How an odd star in the 'Gaia Sausage' could help solve one of astronomy's most enduring mysteries
Astronomers have discovered an exceptionally rare star that may help to solve one of astronomy's enduring mysteries: where the universe's heaviest elements came from.
The star, named LAMOST J0804+5740, resides in the Gaia Sausage (also called Gaia Enceladus), the ancient remnants of a dwarf galaxy that merged with the Milky Way roughly 8 billion to 11 billion years ago. This type of star, known as an actinide-boost star, has a high abundance of radioactive elements known as actinides.
"The actinides are the heaviest group of elements on the periodic table," Anirudh Patel, a doctoral candidate in the Theoretical High Energy Astrophysics group at Columbia University who was not involved in the study, told Space.com. "They include thorium and uranium, for example, and are produced by the r-process."
The r-process, short for "rapid neutron capture process," is a series of nuclear reactions that occur in extreme astronomical environments, like during neutron star mergers or certain types of supernovas, where atomic nuclei rapidly absorb neutrons before they have a chance to decay, becoming heavier elements.
"This is how approximately half of the elements in our universe heavier than iron are synthesized," Patel explained. "The r-process requires more extreme astrophysical environments than your typical nuclear fusion reactions that take place in the cores of massive stars. However, a complete understanding of the astrophysical origin of the r-process has remained elusive for decades."
Direct observations of the r-process in action are rare. So far, astronomers have identified two likely cosmic sites where it occurs. One is the merger of neutron stars, and more recently, Patel and colleagues reported evidence that it may also occur within extremely magnetized neutron stars called magnetars.
Although these discoveries are steps in the right direction, they still fall short of explaining how most of the universe's heavy elements came to be. Known r-process sites alone can't fully account for the observed abundance of heavy elements like uranium, thorium and gold. This is because they are too rare or infrequent to produce the sheer quantity of heavy elements we observe today, suggesting that other, yet-undiscovered sources must be contributing.
Observations of J0804+5740, the first actinide-boost star identified in the Gaia Sausage, provide an exciting new piece of the puzzle. "The study reports a comprehensive set of chemical data, identifying a new r-process enriched star," Patel said. "This, along with other data and theoretical models, will play a role in [pinning down] the origin of the r-process elements in the universe."
To determine which elements are present in a star and uncover the processes that produced them, astronomers use a technique known as atomic spectroscopy.
"The idea is that electrons occupy different energy levels in atoms," Patel said. "The spacing between these energy levels can be different inside atoms of different elements. If an atom is sitting in the atmosphere of a star, it can absorb the light from the star, and its electrons can transition between the internal energy levels. Different elements have different atomic structure[s], so they will absorb different frequencies of light during these transitions."
Using specialized instruments, scientists observe less light at specific colors where elements absorb it due to their internal energy levels. This helps them measure how much of those elements are in the star's atmosphere.
The study's scientific team was excited that, after conducting an elemental analysis, they found that J0804+5740 represents a rare example of an actinide-boost star at relatively high metallicity — the overall abundance of elements heavier than helium in a star.
Actinide-boost stars typically only show an unusually high number of actinides, like thorium and uranium, relative to other heavy elements produced by the r-process, but this boost usually appears in stars that are metal-poor or have low metallicity.
This makes J0804+5740 a bit of an oddball. "Like most r-process enhanced stars, the abundance pattern of most heavy neutron-capture elements in J0804+5740 agrees well with the solar r-process, indicating that the main r-process produced these elements in the early universe," the team wrote in a paper published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. "However, some elements exhibit deviations from [a typical] solar r-process abundance pattern."
It follows the expected pattern for very heavy elements, but it also shows an unexpectedly high abundance of lighter r-process elements, like barium, lanthanum and cerium. "[Their abundance] in the star J0804+5740 is a few times larger than in our own solar system," Patel said. "This implies that there exist multiple types of r-process sites — in particular, one that could produce a relatively high abundance of these light r-process elements."
To better understand the odd star's origins, the team analyzed the motions of J0804+5740 and similar stars. They found that actinide-boost stars are twice as likely to have come from outside the Milky Way, suggesting they were born in smaller galaxies that were later pulled into ours. This points to an important clue: The actinide-boost phenomenon may be more common in older, smaller galaxies.
Theoretical models indicate that one possible source could be a rare and powerful explosion known as a magneto-rotationally driven supernova. These extreme events could create the kind of neutron-rich environments needed to produce actinides, particularly in galaxies like the Gaia Sausage.
