Police reveal outcome of Kneecap Glastonbury probe
Police concluded there was "insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction for any offence" after reviewing video and audio recordings.
The investigation was launched in June after officers examined footage from both Kneecap's and punk duo Bob Vylan 's sets at the festival.
Avon and Somerset Police confirmed they are still investigating comments made by rapper Bobby Vylan, who led chants of, "Death, death to the IDF".
A Kneecap member had joked about fans starting a riot at a bandmate's upcoming court appearance related to a terrorism charge, later clarifying it was for "love and support, and support for Palestine".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
11 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘Letting my boyfriend choke me during sex left me bruised & terrified' – rise of deadly kink GLORIFIED to TikTok teens
FEELING her boyfriend's hands wind around her neck as he bore down on top of her in bed, nurse Paige Jones felt a rush of adrenaline. But that feeling quickly turned to panic when his grip became so tight she felt herself struggling for breath and starting to lose consciousness. 8 8 "I was turning blue," she told The Sun. "It terrified both of us, and we stopped immediately. "Thankfully I wasn't seriously hurt, though I had a lingering cough and a bruise I had to cover with make-up." The couple's horrifying experience is far from an isolated incident, with social media sites like TikTok awash with disturbing videos and hashtags glorifying the deadly trend of choking during sex, a Sun investigation can reveal. One blonde influencer with millions of followers recently uploaded a video with the chilling caption: "How I think I look getting choked vs what I actually look like." The accompanying footage, showing a man's hand tightly gripping her throat, has racked up nearly half a million likes and thousands of comments. Such is the concern that sex education in schools in England will now include warnings to teenagers about the dangerous act's potentially fatal consequences. Experts are warning that children as young as 13 are being exposed to graphic content online that glorifies rough sex, including breath play - a dangerous act that can cause serious harm or even death. As well as being potentially fatal, strangling is linked to strokes, memory problems, seizures, incontinence, difficulty swallowing, depression, anxiety and even miscarriage. In extreme cases women have died at the hands of men who strangled them during intercourse. They include tragic Georgia Brooke, 26, from Ossett, West Yorkshire, who was fatally choked by Luke Cannon, 31, while they couple were having sex in 2022. Devastated Cannon took his own life the following day. Mum's chilling final moments before she was strangled to death by killer lover who claimed it was 'sex game gone wrong' 8 8 Paige, 31, admits she used to enjoy 'rough sex' with her partner and encouraged him to choke her. "I love passionate sex - the kind that's intense, steamy and full of energy," she said. 'For me, that used to include hair pulling, spanking, and choking." Recalling the day her boyfriend took it too far, Paige says: 'His hands were around my neck and I started to lose consciousness. 'My partner felt incredibly guilty and promised he'd never do it again - it really shook us. 'Since then we've stuck to safer options, and we're both more aware of the risks involved." 'Wall of awfulness' 8 8 Fiona Mackenzie, founder of pressure group We Can't Consent to This, is among those calling for a crackdown on vile online content. She tells The Sun: 'TikTok has video after video of - usually young - women either simulating strangulation or saying, 'Strangulation is great.' "It's just this wall of awfulness. 'Young women have told us that this was the key way that [strangling in sex] has been normalised for them - through TikTok and other lighter platforms that welcome children.' Our probe found 28,000 videos on TikTok with strangulation content. One sick clip shows a man in a mask simulating strangling someone, with the vile caption: "Choking the life out of my victim." Another shows a man grabbing a woman by the throat, captioned: "I knew I was the problem when I love when he choked me [sic]." In a third, a young woman smiles to herself beneath the text: "Me remembering the last time I was choked!" Fiona adds: 'The idea that [as a child] you'd be exposed to these gorgeous young girls who are not much older than you, who are showing you how to get choked by your boyfriend, is monstrous. The idea that [as a child] you'd be exposed to these gorgeous young girls who are not much older than you, who are showing you how to get choked by your boyfriend, is monstrous Fiona Mackenzie 'We also found that if you type in choking or you see choking content, [TikTok] will then suggest search terms to you like breath play, asphyxiation and plastic bagging. 'These platforms are supposed to be moderated but they're just slow and often don't do it. 