logo
Fermin hits a 12th-inning single to give Royals 2-1 win over Red Sox, 16th win in last 18 games

Fermin hits a 12th-inning single to give Royals 2-1 win over Red Sox, 16th win in last 18 games

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Freddy Fermin hit a line drive RBI single into left center in the bottom of the 12th inning to give the Kansas City Royals a 2-1 win over the Boston Red Sox on Friday night.
Steven Cruz (1-0) pitched the 12th for his first major league win as the Royals won their seventh consecutve game and for the 16th time in their last 18 games.
Sean Newcombe (0-4), the eighth Red Sox pitcher of the game, took the loss.
Each team scored a run in the 11th after 10 scoreless innings.
Both starting pitchers cruised.
Kansas City's Michael Lorenzen gave up just three hits through seven innings, striking out seven and walking none. He was helped by his defense, including a diving stab of a line drive by first baseman Salvador Perez in the fourth.
Hunter Dobbins didn't allow a run in six innings for Boston, though he did have to work around trouble a couple of times. He gave up two hits in the fourth inning and a one-out triple in the fifth.
Devers, who created a firestorm Thursday when he said he wouldn't play first base, prompting
Red Sox brass to fly to Kansas City
to defuse the situation, was 1 for 5 with an RBI.
Key Moment
In the fifth inning, Kyle Isbel ripped a one-out triple to right center. With the infield drawn in, Jonathan India hit a slow roller to short. Isbel broke for home and was tagged out in a rundown that ended up in a 6-2-5-4 double play.
Key Stat
Lorenzen became the third straight starter for the Royals to pitch seven scoreless innings.
Up Next
The Red Sox will send LHP Garrett Crochet (3-2, 2.02 ERA) to the mound to face Kansas City LHP Cole Ragans (2-1, 3.79) in the second game of the three-game series on Saturday. ___
AP MLB:
https://apnews.com/hub/mlb

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Missouri special session ends with passage of KC stadium funding, disaster aid
Missouri special session ends with passage of KC stadium funding, disaster aid

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Missouri special session ends with passage of KC stadium funding, disaster aid

