logo
You can oppose Israel's policies without killing Jewish people

You can oppose Israel's policies without killing Jewish people

The Guardian2 days ago

It happened again. The third time this year that Jewish people were attacked with murderous intent in a major US city under the guise of the assailant caring about the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza. It's the second time that fires were set. The first happened when an attacker – a US citizen – broke into the official residence of Pennsylvania's governor in Harrisburg, on the evening of Passover and set fire to the residence. The only thing that saved governor Josh Shapiro and his family was a quick response from security guards, leaving only some Passover Haggadahs, the text that charts Jewish hopes for freedom and liberation from one generation to the next, to burn on the tables still set from dinner.
About two weeks ago, there was the murder of two innocent Jewish Israeli embassy workers who were attending an event hosted by the The American Jewish Committee at the Jewish Museum in Washington DC on how to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza; these young people were chosen at random from a crowd apparently targeted intentionally since the murderer, again a US citizen, appeared to have wanted to hunt down and kill Jews in response to Israel – a sovereign country's – military acts. Tellingly, the gunman had a brief association to the far-left Party of Socialism and Liberation (PSL said in a statement that he is not a member and that his association with the group ended in 2017).
And now, again with the element of fire, we wait for word on the condition of at least 12 victims of a torching in broad daylight in downtown Boulder, Colorado, by an assailant named Mohamed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national, who yelled 'Free Palestine' and scorched the skin of activists ranging from their 50s to the 80s who gathered peacefully in that square each week demanding one thing: bring the Israeli hostages still held by Hamas home.
This group of activists, part of the international movement that posts on Twitter/X as #RunForTheirLives walks and runs each week, in Boulder, in New York's Central Park, in Mexico and around the world, in support of freeing the hostages. They also post this missive for participants, beginning by asking: 'Should I be scared to participate?' Their response: 'That's a valid concern these days. Make your best judgment to decide if it's safe. However, we encourage a couple of principles to make this safer: don't protest! Don't disturb your neighbors. Do it quietly and don't block roads. Be polite and peaceful. Focus on humanity. This is about innocent children, women, the elderly, and other civilians being held by terrorists – not about the war. We encourage carrying flags of all countries from which there are hostages.'
They encouraged bringing kids. 'This is a family-friendly event. It is non-violent and does not focus on the traumatic events that occurred during the hostages' captivity. Our events are meant to be quiet and peaceful.'
Jews demonstrating in an open town square were burned solely because they are Jews. It's way past time; there needs to be a real and deep understanding of how ugly some factions of the US left became, both pre and post 7 October's attack by Hamas, with a delegitimizing ideology about 'settler colonialism' the wishful erasure of Israel as a state by proclaiming support for a future Palestine in a region where some protesters hope to annihilate Israel, silencing of Israeli and Jewish voices even when they are voices of protest against Benjamin Netanyahu's government or even if the assailant has no idea what the victim's position is on Israeli policies. This desire for erasure opened the floodgates to those who think they are being one of the team by killing with a slogan as their battle cry.
This is not about parsing legalisms of whether it is a legitimate protest to harm or kill civilians. It isn't. Full stop. (And, I have said and written the same thing regarding Palestinian civilians being killed and will continue to write and protest any innocent civilians being killed. I also reject any attempts by any person or group or government to blame all Palestinians for Hamas's actions. Also, perhaps it needs to be said here and time again: I fully support, and have spent my life fighting for, freedom and self-determination for the Palestinian people, acknowledging the rights of two people to one plot of land).
