Hamas used sexual violence as ‘weapon of war' in 2023 attacks
It based its findings on survivor and witness testimonies, accounts from emergency services personnel, and forensic, visual and audio evidence. It called for a shift in how conflict-related sexual violence was prosecuted, saying Hamas had silenced its victims by killing them, robbing investigators of key evidence.
'Most victims were permanently silenced — either murdered during or after the assaults or remain too traumatised to talk — creating unique evidentiary challenges,' the report said, calling for a more tailored legal approach.
The report comes as Israel and Hamas are negotiating a ceasefire for the 21-month war in Gaza, which began with the militants' surprise cross-border raid.
The deal would pause the fighting in the Palestinian territory and release some of the remaining 50 hostages, more than half whom are said to be dead.
The report said it had relied on dozens of accounts, including from one survivor of attempted rape at a music festival, 15 returned hostages, 17 witnesses and multiple emergency service personnel.
In some cases, the Dinah Project carried out its own interviews, while in others it relied on publicly available testimony or published accounts.
Citing accounts in Israeli and international media, it said 15 former hostages either experienced or witnessed some form of sexual assault which included physical sexual violence, forced nudity, verbal sexual harassment and threats of forced marriage. Two male hostages said they faced forced nudity and physical abuse when naked.
The report said witness accounts indicated at least 15 separate cases of sexual assault, including at least four instances of gang rape.
The report said its findings showed patterns in the assaults, including victims found partially or fully naked with their hands tied, evidence of gang rape followed by killing, genital mutilation and public humiliation, indicating they were intentionally used as a weapon of war.
A Hamas official did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Hamas has previously denied claims that its forces carried out sexual violence on October 7 2023, when militants stormed into Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostage.
In a report last year, the United Nations said there were 'reasonable grounds' to believe Hamas committed rape, 'sexualised torture', and other cruel and inhumane treatment of women during its attack.
In issuing arrest warrants for three Hamas leaders who were eventually killed by Israel, the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court said they bore responsibility for 'rape and other acts of sexual violence as crimes against humanity' during the October 7 attack.
The report recommended that conflict-related sexual violence should be treated differently from regular sexual crimes to allow for evidence that did not primarily rely on testimony from victims, to account for 'the systematic silencing of victims'.
It called for different forms of evidence to be admitted in any prosecution and for joint criminal responsibility to be applied to all participants in the attack, rather than trying to link individual perpetrators to specific acts and victims.
This approach would create 'a pathway to justice for victims of the October 7 attack and potentially for victims in other conflict zones', the report said.
'We must learn from past experience and the understanding that we, as Israeli women, must shout our voices for those who can no longer shout, and we must bring them justice,' said Michal Herzog, the first Lady of Israel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Why is UK preparing to recognise Palestinian statehood?
Keir Starmer is preparing to recognise Palestinian statehood as soon as September unless Israel meets key conditions, including reaching a ceasefire and committing to a long-term peace process. The prime minister's announcement on Tuesday marked a significant shift in the UK's longstanding position that it would recognise Palestine as part of a peace process at the point of maximum impact. Downing Street said Starmer would decide the extent to which Israel and Hamas had met his conditions before he made a decision beforethe UN general assembly in September. This is the first time the government has set concrete conditions and a timeline for recognition of a Palestinian state. Recognition is a symbolic step but one that would infuriate the Israeli government, which argues that it would encourage Hamas and reward terrorism. It is in effect a formal, political acknowledgment of Palestinian self-determination – without the need to engage in thorny practicalities such as the location of its borders or capital city. It also allows the establishment of full diplomatic relations that would result in a Palestinian ambassador (rather than a head of mission) being stationed in London and a British ambassador in Palestine. Advocates say it is a way of kickstarting a political process towards an eventual two-state solution. Out of the 193 UN member states, about 140 already recognise Palestine as a state. These include China, India and Russia, as well as a majority of European countries such as Cyprus, Ireland, Norway, Spain and Sweden. But until Thursday, when France announced it intended to recognise Palestine, no G7 country had committed to it. Two major international factors and heavy domestic pressure have played a role in the timing of Starmer's announcement. Emmanuel Macron, the French president, set the ball rolling last