Open Letter: Standing In Solidarity With Te Pūkotahitanga
Te Whāriki Manawāhine o Hauraki, Te Whakaruruhau Waikato Women's Refuge and The Basket Hauraki (Tangata Tiriti Rōpū), stand in solidarity with Te Pūkotahitanga following the Crown's unilateral disbanding of this critical tangata whenua collective.
As collectives serving whānau across Hauraki and Waikato, we speak alongside our wider hapori and social service partners, in our concern about the Crown's ongoing failure to honour Te Tiriti based partnership and Te Aorerekura commitments.
What Happened
On 26 June 2025, Te Pūkotahitanga formally advised Minister Chhour of their decision to reclaim the gifted names Te Pūkotahitanga and Te Puna Aonui from all Crown use. These names were not branding assets but taonga, gifted with purpose, tikanga, and expectation. When the Crown failed to uphold those responsibilities, Te Pūkotahitanga exercised their customary right to reclaim them.
The following day, Minister Chhour announced she was disbanding Te Pūkotahitanga and dropping the names from government use, without acknowledging that tangata whenua had already reclaimed these taonga or the tikanga based reasoning behind this decision.
Upholding Te Tiriti Obligations
Te Pūkotahitanga was established under Te Aorerekura as a critical mechanism to ensure Māori led solutions, shared leadership, and cultural integrity in our national strategy to eliminate family and sexual violence. This is a serious breach of Te Tiriti obligations and Te Aorerekura commitments.
The reclaiming of the gifted names by tangata whenua leaders is not a political gesture. It is a tikanga based response to the Crown's failure to honour its responsibilities. Decisions of this significance must be made in partnership, not imposed unilaterally.
Supporting Māori Led Solutions
Our experience a cross our communities demonstrates that effective responses to violence require cultural frameworks that acknowledge whakapapa, whanaungatanga, and tikanga. We reject any suggestion that Māori names or tikanga based leadership exclude others.
Many of our hapori partners carry their own intergenerational experiences of violence, healing, and whakapapa responsibilities. We uphold tikanga not to exclude, but to ensure that solutions reflect the lived realities of the whānau most affected. The lived experience of tangata whenua IS the expertise required to address intergenerational trauma and violence and is essential to achieving the vision of Te Aorerekura. To remove this voice from national decision making is not just short sighted; it is grossly negligent when whānau safety is at stake.
Our Resolve
We, as collectives across Hauraki and Waikato, remain committed in our support for Māori led approaches and advocate for the reinstatement of meaningful Māori leadership mechanisms in national governance. We will continue our mahi to protect and heal our whānau through culturally grounded practices and call on the Crown to honour its Te Tiriti obligations.
We are not stepping back. We are stepping forward to protect the mana of our mokopuna.
Call for Accountability
We call on Minister Chhour and the Government to acknowledge the essential role of Te Tiriti based partnership in addressing family and sexual violence. They must reinstate meaningful mechanisms for tangata whenua leadership and recognise that effective solutions require the expertise and leadership of those most affected.
We will continue to stand with Te Pūkotahitanga and all those working to ensure that tangata whenua voices remain central to the kaupapa of ending family and sexual violence across Aotearoa.
Ngā manaakitanga
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Heather Roy and Tim Batt Part 1
Te Aro School teacher Serah Mehrtens reads 'At the Marae' to her class. She says her pupils have not struggled with Māori words in the book. Photo: RNZ / John Gerritsen Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Heather Roy and Tim Batt. First, the Education Minister ordered an almost total ban on Maori words in a series of books used to teach five-year-olds - the panel hears from the Education Institute president. Then, house prices have slumped to their lowest since the Covid-era boom. What's driving the property market down? Coality principle property economist Kelvin Davidson explains.
NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Proposed Pae Ora health bill changes concern Rotorua Iwi Māori Partnership Board
The Government's proposed legislative changes to the health system 'threaten to remove iwi's meaningful participation' on the future of Māori health, the Rotorua area Iwi Māori Partnership Board (IMPB) says. Te Taura Ora o Waiariki attended the national IMPB hui on August 7 and 8 in New Plymouth where IMPBs
Newsroom
9 hours ago
- Newsroom
Crown and council to take voting edge over Māori on Waitakeres body
Joint oversight of the Waitakere Ranges by Māori, Auckland Council and the Crown will not now be through a committee with equal representation after feedback from west Aucklanders, some opposed to 'co-governance'. From initial proposals of an equal five seats for tangata whenua and five representing public bodies, the latest deed to establish the oversight committee has moved to six to five in favour of the council and Crown entities. The change leaves west Auckland-based iwi Te Kawerau ā Maki feeling 'a little bruised, and beaten up' after years of waiting, but accepting it 'could live with' the council's change of representation and wanting to get on and protect the ranges. Iwi chief executive Edward Ashby told Newsroom: 'It was pretty clear there was a fear – and I do think it is an irrational fear because it's an advisory body and we are not the boogie man. But we are really focused on the outcome. We are not too worried by the numbers.' The deed for the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area Forum, a body to be set up under a 2008 law but only now being finalised, goes before Auckland Council's policy and planning committee on Thursday. The Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act recognised the 27,700 hectares of publicly owned land in the ranges as nationally significant, needing protection. It specified the Crown, council and nominated iwi to develop the deed and oversight body, a non-statutory body to identify areas of cooperation and develop a strategic plan for the area. It aims to identify areas tangata whenua can contribute to the management of public land and to acknowledge their traditional relationship with the ranges. The five seats for Māori are initially to be taken up by Te Kawerau ā Maki, as another iwi listed in the Act, Ngāti Whātua, has declined. Under the deed, there will be no change of ownership of land under the deed or forum structure, and the forum would not be able to direct spending of council or Crown funds, other than its own delegated budget. In April, the New Zealand First party complained the forum would be an example of 'co-governance' with Māori able to set strategy and veto council or government measures related to the ranges. MP Shane Jones said his party would never agree to an iwi having '50 percent sovereignty over the Waitakere forest'. Ashby dismissed the criticisms in April as scaremongering and said the forum as proposed was not co-governance. If it had been, there would have been a different structure and entity established. The deed simply acknowledged tangata whenua's special relationship with the ranges area. Around 2250 people and organisations made public submissions on the heritage forum deed, with 51 percent in favour, 39 percent against and 10 percent recorded as 'other'. Analysis of the submissions by research firm Ipsos said there was concern among those opposed to the deed at the prospect of 50-50 representation on the joint committee giving tangata whenua 'disproportionate influence' over management of the public land. Those in favour of the deed and shared oversight acknowledged the iwi role of kaitiaki or guardian and the importance of tangata whenua having a strong voice and seat at the table. It appears that public feedback, rather than the political claims by NZ First and the Act Party, has now seen the forum membership weighting changed to favour the public bodies. Council staff recommend three seats for the Waitakere Local Board, two for the council governing body and one for the Department of Conservation – and five seats to be occupied by Te Kawerau ā Maki, to be shared with Ngāti Whātua should that iwi choose at a later date to participate. The role of chair would come from the iwi side and deputy chair from the public bodies. Waitakere ward councillor Shane Henderson says the composition of the forum changed 'in response to feedback, not to scaremongering from central government politicians but the voices of West Aucklanders that fed back into the process'. He said the new balance allowed half of the six-member Waitakere local board to join the forum, with two ward councillors. DoC's strong interests in the heritage area also needed representation. 'So the new numbers work a little better on that basis too.' Te Kawerau ā Maki chief executive Edward Ashby. Photo: Supplied Ashby says the change in representation came after the consultation and was put to Te Kawerau ā Maki by the council. 'It's a place the council came to that we could live with at the end of the day. It's about giving these people some certainty that there would not be a super majority of Māori on the committee. There's been a lot of misunderstanding of the original proposal. 'It's good the deed is out there and people can read it; it clearly says it's advisory, about public land, it does not have power to make any decisions about budgets. That's all in there.' He said the political claims from Jones and Act's David Seymour, among others, led to fears among some members of the public. 'I do understand that if you are reading scaremongering headlines on Facebook you might react. It's unfortunate. 'It's just the political reality of the time. The original proposal was for 50-50, not out of any power grab but simply that the Crown and council was on one side of the equation and on the other side was Te Kawerau ā Maki and Ngāti Whātua. It was as simple as that.' He noted much of the feedback against the proposed deed had come from beyond Waitakere and Auckland. 'But, there's this beautiful area. It's our heartland and I'm biased. It really needs to be looked after. We really need to get together on how we make it work.' The six-five composition of the forum was 'at least an outcome that takes some of the edge out of some people's concerns, even though I think they were not well-founded concerns'. He hoped the compromise result did not turn the clock back in other areas of the country. 'I like to think most New Zealanders are fair minded … and I would hope that progress made is not lost. There's been some really good progressive stories.' The council's policy and planning committee considers the proposed deed on Thursday, with the full Governing Body having the final say before the forum is appointed. Ashby says: 'We just want to get on with it.'
