logo
David E. Kelley Deep Dives Into The 'Quiet, Cognitive Oppression' Of ‘Presumed Innocent,' His Knack For Adapting Books & Telling Stories From The Heart

David E. Kelley Deep Dives Into The 'Quiet, Cognitive Oppression' Of ‘Presumed Innocent,' His Knack For Adapting Books & Telling Stories From The Heart

Yahooa day ago

On a humid Friday afternoon in Austin, Texas, an audience is treated to the first episode of Presumed Innocent before creator David E. Kelley is bestowed with ATX TV Festival's inaugural Showrunner Award. Backstage, Kelley is also watching the episode for the first time in quite a while.
'I usually don't go back and watch things after they're all done…but we're really proud of this one, so it's not painful,' he jokes.
More from Deadline
David E. Kelley Is "Hopeful" For 'Big Little Lies' Season 3: "We All Want To Do It Again"
David E. Kelley Speaks Of "Compromises And Capitulations" By "Corporate Industry Partners" & "Darker Times" In Rousing Gothams Speech
Denis Arndt Dies: 'Basic Instinct' Actor And Tony Nominee Was 86
Revisiting his work isn't something he's 'philosophically opposed to' or even necessarily actively avoiding, per se, he adds.
'It's not something I do. I feel like one day I will,' he tells Deadline, sitting down for an interview ahead of his award ceremony. 'I've not seen an episode of Ally McBeal or Picket Fences in 20 years…So, I'll probably forget the plots and then I can enjoy them like a new viewer.'
Of course, Presumed Innocent is still pretty fresh on his mind. Season 1, which premiered one year ago on Apple TV+, is based on Scott Turow's novel of the same name and follows the criminal case against Chicago prosecutor Rusty Sabich (played by Jake Gyllenhaal) charged with murdering a colleague, and the nightmare at home that the murder trial visits on the family of the accused.
Kelley is currently developing a second season of the series, which will be an anthology. Season 2 will not follow any of the characters from the first season and will instead adapt Jo Murray's upcoming legal thriller Dissection of a Murder.
Presumed Innocent was initially planned as a limited series with no intentions of continuing beyond the first season, Kelley says.
'I think that the genesis of it first came from Apple [asking], 'Have we got another one in us?' And we didn't, for these characters,' he explained. 'But the themes of Presumed Innocent, the psychological thriller, the elements of infidelity and betrayal, that's timeless. So we thought maybe there's other IP that we can mine the same terrain, so people can feel they're coming to the same series, but with different storytellers. We thought, if we find the right material, we will do it, and if we don't, we won't.'
Ultimately, a few different contenders emerged, including another book by Turow. 'We chose Dissection of a Murder for year two. But in success, it could go on beyond that,' adds Kelley.
Turow has built out a bit of a universe within his novels, revisiting Rusty several times and also writing stories around other ancillary characters from Presumed Innocent. Upon learning Kelley had weighed another one of Turow's novels for Season 2, I ask if he'll consider revisiting any of those characters himself in future seasons or aims keep it a true anthology.
'We did talk about that,' he confirmed. 'My fear in doing it without Rusty is that it would feel like a subset of the whole. Jake was pretty extraordinary in Season 1. He is the face of the series. So to come back with the same ensemble and not have him be part of it, I think that it would just feel a little bit less than. So we thought better to start with a new blank page.'
Kelley never really thought he'd enjoy adapting novels. That is, until he brought Liane Moriarty's best-seller Big Little Lies to the small screen for HBO.
'Breaking [a story] is hard, hard work, and the fuel for it is often the idea. When that idea comes pre-baked or the story is already broken, you haven't got the adrenaline to supply the fuel for the writing process,' he said. 'So I thought, 'That's like being a carpenter and not getting to be the architect. I'm not sure I will like it.' But turns out, I really did.'
Generally, he explains, he is most responsive to works with strong character development, but he also very much values 'the opportunity to take departures from the original IP.'
Kelley has become known for adding unexpected twists to well known literary source material, and Presumed Innocent is no exception. An attorney by trade, Kelley surprised fans of the book by revealing an entirely different killer at the end of the eight-episode series.
'The job is never easy, whether it's original writing or adaptation. It's hard finding good stories and finding good story twists, so you're always a bit daunted coming into any project,' he said. Maybe less so with Presumed, because the architecture was so tight in that book, that probably provided me with more comfort than less, because I knew it worked. I knew it worked on the page of the book. I saw it work in the movie. Maybe the anxiety, if any, on Presumed was I don't want to be the one who screws it up.'
