logo
For Alaska legislators, it's try, try, try again on big public education funding effort

For Alaska legislators, it's try, try, try again on big public education funding effort

Yahoo01-05-2025

Members of the Alaska House of Representatives look at the voting board for House Bill 57 on Wednesday, April 30, 2025. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
For the third time in two years, the Alaska Legislature has approved a bill that seeks to increase long-term state funding for the state's K-12 public schools.
On Wednesday, the state Senate voted 17-3 and the House voted 31-8 to approve House Bill 57, which would permanently increase the base student allocation, core of the state's per-student funding formula, by $700 per student, or $183 million across the state per year.
The bill also makes some policy changes for charter schools, creates a grant program to encourage schools to improve students' reading performance, and establishes an education task force to recommend further changes.
'I can't express how much gratitude that I know all of Alaska is sending with the message that we've sent,' said Rep. Alyse Galvin, I-Anchorage, after the House passed the bill.
'Everybody wants something for children, and to see what we've seen, people working together … I think that was achieved and we found a little something for everyone.'
Wednesday's votes send the bill to Gov. Mike Dunleavy, who vetoed two previous bills that attempted to increase the BSA.
The governor did not have an immediate comment on the Legislature's action. Dunleavy, on a trip to Washington, D.C., was unavailable for questions by phone, a spokesperson said.
While the Legislature failed to override the governor's two previous vetoes, the result of a third override could be different, legislators said.
'It's one of the most sweeping sets of policy reforms for education, I think, in state history,' said Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage and the original author of HB 57. 'And I think that's why you see such unity between the chambers and from every caucus. And that kind of unity is unprecedented.'
Since the start of April, the governor has urged the Legislature to include policy changes for charter schools, an open enrollment policy between schools and districts, an extra funding boost for homeschooled students, and grants for school districts whose students meet reading standards.
In talks over the weekend, the Republican minority caucuses in both House and Senate negotiated some of those provisions into HB 57. That was enough to sway some Republicans who voted against prior school funding measures, such as the recently vetoed House Bill 69.
'That's the process; you do the best that you can, and this is a much better bill than HB 69,' said House Minority Leader Mia Costello, R-Anchorage. She voted against House Bill 69, but in favor of HB 57.
'Vetoing HB 69 set the stage for being listened to by the majority. When we stuck together on that veto, we were basically sending a message that there were other things that needed to happen,' Costello said.
'While nobody is perfectly fine with the outcome of this bill, it makes it a step in the right direction, and we couldn't have gotten there if we hadn't held firm on that.'
In an unusual move, the governor's education commissioner sent a letter to school district superintendents on Monday, asking them to lobby the Legislature in favor of the governor's proposals.
Within the letter, she said that if the Legislature failed to meet the governor's demands, he could end up vetoing money used to pay for the updated formula.
In the end, some of the governor's requests were included, but others — including an extra funding boost for homeschooled students — were not.
Last year, lawmakers approved $174 million in one-time bonus funding on top of the BSA, so the formula change would not significantly increase year-over-year funding. Instead, the change's main advantage is that it allows school districts to plan ahead when budgeting, instead of waiting to see what the Legislature approves each year.
'Having the stability of the funding in the formula is critically important,' Fields said.
Without the change, school districts have to act as if there will be no funding bonus, a possibility until the state budget is finalized. That means warning teachers of possible layoffs, then rehiring them when money is approved.
'Having (the BSA increase) in policy avoids this destructive policy of pink slips and replacement,' Fields said.
At the start of the year, school districts said they needed a BSA increase of more than $1,800 to keep up with inflation since 2011. The final version of HB 57 is a little over a third of that figure, and some lawmakers called it a good first step.
'Fairbanks schools are suffering right now. Our schools have been starving for well over a decade. It's absolutely critical that we invest right now. This funding is stabilizing our school district and districts across the state, and it was a no-brainer,' said Rep. Ashley Carrick, D-Fairbanks.
But not everyone was pleased with the final result — of the Legislature's 60 members, 11 Republicans voted against the bill, and one, Rep. David Nelson, R-Anchorage, was excused absent.
Rep. Cathy Tilton, R-Wasilla, said she was unhappy with the final versions of policy proposals inserted into the bill. The reading grants won't become effective unless a bill updating corporate taxes becomes law. Open-enrollment provisions, which would allow students to transfer between schools and districts, were referred to a task force and not included in the bill.
'I just felt like the policy positions that were taken in the bill were not strong policy positions,' she said.
Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake, also voted against the bill.
'I don't think it's enough. I think we need to focus on our kids,' he said.
Electoral factors may have been in play for Wednesday's vote.
In a column published by the conservative website Must Read Alaska, Bob Griffin of the Alaska Policy Forum opined that if the legislative session were to end without an education bill, the 'outcome wouldn't just harm our kids, it would also complicate Republican messaging in the next election, particularly with swing voters drawn to simplistic narratives.'
Before Wednesday's House vote, the Alaska Senate needed to fix errors revealed after it approved HB 57 on Monday.
There were two errors, lawmakers said. One involved the use of 'shall' instead of 'may' in a funding clause, raising concerns that it could run afoul of the Alaska Constitution's prohibition on budget accounts for particular programs.
The second involved a mistake on the effective date of a program that distributes grants to schools whose students reach certain benchmarks for reading skills. Those grants would begin with the 2026-2027 school year, not in January, halfway through the 2025-2026 school year.
The Senate had voted 19-1 in favor of HB 57, but its vote on Wednesday was 17-3.
The change was largely due to the way the new reading grant program is linked to passage of Senate Bill 113, a bill that updates corporate tax law pertaining to internet sales.
That change is expected to raise as much as $65 million per year, and proceeds would be directed toward the reading grant program.
If there's more than enough money to fund that program, the extra cash would be available for career and technical education programs in high schools.
'That's going to be huge, I think,' said Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka.
Amid a state budget crunch, education 'is the only area in the state where we're increasing spending,' he said.
But some senators noted that if SB 113 doesn't become law, the reading grants won't just be defunded — they'll be eliminated entirely.
'We are conditioning not only the funding of the reading grants … but the existence of the reading grants on another bill or policy,' said Sen. Robert Myers, R-North Pole.
For that reason, he said, he was unable to vote for the bill.
'I do find it a little odd that we guarantee a ride to school, but we don't have that guarantee that we're going to incentivize the growth of reading,' he said.
Senate Minority Leader Mike Shower, R-Wasilla, voted in favor of the bill on Monday but changed his vote on Wednesday, saying he wasn't aware that the reading grants were contingent on the revenue bill.
'I'm kind of on a hope and a prayer that those things happen. … That makes it problematic for me,' he said.
Sen. Shelley Hughes, R-Palmer, also voted in favor of the bill on Monday and against it on Wednesday for the same reason.
After Wednesday afternoon's final vote, a House majority spokesperson said he expects HB 57 to be transmitted to Dunleavy on Thursday.
When the bill is sent, the governor will have until May 17 to sign the bill, veto it, or allow it to become law without his signature.
If he vetoes it, the Alaska Constitution calls for the Legislature to meet 'immediately' for a vote to override or sustain the governor's decision. Forty of 60 legislators, meeting in joint session, would have to vote for the bill in order to override a veto.
Legislators have not overridden a veto since 2009.
Alaska Beacon reporter Corinne Smith contributed to this article from Juneau.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking
Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking

Skift

timean hour ago

  • Skift

Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking

Although travel isn't at the top of Congress' agenda, lawmakers in Washington are discussing several bills that would impact the industry. Travel and tourism isn't at the top of Congress' agenda, which this month is dominated by debate over the President Donald Trump-backed 'big, beautiful' tax and spending bill. But that doesn't mean that lawmakers aren't attempting to make laws that would directly affect the hotel, lodging, air travel, and cruise industries. Here are seven such federal bills to watch heading into the summer: 1: Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2025 Introduced by Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.), this bipartisan bill targets 'unfair and deceptive advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other places of short-term lodging.' Bill co-sponsors include Reps. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), Russell Fry (R-S.C.), Kevin Mullin (D-Calif.), Craig Goldman (R-Texas), Eugene Vindman (D-Va.) and André Carson (D-Ind.). The bill mandates that hotels and short-term rental providers must: Display the 'total services price, if a price is displayed, in any advertisement, marketing, or price list wherever the covered services are displayed, advertised, marketed, or offered for sale.' Disclose 'the total services price at the time the covered services are first displayed to [an] individual and anytime thereafter throughout the covered services purchasing process.' Disclose before a final purchase 'any tax, fee, or assessment imposed by any government entity, quasi-government entity, or government-created special district or program on the sale of covered services.' The bill passed the U.S. House on a voice vote in April. The U.S. Senate is now considering the measure. There, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) has introduced a Senate version of the Hotel Fees and Transparency Act of 2025, which is co-sponsored by Sens. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and Shelley Moo

Trump says Elon Musk bromance may be over after attacks on tax bill
Trump says Elon Musk bromance may be over after attacks on tax bill

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump says Elon Musk bromance may be over after attacks on tax bill