State Rep. Chris Brown, R-Kansas City, speaks Wednesday in favor of the bill he handled that would finance new or improved professional sports stadiums in Kansas City (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent). The Missouri House closed the special legislative session Wednesday with votes to finance professional sports stadiums in Kansas City and provide tornado relief for St. Louis. Three special session bills, already approved in the state Senate, are now in the hands of Gov. Mike Kehoe. He is expected to sign them quickly, putting the decision on whether to stay in Missouri in the hands of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals, who are also considering an offer from Kansas to cross the state line. State Rep. Chris Brown, a Republican from Kansas City handling the stadium bill, asked his colleagues to do what they would do to retain any large employer. 'We really need to, or should, look at these franchises, not just as entertainment,' Brown said. 'They are entertaining, obviously, but it's an incredibly big business.' Opponents of the legislation said it improperly benefits wealthy team owners at the expense of other Missourians. They also contend the bill is unconstitutional. 'The middle class, everyday Missourian is expected to pay for this,' said state Rep. Richard West, a Republican from Wentzville. 'We've been promising for years for some form of tax relief or tax adjustment or something to ease the burden on what they have, and this is exactly the opposite of what we promised them to come up here to do.' The measure to finance new stadiums was the most controversial of the three bills, passing on a 90-58 vote, with 32 Democrats joining with 58 Republicans to provide the majority. There were 13 Democrats and 45 Republicans who voted against the bill. To finance the stadium construction, the bill sets aside tax revenue generated by the teams and economic activity at Arrowhead and Kauffman stadiums. Estimated at just under $1.5 billion over 30 years, the funding would pay for half the costs of improvements at Arrowhead and a new home for the Royals. The Kansas offer would cover 70% of the construction costs for new stadiums, but it expires at the end of the month. The bill passed Wednesday requires financing from local governments, either in Jackson County, where the teams currently reside, or Clay County, which is trying to lure the Royals. It is impossible to put a ballot measure before voters in the time remaining for the Kansas offer. House leaders from the Kansas City area had differing views on whether the teams should accept or reject Missouri's offer now that it is a firm commitment but without knowing what voters will approve in the Kansas City region. 'I don't know what the teams will do,' said House Speaker Jon Patterson, a Lee's Summit Republican. 'They have their own plan. I think that's very unlikely, but I'm just worried about the things I can control, and teams are on their own schedule and will act accordingly.' House Minority Leader Ashley Aune, a Democrat from Kansas City, said the teams should make a decision before June 30 'I would call on them to do so,' Aune said. 'We bent over backwards here in the Missouri legislature to deliver them something by the end of their imposed deadline of June 30. And I would very much like for them to hold true to that deadline and let us know where they're going before that.' Chiefs owner Clark Hunt issued a statement thanking the legislature but made no commitment. 'The passing of this legislation is an important piece of the overall effort,' Hunt said. 'While there's still work to be done, this legislation enables the Chiefs to continue exploring potential options to consider remaining in Missouri.' Patterson and Aune also disagreed on whether the extra disaster aid and property tax controls Kehoe added to the special session agenda had made the difference between success and failure on the stadium bill. Patterson said each bill was considered on its own merits and that the property tax provisions may have cost votes. The stadium legislation won 103 votes in the House in May but the bill died in the state Senate. 'I'd like to think that people took a look at both those things on their own,' Patterson said. 'I don't think anybody here voted for one thing just because of the other.' The House voted down two amendments so the bill did not require another vote in the state Senate. Patterson said it would have failed the second time around. 'A second Senate vote on the (stadium bill) would have been impossible, just the political climate after that vote,' Patterson said. 'So we were very mindful of that. I thought if it goes back, it's not going to pass.' Aune said the additional disaster aid was essential to securing Democratic votes. 'If he wanted to get this stadium done, which is an economic development opportunity for the state and a priority of our governor, it was necessary to make sure that he could shore up those votes by making folks happy in other ways,' Aune said. During debate on the special session spending bill, the House fell silent as state Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins, a St. Louis Democrat, described the devastation of her north St. Louis legislative district. Collins was home on May 16 because the General Assembly adjourned early instead of working to the final day allowed by the Missouri Constitution. She was in her car, preparing to attend a high school graduation when the tornado hit, she said. 'I watched a tornado rip through the middle of my house district,' Collins said. 'I also watched it rip off my roof, and I watched the tornado rip off my neighbor's roof. To this day, debris still sits in my front yard, and I'm a girl that has no insurance.' Four of the five Missourians who died in the tornado lived in her district, Collins said. The disaster relief provisions in the legislation address both the devastation of the May 16 tornado in St. Louis and the damages suffered by other Missourians in storms and flooding earlier in the year. They are: $100 million in the spending bill for storm recovery in the city of St. Louis; $25 million for home repairs and other housing needs through programs of the Missouri Housing Development Commission, available in any county included in a request for federal disaster aid; A tax credit worth up to $5,000 for insurance deductibles paid for residential damage in an area included in a request for federal disaster aid. The legislation would allow $90 million in claims this year and $45 million per year for future years. The provisions were demanded before the Senate vote because of uncertainty about the federal response to the tornado. Kehoe asked President Donald Trump for a federal disaster declaration for the tornado on May 25 and for April 29 storms in Scott on May 19. Trump approved both late Monday, making federal aid for emergency housing and rebuilding available to individuals and providing money to reimburse the state and local governments for recovery costs. State Rep. Raychel Proudie, a Democrat from Ferguson who is in her last term in the House, asked her colleagues to stand by St. Louis for the long-term. 'For those of us who will be termed-out next year,' Proudie said, 'we need the rest of you who will be here five years later to continue to remember this day, to remember this time, to remember these last three weeks, to continue to pour help into these communities, into these people.' The property tax cap in the stadium bill will be imposed in 97 counties. There would be 75 counties where basic tax bills would not increase more than 5% per year and 22 where no increase would be allowed. The list excludes most of the largest counties of the state and many members opposed it because the Missouri Constitution requires property taxes to be 'uniform upon the same class or subclass of subjects.' Another constitutional objection was raised that the bill improperly aids a private entity by giving state support to the Chiefs and Royals, in violation of a provision added to the Constitution in 1875. 'I haven't heard an argument yet that this bill is going to be upheld,' said state Rep. Bill Hardwick, a Republican from Dixon. 'I've only heard arguments that we should ignore the fact that it's unconstitutional.' The likelihood of the property tax provisions being blocked by the courts led at least one Democrat to vote for the bill. State Rep. Kathy Steinmetz of Columbia, speaking at a news conference after the vote, said she sees the cap as shifting the tax burden for schools to state taxpayers. 'They're ending up paying more,' she said, 'so that we can help the school districts that are not putting forth that local tax effort.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Missouri House passes bill to keep Chiefs, Royals in state
Missouri House passes bill to keep Chiefs, Royals in state