In the novel, Rusty's wife Barbara murders his colleague Carolyn Polhemus in a jealous rage after learning Carolyn and Rusty were having an affair. Spoiler alert, for anyone who hasn't seen the series yet, but the finale of the series instead reveals that Rusty and Barbara's daughter Jaden killed Carolyn — and Rusty, having found Carolyn's body shortly after and assuming his family was involved, ties her up like a prior victim on a case that Carolyn tried to divert suspicions.
Kelley says he didn't necessarily intend to rewrite the ending when he began adapting Presumed Innocent.
'I was open to changing the ending, and it was one of the possibilities, because we knew we had to be different from the book…Probably by [Episode] 3, I decided that it would be Jaden,' Kelley tells Deadline. 'I wanted to be true to the themes of the book.'
One thing he did know was that he wanted Barbara, played by Ruth Negga, to have a larger presence in the series than she does in the book. That set up nicely for either her eventual reveal as the murderer, or a convincing red herring to allow Kelley to surprise audiences, should he choose to shake things up.
'If she was going to be the killer, we had to figure out why, and it had to be a little bit more than jealousy. So we really started developing a pathology for her, that she was a guardian of that family, almost in a dangerous kind of way. Once we started mining Barbara's character that way, we quickly tumbled to the idea that we could do that with Jaden as well, and drawing those same personality traits, it would justify her being the killer as well as Barbara,' he explained. 'So we actually gave a few lines to Barbara early on [like], 'I will protect this family at any cost' to set up the idea that it could be her. But we gave Jaden that same DNA so it would be credible when we revealed it to be her.'
All too quickly, the Presumed Innocent premiere is nearing its end. In a few moments, Kelley will step on stage to receive his award and discuss his lengthy and illustrious television career, which spans nearly four decades and includes the likes of L.A. Law, Doogie Howser, M.D., Ally McBeal, The Practice, Big Little Lies, The Lincoln Lawyer, and Nine Perfect Strangers.
But first, he smirks as he watches Gyllenhaal go toe-to-toe with Peter Sarsgaard's Tommy Molto in the final moments of the episode, when Rusty is confronted about his affair with Carolyn, much to the surprise of the former district attorney Raymond Horgan (played by Bill Camp), who is now defending him.
'It's such a delicious scene, because this story's going on in all their faces. Raymond is hearing this stuff for the first time and trying to keep a poker face. The nuance of that scene, where Bill has to play a scene and convey that he's learning information that he hadn't heard before, but he's not playing it for the other actors in the scene. That's tricky acting,' Kelley muses. 'And Peter with Molto, it's like he doesn't want this moment to end. He has taken such shit from Rusty for so long, and now he's got the upper hand. It's like a meal. He doesn't want to wolf down. He just wants to savor it. That's what he's doing here.'
As for Gyllenhaal's display of Rusty's emotional turmoil, he adds, 'you can feel his insides churning as the walls are are closing in.'
'It's not a traditional cliffhanger type scene. There's no action sequence. No one's chasing anyone with a car or firing a bullet. This is all very quiet, cognitive oppression going on here,' Kelley explains.
The episode ends with a bombshell revelation that Carolyn was pregnant when she died, planting the ultimate seed of doubt regarding Rusty's innocence. It's got all the hallmarks of Kelley's signature style, leaving the audience with just enough intrigue to lure them to the next episode — a skill he will exercise again and again over the course of each of the remaining eight episodes.
Before he accepts his award, I have one final question for him. What piece of advice would he give himself, if he could go back in time to his first days as a television writer?
'That's a hard one, but I probably would've gave the same piece of advice that Stephen Bochco gave me when I first walked through his door and it's just start writing from here [points to his heart],' he said. 'You certainly got to think and be smart and pay attention to storytelling, but don't ever forget that it should come from here.'
Best of Deadline
Sean 'Diddy' Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial Updates: Cassie Ventura's Testimony, $10M Hotel Settlement, Drugs, Violence, & The Feds
A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media
Where To Watch All The 'John Wick' Movies: Streamers That Have All Four Films

