Stonehouse chippy apologises for prices as fish costs surge
Fishing quotas are negotiated annually between the UK, EU and Norway.This year there is a cap of 25,028 tonnes on cod, a drop of 20% compared to last year.There is a limit of 112,400 tonnes of haddock - down 5% from 2024's catch limit.Mr Lee said attempts to find substitutes had not gone down well in the past."We've tried different types of white fish but we've not had that good feedback on them," he said."If you get cod, you know what you're getting, it's nice and tasty, it's fluffy, and then when you've got the batter over it it makes nice and flakey, but maybe it's something we look at in the future if it goes too high."
'A challenge'
Andrew Crook from the National Federation of Fish Fryers explained the quotas are set by scientists who analyse the catch and agree a quota.He said the quota is then in place for 12 months, but the current one may last two years."They think then maybe the quota will increase and things will get a bit more normal," he said. "But it's certainly a challenge at the moment."Mr Lee has to face the public however: "We've had a few shocked faces when customers come in but once you explain what's actually happening people are understanding."Fish and chips is a Friday night treat mainly, it's still the number one eaten thing in the UK. There is a crazy amount that we eat as a nation."
After this year's fishing quotas were agreed, Fisheries Minister Daniel Zeichner said: "This government will always stand up for the British fishing industry, which is the lifeblood of so many communities around our coastline."That's why I'm pleased to have secured a deal providing the UK fleet quota for stocks including cod and haddock worth up to £310m, while maintaining sustainable levels of stocks for the long-term health of our industry."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
As thousands more teenagers scramble for university places, I have to ask – why?
A Chinese economist once asked me to explain British universities. 'Why do you take your young,' he said, 'at their most creative age, lock them in a monastery for three years and make them drunk?' Each August I recall this question when hundreds of thousands of British teenagers scramble to enter university. They must perform utterly archaic feats of memory in their exams and then embark on an academic experience that has almost nothing to do with real life. Their reward may be a higher income, but perhaps not higher than their innate ability would have gained them anyway. England's present university system is in a terrible mess, chronically in need of a royal commission. Between 1997 and 2010, university student numbers increased by 68%. Then, under the coalition government, universities were offered £9,000 a year for each of an unlimited number of students. It was an open invitation to lower standards and increase overcrowding. Some cities found themselves with two if not three universities, with multiple campuses, student residences and overheads to match. The waste was ludicrous. Their vice-chancellors received crazy sums. The average for the Russell group is now £400,000. The government supposedly recouped the cost of all this by treating fees and maintenance grants as borrowed. This allowed university extravagance to appear not as public spending but as debt, on the thesis that the students would repay it with interest one day. Until recently no more than a quarter of graduates were expected to fully repay their loans – small wonder, as they averaged £50,000 a head. The accumulated student debt is enormous. It has reached more than £250bn and is said to be heading for £500bn by the late 2040s. Quite why higher education should be so privileged as not to count as current spending has never been clear. As with HS2, the Treasury likes to treat certain sorts of posh spending as 'investment' rather than hard cash. The reliance on fees from overseas students – now covering nearly a quarter of university income – caused the present crisis. As this income has fallen, in part through recent immigration and visa changes, 40% of England's universities are set to be in financial deficit. Jobs and courses are being cut back. Meanwhile, every bit of news out of the university sector seems grim. Employers are disregarding not just classes of degree, but degrees at all. It is 10 years since the large accountancy firm EY started disregarding A-levels and degree classes in recruitment, while PwC said it would rely on aptitude and behaviour tests. I know of no job that ever depends on a class of degree. The Office for National Statistics records that more than a quarter of graduates in England are now in medium- or low-skilled jobs. Another survey shows the graduate 'premium' is plummeting. This is not just a British issue. Across the US and the EU, graduate unemployment is almost on a par with non-graduate. Students seem miserable. The two-thirds who leave home to go to college report soaring mental illness, with 90% suffering from loneliness. The Boston Consulting Group last year found ex-students the fastest group of young people going straight into long-term sickness. The solution is glaring: cut back. The thesis that university courses requirea minimum of three years, each with barely six months of teaching, is absurd. For most courses, two years should be enough, as the former universities minister, Jo Johnson, has proposed. The number of institutions claiming fully-fledged university status should be slashed. The practice of almost every city hosting two universities – or 40 in London – should end in a mass of mergers. There should be a return to vocational colleges, with an emphasis on contact with local employment. This was proposed by James Dyson in setting up just such a college in Wiltshire, the Dyson Institute, in 2017. Another, the New Model Institute for Technology and Engineering in Herefordshire, was started by the Tory MP Jesse Norman. It is simply absurd that a large number of graduates should be doing work supposedly not requiring a degree, and yet the welfare state