'Meanwhile parents just assume that it's fine for their teens to browse on TikTok, and that the algorithm will only show them stuff that they actually want to see.' Children will be taught that strangulation is a criminal offence under new sex education guidance published in England. Pupils will learn that applying pressure to someone's neck or covering their mouth and nose is illegal, even without visible injury. Alarming surge The updated sex education guidance - its first major overhaul since 2020 - urges secondary schools to address the alarming surge in the influence of the so-called 'manosphere' and incel culture, along with new forms of harm linked to pornography. Toxic influencer Andrew Tate has also been blamed for the alarming rise in young men chocking partners during sex, after posts promoting the idea of male dominance and sexual control online. Strangling is now thought to be the second most common cause of stroke in women under 40. A 2022 survey by the Institute for Addressing Strangulation found over a third of 16 to 34-year-olds had experienced choking - compared with 16 per cent of 35 to 54-year-olds and three per cent of those 55 and above. 'Our research suggests it is now much worse,' Fiona says. 'There is this complete normalisation through social media and through porn that getting strangled is something that you should expect to be done to you." Fiona formed WCCTT in 2018 in response to alarming cases where women had been killed during allegedly consensual sexual activity, with perpetrators let off or handed light sentences by using the so-called 'rough-sex defence'. 8 8 In August last year, Alcwyn Thomas, 44, tried to claim his partner's death was the result of "sex gone bad" when she had asked to be choked. Victoria Thomas, 45, was found dead in a spare bedroom at their home in Cardiff in the early hours, after the couple had been on a night out. Thomas had been drinking heavily and taking cocaine when he strangled her. He admitted manslaughter but denied murder. He was jailed for life in April after being found guilty of brutally "murdering" her. Dubbed the '50 Shades' rough sex defence, it was effectively scrapped with the Domestic Abuse Act of 2021, which clarified that a person cannot consent to being harmed for the purpose of sexual gratification. It also made non-fatal strangulation a specific criminal offence. Although it now carries a five-year prison sentence, in the year up to 2023, around 700 offenders were sentenced for non-fatal strangulation. 'Now if you go to court, if you go to the police, you're likely to get a better outcome than you did before,' Fiona says. 'But what we didn't manage to do was reduce how prevalent the strangulation of women is. 'It's everywhere. It's completely normalised. And women are humiliated for being vanilla or sex-negative if they stand up against it.' 'He seemed to enjoy my panic' By Sun Sexpert Georgie Culley I'LL never forget the moment I felt his hands snake around my neck. I was in my 20s, dating a handsome guy who seemed like the perfect catch - until his eyes glazed over during sex and he suddenly turned into a monster. At first I was shocked as his strong hands wrapped around my throat. We'd both had a few drinks and it took me a few seconds to realise what was happening. As I struggled to release his grip, he just tightened it. I couldn't breathe. I couldn't speak. But he seemed to enjoy my panic. I nearly blacked out. Afterwards, it hurt to talk. My neck was covered in red finger marks, which later turned into bruises. I had a sore throat for days. But worse than the physical pain was the emotional trauma. I felt violated and confused. How could someone I trusted - someone who was supposed to protect me - do that? Sure, we'd had rough sex before. But there's a huge difference between consensual kink and being choked to the point of unconsciousness. This wasn't exciting or playful - it was terrifying. It could have killed me. That's why I welcome the government's decision to teach kids that strangulation is a criminal offence in the new education curriculum. After my own terrifying experience, I feel passionately about educating youngsters after the dangers of asphyxiation. When I started investigating the rise of choking content on TikTok, it brought all those painful memories flooding back. It's extremely depressing that so many young people are being exposed to videos that glamorise this behaviour - without understanding how dangerous it really is. Scrolling through video after video of young women boasting about being strangled is truly horrifying. Explore your fantasies by all means - I'm The Sun's Sexpert, I believe in a varied and vibrant sex life - but there must be a line. Consent, communication and safety must always come first. Because what's fashionable online isn't always harmless - and sometimes it can be fatal. 'Shame' Orla Davidson, 26, was left with bruises around her neck after her partner strangled her during a sexual encounter earlier this year. The restaurant supervisor told us: 'We had a few drinks, went back to his and started having sex - then he began choking me. I did not give consent. 'His hand was pushing on the front of my neck with a lot of pressure, I remember thinking 'this is hard' - and then I don't remember a certain portion after that.' Two days later, bruises emerged around her neck that grew darker, which Orla hid with high-necked jumpers. 