logo
‘Not everyone is in a position to tell their stories': In Transit makers Zoya Akhtar, Reema Kagti and Ayesha Sood on the need for authentic representation

‘Not everyone is in a position to tell their stories': In Transit makers Zoya Akhtar, Reema Kagti and Ayesha Sood on the need for authentic representation

Indian Express13-07-2025
Your new docu-series on Amazon Prime Video, In Transit, follows the life of nine transgender, non-binary personalities and their journeys. What triggered the idea for this series?
Zoya Akhtar: The reason we wanted to do the series is also how the title came about. It felt like there were these people on a journey. And, not just them; it seemed the law of the land was also on a journey — the mentality was beginning to shift. But everything is in a flux right now. So, while it (homosexuality) was decriminalised, the civil liberties were still not there. There was also 'trans', as in transitioning. In Transit was the working title but the name just stuck.
You must have gone through several stories before you zeroed in on these nine people.
Ayesha Sood: We had a long period, almost a year-and-a-half, of research and development. We built a small crew of trans-activists, journalists, researchers and production assistants. During that time, a lot of names came up. We started conversations with them. We started investigating their stories and a long list filtered down into a shorter one. It also depended a lot on the fact that characters should be able to tell their stories. Not everyone is in a position to do that.
In Made in Heaven S2 (2023), you introduced a transgender character Meher, played by Trinetra Haldar Gummaraju. Did that move lead to the making of this series?
Reema Kagti: Definitely. When Zoya and I were researching Meher's character, we realised we needed to educate ourselves. We reached out to people in the community and those interviews opened our minds. That was when Zoya thought this was a series waiting to happen. We even changed the track of Trinetra's character because we ourselves learnt a couple of things.
Akhtar: Our work for In Transit started way before Made in Heaven S2 dropped.
In 2018, the Supreme Court gave sanctity to LGBTQIA+ relations but it left the policy framework for Parliament. For the last seven years, there hasn't been much headway. What is your expectation from the lawmakers?
Akhtar: When we wrote Made in Heaven S1, it was still a criminal act. It was released on March 8, 2019. Before it dropped, it was decriminalised. We had to put a disclaimer at the end of the series. I'm hopeful that things are going to change.
As filmmakers, we have to tell those stories because stories bring change. Stories connect you to the other person. You think this is too much or this is not for me or this is not my culture but then you realise that these people have the same concerns as you. They are living in the same system as you. Stories bring us closer and they show us how similar we are.
Kagti: It's a process. Today, things are better than how they were 30 years ago. Maybe not a lot better but like any social change, this will also take a long time.
Sood: Based on my experience of travelling across the country, you'll be surprised how accepting different communities are. I think society is getting there. Regardless, I think policy and laws have to change first and society will follow.
When you are dealing with people who are vulnerable, it takes that much time for them to open up and trust you.
Sood: Over a period of a year-and-a-half, we built this team and started to find these characters. We had conversations with them over phone, Zoom and later met them in person. All this while we were trying to get to know them and their stories better. Eventually, they knew exactly what this conversation was going to be like.
Kagti: All the nine characters are courageous. They all felt a certain responsibility
to speak up.
In your experience, what are the positive changes you have seen over the last decade and how much has filmmaking contributed to them?
Akhtar: All positive reinforcement that can come with accurate and authentic representation is needed because one may be growing up and feeling different. One may not have that in one's family or in one's friend circle and that could be an isolating experience. When one is able to see these stories on screen, one definitely feels: 'Okay I am not alone'. That is very important and that comes with all kinds of things, whether it is your community, sexuality, disability or even a point of view. You just need to see how you feel represented in a way that may not be in your immediate environment but makes you feel like part of society in a good way.
Which medium do you think is more effective while telling stories — features, series or documentary?
Akhtar: There is no one thing you can choose. It depends on how stories lend themselves to certain mediums. A certain film can't be stretched for eight hours and a certain series can't be put in three hours. You can't say what is more effective. I am greedy. I love storytelling and I would tell a story in whatever form I think it works. But my heart is in the features.
What are the dos and don'ts that you followed?
Sood: We never asked any of our characters about whether they have transitioned. If they tell us about it, we talk about it. But sometimes some of the characters have not had a physical transition. We never wanted to make them feel like we are being voyeuristic about their lives. I was never going to ask them if they had had a surgery and what it felt like. If they talk to me about their surgery, only then are we going to bring up how they feel afterwards.
You mentioned how one of the characters identified with Kajal bhai in the 90s' show Hum Paanch and, for decades, Rekha and Sridevi have been queer icons. What is the impact cinema has had?
Sood: Cinema is the background score to everybody's world. This is the world that we live in and this is our go-to pop culture. Cinema is the world that everyone, sort of, feeds off.
Aamir Khan recently said that people are not going to theatres because they get to watch new releases on streamers. How effective is the pay-per-view YouTube model that he spoke about?
Akhtar: The model he is speaking about is interesting. YouTube is the most watched platform in India. There are a lot of factors to why the footfalls have fallen post the pandemic. The viewing habit changed because people started watching stuff that was accessible to them. It is very expensive. Regular families choose their outings. Traffic is not fun. Having said that, I have great faith in community viewing. I was in the cinema yesterday, it was a full house and people were clapping. Nothing beats that.
Kagti: Parents who enjoy watching movies in theatres must try and inculcate that activity in their children.
Also Read | At long last, Gabbar is dead: How Sholay got its original ending back
Do you think something should be done about the gap between the movie releasing and when it becomes available on OTT?
Akhtar: Producers take certain decisions because of economics. But I agree that there should be more of a gap. Therefore, if you know that you may not see a particular film for a while, that informs the decision differently for certain films. For the big spectacle, tentpole films, anyway, people want to go see it in the theatre.
Kagti: It is a two-way process. If, as an audience, you are feeling there is an absence of the kind of films you love watching, you must go out and support the releases that you like.
In today's day and age, after a movie comes out, there are people who come on social media and say it is 'their' story.
Akhtar: There is a lot of heft when it is a true story. In that case, we will first take the concerned person's permission, rights, blessing and put it out that this is a true story. But, when it is not a true story and if people feel that way, we can't control it. They are free to say what they want, take action and go to court.
Kagti: If you really feel this way, you should go to court but nobody actually does. In this day and age of social media, they just want the attention. Then, it ends.
Do you have a dream project?
Akhtar: For the longest time, my dream project was to make my first film. Luck By Chance (2009) could have been my dream project.
Kagti: Whatever we are doing right now is our dream project. Once that gets over, the next one feels like the new dream project.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rangeen review: Viineet Kumar Siingh leads a drama about male sex work that doesn't know where it's headed
Rangeen review: Viineet Kumar Siingh leads a drama about male sex work that doesn't know where it's headed