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Missouri House passes bill to keep Chiefs, Royals in state

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — The Missouri House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a plan to try and keep the Chiefs and Royals in the Show Me State. Senate Bill 3 authorizes the state to issue bonds valued at up to half the cost of stadium projects for the Chiefs and the Royals. On Thursday, June 5, the Missouri Senate passed the bill, with 19 voting for it and 13 against it. Now, it heads to the desk of Governor Mike Kehoe, who is expected to sign the bill into law. KC2026 to provide update on FIFA World Cup tournament plans Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas released a statement Wednesday afternoon, praising the Missouri Legislature's passage of Senate Bill 3: 'I commend Governor Kehoe for crafting legislation that will keep the Chiefs and Royals in Missouri for years to come. With passage in the Missouri legislature, Kansas City will continue its work with the Royals to build a robust and responsible area development and incentive plan to keep the Royals in Kansas City, Missouri—building on a generation of investment and growth in Downtown Kansas City. New, firm, and non-speculative Missouri state support matched with Kansas City's own resources and unique experience among area local governments in large facility development of venues like CPKC Stadium, the Kansas City International Airport, and more, will allow Kansas City to move the long conversation on the future of local sports facilities to completion. Kansas City also will provide necessary assistance to the Chiefs, their landlord Jackson County, and Clay County to build a long-term future for Arrowhead Stadium, one of the finest football venues in the world, and practice venues that can spur more development opportunities for the team and our region.' Download WDAF+ for Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV The property tax portion of the bill has made it more controversial, though. It allows counties to put a local property tax reform measure on their ballots – capping a person's real property tax liability at five percent. But the largest counties in the state, like Jackson County for instance, aren't included. When it comes to the stadium portion of the bill, there was opposition from some state lawmakers who said it makes the Chiefs and Royals more profitable—at the expense of taxpayers. The Chiefs also released a statement Wednesday, thanking Gov. Kehoe: 'We are grateful to Governor Mike Kehoe and the Missouri Legislature for taking this significant step forward. The passing of this legislation is an important piece of the overall effort. While there's still work to be done, this legislation enables the Chiefs to continue exploring potential options to consider remaining in Missouri.' The Royals released a statement as well: 'As we said from the beginning of the Legislature's deliberations, their work is a very important piece of our decision-making process. Now that both houses have voted and the bill is headed to the Governor's desk, we look forward to evaluating the plan in full detail.' 'Our focus remains the same: to prioritize the best interests of our team, fans, partners and regional community as we pursue the next generational home for the Kansas City Royals.' The bill will now head to Gov. Kehoe to sign. The Chiefs and Royals currently play football and baseball in side-by-side stadiums in Jackson County, Missouri, under leases that expire in January 2031. Jackson County voters last year defeated a sales tax extension that would have helped finance an $800 million renovation of the Chiefs' Arrowhead Stadium and a $2 billion ballpark district for the Royals in downtown Kansas City. That prompted lawmakers in neighboring Kansas last year to authorize bonds for up to 70% of the cost of new stadiums in Kansas to lure the teams to their state. The Royals have bought a mortgage for property in Kansas, though the team also has continued to pursue other possible sites in Missouri. The Kansas offer is scheduled to expire June 30, creating urgency for Missouri to approve a counteroffer. Missouri's legislation authorizes bonds covering up to 50% of the cost of new or renovated stadiums, plus up to $50 million of tax credits for each stadium and unspecified aid from local governments. If they choose to stay in Missouri, the Chiefs plan a $1.15 billion renovation of Arrowhead Stadium. Many economists contend public funding for stadiums isn't worth it, because sports tend to divert discretionary spending away from other forms of entertainment rather than generate new income. But supporters said Missouri stands to lose millions of dollars of tax revenue if Kansas City's most prominent professional sports teams move to Kansas. They said Missouri's reputation also would take a hit, particularly if it loses the Chiefs, which have won three of the past six Super Bowls. The legislation faced some bipartisan pushback from those who described it as a subsidy for wealthy sports team owners. Others raised concerns that a property tax break for homeowners, which was added in the Senate to gain votes, violates the state constitution by providing different levels of tax relief in various counties while excluding others entirely. The Associated Press contributed to this report. This is a developing story. Stay with FOX4 for the latest updates. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Missouri House approves $100 million in storm relief, stadium funding
Missouri House approves $100 million in storm relief, stadium funding

