The social media-hating philosopher relishing his X ban
Philosopher AC Grayling revels in being banned from social media platform X because his latest book is all about cancel culture.
"How about that? I mean, that is so ironic it's almost unbelievable," he said.
"Elon Musk, the great would-be champion of free speech, has cancelled me on Twitter!"
Grayling was blocked in February - he suspects over a repost - as his book Discriminations: Making Peace in the Culture Wars was about to hit bookshelves worldwide.
An author of more than 30 books, Grayling holds positions at both Northeastern University London and St Anne's College in Oxford University.
He's in Australia in May, having appeared at the Margaret River Readers and Writers Festival with Melbourne, Sydney and Newcastle writers' festivals to come.
But unlike most authors, Grayling won't be promoting these events on social media.
As well as being blocked on the Musk-owned X, he admits to having forgotten his Facebook password.
What's more, he argues social media is toxic and has been harmful to democracies around the world.
It's all part of his analysis of the culture wars, which he explains go back to ancient times - the word ostracism can be traced to ancient Greek - because tribalism is simply the flip side of community.
"The whole of history is about one group trying to cancel another group - that's what a war is," he said.
From political correctness to wokeness, Grayling views contemporary culture wars as fundamentally about human rights and fairness, and fighting against sexism, racism and homophobia.
"People who are in positions of privilege don't want other people to have a fair share because they think they will lose their hold on the levers of privilege," he said.
Australia's book festival scene has had to contend with these culture wars in recent years, with donations withdrawn from events and staff and board members quitting over issues such as the Gaza conflict.
With the patience of a philosopher, Grayling sees writers' festivals as an opportunity for rational debate, but he adds it's understandable that people occasionally get riled up.
He interprets Australia's federal election, which resulted in a Labor triumph, as a move away from the culture wars the nation's politicians have indulged in over the past decade.
"It's maybe a step in the right direction, towards bringing the culture wars to a more peaceful conclusion."
Grayling appears at the Melbourne Writers Festival, which began on Saturday, followed by the Sydney Writers' Festival, held from May 19-27, and a special Newcastle Writers Festival event on May 20.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
Musk deletes explosive posts about Trump as US president issues threat
Billionaire Elon Musk has removed several of his explosive posts that targeted US President Donald Trump, appearing to seek a de-escalation of their public feud. Musk posted on X on Thursday: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files,' he wrote. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' But on Saturday (Sunday AEST) the tweet was no longer available, with the link to the post now showing a message that said, 'Nothing to see here'. Musk also deleted his social media post that signalled support for impeaching the president. Meanwhile on Saturday, Trump told NBC that he had no desire to repair his relationship with Musk, and said there would be 'serious consequences' if Musk funded US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the president's sweeping tax cut and spending bill. Loading In a telephone interview with NBC News, Trump declined to say what those consequences would be, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate Musk. 'I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him,' Trump said in the interview, calling Musk 'disrespectful'. Asked if his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said 'I would assume so, yeah.'
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together
Instead, they were animated by issues that weren't so potent back in 2016, like the excesses of the 'woke' left and pandemic-era public health policy or anger at rising prices, crime, homelessness and an influx of migrants. In different ways, Joe Rogan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Musk each epitomise different facets of this enlarged Trump coalition. It seemed possible that vehement opposition to progressives would hold everyone together during the presidency, as it did during the campaign, and that maybe Trump would also do enough to please each group and avoid alienating a constituency. Less than five months into Trump's term, there are indications that this broader coalition is fraying. Polls suggest many young and non-white voters who backed Trump in November now disapprove of his performance. There haven't been as many examples of elite defections, but there have been many signs of queasiness with the excesses of his policies. The extent of Trump's tariffs, his defiance of the courts, his attacks on high-skilled immigration and higher education, and more simply go beyond what many of Trump's backers thought they were signing up to support. Musk's defection is not necessarily representative. His grievances may be personal as much as they're about policy. Still, Trump failed to keep Musk on board, and it seems to have been at least partly because of the challenge in reconciling the ideologically diverse factions in his orbit. And while Musk complained most loudly about how much the Republican tax and spending bill would add to the national debt, the possibility that other policies were a factor – like attacks on international students or reducing support for renewables – shouldn't be discounted. And even if other Trump policies, like deportations or universal tariffs, weren't problems for Musk, they might well erode Trump's support among other members of his coalition. Loading The return of deficit politics For the past decade or so, deficits haven't been a major issue in American politics. This is changing fast. The