'There was a lot of shock and not knowing how to react to it, and feeling a weird kind of shame,' she recalled. 'I knew I should confront [the man] but didn't know how to have that conversation.' Orla confided in a friend who was 'shocked' by the bruising. 'She said, 'he f***ing strangled you.' I'd known it was bad but her reaction confirmed it. I'm definitely worried women are being subjected to similar things.' She is also concerned about the accessibility of normalisation of choking and violent content on social media and dating apps. Orla added: 'There's a lot of videos on TikTok, especially men telling the camera, 'I'm gonna choke you' as though speaking to a woman. 'I've had to block many men on dating apps who say things like, 'I'm gonna hurt you'. "Some people use the guise of being open-minded or being into BDSM when they're actually into hurting women. 'There's nothing wrong with women wanting casual sex, that's not the issue. It's the fact you can go on a date and end up dead.' 'Embarrassment' Another victim, Steph - not her real name - told The Sun she blacked out and had a seizure while a male friend choked her during sex - then convinced her not to seek medical treatment. Now 21, she says: 'Choking was something I'd experienced guys liking and doing since my first relationship when I was 14, which in itself is concerning. 'But this time was different. I remember him choking me on and off and my vision going as I blacked out. "I tried to tap him to make him stop, but the next thing I knew I was thrashing about having a seizure and my leg hit a glass and broke it. "He didn't stop or let go immediately. I dread to think what could have happened.' I remember him choking me on and off and my vision going as I blacked out. I tried to tap him to make him stop, but the next thing I knew I was thrashing about having a seizure and my leg hit a glass and broke it. He didn't stop or let go immediately. I dread to think what could have happened Steph Afterwards, she wanted to go to hospital but the man talked her out of it, fearing it would get him 'in trouble'. 'It was terrifying, I wanted to get checked out but I also didn't want to be seen as that girl who ruins someone else's fun or as a prude," she recalls. "My initial reaction was embarrassment, or feeling like I did something wrong. You're not confident in what's normal or not in sex, especially when you're younger.' Steph fears the accessibility of extreme porn to youngsters is normalising violent sex. She is also concerned about toxic influencers like Andrew Tate - who is facing rape and strangling allegations. A TikTok Spokesperson said: "We do not allow fetish or kink behaviour on our platform, we have removed content which breaches our rules and proactively remove 97 per cent of this type of content before it is reported to us.'
The Sun
11 minutes ago
- The Sun
UK-wide emergency alert to OVERRIDE millions of phones & trigger loud siren – exact date you'll be hit
A UK wide emergency alert is set to override millions of phones and trigger a siren on your device. A message that will be sent to phones across the country in a national test of the UK's emergency alert system has been published in advance as the Government seeks to ready the public for the drill. Millions of devices will vibrate and make a siren sound for around 10 seconds as they receive the text of fewer than 100 words at around 3pm on September 7. It will assure the public that they "do not need to take any action" and include a message in both English and Welsh. The Government has been carrying out a public awareness campaign to ensure people know when the test is taking place, including those facing domestic abuse who may have hidden phones. On Monday, the Cabinet Office said the text message will include both English and Welsh and be sent to mobile phones on 4G and 5G networks in the UK. It will read: "This is a test of Emergency Alerts, a UK government service that will warn you if there's a life-threatening emergency nearby. "You do not need to take any action. In a real emergency, follow the instructions in the alert to keep yourself and others safe. "Find simple and effective advice on how to prepare for emergencies at Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said: "Just like the fire alarm in your house, it's important we test this system so that we know it will work if we need it. New Emergency Alerts system will inform people who are in immediate danger by sending alerts direct to mobile phones "The alerts have the potential to save lives." Since the first national test of the system in April 2023, five alerts have been sent, including during major storms such as Storm Eowyn in January when lives were at risk. Other activations have took place when an unexploded Second World War bomb was discovered in Plymouth, as well as during flash floods in Cumbria and Leicestershire. Some MPs have called on ministers to use different modes of communication for the alert in order to ensure it reaches people who do not have access to a phone. Liberal Democrat Cabinet Office spokeswoman Sarah Olney has suggested the Government follows Scandinavian examples where the public have been handed pamphlets about preparing for emergencies.
