
Pakistan signs $1.5 billion deal to sell lethal combat weapons to Sudan's junta
The deal was signed during a visit to Islamabad by 'Pilot' El Tahir Mohamed El Awad El Amin, the head of the SAF's air force, during which he reportedly held talks with Pakistan's defence minister, air force chief, and other senior military figures.
New Delhi: Pakistan has signed an agreement to supply $1.5 billion worth of military equipment to the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the internationally sanctioned military junta fighting to control the war-torn north-east African country. The deal, believed to be paid for by a third nation, will give the regime of General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan access to light attack aircraft, engines, armoured fighting vehicles and a range of unmanned aerial vehicles.
According to Swiss government sanctions, El Amin was responsible for the indiscriminate aerial bombing carried out by the air force of the SAF in densely populated residential areas, notably in Khartoum, Omdurman, Nyala (South Darfur) and North Kordofan, documented by the United Nations Integrated Transition Assistance Mission in Sudan.
The indiscriminate air strikes, the sanctions documents reveal, caused the 'destruction of critical infrastructures, including medical facilities such as the East Nile Hospital in Khartoum in May 2023 and the Babiker Nahar Paediatric Hospital in El-Fasher in May 2024'.
Earlier this year, the United States Treasury Department also imposed sanctions on the head of the SAF, Al-Burhan, holding that he had command responsibility for 'lethal attacks on civilians, including airstrikes against protected infrastructure including schools, markets, and hospitals'. The SAF is also held responsible for the routine and intentional denial of humanitarian access, using food deprivation as a war tactic.
The Treasury Department had also indicted Ahmed Abdalla, a Sudanese-Ukrainian dual national, for routing Iranian-made UAVs through Azerbaijan to the SAF through his Hong Kong based firm, Portex.
An arms embargo and asset freeze is also in place against both sides, enforced by the UN Security Council. However, both sides have continued to receive supplies of arms through third countries, while the Rapid Support Forces is alleged to have been using mercenaries recruited on its behalf by the UAE from Colombia.
Fuelled by competition between Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the conflict in Sudan, which began in 2023, has claimed more than 70,000 lives, and left several hundred thousand people on the edge of starvation.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has backed the SAF, hoping to shut out Iran, and also bring stability to the Red Sea, where instability directly threatens key projects, like the city of Neom, and Yanbu Terminal expansion, which aims to diversify oil export routes away from the Strait of Hormuz, expert Elfadil Ibrahim explains.
For its part, the UAE seeks to block jihadist groups, who were overthrown in 2019, from riding on the SAF's back to retake power.
The Pakistani supplies—10 K8 Karakorum light attack aircraft, engines for MiG21 aircraft, HQ-9 and HQ-6 air defence systems, armoured fighting vehicles, and hundreds of various kinds of drones—would give a significant edge to the junta.
Large numbers of countries, including India and Pakistan, had participated in UN peacekeeping operations in Sudan, which concluded in 2024. There have been inconclusive discussions since then on redeploying international forces to protect civilians.
(Edited by Mannat Chugh)
Also Read: Can Syria's tiny Druze minority survive West Asia's new storms? There's little hope
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Why a Swatch ad has been pulled from China
Swatch, the luxury Swiss watchmaker, pulled an advertisement and apologised after the image of a male model resulted in heated accusations of racism on social media. The company, taking to China's Weibo platform as well as Instagram, said it took into account 'recent concerns regarding the portrayal of a model' and that it sincerely apologises for any distress or misunderstanding this may have caused. But what happened? The Swiss watchmaker has apologised after an image resulted in heated accusations of racism on social media. Image courtesy: X Swatch has pulled an ad from China. The Swiss watchmaker has apologised after an image resulted in heated accusations of racism on social media. The company, taking to China's Weibo platform as well an Instagram, said it took into account 'recent concerns regarding the portrayal of a model'. It said the material had been removed from across the world. 'We sincerely apologise for any distress or misunderstanding this may have caused,' the company wrote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what happened? Why was the ad pulled? Let's take a closer look: What happened? The luxury watchmaker put up an ad in featuring an Asian male model. The advert was for the firm's for Swatch Essentials collection. The problem? The male model was pulling at his eyes – a gesture that is evocative of racist taunts against people of Asian origin. The image caused a firestorm on social media with many accusing Swatch of being racist against Chinese people. Swatch quickly apologised, but the netizens were having none of it. Mei Hua Long, an influencer with over a million followers, slammed the advertisement as 'racism towards Asians'. Another influencer, Nie Hua Xiong, who also has over a million followers, claimed the ad was trying to 'disgust Asians and degrade Chinese' at a time "when the watch industry is going downhill". Swatch is 'only afraid for its profits,' a Weibo user wrote. 'You can apologise, but I will not forgive.' 'They make money from us and still dare to discriminate against Chinese people. We would be spineless if we don't boycott it out of China,' another Weibo added. However, not everyone was quick to condemn Swatch. Swatch, which also makes Omega, Longines and Tissot watches, depends heavily on China for revenue. AP On the app RedNote, a user named Dylan wrote: 'Some people will say those who feel offended are fragile, but this is a different situation – slanted eyes are an insulting gesture pointing to Asians made by the whites.' Another RedNote commenter named You Ren Ray added, 'The first thing to do after feeling offended is to boycott [the brand], instead of contemplating whether the other party intentionally thought of doing something.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Even if I don't see racism [in the ad], there is no way to judge how this slanted eyes gesture can add value to the product, unless the move aims at getting attention with promotional effect for free,' Wai, a third RedNote user, said. 