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Rangeen review: Viineet Kumar Siingh leads a drama about male sex work that doesn't know where it's headed

Rangeen web series review Cast: Viineet Kumar Siingh, Rajshri Deshpande, Taaruk Raina, Seeba Chaddha Creator: Amardeep Galsin, Amir Rizvi Star rating: ★ In a country where sex-related crimes and sexual repression are at an all-time high, one would expect that a show like Rangeen, now available to watch on Prime Video, would treat the subject of male sex work with some amount of sensitivity and respect. Unfortunately, keeping that expectation put me on the wrong track to begin with, because Rangeen does not know whether to empathise with its protagonist or laugh at him, so as a case study, it attempts both at one go and ends up doing neither. Vineet Kumar Siingh plays a journalist turned gigolo in Rangeen. The premise Rangeen begins with Adarsh (Viineet Kumar Siingh), who runs a local newspaper. He is too busy trying to make ends meet and make sure that things are in place at work to even notice how lonely his wife, Naina (Rajshri Deshpande), feels, even when he is present at home. Then comes the shocking revelation when he catches her with a young gigolo named Sunny (Taaruk Raina). Adarsh loses it, and Naina leaves. His humiliation now drives him to seek what it is that he lacks, and this curiosity leads him to take up the job of a gigolo himself. He wants to experience this and prove that he is no less. If I thought I didn't understand men, maybe the character of Adarsh would be the prime example to prove my point. None of what Adarsh does next makes sense. It is a series of baffling character choices, none of them attuned to any iota of emotional unrest. One fails to understand Adarsh as he chases the goal of becoming a gigolo, letting his journalism instincts go like it meant nothing to him, and refuses to allow some common sense into him, even when that arrives from the elusive madam, Sitara (Sheeba Chadha), who is running the gigolo business. In the same chain of events, we follow the parallel tracks of Naina as she takes refuge in her parents' house, and that of Sunny, who is revealed to work in a local meat shop. What doesn't work Rangeen is a show that is utterly confused about the subject of sex work, one that piles up a series of bizarre situational plot twists and shocks. The scenes that follow after Adarsh ruins and embarrasses his way through the trial session are so clueless and unnecessary in their context- we are seeing a man setting up for his own humiliation. Are we meant to laugh at him then? The writing seems peculiarly rushed and unsupervised, running around in circles and barely aware of the next steps once the central crisis is in place. Look, it says, a man so desperate to prove himself. Hear, as this woman displays her nonchalance and strength to say there is nothing wrong with cheating. What is most jarring is the comic background score that continuously underlines and sets up the tone of the series in most parts. I could almost hear the disclaimer of a scene ending with the phrase- 'Thoda halka rakhte hain.' The show is obsessed with keeping the punchlines light, the observations colourful. Therefore, it forgets the very desire, the primal need that these people crave. Sex is as intimate as anything human there is, but the makers of Rangeen seem to have made up their mind that sex work also includes some provocation that is meant to be seen through a lighter lens. The tonal inconsistency snatches away from any emotional connection with the characters, and we are left with a bunch of foolish people running blindly around the same circle. Final thoughts Rangeen has barely any insight into the sexual repression that a country like India deals with. Perhaps it does not want to deal with it in the first place, because nowhere is the psychological inquiry present. The characters speak as if they are joking all the time, speaking like cardboard cutouts and in urgent need of a therapist. Even in Sunny's track, there is a shocking absence of the socio-political dread of belonging to a certain class and community. He seems to be living without any idea of where he is or what his future looks like. Only Rajshri Deshpande's presence reflects an awareness of the responsibilities of playing a character like Naina. She seems to be working overtime in a show that does not know where to start the dialogue, so she fills the dialogue with her mere presence. Viineet Kumar Siingh seems to be as confused as Adarsh himself, and there's hardly anything to write home about. Even the chain-smoking bit feels misplaced when there is no emotional context. He also has a rather patriarchal undertone to his view of the relationship that magically disappears somewhere along the line. How? Why? Better to ask no questions and dive along, because what's more fun than shaming sex and desire? More than just a vision check, a show like Rangeen needs to open its eyes first.