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rick Moranis Ends Acting Hiatus for 'Space Balls 2'
Rick Moranis Ends Acting Hiatus for 'Space Balls 2'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Rick Moranis Ends Acting Hiatus for 'Space Balls 2'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors May the Schwartz be with you! "Space Balls" is back! Hollywood legend Mel Brooks has taken to social media to officially announce that "Space Balls 2" is in the works and will be releasing theatrically. I told you we'd be back — Mel Brooks (@MelBrooks) June 12, 2025 In addition to its humorous title crawl, the most stand out moment came when Dark Helmet appeared on the screen, seemingly indicating that Rick Moranis is ending his nearly 20 year film hiatus to be in the film. Now, we have confirmation. Rick Moranis during 1994 ShoWest in Las Vegas, Nevada, United States. Rick Moranis during 1994 ShoWest in Las Vegas, Nevada, United States. Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic, Inc./Getty Images According to a report from Matt Grobar of Deadline, Moranis is returning as the Schwartz master. This marks the first film Moranis has appeared in since "Brother Bear 2" in 2006 and the first theatrical release for Moranis since "Brother Bear" in 2003. Bill Pullman & Rick Moranis Returning For New 'Spaceballs'; Keke Palmer Also Set – The Dish — Deadline (@DEADLINE) June 12, 2025 Also returning from the original cast is Bill Pullman as Lonestar and, of course, Mel Brooks as Yogurt. Time will tell if Brooks will also play President Skroob. Joining these three is Keke Palmer, who most recently starred in "One of Them Days" alongside SZA. More Entertainment: For more movie and entertainment news, head on over to Newsweek Entertainment. This story is currently being updated...

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds will end with a truncated fifth season
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds will end with a truncated fifth season

Engadget

timean hour ago

  • Engadget

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds will end with a truncated fifth season

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds will only visit around 26 strange new worlds before shuttling into that cancellation sunset. The show will end with a truncated fifth season of six episodes, according to reporting by Deadline . This news is relatively surprising, given that Strange New Worlds seems like the most popular and successful show of the modern era. However, not a single newer Trek series has made it past five seasons, so maybe that's just the way things go now. It's worth remembering that Captain Kirk's narration in the original 1960s Star Trek spoke of a five-year mission. 'We're deeply grateful to Paramount+ for the chance to complete our five-season mission, just as we envisioned it, alongside our extraordinary cast and crew. And to the passionate fans who've boldly joined us on this journey," executive producers Akiva Goldsman, Henry Alonso Myers, and Alex Kurtzman said in a joint statement provided via press release. To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings. Please click here and view the "Content and social-media partners" setting to do so. This is a bummer, as Strange New Worlds is a fantastic watch, but it's not the end of the world. The show is about to premiere its third season on July 17 . A full fourth season is already in production, and the shortened fifth season will ramp up sometime in the next year. So there are still 26 episodes left to watch. That's a good amount of Trek. It's also not the end of live-action Star Trek on television screens. The upcoming Starfleet Academy has already been renewed for a second season , though that's the only new show on our radar. There have been rumblings of movies, but we aren't sure what's actually being made. A film chronicling the formation of Starfleet was announced around 18 months ago , but there hasn't been any news since then. Patrick Stewart has been openly campaigning for a Captain Picard movie, but, well, he's 84 as of this writing.

