FBR redrafts Sec 37A: Amended Finance Bill sets conditions for tax fraud arrests
Tax fraud cases involving an amount below Rs 50 million would not be liable to arrest through high-powered FBR committee in this particular situation under section 37A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.
The said arrest would be made in a situation where the accused is intentionally or wilfully not joining the investigation after three notices; accused attempting to abscond or there are sufficient grounds that the accused would temper with the evidence.
Arrests for tax fraud: major changes made in sales tax law thru Finance Bill
According to the amended Finance Bill (2025-26), the FBR has redrafted section (37A) Power to inquire and investigate offences warranting prosecution under Sales Tax Act and Arrest of a person.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 11E of this Act, an officer of Inland Revenue not below the rank of assistant commissioner or any other officer authorised by the Board in this behalf on the basis of material evidence pointing to the commission of tax fraud or an offence warranting prosecution under this act may initiate an inquiry upon approval by the Commissioner.
(2) For the purpose of an inquiry under this Act, the officer of Inland revenue shall have the powers of a civil court trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure,1908(Act No. V of 1908), in respect of the following matters, namely: (a) Summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining on oath; and (b) Requiring the discovery and production of documents and receiving evidence on affidavits.
(3) The inquiry officer shall complete the inquiry while exercising the powers under the provisions of Section 37, 38, 38A, 38B, 40 or any other section of the Act, wherever required within six months.
(4) During inquiry proceedings, the inquiry officer shall give an opportunity of being heard to the person whose actions alleged to have caused tax fraud warranting prosecution under this Act, confronting the person the details of tax fraud committed or caused to be committed by such person for explanation.
(5) The inquiry officer shall submit inquiry report along with reasons to be recorded including the loss of tax calculated as a result of such inquiry to the Commissioner to obtain prior approval for investigation or the closure of inquiry without any further investigation.
(6) The Commissioner, on the basis of inquiry report under sub-section (5) and after recording reasons in writing, shall either-
(i) Approve initiation of investigation, or (ii) require the Officer of Inland Revenue to submit such further information or documents as he may direct for his decision; or (iii) close the inquiry by rejecting the report or accepting the report, as the case may be. Provided that a copy of the report shall be furnished to the person alleged to have committed the tax fraud.
(7) After approval of investigation under sub-section (6), the inquiry officer shall complete investigation within three months and prepare investigation report for submission before the competent court.
(8) The Board through a three member committee notified by the Chairman may authorize the Commissioner to issue warrant of arrest for a person in a case of a fraud which falls within the ambit of sub-clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of clause (37) of section 2 and the tax loss due to fraud exceeds the amount of rupees fifty million during the course of investigation if:-
(i) The accused is intentionally or wilfully not joining the investigation after three notices; (ii) The accused attempting to abscond; (iii) There are sufficient grounds that the accused would temper with the evidence.
(9) The officer of inland revenue may arrest a person alleged to have committed a tax fraud after obtaining an arrest warrant from the Special Judge in a case of a fraud falling within the ambit of the sub clauses of clause (37) of section 2 other than those mentioned in subsection (8) of this section during the course of investigation if: (i) The accused is intentionally or wilfully not joining the investigation after three notices; (ii) The accused attempting to abscond; (iii) There are sufficient grounds that the accused would temper with the evidence.
(10) Where the person suspected of tax fraud or any offence warranting prosecution under this Act is a company, every director or officer of that company whom the authorised officer has reason to believe is personally responsible for actions of the company contributing the tax fraud or any offence warranting prosecution under this Act shall be liable to arrest; provided that any arrest under this sub-section shall not absolve the company from the liabilities of payment of tax, default surcharge and penalty imposed under this Act.
(11) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person has committed a tax fraud or any offence warranting prosecution under this Act, the Commissioner may, either before or after the inquiry or investigation, compound the offence if such person pays the amount of tax evaded or sought to be evaded as determined in the inquiry or the investigation along with default surcharge and penalty as provided under this Act.
(12) Any person accused of an offence who is arrested under this Act shall at the time of arrest be informed of the grounds of arrest in writing on the basis of which he has been arrested.