RELATED STORIES:
—The most powerful explosions in the universe could reveal where gold comes from
—Nearby asteroid may contain elements 'beyond the periodic table,' new study suggests
—Where does the universe's gold come from? Giant flares from extreme magnetic stars offer a clue
"The theoretical models are promising, but they are not without their uncertainties," Patel said. "More observational constraints are needed to assess how well these models reproduce what actually happens in nature."
Regardless, these elemental deviations in J0804+5740 suggest a more complex nucleosynthetic origin — possibly involving multiple types of r-process events or contributions from other processes beyond the main r-process.
"This means we don't yet have the complete picture," Patel said. "Future observations […] will reveal more about the nature of r-process sites in the universe," Patel said. "Along with new and advanced theoretical models, this will be essential to resolving the r-process mystery and completing our understanding of the origin of the elements."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
78,000-year-old footprints from Neanderthal man, child and toddler discovered on beach in Portugal
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Just before the first COVID lockdown in March 2020, Carlos Neto de Carvalho and his wife, Yilu Zhang, were walking along Monte Clérigo beach in southern Portugal. As the geologist and geographer couple scrambled over rocky outcrops and an old collapsed cliff, they stumbled on a series of ancient Neanderthal footprints. "It was early in the morning of a sunny day, with perfect light for checking tracks," Neto de Carvalho told Live Science in an email. But when they brought colleagues back to the site to take photos of the tracks, "we were almost trapped by the sudden rise of the tide and needed to swim and climb a 15-meter [49 feet] nearly vertical cliff with all our gear," Neto de Carvalho said. Their daring adventure paid off. The researchers ultimately discovered five trackways comprising 26 footprints at Monte Clérigo and, in turn, substantially increased experts' understanding of Neanderthals' activities along the Atlantic coast 78,000 years ago. "The fossil record of hominin footprints, and especially the ones attributed to Neanderthals, is exceedingly rare," Neto de Carvalho and colleagues wrote in a study published July 3 in the journal Scientific Reports, since Neanderthal footprints are nearly identical to humans'. In this case, the footprints were identified as Neanderthal because modern humans weren't in Europe at that time. Rather, evidence suggests that besides a few earlier failed attempts, Homo sapiens started leaving Africa around 50,000 years ago. Only six sets of Neanderthal footprints had been discovered previously. Along with the Monte Clérigo tracks, the researchers have reported the new finding of a single footprint from Praia do Telheiro, also in southern Portugal, bringing the total number of Neanderthal trackways discovered in Europe to eight. At Monte Clérigo, the ancient footprints were made near the shoreline in a coastal dune. Optically stimulated luminescence dating, which measures the last time a mineral was exposed to sunlight, placed the footprints in the range of 83,000 to 73,000 years old. Related: DNA of 'Thorin,' one of the last Neanderthals, finally sequenced, revealing inbreeding and 50,000 years of genetic isolation Based on the size and shape of the Monte Clérigo prints, the researchers think an adult Neanderthal male walked up and down the dune, accompanied by a child between 7 and 9 years old and a toddler under 2 years old. "The fact that in the context of Monte Clérigo infant footprints were found together with those of older individuals suggests that children were present when adults performed day-to-day activities," the researchers wrote. Because the trackways were heading both toward and away from the shore, these Neanderthals may have been foraging for food, such as shellfish. But another possibility is that the Neanderthals were practicing ambush hunting or stalking prey such as horses, deer or hares, according to the researchers, since some of the Neanderthal footprints were "overprinted" with large mammal tracks. RELATED STORIES —Endurance athletes that carry Neanderthal genes could be held back from reaching their peak —125,000-year-old 'fat factory' run by Neanderthals discovered in Germany —140,000-year-old child's skull may have been part modern human, part Neanderthal — but not everyone is convinced "At the Monte Clérigo site, the presence of footprints attributed to, at least, one male adult, one child and one toddler, negotiating the steep slope of a dune, allow us to speculate about close proximity to the campsite," the researchers wrote. But if the Neanderthals had established a camp at Monte Clérigo, no evidence of it remains today. "The presence of Neanderthals in these environments was intentional even if seasonal," the researchers wrote, "taking benefits from ambush hunting or stalking prey in a rugged dune landscape." Neanderthal quiz: How much do you know about our closest relatives?