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Missouri House approves $100 million in storm relief, stadium funding

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – The Missouri Legislature voted Wednesday to advance measures outlined in Governor Mike Kehoe's call for a special session. Lawmakers in the House approved $100 million in storm relief, appropriations for capital projects around the state, and a controversial measure that will provide public funds for professional sports stadiums. Following the Senate's lead, the House moved expeditiously to pass all three bills in less than a week. While the measures related to storm victims and capital spending passed overwhelmingly, legislators in the House broke out in a back-and-forth debate over the stadium issue. The opposition to and support of the stadium package, an initiative aimed at keeping the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals in Missouri, was bipartisan as it was regionally contentious. 'I come from a Jeffersonian view of government,' State Rep. Bryant Wolfin, R-Ste. Genevieve County, said. 'We exist here to restrain power, not to redistribute wealth.' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Wolfin, who often stands up to discuss the constitutionality of legislation, said the stadium bill was the one of the most egregious bills that he has reviewed. '(The stadium bill) is corporate welfare dressed up as economic development,' Wolfin, a Republican, said during debate on the House floor. 'It isn't just wrong, it's dangerous.' 'I came here to be a champion of liberty,' he said while urging his colleagues to vote against the stadium deal. 'I know you guys love these teams and I know you'll do the right thing,' State Rep. Keri Ingle, D-Lee's Summit in support of the stadium package. The bill's sponsor, a Republican from Clay County, urged representatives to support the proposed financing deal. Police: Suspect tracked obituaries, stole from dead St. Louis County residents 'We're here to move the state forward,' said State Rep. Chris Brown, R-Kansas City. The end result, however, was a majority of House members voting to approve using state funds to help finance a new stadium for the Royals–likely to be built in Clay County, which is north of the current site along Interstate 70 in Jackson County. The vote on the stadium deal was 90-58. Timing was key on the stadium piece as Kansas lawmakers authorized a bond deal that was meant to lure the Chiefs and Royals across the state line. The proposal from Kansas expires at the end of June. With no changes made during the House process, the finally agreed upon bills will now head to Gov. Mike Kehoe's desk for final approval. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store