(13) All arrests made under this Act shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act V of 1898), the revised procedure of arrest added.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Google granted tax exemption
Sources said tax authorities assured the company that 'Google is not the target of the Digital Presence Proceeds Tax Act' and that the legislation is designed to address only those with significant digital presence but no physical or registered presence in Pakistan. photo: REUTERS Listen to article Pakistan has assured US-based Google that it will be exempt from the newly imposed 5% digital tax, and parts of the company's income will be taxed at even two-thirds reduced rates, further reducing the country's earnings from foreign firms operating locally. The clarification, given by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to the tech giant, has raised questions about the effectiveness of the new tax law, indicating that the government may have not fully considered the implications before enacting the Digital Presence Proceeds Act 2025 last month. The government enacted the Digital Presence Proceeds Act in June to enhance tax collection from offshore companies with significant digital presence that were not paying taxes on their earnings. Sources said tax authorities assured the company that "Google is not the target of the Digital Presence Proceeds Tax Act" and that the legislation is designed to address only those with significant digital presence but no physical or registered presence in Pakistan. This assurance was sent electronically to Kyle Gardner, Google's representative for government affairs in South Asia. Google has a significant business presence in Pakistan and provides services for online advertising, search engines, cloud computing, communication, and entertainment. It is also the single largest contributor of digital service tax payments. In contrast, firms like Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and Netflix contribute little to the over Rs1 billion in total income tax collected from tech giants, according to FBR officials. The tax authorities assured Google that since it has a branch office in Pakistan, it will not be liable to pay the 5% tax on its income due to its legal status as "a tax resident under relevant tax laws of Pakistan." FBR spokesman Dr Najeeb Memon was not available for comments. The new law states that it will not apply to any payment for digitally ordered goods where such payment is effectively connected with a branch office of the foreign vendor in Pakistan, and the goods are supplied from within Pakistan. It also excludes digitally delivered services received in Pakistan and rendered through a branch office of the foreign vendor. "Since you are operating through a registered branch, your operations fall squarely within this exemption. Similarly, the digital services tax provisions of the income tax law do not apply to tax residents of Pakistan," stated the FBR communication with Google. The enactment of the Digital Presence Proceeds Act had created ripples in Pakistan, particularly among YouTube users. Before the new budget, Google was paying 10% income tax under Section 152 of the Income Tax Ordinance, which the government increased to 15%. However, surprisingly, the government has also shown a path for Google to pay only 5% income tax instead of 15%. Authorities further stated that even if any of Google's operations are conducted from outside Pakistan, the applicable rate under the Digital Services Tax and the Digital Presence Proceeds Act has been reduced to 5% instead of the 15% rate the company had perceived. According to the FBR, if a person is subject to the Digital Presence Proceeds Tax, then tax under Section 152 of the Income Tax Ordinance shall not be deducted on the same transaction. "This safeguards Google against any double taxation. In fact, Google's applicable tax rate has now been reduced from 10% to 5%, given that the Digital Proceeds Act imposes a 5% rate compared to the 15% withholding tax rate under the Income Tax Ordinance," the government assured Google. Going a step further, the government has offered Google full income tax exemption if it shifts its local branch office to a Special Technology Zone (STZ). Under Clause 123EA of the Second Schedule of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, profits and gains derived by zone enterprises under the STZ Authority Act are fully exempt from income tax until 2035. The law was intended to tax digitally delivered services provided over the internet or electronic networks, where delivery is automated with minimal or no human involvement. These include services such as music, audio and video streaming, cloud computing, software, telemedicine, e-learning, online banking, architecture, research, consultancy, and digital accounting services.