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Never-before-seen cousin of Lucy might have lived at the same site as the oldest known human species, new study suggests
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Roughly 2.6 million-year-old fossilized teeth found in Ethiopia might belong to a previously unknown early human relative, researchers say. The teeth are from a species of Australopithecus, the genus that includes Lucy (A. afarensis). But these newly discovered teeth don't appear to belong to any known species of Australopithecus, according to a new study published in the journal Nature on Wednesday (Aug. 13). What's more, at the same site the researchers found extremely old teeth from Homo, the genus that includes modern humans (Homo sapiens). These teeth may belong to the oldest known Homo species on record, which scientists haven't yet named, the study found. These new discoveries show that at least two lineages of early hominins — a group that includes humans and our closest relatives — coexisted in the same region around 2.6 million years ago, the researchers said. Discoveries at Ledi-Geraru archaeological site The researchers found the teeth at the Ledi-Geraru archaeological site in northeastern Ethiopia, which is known for earlier groundbreaking discoveries: a 2.8 million-year-old jawbone that's the oldest known human specimen, as well as some of the oldest known stone tools made by hominins, which date to 2.6 million years ago. Paleontologists and archaeologists hypothesize that the region was an open and arid grassy plain during this period, based on grass-eating animal fossils from that time. The area offered resources Homo and Australopithecus could use, Frances Forrest, an archaeologist at Fairfield University in Connecticut who was not involved with the new research, told Live Science in an email. Grasslands and rivers would have provided water to drink, plants to eat and large animals to hunt. Related: 'Huge surprise' reveals how some humans left Africa 50,000 years ago But the unusually rich fossil record in this area could also be because of excellent preservation of remains, due to volcanic eruptions, for example — not necessarily that this was a hominin hotspot, Forrest said. Australopithecus and Homo teeth In the new study, the researchers used layers of volcanic ash above and below the newly discovered fossils to determine their age. Of the 13 teeth discovered, the team found 10 are 2.63 million years old and belonged to an unidentified species of Australopithecus, which for now the researchers are calling the Ledi-Geraru Australopithecus. Previously, researchers had found remains in the region from A. afarensis and Australopithecus garhi. But the newfound teeth look different from the teeth of those species. "It doesn't match any of these, so it could be a new species," study co-author Kaye Reed, a paleoecologist at Arizona State University, told Live Science. However, the research team hasn't officially named it as a newly identified species because the teeth don't have any especially unique features. "In the fossil record, researchers usually define a new species by finding anatomical traits that consistently differ from those of known species," Forrest said, adding that the evidence from this discovery is too limited to define a new species. The researchers also identified two teeth that are 2.59 million years old, and one that is 2.78 million years old, all belonging to the genus Homo, which Reed believes are from the same species as the oldest known Homo specimen — the jawbone discovered in Ledi-Geraru — although this hasn't been confirmed. Image 1 of 2 Study authors J. Ramón Arrowsmith and Christopher J. Campisano examine the geology of the area near the new fossils. Image 2 of 2 An aerial view of the Ledi-Geraru excavation site, home of the newly discovered fossilized teeth, and where the oldest known Homo specimen has been uncovered. The new discovery means at least three hominin species were living in this region of Ethiopia before 2.5 million years ago: the Homo and Australopithecus species these teeth belong to, as well as A. garhi. At the same time, A. africanus lived in South Africa, and Paranthropus, another hominin genus, lived in what is now Kenya, Tanzania and southern Ethiopia. This evolutionary trial-and-error within the extended hominin family is why humans' evolutionary tree is considered "bushy" rather than linear. "It has become clear over the last decade or so that during most of our evolutionary history … there have been multiple species of human relatives that existed at the same time," John Hawks, an anthropologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who was not involved in the new research, told Live Science. "The new paper tells us this is happening in Ethiopia … [in] a really interesting time frame, because it's maybe the earliest population of our genus Homo." Next steps The research team is now studying the enamel on the newfound teeth, as their chemistry can reveal what these species were eating. This may shed light on whether these hominins were eating the same things and competing for similar resources. "Right now, we can say very little with certainty about direct interaction between Australopithecus and Homo," Forrest said. "We know that both genera sometimes overlapped in time and space, but there is no behavioral evidence linking the two." RELATED STORIES —300,000-year-old teeth from China may be evidence that humans and Homo erectus interbred, according to new study —78,000-year-old footprints from Neanderthal man, child and toddler discovered on beach in Portugal —Stunning facial reconstructions of 'hobbit,' Neanderthal and Homo erectus bring human relatives to life Chimpanzees and gorillas live in some of the same forests, Hawks pointed out, but they're mostly geographically separated from each other, not living side by side. The fact these early hominins may have lived closer together than primates typically do now is interesting, Hawks said. "They probably weren't eating the same things," Reed noted. "But right now we don't really know." The researchers are also searching for more information and fossils at the site. "Everything we find is a piece in the puzzle of human evolution," Reed said. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ancient DNA suggests ancestors of Estonians, Finns and Hungarians lived in Siberia 4,500 years ago