is chronically short of trained medical and care staff. This is a serious failure of education planning. Higher education should be free at the point of use; not, as now, free only to those whose parents can pay their fees upfront. But those completing a university course should repay the privilege with a modestly higher rate of tax throughout their working life. Loans should cover only maintenance. Of course university is not just a preparation for work, even if for 18-year-olds that is the primary issue at hand. A university is more than a start in life. It is also an experience of liberal education that goes far beyond the young who are its current beneficiaries. A true university should promote breadth of thought and freedom of speech to old as well as young. It should not turn in on itself as its resources shrink. It should make its courses and work accessible to people beyond its walls and across the community. Universities are costing us dear. We should not feel they are wasted on the young. Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Meloni has proven that cutting taxes works. If only Reeves was taking notes
Not only do Italians enjoy better food, warmer weather and la dolce vita, they're now richer than us too. Adjusted for the cost of living, Italy's GDP per capita has overtaken the Britain's for the first time this century, according to the World Bank. Though the gap in living standards is small – the Italians and the British both have GDP per capita of just over $60,000 (£44,000) – the symbolism is huge. Back in 1987, when Italy's economy briefly overtook the UK's in size for the first time, the news prompted an outpouring of patriotic sentiment and became known as il sorpasso – 'the surpassing'. It hasn't always been plain sailing for our Mediterranean rivals. After 1945, Italy's weak coalitions became a byword for political instability. For decades, the country has struggled with demographic decline and fiscal debt crises. In 2011 there was national humiliation when the then prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, was effectively removed from office by Brussels, which threatened to force Italy out of the eurozone. Today, however, Italy seems to have achieved an enviable stability. Under Giorgia Meloni's tough-minded conservative leadership, Italy is now among the most desirable domiciles in Europe, not least for millionaires fleeing the Labour Government's tax raids.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Dollar higher as U.S. producer prices surge in July
NEW YORK, Aug 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. dollar snapped a two-day losing streak on Thursday as data showed U.S. producer prices increased more than expected in July amid a surge in the costs of services and goods, suggesting a broader pickup in inflation in the months ahead. The hot measure of inflation at the wholesale level follows the release on Tuesday of a better than feared rise in consumer prices in July, which emboldened traders to boost bets on interest rate cuts from the Federal Reserve in coming months. While Thursday's data did not upset the case for a September rate cut it did raise worries that tariffs could still stir up inflation in coming months and change the course of interest rate cuts for the rest of the year. It also hurt the case for the Fed to resume cutting rates with a 50 basis point cut in September, something Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested in an interview on Wednesday. "I think that was never particularly likely, but presumably this PPI report quashes that," Matt Weller, global head of market research at StoneX. More importantly the inflation data raises questions about whether the Fed can deliver an aggressive pace of cuts for the rest of the year, he said. "Some people were saying that we could see three consecutive 25 basis point rate cuts ... but if anything approaching this level of inflation is in place it seems like we might be looking at more of a max of two interest rate cuts and even that might be questionable," Weller said. While financial markets have priced in an interest rate cut from the Federal Reserve next month, rising services inflation and the expectation tariffs could still significantly boost goods prices left some economists doubtful of an aggressive resumption in policy easing in the absence of further labor market deterioration. Traders still see a Fed rate cut on September 17 as a near certainty, according to LSEG data. The dollar index , measuring the currency against a basket of peers, was 0.5% higher at 98.17. The euro was 0.5% weaker at $1.16485 while the British pound eased 0.3% to $1.3538. Still, analysts warned against expecting a sustained rebound in the buck. "The market is very much likely to remain 'all in' on the idea of a September cut, at least until we hear from Powell at Jackson Hole next week," Michael Brown, market analyst at online broker Pepperstone in London, said, referring to the Fed's Jackson Hole Economic Symposium later this month. The yen rose against the dollar earlier in the session after Bessent suggested the Bank of Japan needs to raise rates again soon, before ceding ground to trade about flat on the day at 147.385 yen to a dollar. The stronger greenback weighed on the Australian dollar even as upbeat jobs data calmed concerns about a downturn in the labour market and lessened the need for another rate cut in the very near term. The Aussie was last down 0.8% to $0.6493. . Meanwhile, bitcoin earlier hit its first record peak since July 14, pushing as high as $124,480.82 before trimming gains and was last down nearly 4% at around $118,536. Bitcoin was already underpinned by increased institutional money flows this year in the wake of a spate of regulatory changes spearheaded by Trump, who has billed himself the "cryptocurrency president." In the latest move, an executive order last week paved the way to allow crypto assets in 401(k) retirement accounts. "Corporate treasuries like MicroStrategy and Block Inc. continue to buy bitcoin," said IG analyst Tony Sycamore.