week when he announced that France would recognise Palestine at the UN general assembly in September. Starmer has now set himself the same deadline, though unlike Macron he has set conditions for Israel and Hamas. The other international factor was the tacit green light that Donald Trump gave to Starmer on Monday. Asked whether the prime minister should bow to pressure from MPs to recognise Palestine, the US president told reporters: 'I'm not going to take a position, I don't mind him taking a position. I'm looking for getting people fed right now.' Trump's reaction to France's announcement was similarly low-key – he said Macron's position on a Palestinian state 'doesn't matter' or 'carry any weight'. Starmer, who has himself expressed horror at the images of starvation in Gaza, has also come under heavy domestic pressure to act. Several of his most senior cabinet ministers – including Angela Rayner and Yvette Cooper – support immediate recognition. Some influential ministers, such as Wes Streeting and Shabana Mahmood, have raised the issue in cabinet meetings. More than 250 cross-party MPs have signed a letter calling for immediate recognition, including more than a third of Labour MPs. Polling suggests that the public also backs action. In a poll commissioned by Ecotricity, the company founded by Labour donor Dale Vince, and carried out by Survation, 49% of people said the UK should recognise Palestine as a state compared with 13% who said it should not. An official government statement issued on Tuesday night said the UK would recognise Palestine at the UN general assembly unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, makes it clear it will not annex the West Bank, and 'takes substantive steps' to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza including by allowing the UN to supply aid. This effectively requires Israel to revive the prospect of a two-state solution, an idea that Benjamin Netanyahu has long rejected. The UK government's statement also reiterates its demands for Hamas to immediately release all the hostages, sign up to an immediate ceasefire with Israel, commit to disarmament and accept it will play no part in the government of Gaza. Starmer will assess the extent to which the two parties – Israel and Hamas – have met his conditions in September. The government said that beyond recognition, it was working on a 'credible peace plan' with allies to establish transitional governance and security arrangements in Gaza and ensure the delivery of UN aid. It said this plan must involve the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the removal of Hamas leadership from Gaza as steps towards a negotiated two-state solution. The government's statement paves the way for the UK and France to jointly recognise Palestine in September. Several other countries are taking part in UN talks on this subject brokered by France and Saudi Arabia in New York. France expects several Arab countries to condemn Hamas and call for its disarmament for the first time in an effort to encourage more European countries to join in recognising Palestine. European countries that do not already recognise Palestine could reassess their positions in the coming weeks – the Belgian government has said it will determine its policy in September. Some countries, including Germany and the US, say they will recognise a Palestinian state only as part of a long-term political solution to the conflict in the Middle East.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
UCLA agrees to $6.5m settlement with Jewish students over pro-Palestinian protests
The University of California, Los Angeles, will pay nearly $6.5m to settle a lawsuit by Jewish students and a professor who said the university allowed antisemitic discrimination to take place on campus during last year's pro-Palestinian protests. The lawsuit alleged that with the 'knowledge and acquiescence' of university officials, protesters prevented Jewish students from accessing parts of campus, and made antisemitic threats. Under the settlement agreement announced on Tuesday, the university admitted it had 'fallen short' and agreed to pay $2.33m to eight groups that support UCLA's Jewish community, $320,000 to a campus initiative to fight antisemitism, and $50,000 to each plaintiff. 'We are pleased with the terms of today's settlement. The injunction and other terms UCLA has agreed to demonstrate real progress in the fight against antisemitism,' the parties said in a joint statement provided by the University of California. On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced the US Department of Justice's civil rights division found UCLA violated the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 'by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students'. 'UCLA failed to take timely and appropriate action in response to credible claims of harm and hostility on its campus,' said Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general of the justice department's civil rights division. The university has said that it is committed to campus safety and will continue to implement recommendations. UCLA was the site of massive protests last year amid a wave of campus demonstrations nationwide in response to the war in Gaza, in which Israeli forces have killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, which experts say is probably an undercount. The protests at UCLA attracted national attention, particularly after counter-protesters staged a violent attack on pro-Palestinian demonstrators. UCLA also faces a lawsuit from more than 30 pro-Palestinian protesters who say the university was negligent during the 'brutal mob assault' on the encampment and that officials did not intervene. 