health illnesses, and a significant number of them are homeless,' he said. In an interview, Cooper said he does not oversee the jail's mental health services but that mentally ill inmates 'are being dealt with.' Still, he and Ho contended that the diversion program allows nearly anyone to claim mental health problems and evade accountability.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store