Your comments are proof why Renukaswamy's family needs justice: Ramya slams Darshan fans
Your comments are proof why Renukaswamy's family needs justice: Ramya slams Darshan fans

Time of India

time8 hours ago

  • Time of India

Your comments are proof why Renukaswamy's family needs justice: Ramya slams Darshan fans

Actress Ramya is once again facing a wave of online trolling for speaking out in support of Renukaswamy's family — the victim in the ongoing murder case linked to actor Darshan . Last week, the Supreme Court strongly criticised the Karnataka High Court's decision to grant bail to Darshan, questioning the rationale behind the order and suggesting it nearly amounted to an acquittal. Sharing a screenshot of this development, Ramya took to Instagram to demand justice for Renukaswamy's death, and wrote: 'SC is a ray of hope for the common people of India- justice for the family of Renukaswamy.' However, her post did not sit well with Darshan's fanbase, many of whom flooded her comments section with abusive and hateful messages. Unfazed, Ramya responded with a sharply worded Instagram Story that read: 'To all the DBoss fans — Welcome to my Instagram :) Your comments are proof why Renukaswamy's family needs justice!' This isn't the first time Ramya has been targeted. Last year, shortly after Darshan's arrest, she had posted, 'No one is above the law. No one should take the law into their hands.' That too had triggered a wave of trolling from his supporters. Meanwhile, Darshan — currently out on bail — has been on a temple run, recently spotted visiting multiple temples across Karnataka. He had also traveled to Thailand last week to shoot portions of his upcoming film Devil, and returned to Bengaluru two days ago. Ramya and Darshan have shared the screen in two Kannada films — Datta and Snehana Preethina.

Udaipur Files producer Amit Jani given Y-category security amid threats
Udaipur Files producer Amit Jani given Y-category security amid threats

India Today

time10 hours ago

  • India Today

Udaipur Files producer Amit Jani given Y-category security amid threats

In the wake of the ongoing controversy and threats around 'Udaipur Files', a film based on Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal's murder, the producer of the movie, Amit Jani, has been provided Y-category security, an official statement said on movie is based on Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor from Udaipur who was murdered by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous for allegedly sharing a post supporting former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma's controversial on-air remarks on Prophet Muhammad in per the Y-category security protocol, Jani will be accompanied by a total of 11 personnel of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). The security cover will be provided to Jani for movement within Uttar Pradesh and Delhi. This came days after the Supreme Court allowed the producer, director and the son of Kanhaiya Lal to approach the police and seek protection as they alleged threat to their top court noted that if the threats are found to be serious in nature, concerned authorities must take steps to ensure their safety.'Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder' got the go-ahead for a release in theatres on August 8, 2025 after a Supreme Court ruling directed the Delhi High Court to address challenges against the government's approval of the film's court directed those objecting to it to approach the Delhi High Court to challenge the Centre's revisional order, which had allowed the movie to be screened with six Bharat Shrinate announced the new release date after the Supreme Court's decision, signalling the end of the legal journey for the film's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting directed the makers of Udaipur Files to implement six specific changes before its release, in line with the recommendations of a screening slated for release on July 11, 2025, 'Udaipur Files' faced many delays due to censorship and legal troubles. The film, featuring Vijay Raaz as Kanhaiya Lal, is produced by Amit Jani and has generated considerable interest among audiences and critics tailor Kanhaiya Lal was murdered in June 2022 allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad assailants later released a video claiming that the murder was in reaction to the tailor allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP member Nupur Sharma following her controversial comments on Prophet case was probed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the accused were booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, besides provisions under trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur.- EndsMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store