logo
P.E.I. landlord says rental turned into a nightmare after tenants 'ruined' her property

P.E.I. landlord says rental turned into a nightmare after tenants 'ruined' her property

Yahoo09-07-2025
When Thamara DeVries handed over the keys to her fully furnished home in Wheatley River, P.E.I., in February, she thought she was renting it to a family of four.
But shortly after move-in day, DeVries was called to help with the property's hot tub.
"I realized that there was a mom and a dad and 10 children, which is definitely not what we agreed on," DeVries told CBC News.
She said the couple confirmed the 10 children were all theirs and were all living in the house.
DeVries immediately contacted the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (IRAC), which handles disputes between landlords and tenants on P.E.I.
That began a months-long effort to evict the tenants. She said the legal process has dragged on, and in the meantime, she's watched the home deteriorate.
"That process has been incredibly painful, excruciating and draining, to say the least," she said. "We have a hard time going to bed, and our financial situation has changed quite a bit, including lawyer fees and the fact that they haven't paid any rent since April."
CBC News knocked on the door of the property in an attempt to speak to the renters, but no one answered.
Eventually — after providing the tenants with written notice that she was going to enter the property, in accordance with IRAC policy — DeVries called the police for assistance.
She said she didn't feel safe going in without officers nearby after noticing aggressive dogs on the site. Soon she saw something she found even more menacing.
"There were knives all over the door frames on every door of the main floor — all covered in knives — to prevent us from walking into the property," she said.
"We had to remove the knives and push the door in and to see the absolute disaster that it was."
Once inside, the first thing she noticed was the smell — "the worst smell you could imagine," DeVries said.
She said the downstairs of the property had been turned into a greenhouse for growing plants and all the furniture had been tossed outside, exposed to winter conditions. She also found kittens in the bathtub.
"The furniture is gone, ruined. The floors are ruined. The screen doors and all the screens on the windows are ripped. The kitchen is absolutely trashed and the carpets are absolutely filthy and… my hot tub isn't working anymore and the yard looks like a dump," she said, describing her walk through the house.
"At that point, I am beyond devastated."
Outside, she said the tenants had turned the yard into farmland and dumped several truckloads of manure on top of where her well sits. Despite repeated requests to have it moved, she said the pile remains there.
"I'm going to be left with maybe $80,000 of damages, lawyer fees to the roof and the mental stress that is … beyond anything anyone can imagine," she said.
DeVries presented photos of the damages and documents showing non-payment of rent during a hearing at the end of May. IRAC ruled the tenants had seven days to vacate.
But she said the tenants appealed the decision, arguing they couldn't find housing within a week and alleging discrimination in the rental market against large families.
"Honestly, I have no idea how any of those two things are related to me," DeVries said.
The tenants also applied for a return of rent totalling $14,500, along with "compensation for emotional distress" in the amount of $12 million, according to IRAC documents.
That application was denied, with a residential tenancy officer for the commission writing that the tenants "have not established a valid claim for a return of rent and I do not have the jurisdiction to consider the tenants' claim for emotional distress."
The next hearing between the two sides will be conducted in writing, and both sides can submit evidence later this week. It's not known when a decision will be made.
It just feels that there is a high level of injustice and the process is not fair. — Thamara DeVries, landlord
"In all rental matters, the commission endeavours to provide a timely decision to the parties, taking into account the unique circumstances of each matter," IRAC wrote in a statement to CBC News.
Meanwhile, DeVries said it pains her to see the property her family worked hard to purchase — the place where she hoped to host her daughter's wedding someday — in an unrecognizable state.
"It's the process that is killing us. It's not... that I have no evidence. It's the fact that the process is so slow and there's so many loopholes, and people know how to play the game," she said.
"It just feels that there is a high level of injustice and the process is not fair."
Conflicts between landlords and tenants are common on P.E.I., said Rowen Gallant, program manager of Renting P.E.I. at Community Legal Information.
Gallant said the office often receives calls from tenants seeking to understand their rights or needing support after a relationship with their landlord has broken down.
He added that landlords must also be informed of their responsibilities from the beginning. Renting P.E.I. offers a guide specifically for landlords.
"It helps you know what you're getting into before you before you actually get into the trouble or the trouble starts," he said.
He added that good communication and relationship-building are also crucial in preventing and managing potential conflicts. He said this applies to both tenants and landlords.
"When both parties have a firm understanding of how the legislation works and what their rights are and what their responsibilities to each other are, that always is going to give you the best chance of success at having a good relationship."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Calgary woman was unable to complete a breathalyzer test. Now, she can't drive
A Calgary woman was unable to complete a breathalyzer test. Now, she can't drive