'This was four-plus hours of unmitigated violence while UCLA private security stood sometimes feet away and did nothing to protect the faculty, students and community members protesting genocide,' Thomas Harvey, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said earlier this year. The lawsuit that was settled this week was filed last year. This spring the Department of Justice announced it would investigate the University of California system for possible antisemitic discrimination and violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The university said it had taken 'substantive action' to combat antisemitism, including publicizing information about campus bans on encampments, opposing calls to boycott Israel and publishing a systemwide anti-discrimination policy. 'Antisemitism, harassment and other forms of intimidation are antithetical to our values and have no place at the University of California. We have been clear about where we have fallen short, and we are committed to doing better moving forward,' said Janet Reilly, the UC board of regents chair. 'Today's settlement reflects a critically important goal that we share with the plaintiffs: to foster a safe, secure and inclusive environment for all members of our community and ensure that there is no room for antisemitism anywhere.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Israel-Gaza war: UK wants to 'affect situation on the ground'
Foreign Secretary David Lammy has said the UK is attempting to "affect the situation on the ground" in Gaza after the government announced it would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agreed to end the crisis in to the BBC's Tom Bateman at the UN in New York, Lammy said the world had seen "the most horrific scenes" in Gaza and called for a time had come, he said, to "abate the suffering of the Palestinian people" and set a pathway to the decision has been criticised by opposition parties, with the Liberal Democrats saying recognition should happen right away, and the Conservatives and Reform UK arguing now is not the right time. The UK government has previously said recognition of a Palestinian state should come at a point when it can have maximum impact, as part of a peace said Tuesday's announcement "puts us on a pathway towards recognition"."It is my sincere hope that the decision that we have taken today affects the situation on the ground, and we get to that ceasefire, we get to those hostages coming out as soon as possible," he told the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hit back at the announcement, saying the move rewarded "Hamas's monstrous terrorism" and "appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails". Watch: How did Gaza get to the brink of starvation?UK to recognise Palestinian state unless Israel meets conditionsFamine 'currently playing out' in Gaza, UN-backed experts warnFrance will recognise Palestinian state, Macron says Lammy added that the global community was "deeply offended by children being shot and killed as they reach out for aid" and called for the flow of medical equipment and supplies to be MP Dame Emily Thornberry welcomed this shift in UK policy as a "historic moment"."I have been calling on the government to take this step for months... we must not underestimate the significance of this move," she said in a Emily chairs the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, which just last week said the UK must act before there was no Palestinian state left on the ground to added: "Recognition is not a end by itself, it must be the first step to a long-term, two-state solution."Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey was critical however, saying recognition should not be used as "a bargaining chip" to apply pressure to Israel and there should be no conditions attached."Rather than use recognition, which should have taken place many months ago, as a bargaining chip, the prime minister should be applying pressure on Israel by fully ceasing arms sales, and implementing sanctions against the Israeli cabinet," he said. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said that, while she supported Palestinian statehood, doing it now would not solve the war or the humanitarian crisis. "Recognising a Palestinian state won't bring the hostages home, won't end the war and won't get aid into Gaza. This is political posturing at its very worst," she said in a social media added that Prime MInister Sir Keir Starmer was trying to fix a political problem in the Labour Party as he had faced mounting pressure from his own UK's Zia Yusuf also criticised the government's decision, telling the BBC's Newsnight programme that it was a "political calculation" by the prime minister."What this does is to trivialise, quite offensively actually, a horrendous situation in Gaza," he Tuesday's address, Sir Keir said Israel must also meet other conditions, including agreeing to a ceasefire, committing to a long-term sustainable peace that delivers a two-state solution and allowing the UN to restart the supply of added that Hamas must immediately release all hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and accept that they will play no part in the government of Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 60,034 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry.