Trump says Elon Musk bromance may be over after attacks on tax bill 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' President Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on June 5. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' Show Caption Hide Caption 'Kill the bill': Musk urges lawmakers to stop Trump's tax cut bill Elon Musk blasted President Trump's new tax bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' urging millions of followers to lobby lawmakers to 'kill the bill.' WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump said his close relationship with Elon Musk might be over after the world's richest man and former top White House adviser spent the past few days slamming the president's signature tax and policy bill. "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on June 5. "I don't know if we will anymore." The president's comments triggered a war of words with Musk, who said Trump wouldn't have won a second term if it weren't for the quarter of a million dollars in campaign cash he pumped in his 2024 campaign. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk said in a post on X, the social media company he owns. "Such gratitude." Trump's remarks were his first since Musk called Trump's reconciliation bill "a disgusting abomination" and later urged his social media followers to lobby their representatives to "kill the bill." Musk has objected to the deficit implications with the legislation. "I'm very disappointed with Elon. I helped Elon a lot," Trump said during a lengthy response to a question from a reporter about Musk's criticism as the president sat next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for a bilateral meeting. Trump accused Musk of opposing the legislation because it would end a $7,500 consumer tax credit for buyers of electric vehicles, a policy of former President Joe Biden that has benefited electric car companies like Musk's Tesla. "Elon knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here," Trump said. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut EV mandate." Musk fires back at Trump: 'Whatever' More: Trump overpowers Musk's attacks on mega tax bill with blizzard of orders Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, fired back at Trump shortly after the president's comments. "Whatever," Musk said in a post on his social media platform X. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." Musk added: "In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!" He also disputed Trump's assertion that Musk was kept abreast of the bill's details. "False" Musk said. "This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" Musk left the White House last week after leading the government-slashing Department of Government Efficiency during the first four month's of Trump's second term. Although Musk first voiced criticism of Trump's bill before his exit, Trump had seemed to smooth things over when he welcomed him to the Oval Office for a friendly send-off news conference on May 30. "I'll be honest," Trump said six days later on June 5. "I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office." Musk, prior to his White House departure, asked for his special government employee status to be extended beyond 130 days to allow him to continue to lead DOGE, but the White House declined, a source told USA TODAY. Last weekend, Musk expressed disappointment after Trump withdrew his nominee for administrator of NASA, Jared Isaacman, a billionaire commercial astronaut with close ties to Musk. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. (This story has been updated with more information.)

Tesla Stock Drops 12% As Trump-Musk Relationship Appears To Unravel
Tesla Stock Drops 12% As Trump-Musk Relationship Appears To Unravel

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Tesla Stock Drops 12% As Trump-Musk Relationship Appears To Unravel

Shares of Tesla dropped by 12% on Thursday as the relationship between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's appeared to unravel, with Musk launching attacks at the president on X and Trump suggesting to reporters at the White House criticism of his signature bill from the world's wealthiest person amounts to 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Tesla's stock fell 12.3% to around $291.18 as of just before 3 p.m. EDT on Thursday, with losses accelerating following Trump's comment. Through more than a dozen posts on X since Tuesday, Musk has referred to Trump's policy bill as 'massive, outrageous' and 'pork-filled,' while adding, 'shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' Musk's latest criticism of the bill Thursday targeted Trump for the first time, as Musk wrote 'wise words' in response to a tweet from Trump in 2013, in which Trump said, 'I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!' Trump responded to Musk's recent attacks, suggesting Thursday he and Musk 'had a great relationship,' but 'I don't know if we will anymore.' $17.2 billion. That's how much was cut from Musk's fortune amid Tesla's stock slide, bringing his net worth below $400 billion to $398 billion, according to Forbes' estimates. Tesla's stock jumped 22% in May, which came as Musk said he would leave the White House and committed to serving as Tesla's chief executive for the next five years. Trump has called on Republican senators to approve his policy bill by a July 4 deadline set by Senate leadership. A stock slide for Tesla also comes as sales for the automaker declined in the U.K., Germany, Italy and China in May. Tesla's sales dropped more than 45% in the U.K., despite sales across the industry increasing by 28%. Tesla will launch a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, in June, featuring some 20 self-driving Model Y vehicles. The service's debut in Austin follows criticism about Tesla's self-driving software and Musk's failure to disclose detailed safety and technical data about Tesla's technology. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened several investigations into Tesla's Autopilot feature over nearly a decade, including recent probes into whether Tesla's Full-Self Driving software is linked to two deaths. Musk has repeatedly said the software allows for 'full autonomy' while in a vehicle, though he has said an active driver is still required. Musk's attacks on Trump's policy bill follow his monthslong stint in the White House leading the Department of Government Efficiency. Trump and Musk have said Musk's departure happened on good terms, and that Musk would continue to be present as a Trump adviser. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump 'already knows' Musk's stance on his bill, saying 'it doesn't change the president's opinion.' Tesla's stock declined in recent months as Musk appeared to increasingly focus on his role with the Trump administration, with some analysts criticizing him for spending '110%' of his time as head of the DOGE rather than leading Tesla. After Tesla's first-quarter earnings report in April, Musk signaled he would be 'allocating far more of my time' to Tesla, though he had yet to commit to exiting his government role.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store