One of the first things I did after 7 October was to purchase and wear a Jewish star around my neck. In my 69 years, I had never worn my religion or my identity on my person. But since 7 October, perhaps defying the odds – but more so, wearing my pride, I purchased a star which I wear proudly. In solidarity with those in Israel and around the world who are demanding that the Israeli hostages come home, I also wear a yellow ribbon affixed to my bag whenever I leave my home. It is perhaps the sort of symbol that is an 'if you know, you know,' but I want the world to know two things: this is not OK, and no one will scare me off because of my Jewish identity or my support for an end to the poisonous Hamas's incursion of 7 October.
I intensely hope this is obvious: you can oppose policies without setting people on fire because they are Jewish. The majority of US Jews overwhelmingly oppose the Israeli prime minister's policies. But subtleties get lost and truly unleashed people react. The leftwing reaction to an horrific action like this has to be swift and soul-searching. Again, while this current perpetrator apparently has no ties to the left, the rhetoric of the left – and the actions of some leftwing organizations – have to be examined. Imagine a situation where there was in fact an American left that embraced peace efforts on both sides instead of demonizing one side or the other, which is by the way, a mirror image of what the right wing does. Two sides. Two peoples.
I write this as someone whose entire life has been lived on the left, as a prominent activist and one who continues to believe in my gut in the values of a humanitarian left. I won't allow a very real fear to stop me from being a proud Jew or an outspoken leftist demanding my rightful place in the lexicon of what must be an inclusive movement, promoting humanity for all and freedom for all. No erasures. No exceptions. I write this as someone whose entire life has been lived on the left, as a prominent activist and one who continues to believe in my gut in the values of a humanitarian left. I won't allow a very real fear to stop me – not to stop me from being a proud Jew or an outspoken leftist demanding my rightful place in the lexicon of what must be an inclusive movement promoting humanity for all and freedom for all. No erasures. No exceptions.
Meanwhile, it's important to also call out the sickening and cynical usage of antisemitism on the right by Donald Trump and his allies. The US president is handily and cynically already using the Boulder attack to attack all immigrants and to promote his heartless expulsion agenda with barely a mention of the victims of the crime. He has used antisemitism throughout his term in the most cynical of ways, never showing any genuine interest in eradicating it or embracing the victims. He pretty much ignored the heinous attack on Shapiro, most likely because Shapiro is a vocal and effective opponent of Trump. And, of course, Trump's Darth Vader imitator Stephen Miller is hard at work using these crimes to promote his anti-American agenda to attack immigrants in the US as well as attack universities and legitimate protest. Trump's destructive weaponizing of antisemitism to promote his own authoritarian agenda will not keep one Jew safe: in fact, it does the opposite.
Jews don't want to be played by the left or the right. We don't want to be pawns tossed back and forth. We want to be safe. We want to be heard. We want to be seen in our diversity, as would any people. We don't want our lives to be at risk. Listen to and watch what each person says. See each person as an individual. Please build a serious political program that doesn't cancel or promote violence of any kind but rather lifts up the hopes and desires of everyone. The alternative is deadly.
Jo-Ann Mort is co-author of Our Hearts Invented a Place: Can Kibbutzim Survive in Today's Israel? She writes frequently about Israel for US, UK, and Israeli publications