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Present-day speakers of Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian have substantial Siberian ancestry, a new study of ancient genomes finds. These roots likely spread westward from a group of people living in the forest steppes of the Altai Mountains of Central and East Asia 4,500 years ago. Ancient DNA revealed that this group was patrilineal, or organized based on descent from fathers. However, while ancient DNA can show where a group moved over time, it's challenging to use genetics to track language. So experts have noted that the results do not definitively prove a link between speakers of these languages and the ancient DNA pattern. Migrating out of Siberia In a study published July 2 in the journal Nature, researchers analyzed 180 people who lived in northern Eurasia between the Mesolithic period and the Bronze Age (11,000 to 4,000 years ago). The team then added these individuals to a database of more than 1,300 previously analyzed ancient people, and then compared these genomes to those of modern people. One significant finding came from the genomes dating to the Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age (4,500 to 3,200 years ago). They discovered that the geographical locations of ancient people with a DNA pattern they termed Yakutia_LNBA were "unambiguously associated with ancient and present-day Uralic-speaking populations," the researchers wrote in the study. Related: Can you forget your native language? Uralic languages are a group of more than 20 tongues spoken by millions of people, but the most prominent are Estonian, Finnish and Hungarian. Linguists have been interested in these three major Uralic languages because they are different from the Indo-European ones spoken in the countries around them. "Neighboring populations speaking Indo-European languages tend not to have Yakutia_LNBA ancestry, or any other kind of East Asian ancestry," study lead author Tian Chen Zeng, a graduate student in human evolutionary biology at Harvard University told Live Science in an email. "Yakutia_LNBA ancestry is the only East Asian ancestry present in the genetic makeup of almost all present and ancient Uralic-speaking populations." The researchers identified the Yakutia_LNBA group in the bones of people who lived between 4,500 and 3,200 years ago in Siberia. They may have been part of the Ymyyakhtakh culture, an ancient culture in northeast Siberia that had ceramic technology, bronze objects and arrowheads made of stone and bone. Archaeologists had previously found that Ymyyakhtakh pottery spread south to the forest steppes of the Altai-Sayan region near the intersection of modern-day Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan and China around 4,000 years ago. The researchers suggested the Yakutia_LNBA DNA pattern may therefore be tied to prehistoric Uralic-speaking cultures. "A straightforward interpretation of this is that Yakutia_LNBA ancestry dispersed from East to West alongside the Uralic languages," Zeng said. "We show that Yakutia_LNBA may serve as an excellent tracer dye for the spread of early Uralic-speaking communities," the researchers noted in the study. The scientists also found that this group, which eventually spread westward, may have been organized by patrilineal descent, based on Y chromosome patterns in the ancient DNA. The challenges of tracking languages But the association between genetics and language is complicated to prove, particularly in the past. "One's genetic make-up offers no insight into the range of languages one might speak, nor which of these one considers their primary language," Catherine Frieman, an archaeologist at Australian National University who was not involved in the study, told Live Science in an email. Because people communicate in complex ways, "I think we need to consider how multilingualism, including across language families, may have shaped or affected language spread and change," Frieman said. RELATED STORIES —'Universal language network' identified in the brain —Scientists find 'missing link' behind first human languages —Stone Age child may have been buried with a wolf While the researchers do not address multilingualism in their study, Zeng said that "it is extremely likely that ancient populations were multilingual." However, he said, "extensive language change would have likely involved migration — or at the very least the integration of a substantial fraction of linguistic newcomers into populations across a region — to a level that is likely to leave some genetic impact." But Frieman cautions that we need to be careful not to equate a genetic cluster to a specific language or family, particularly when thinking about how past people lived their lives. Although the study presents "an interesting and welcome focus on [ancient] DNA from eastern Eurasia," Frieman said, "this particular manuscript was largely designed to answer questions about population genomics," not language, Frieman said. Stone Age quiz: What do you know about the Paleolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic?