Another Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Could Start This Fall, Judge Says; Current Case Ends In Mistrial As Jury Foreman Won't Return To Deliberations
Another Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Could Start This Fall, Judge Says; Current Case Ends In Mistrial As Jury Foreman Won't Return To Deliberations

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Another Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Could Start This Fall, Judge Says; Current Case Ends In Mistrial As Jury Foreman Won't Return To Deliberations

(Updated with more details) The rape retrial of Harvey Weinstein is over with the New York jury foreman refusing to return to deliberations, but the much accused producer remains incarcerated and another trial is on the horizon. The judge in Weinstein's retrial declared a mistrial this morning on the remaining, undecided charge of third degree rape involving accuser Jessica Mann. Judge Curtis Farber's ruling came after the jury's foreman, who claimed again told the judge in open court — and away of the other jurors — that he did not want to go rejoin his colleagues into the jury room. More from Deadline Patricia Clarkson Recalls Harvey Weinstein Telling Her She'd 'Never Work Again' Graydon Carter Reveals Why Harvey Weinstein Was 'Banned' For Life From Vanity Fair Oscars Party House Set To Vote On Bill To Rescind Funding To PBS, NPR And Public Broadcasting Stations Are you willing to go back into the jury room today and continue deliberations?' Judge Farber asked Juror No. 1 today. 'No, I'm sorry,' he replied from his seat alone on the jury bench. Yesterday in a near unprecedented move, the jury found Weinstein guilty of a first-degree criminal sexual act against Miriam Haley and not guilty of the same act against Kaja Sokola. In this retrial that started in late April, the single count of third-degree rape the ailing 73-year-old Weinstein faces carries a maximum sentence of four years. However, each first-degree criminal sexual act count carries a maximum sentence of 25 years. Judge Farber has said that the Haley and Sokola verdicts will stand regardless of today's partial mistrial. Once clarification was given on the state of the other verdict delivered on Wednesday, prosecutors told the court that Mann is 'ready and willing' to testify again in a retrial. In response Judge Farber set July 2 as the next hearing date, which could see a start date penciled in for the next retrial. Judge Farber guessed from the bench that the next retrial would happen in the fall. Weinstein's defense lawyers were quick to urge the judge to speed up sentencing on the single guilty count. However, interestingly, Judge Farber declined. In another dramatic move on a dramatic morning, he told the courtroom Thursday he would not separate the Mann charge from the indictment under which he was convicted Wednesday of assaulting Haley. Which means Harvey Weinstein won't know for many months how long he is going to sit in a New York state prison on this Empire State sex crimes. With Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg expected to address today's events soon, lead defense lawyer Arthur Aidala said outside the courthouse that Weinstein will be appealing the Haley verdict. The attorney stated that jury misconduct would form the basis of the appeal. Every before today's shocking developments, the foreman had come before the judge repeatedly since Friday, in court and in chambers, to say he felt threatened by other jurors. After declaring the mistrial, Judge Farber brought the full jury out to tell them he was ending their deliberations. 'I understand this particular deliberation was more heated than some others,' he said, with some understatement. When Judge Farber excused the jury, the foreman exited first, walking through a side door at a noticeably quicker pace than the other men and women behind him. Judge Farber also left the courtroom for a brief spell. When he returned, the judge said to the lawyers and others in the court that he had spoken to the other eleven jurors to thank them for their work. Judge Farber added that 'all eleven' spontaneously expressed to him that they were 'extremely disappointed' they did not get to complete their deliberations. 