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's proposed ‘immigrant worker tax' will drive money transfers underground, experts warn
Trump's proposed ‘immigrant worker tax' will drive money transfers underground, experts warn

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Trump's proposed ‘immigrant worker tax' will drive money transfers underground, experts warn

Donald Trump's proposed tax on immigrant workers sending money home from America will take billions out of poor economies and drive the transfers underground, aid and industry experts have warned. The US president wants to impose a 3.5 per cent tax on remittance transfers sent by anyone who is not an American citizen, as part of his 'big beautiful' tax bill currently passing through Congress. The new tax would apply to an estimated 40m people in the US, including those with green cards or on working visas, and would include Britons working in America. The tax comes as part of broader legislation to cut down on illegal migration, and will make America the most expensive G7 country for workers to send money home from. The measure would effectively cut the amount of money being sent back home, experts say, hitting families that rely on remittances as an economic lifeline. Some countries in Latin America stand to lose as much as one per cent of their Gross National Income from the measure, research has estimated, with more money sent home from the United States than any other country in their world. The proposed tax also comes on top of sweeping cuts to US foreign aid which has already left large holes in the government budgets of many poor countries. Mexico stands to lose the most money in absolute terms, or around $2.6bn (£1.9bn) annually, according to modelling from the Centre for Global Development, a Washington-based global development think tank. But in terms of the proportion of their income, the worst hit will be El Salvador at just over 1 per cent, Honduras at 0.9 per cent and Jamaica at 0.7 per cent. Several African countries will also be badly hit, including the Gambia and Liberia. The centre said: 'For many countries, the remittance tax would be a further crushing blow after the recent cuts to US aid. 'For example, Liberia is a country heavily reliant on both foreign aid and remittances: a quarter of the country's foreign assistance came from the US, and remittances totalled more than three times Liberia's bilateral foreign aid in 2023. 'The US aid cuts were already projected to remove the equivalent of 2 per cent of GNI; even though it is small, the remittance tax will remove another 0.2 per cent.' Remittances sent back to Mexico have already fallen sharply, as Mr Trump has vowed to toughen up immigration enforcement and enact mass deportations. Mexico earlier this week said it had received 12 per cent less in April from a year earlier. Economists said the fall was due to a slowing US labour market and fear of deportation among immigrant workers. Gabriela Siller, director of economic analysis at Grupo Financiero Base, told Bloomberg: 'This was due to the fact that migrants in the United States are afraid to go out to work and send remittances because they could be deported.' Remittances are a huge part of the global economy, with the World Bank estimating that some $656bn (£484bn), equivalent to the GDP of Belgium, was sent home by workers abroad in 2023. The flow of money is deemed so important for development, that the United Nations has targets to bring the cost of remittances down by 2030. World Bank figures show that in the third quarter of 2024, the global average cost of sending a remittance of $200 (£148) was 6.62 per cent. The majority of that cost was taken up by fees to the provider, such as a bank, mobile phone app, or transfer firm like Western Union. The rest of the cost was due to foreign exchange margin. Looking at the G7 richest countries alone, the average cost to send money home was an average of 6.14 per cent, including 6.03 per cent in the US and 5.75 per cent in Britain. Mr Trump's new tax would put the US cost close to 10 per cent. Under the legislation, the tax would start in 2026 and hit anyone who is not a US citizen or US national, including green card holders and those visiting for work. Banks and money transfer services would collect the tax for every transaction and hand it on to the US Treasury, according to FXC Intelligence. Yet experts said the measure risked instead forcing large sums out of heavily regulated financial channels and into more informal underground routes which have no safeguards against money laundering, or criminal financing. The Atlantic Council this week said: 'Countries that have enacted punitive measures on cross-border payments and currency exchange have often undermined their own ability to combat financial crime, thereby weakening their economies and diminishing their foreign influence.' An original version of the bill wanted the tax to be set at five per cent, but it was cut back at the last minute. The current version is heading to the Senate and is expected to still face stiff opposition from transfer companies. Payments-industry trade groups representing companies like Western Union and Visa have written to Congress members saying the measure would hit migrants sending money back to relatives, on top of posing a greater money-laundering risk. The letter said: 'This provision would create a dangerous new precedent with respect to government overreach by invading the privacy of Americans, harming American businesses, and - for the first time - intruding on payment transactions between private individuals.' 'Everyday Americans would be asked to turn over sensitive identification information in order to use a regulated and licenced financial services provider to conduct ordinary, everyday financial transactions.'

Musk didn't have to defeat the swamp, he had to defeat Maga and he failed
Musk didn't have to defeat the swamp, he had to defeat Maga and he failed

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Musk didn't have to defeat the swamp, he had to defeat Maga and he failed