US fiscal picture has become markedly worse over the past few years. The national debt is projected to be well over 100 per cent of gross national product in a decade. Already, interest payments on the debt have reached nearly one-fifth of federal revenue. The country is projected to have trillion-dollar deficits for the foreseeable future, even during a period of low unemployment and economic growth. High interest rates will make it expensive to finance additional debt. The deteriorating fiscal situation is beginning to affect politics, most obviously in the challenge of passing a big tax and spending bill. In the past, it was easy enough for Republicans to cut taxes. Now, with the deficit and interest rates so high, a nearly $3 trillion ($4.6 trillion) expansion in the debt over the next decade is suddenly not so easy to swallow. Loading This challenge for Republicans won't go away. The alliance between traditional and populist conservatives was much easier when Trump could promise tax cuts while sparing popular entitlement programs. As the burden of the debt mounts, this win-win proposition will be hard to sustain. Less obviously, the same fiscal issues will be a major challenge for the Democratic coalition as well. With all the fighting between progressives and moderates over the past decade, it's easy to overlook that deficit spending made it much easier for the party to stay unified. Mainstream Democrats could bridge the gap between the party's ideological wings by campaigning on investments in infrastructure and renewable energy as well as on modest but significant expansions of the social safety net, like paid family leave. The debt issue might prove to be even a bigger one for Democrats than Republicans. It's hard to say whether the Republican mega-bill is really the reason Musk broke with the president. Still, he called the bill an 'abomination'. And the potential power of this issue over the longer term should not be underestimated.
Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together
Instead, they were animated by issues that weren't so potent back in 2016, like the excesses of the 'woke' left and pandemic-era public health policy or anger at rising prices, crime, homelessness and an influx of migrants. In different ways, Joe Rogan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Musk each epitomise different facets of this enlarged Trump coalition. It seemed possible that vehement opposition to progressives would hold everyone together during the presidency, as it did during the campaign, and that maybe Trump would also do enough to please each group and avoid alienating a constituency. Less than five months into Trump's term, there are indications that this broader coalition is fraying. Polls suggest many young and non-white voters who backed Trump in November now disapprove of his performance. There haven't been as many examples of elite defections, but there have been many signs of queasiness with the excesses of his policies. The extent of Trump's tariffs, his defiance of the courts, his attacks on high-skilled immigration and higher education, and more simply go beyond what many of Trump's backers thought they were signing up to support. Musk's defection is not necessarily representative. His grievances may be personal as much as they're about policy. Still, Trump failed to keep Musk on board, and it seems to have been at least partly because of the challenge in reconciling the ideologically diverse factions in his orbit. And while Musk complained most loudly about how much the Republican tax and spending bill would add to the national debt, the possibility that other policies were a factor – like attacks on international students or reducing support for renewables – shouldn't be discounted. And even if other Trump policies, like deportations or universal tariffs, weren't problems for Musk, they might well erode Trump's support among other members of his coalition. Loading The return of deficit politics For the past decade or so, deficits haven't been a major issue in American politics. This is changing fast. The US fiscal picture has become markedly worse over the past few years. The national debt is projected to be well over 100 per cent of gross national product in a decade. Already, interest payments on the debt have reached nearly one-fifth of federal revenue. The country is projected to have trillion-dollar deficits for the foreseeable future, even during a period of low unemployment and economic growth. High interest rates will make it expensive to finance additional debt. The deteriorating fiscal situation is beginning to affect politics, most obviously in the challenge of passing a big tax and spending bill. In the past, it was easy enough for Republicans to cut taxes. Now, with the deficit and interest rates so high, a nearly $3 trillion ($4.6 trillion) expansion in the debt over the next decade is suddenly not so easy to swallow. Loading This challenge for Republicans won't go away. The alliance between traditional and populist conservatives was much easier when Trump could promise tax cuts while sparing popular entitlement programs. As the burden of the debt mounts, this win-win proposition will be hard to sustain. Less obviously, the same fiscal issues will be a major challenge for the Democratic coalition as well. With all the fighting between progressives and moderates over the past decade, it's easy to overlook that deficit spending made it much easier for the party to stay unified. Mainstream Democrats could bridge the gap between the party's ideological wings by campaigning on investments in infrastructure and renewable energy as well as on modest but significant expansions of the social safety net, like paid family leave. The debt issue might prove to be even a bigger one for Democrats than Republicans. It's hard to say whether the Republican mega-bill is really the reason Musk broke with the president. Still, he called the bill an 'abomination'. And the potential power of this issue over the longer term should not be underestimated.