'Slanted eyes' and racism The 'slanted eyes' gesture is said to be particularly racist against people of Japanese and Chinese origin. The adjective itself first appeared in the 1860s. It was seen in Western newspapers and in magazines from the 20th Century. The Chinese men and women were also portrayed with eyes having slits. For context, the US passed the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882. The noun slant-eye comes from the 1920s. It gained currency as a slur at the beginning of World War II. It was also used to refer to the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war. It has also been used as a slur against Asians. Swatch, which also makes Omega, Longines and Tissot watches, depends heavily on China for revenue. Nearly a third of the group's sales last year coming from the China, Hong Kong and Macau region. Revenue for the watchmaker last year slumped 14.6 per cent to $8.4 billion in 2024. This was due to a downturn in demand in China, where Swatch said it was seeing 'persistently difficult market conditions and weak demand for consumer goods overall'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This isn't the first time Chinese consumers have flexed their muscles. In 2024, some tried to boycott Uniqlo, a Japanese firm, after it announced its cotton was not from Xinjiang. In 2023, Dior, the French luxury brand Dior similarly faced ire for its advert with an East Asian model pulling up the corner of her eye. In 2021, Chinese consumers announced a mass boycott against H&M, Nike and Adidas. This came after the companies said they were worried about alleged human rights abuses in Xinjiang province. Consumers also went after Dolce & Gabbana in 2018 after it put up clips showing a model using Italian food via chopsticks. The Italian fashion firm's goods were taken down from Chinese e-commerce sites. It also called off its Shanghai fashion show. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran warns of imminent war with Israel amid fragile lull in hostilities
Iran's first vice president has warned that war with Israel could erupt at any moment, stressing there is no formal ceasefire in place after June's 12-day conflict A senior Iranian official warned Monday that war with Israel could erupt at any moment, describing the current lull after June's 12-day conflict as only a temporary halt. 'We must be prepared at every moment for confrontation; right now, we are not even in a ceasefire (agreement); we are in a cessation of hostilities,' said First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref. The fighting in June saw Israel bombard Iranian nuclear and military sites, as well as residential areas, killing more than 1,000 people, including senior commanders and nuclear scientists. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes that killed dozens in Israel. The United States announced a halt in fighting on June 24, two days after it joined the war by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. But there was no agreement formalising the ceasefire, only an undeclared pause in hostilities. On Sunday, Yahya Rahim Safavi, a military adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told Iranian media the country was 'preparing plans for the worst-case scenario'. 'We are not in a ceasefire now, we are in a war phase, it could break down at any time, there is no protocol, no regulations, no agreement between us and the Israelis, between us and the Americans,' he said in remarks carried by the Shargh daily. 'A ceasefire means ceasing attacks; that could change at any time,' he added. Since then, Iranian officials have insisted the country is not seeking war but is ready for another confrontation. Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons through its atomic programme, a charge Tehran strongly denies. Following the war, Israel and the United States repeatedly threatened to attack Iran again should Tehran relaunch its nuclear sites and resume its nuclear enrichment programme. The United Nations nuclear watchdog has warned that Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country that enriches uranium to 60 percent -– far beyond the 3.67 percent cap set by a landmark international accord reached in 2015. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The level is a short step from the 90-percent enrichment required for a nuclear weapon. Last week, Britain, France and Germany, all signatories to the 2015 deal, threatened to reimpose sanctions lifted under the agreement. Iran has warned of serious consequence with some officials in the country hinting at withdrawal of Tehran from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Stationing troops in Ukraine would probably be too much for us: German foreign minister
Germany has expanded defence spending but continues to face recruitment and training shortfalls. Troop numbers have plateaued at about 182,000 German Chancellor Friedrich Merz walks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the Chancellery in Berlin, Germany, May 28, 2025. (Photo: Annegret Hilse/Reuters) Germany can play a central role in crafting security guarantees for Ukraine but is unlikely to deploy troops there, the foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, has said. Berlin is already the only European contributor stationing a combat-ready brigade in Lithuania, and officials argue that adding a second permanent deployment in Ukraine would stretch the force beyond capacity. The debate over guarantees will be a core theme when Volodymyr Zelenskyy meets Donald Trump and European leaders in Washington on Monday. European capitals see credible, durable commitments as essential to any eventual peace framework between Kyiv and Moscow. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Important role' for Berlin Wadephul said Germany is ready to help shape a package with the United States and European partners, with Berlin playing an 'important role'. Officials point to military and technical assistance as likely pillars, alongside coordination with allies on the scope and conditions of any pledge. Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, told Fox News there was support for 'much more robust security guarantees' and for EU membership, floating an 'Article 5-like' formulation that evokes Nato's mutual defence clause. German troops off the table Germany has expanded defence spending but continues to face recruitment and training shortfalls. Troop numbers have plateaued at about 182,000. In April Berlin launched its first permanent foreign deployment since the second world war, a 5,000-strong armoured brigade in Lithuania to reinforce Nato's eastern flank. Wadephul said stationing forces in Ukraine as well would 'probably be too much', though he noted the defence minister, Boris Pistorius, would review options. Conservative chancellor Friedrich Merz, who is also travelling to Washington, has remained vague about a possible deployment, previously suggesting Germany could participate if the United States did so. Will 'Article 5-like' pledges be enough? It is unclear whether Zelenskyy would view a guarantee without troops on the ground as a sufficient deterrent, particularly given Trump's earlier scepticism about Nato's collective defence. German officials caution that any framework will require intricate coordination and time to define. 'The issue of security guarantees is highly complex,' a government spokesperson said, adding that the specifics would emerge only through a lengthy process.