Elon Musk's mistake, it seems, was believing Republicans and Donald Trump when they told him they cared about America's debt. Just a week or so ago, when Musk was taking leave of the White House, he had a ceremony in which Trump praised him and his efforts, and gave him a pretty model of a key, saying he could come back any time. But now Musk has broken ranks and broken silence, calling Trump's only significant piece of legislation a sham. Musk's right. It is. But it might be too late to save America's fiscal position. For a hundred and thirty days, Musk and his boys prowled the bureaucracy, looking for fat to trim. They got access to databases and to bank accounts. They found – in their own estimation – hundreds of millions of dollars of, for instance, redundant annual subscriptions for unused software. And they were used as a battering ram and an excuse for many very dubious cuts, some of which will cost lives: cuts to USAID, cuts to disease prevention, cuts to things that cost very little but have such extraordinary externalities in terms of keeping African birth rates manageable by decreasing child mortality that cutting them is the falsest of false economies. But let's take Musk at his word. He wants to cut the budget so the US government can control its debt. Interest rates are rising – returning to historically normal levels. This is murder, it's death, it's failure, to countries like Britain and America who are currently borrowing more than ever before and running unsustainable deficits on top of that borrowing. Debt interest will drown us. Our states will collapse. Everything will cost more than it has ever cost. This is inevitable without a sound fiscal policy. But most Republicans only say they care about that in an election year. They want to increase spending in their districts. They want their favoured groups to get subsidies. They all have squeaky wheels in mind that need the grease. Trump's headline piece of legislation, the Big Beautiful Bill, is guaranteed to jack up American borrowing to end of the world levels. Musk correctly calls the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' He correctly says that those with conscience must 'kill the bill.' He threatened those Republicans in the House of Representatives who voted for the bill with primary challengers; he said they have betrayed their country and there will be consequences. But apart from three all House Republicans voted for the bill. Even a man as rich as Musk can't fund that many primary opponents. There is safety in numbers, particularly if you are exploding the national debt for selfish, short-term reasons of your own popularity. Musk is right. America's national debt is terribly large. He's right that the federal budget is insane and needs radical surgery. He's correct that the trend in American fiscal policy is one of deranged adding to the debt at all times. Correct, too, that democracy dies when the people – or the vested interests – discover they can vote themselves more money until the state capsizes. (The same thing has been happening in Britain since the First World War.) But Musk was wrong when he believed Donald Trump or those of his surrogates. Trump has declared corporate bankruptcy a number of times. He is continually receiving cash injections from supporters, from people who want things. His previous presidency precipitously increased America's national debt, even as – for most of those four years – the economy boomed and roared ahead. Trump loves debt. Trump loves borrowing. He'll borrow until the end. Musk ought to have learnt that lesson by now.

British defence giant to make satellites for Trump's missile shield
British defence giant to make satellites for Trump's missile shield

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

British defence giant to make satellites for Trump's missile shield

British defence giant BAE Systems is to build satellites for a new American missile-tracking system that is poised to form part of Donald Trump's 'Golden Dome'. On Thursday, the FTSE 100 company said it had secured a $1.2bn (£880m) contract from the US Space Force to provide 10 satellites for the Pentagon's missile warning and missile tracking programme. The constellation will sit in a medium Earth orbit – between 1,000 miles and 22,000 miles above the planet's surface – and track threats including intercontinental ballistic missiles and hypersonic missiles. It is eventually expected to form part of the US president's broader Golden Dome, a $175bn proposal to stitch together a network of land and space-based sensors and interceptors to shoot down missiles aimed at the United States. Lt Col Brandon Castillo, of the US Space Force, said the system being provided by BAE would 'provide accurate real-time information to decision-makers'. He added: 'This allows for additional resiliency in the missile warning and tracking satellite architecture.' The satellites will use infrared sensing technology and, along with another batch commissioned under the same programme, will have 'the ability to track hypersonic missile threats anywhere on the globe', Space Force said. They are planned for delivery from 2029 onwards. Mr Trump announced the Golden Dome plans last month, reviving an idea for a global missile shield that was first mooted by former president Ronald Reagan in the 1980s – dubbed 'Star Wars' at the time. The Reagan proposals have since been credited with kicking off a fresh arms race that piled fresh financial pressures on the Soviet Union before its eventual collapse. However, experts have questioned whether, even today, it is technically and financially feasible. The Trump administration's idea has also been partly inspired by the 'Iron Dome' missile shield used by Israel to defend itself against rocket attacks, over a smaller area. Interest in the system has grown amid fears about the capabilities of new hypersonic missiles developed by China and Russia, which American defence planners fear could slip through their defences in a conflict. Mr Trump has vowed that his system will be able to block all kinds of missiles, including nuclear weapons, using 'super technology'. 'This is very important for the success and even survival of our country. It's a pretty evil world out there,' he said last month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store