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

A Calgary woman was unable to complete a breathalyzer test. Now, she can't drive

A Calgary woman says she had her driver's licence suspended after being unable to complete a breathalyzer test — and some experts say the situation is more common than you might think. Pam Lacusta, 58, was driving on Stoney Trail in April when she was pulled over by Calgary police, who administered a breathalyzer test. Lacusta attempted the test 30 times and couldn't complete it. The officer handed her an administrative penalty for failing to provide a proper breath sample — a penalty that carries the same consequences as driving while impaired. Now, Lacusta must complete a driver's education course and install an interlock device in her car before she can drive again. Her prior insurance now refuses to cover her. "I feel like I'm being punished for something that I never did," said Lacusta, who said she doesn't drink for religious reasons. Later on the day she was ticketed, Lacusta took a urine test at a private clinic at her own expense to prove she wasn't drinking. She sent CBC News a copy of the negative results. Edmonton-based paralegal Sandra Weber said she hears of situations like Lacusta's fairly regularly. Weber said people may struggle to complete a roadside test due to medical conditions like lung cancer or asthma, compounded by the stress of completing a test in front of an officer. Once someone has received a penalty for failing to complete a breathalyzer, she said, it can be difficult to fight. "It's up to the recipient … to prove that there was something wrong with the machine or something that the police had done wrong," said Weber, who works with Moreau Law. "It's a very challenging situation and without any medical evidence it's very difficult to overcome these types of tickets." Lacusta did appeal her penalty with a provincial adjudicator, who turned her down. Lacusta said her difficulty with the test may have been due to a recent Botox injection that kept her from making a proper seal with her mouth. She also later learned that she had two suspected rib fractures, but not in time to include that information in her appeal. 'Not enough puff' Recent research out of the University of Sheffield in the U.K. suggests there may be people without severe lung or breathing problems who nevertheless struggle to complete breathalyzer tests. "There is a small, but significant, subset of people who just don't have enough puff to be able to operate the machine successfully," said lead researcher Galen Ives, who noted that older people, short people and women are more likely to struggle. Ives said police should be more willing to offer blood or urine tests as an alternative to people who try and fail to complete breathalyzer tests, though he acknowledged there would be practical hurdles to testing at a second location. A spokesperson for the Calgary Police Service said she couldn't comment on Lacusta's situation, but said anyone who believes they are medically unable to complete a breathalyzer test should tell the officer at the scene. A spokesperson for the provincial minister of justice said if people can't provide breath samples they may be asked to provide blood or urine samples "where certain legal requirements are met." Lacusta said blood and urine tests were not offered in her situation, and she believes they should be more widely available to people who can't provide a breath sample. For now, she's relying on her friends and her bicycle to get around the city, but still hopes to fight her penalty and have her clean driving record restored.

Hiker dead after falling into waterfall near Squamish, B.C.
Hiker dead after falling into waterfall near Squamish, B.C.

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hiker dead after falling into waterfall near Squamish, B.C.

SQUAMISH — Police say a hiker has died after falling into a waterfall near Squamish, B.C. RCMP in the community north of Vancouver say they received a call Thursday evening about a hiker who had fallen into Crooked Falls in the Squamish Valley. They say crews from Squamish Search and Rescue responded and found the person, who was pronounced dead at the scene. The Mounties say rescue crews returned to recover the hiker's body on Friday. They say challenging terrain and fading daylight meant recovery hadn't been possible the night before. Police say there is no indication of criminality in the death, which is under investigation by the BC Coroners Service. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. The Canadian Press

N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him
N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him

The N.W.T. Court of Appeal has dismissed an application from former Denesoline CEO Ron Barlas. Barlas had sought to appeal an N.W.T. Supreme Court ruling against him, which ordered, among other things, his removal as CEO of Łutsel K'e Dene First Nation's (LKDFN) business arm, Denesoline Corporation. Supreme Court Justice Karan Shaner found Barlas had used his authority improperly to enrich himself and his family. In a decision Friday, Court of Appeal justices Jack Watson, Jolaine Antonio and Karen Wenkebach wrote that neither of the grounds Barlas cited for appeal — whether Shaner had given him and his wife Zeba a fair hearing, and whether the remedies granted to LKDFN were justified — had merit. The decision comes as the latest development in the wide-ranging civil lawsuit LKDFN filed against Barlas, who for years ran Denesoline Corporation. The First Nation accused him of diverting nearly $12 million from its companies for his own gain. The decision states Barlas objected to the fact Shaner's decision relied on affidavits, questioning, documents and lawyers' oral presentations, and felt she should have ordered a trial. "Barlas ... disputes various findings by [Shaner] about discreditable conduct that she found was revealed by his own words and the documentary record," the decision noted. The Court of Appeal found Shaner canvassed similar cases from other jurisdictions of Canada to help her come to a decision. The court wrote that the suggestion that Shaner's decision to not order a trial led to unfairness is "not an accurate way of looking at what happened here." It cited case law where a judge observed that the ultimate question in a fairness test isn't whether a decision was "the" fair one, but rather "a" fair one. "The appellants have no basis to claim that they did not have fair notice or opportunity to present evidence and argument," the court wrote. The Court of Appeal wrote that Shaner's findings, including her characterization of Barlas' actions and attitude, were "amply supported by the evidence."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store