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Cracks emergein traders' ranks over strike
FPCCI President Atif Ikram Sheikh addresses the media alongside presidents of other chambers of commerce in Islamabad after talks with Special Assistant to PM on Revenue Haroon Akhtar on July 18, 2025. PHOTO: ONLINE Listen to article Cracks have emerged within the traders' community over the planned strike on Saturday, with some groups calling it off after negotiations with the government, while others remain adamant about going ahead with it. Following talks with officials, Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) President Atif Ikram Sheikh announced that the nationwide shutter-down strike had been called off, claiming the government had accepted the business community's demands. He added that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) would not exercise its newly granted powers for the time being. "The trade bodies of the entire country are with us and the federation does not want to fight with anyone," said the FPCCI president, adding, "We want to resolve issues through negotiations." He said the traders had reservations about various amendments to the Finance Act while the government has assured to review Article 37A of the Finance Act. The FPCCI president said a four-member committee has been formed. However, he said a strike may be observed sporadically. In a twist, Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) took a strong stand and announced that the strike would not be called off until a written assurance is received from the authorities. Speaking at a press conference, KCCI President Javed Balwani said that a meeting was held on Friday with the government negotiation committee chaired by Haroon Akhtar Khan, in the presence of minister of state for finance and the FBR chief. "The government accepted most of our demands verbally, but we were not given a written assurance, so we have decided to go ahead with the strike," the KCCI president said. He said that all markets in Karachi, including Jodia Bazaar, Electronics Market, Fruit and Vegetable Market, and other business centers will remain closed on Saturday. The Karachi Mobile and Electronics Dealers Association, All Pakistan Restaurant Association, and the city's transport organizations have also backed the strike. He warned of expanding the scope of protest if their demands were not met by the next meeting. Initially, the strike will be observed for one day, then two days and then for the entire week if needed, the KCCI president warned "We work for 7 days, while the bureaucracy works for 5 days, even then, we are pushing against the wall," said Balwani, adding, "We are tax-paying traders, and unnecessary burden should not be put on us." Fruit and Vegetable Market President Abdul Qadeem Agha said, "We reject strict laws like 37A and 37B of the FBR, adding the tax on 0.2 million cash transactions is also unacceptable." Karachi Mobile and Electronics Dealers Association President Muhammad Minhaj Gulfam said that all electronics and mobile markets in Karachi will remain closed today. Meanwhile, Anjuman Tajiran President Mujahid Maqsood Butt also announced observing strike today. He said the business community will not be trapped by government tactics. He demanded that the government immediately withdraw all the black laws of the FBR, adding, "We will not retreat under any circumstances until the abolition of FBR's controversial powers. He announced that all wholesale markets in Lahore will remain closed on Saturday.
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PBF writes letter to NA Speaker: Call to declare ongoing fiscal year as ‘Year of Economic Legislation'
KARACHI: In a significant move aimed at spurring private sector growth, the Pakistan Business Forum (PBF) has written a letter to the Speaker of the National Assembly, urging Parliament to declare the ongoing fiscal year as the 'Year of Economic Legislation.' President PBF, Khawaja Mehboob ur Rehman emphasized that sustainable private sector growth is only possible when Parliament stands firmly with the business community. He expressed hope that the Speaker would play an active role in positioning the legislative branch as a true economic partner. 'It is imperative that Parliament leads the way in crafting legislation that binds banks to offer fair and accessible credit to the SME and startup sectors,' said the PBF President. 'For too long, the banking industry has operated on its own terms — refusing to extend credit to small businesses while focusing almost exclusively on lending to the government, which is an easier route.' Highlighting the deep-rooted financial access issues, particularly in Balochistan, the PBF pointed out the shocking reality that many businesses in the province are effectively excluded from the credit system. The Forum also raised alarms over Sections 37AA and 37B of the Finance Bill, demanding immediate revision. 'Mehboob warned that those measures would cripple businesses, accelerate unemployment and damage investor confidence. The chamber strongly condemned the extraordinary powers granted to Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officials, unjust treatment of the business community and policy decisions made without business consultation. It demanded immediate withdrawal of those measures and a halt to economic victimisation of the business community.' 'If these clauses are not removed, the business community may be forced to shut down operations. These provisions have deeply shaken business confidence across Pakistan. We call upon the Speaker to form a special parliamentary committee to address these issues.' The letter further states that access to easy and fair credit is considered essential in all developed economies, but Pakistan continues to lag behind, with the government currently working on a 10-year industrial policy, the Forum warned that without enabling financial access for the private sector, the policy's objectives will remain unfulfilled. The PBF urged the National Assembly to act now, reiterating that sound parliamentary policy and legislation are the keys to national progress. The business community is looking for practical solutions, not confrontation, and hopes to avoid protest actions such as strikes. The forum further warned that if the government fails to do so, the business community will continue its protest against 37AA and 37B within the legal and democratic framework for a long time. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