'They did not understand why the foreperson bowed out,' Farber proclaimed 'They thought they were still in the course of deliberations and were hopeful to reach a verdict.' He continued with some lament: 'They did not describe anything that rose to the level of threats.' Up until this unique morning, to put it mildly, the seven-woman, five-man panel have been in deliberations since June 4 with tensions emerging repeatedly. It took five days for a previous Empire State jury took to reach a verdict in Weinstein's 2020 sex crimes trial. Sentenced to 23 years in state prison five years ago, Weinstein saw that case tossed out last year by a New York Court of Appeals based on its decision of the improper inclusion of prior bad acts testimony by the previous judge. After days of open tension out of the jury room, the foreman Wednesday came to Judge Farber expressing frustration and even fear in what was going on behind closed doors. Amid all that drama, the judge rejected the foreman's efforts to exit the case and denied a defense motion to get a mistrial declared. However, to cool things off a bit, Judge Farber did send the panel home early on June 11. Weinstein may not have taken the stand, but he was very vocal in court Wednesday. 'This is my life that's on the line, this is not fair,' he proclaimed. 'I'm not getting a fair trial.' Judge Farber's early exit decision on June 11 was preceded by getting a partial verdict out of the jurors. Having created a possible legal mess, the jury found Weinstein guilty on Count 1 of a criminal sexual act in the first degree against Miriam Haley. Pressed by the judge for an answer, the jury also found the ex-mini-mogul not guilty of the same charge involving Sokola, and offered no verdict Wednesday on Jessica Mann. RELATED: Still incarcerated due to his 16-year sentence on a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles, the much-accused Weinstein and his team have spent the past several months trying to rehabilitate the ex-Miramax boss' reputation with the anticipation of the #MeToo backlash of the past year or so. Weinstein had a self-pitying and widely covered jailhouse conversation with right-wing commentator Candace Owens in March. That effort saw the likes of the hugely influencial Joe Rogan express a reassessment of Weinstein. Ignoring the fact that Weinstein's case is in state court, not federal, some have even floated that Donald Trump could pardon the one-time big-time Democratic donor. On June 6, via phone, Weinstein told Fox 5's Good Day New York that while he acted 'immorally, nothing he ever did was 'illegal.' This is despite the fact that more than 100 women, from the famous to interns and others, have come forward since the deeply sourced 2017 New York Times exposé of Weinstein to tell their tales of abuse and assault by him. Allegations that Weinstein has been convicted of on both coasts and settled in several civil cases with big payoffs. It is money and fame that is behind most of these claims, the defense has been asserting in the retrial. Last week, defense lawyer and frequent CNN guest Arthur Aidala told the jury in his closing argument that accusers Jessica Mann, Miriam Haley and Kaja Sokola are 'all women with broken dreams … they're all women who wanted to cut the line.' Portraying the trio of accusers as having engaged in consensual sex with Weinstein, Aidala, who represented Steve Bannon in the MAGA warlord's fundraising fraud case, attempted to make his client the real victim. The lawyer pointed the finger at Mann, former Project Runway production assistant Haley and Polish model Sokola for using 'their youth, their beauty, their charm, their charisma to get stuff' from Weinstein. In the prosecution's closing argument, with her boss Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg looking on in the courtroom, Assistant DA Nicole Blumberg offered a perspective on Weinstein's decades of power in Hollywood, making and breaking careers. 'He also used that same power to isolate women, to trap women into places where he'd be alone with them and to rape them,' she told the jury. 'That's not fame,' Blumberg added of the trio coming forward to tell their stories publicly — again, in two cases. 'Nobody wants that.' Making that point more bluntly, Haley at one juncture in her highly emotional testimony called Weinstein a 'f*cking assh*le' on the stand. The witness later ran out of the courtroom crying under intense questioning from defense lawyer Jennifer Bonjean over what she was wearing the night in 2006 when she claims Weinstein forced himself on her in his Soho apartment. Regardless of the verdict the New York jury could have delivered and a new jury may deliver on the next retrial, Weinstein still has his L.A. conviction to deal with. If the Oscar-winning Shakespeare in Love producer is found innocent on all the East Coast charges, he will be packed on a plane in a matter of days to sit in a cell on the West Coast while the appeal of his L.A. case continues. Which is to say, despite the partial mistrial today Harvey Weinstein isn't going to be a free man anytime soon. Best of Deadline 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store