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The late Queen was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew, royal insider reveals
Queen Elizabeth II was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew. The Duke of York's mischievous behaviour towards his mother was revealed by Robert Lacey in his book Battle Of Brothers. His practical jokes included putting itching powder inside his mother's bed and creeping behind a member of the Queen's Guard and tying their shoelaces together. The prince's most dramatic stunt involved climbing on the roof of the palace to change the direction of the TV aerial so the Queen could not watch her favourite horserace from Sandown Park. Despite his naughty actions, it is likely that Andrew was able to get away without any repercussions due to his coveted position as the late Queen's favourite son. Their close relationship was believed to have been because of the timing of Andrew's birth during the Queen's reign. The Duke of York was born in 1960, eight years after the Queen was crowned, while Charles and Anne had been toddlers when their mother became the monarch. This meant that, during their formative years, Elizabeth was busy on royal tours and learning to navigate her new role as Queen. But by the time Andrew was born, she had grown into her role much more and was therefore able to take a much active role in his, and younger brother Edward's, upbringing. For example, Elizabeth was able to even pick up the two boys from school in her own car and even attend sports days. A royal insider previously told the Telegraph, that Elizabeth liked Andrew because he was 'straightforward' and could make her 'laugh and raise the family's spirits'. On the other hand, she found Prince Charles 'emotionally complicated'. Meanwhile, Andrew's military service during the Falklands Wars was a source of great pride for his parents and made the prince the darling of the press. However, Prince Philip had a much less warm relationship with Andrew. Royal author Ingrid Sewell wrote in her book, My Mother And I, that Philip 'berated' Andrew for being 'pointless' and he believed the Duke of York 'failed to reach all his family's expectations'. In stark contrast to his relationship with the Queen, Andrew is known to have a more distant relationship with his older brother, with Charles going as far to claim in 2019: 'The problem with my brother [Andrew] is that he wants to be me.' Royal aides have gone as far as to claim that Andrew 'looked down on Charles' and 'thought he would make a much better king than his eldest brother'. His rude behaviour also extends to members of royal staff, with an aide telling royal expert Tom Quinn in his book, Gilded Youth, that Andrew 'was always curt to the staff and dismissive of them – he treated them as if we were living in the Middle Ages.' In 2022, Andrew was accused of 'overbearing' and 'verbally abusive behaviour' towards Palace staff. Former royal protection officer Paul Page has claimed he personally made three separate complaints to the Palace during the time he worked in the Royal Protection Command from 1998 until 2004. Speaking to The Sunday Mirror, Mr Page said that he is aware of 'at least a dozen' other reports made by colleagues about the Duke of York. 'The Palace has a problem because there are instances and evidence of Prince Andrew being overbearing and verbally abusive,' he told the newspaper. Mr Page alleged his complaints during his time working for the Palace were ignored because senior courtiers wanted to avoid agitation. While for many years Andrew was celebrated as the royal family's 'scallywag', Lacey wrote that the Prince's 'dubious choice of business contacts' have 'came to shadow his reputation'. This culminated in Andrew stepping down from his role as a working member of the royal family following his infamous interview with BBC Newsnight about his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. More recently, there was further controversy when it was uncovered that he unknowingly struck up a friendly relationship with an alleged Chinese spy. It was even reported that Andrew extended an invitation to the man, known as H6, to visit Buckingham Palace. The man was later banned from Britain by the Government on national security grounds. Since stepping down, Andrew has been involved in an ongoing scuffle with Charles over the Royal Lodge. Located in the leafy countryside surrounded by greenery, the Royal Lodge, which Prince Andrew shares with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, is just three miles from Windsor and 25 miles from London. Charles reportedly wants his younger brother to move out of the lavish 30million Royal Lodge, which has been in the family for centuries, and into Frogmore Cottage, the former residence of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. But moving Andrew hasn't been easy, as a 75-year contract he signed in 2003 means that he can continue living there, as long as he can afford the cost of upkeeping the 30-room mansion. Speaking of Andrew's potential move to Frogmore in January this year, Royal expert Ingrid Seward said: 'It's going to cost him a tenth of what it costs him at Royal Lodge, but that's not how Andrew thinks. He has serious delusions of grandeur and he thinks he needs to live in a house like that. 'If King Charles wants him to leave Royal Lodge, well he's going to have to use persuasion, because legally he can't move him out as he's rented it from the Crown Estate. 'If he can't keep up the roof and the outside and all the things a big house needs, he could be in contravention of his lease and that's the only way he could be moved out.'
