Trump Confirms Musk-Bessent Argument, Denies Fight: ‘Didn't See a Lot of Physicality'
President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed that Elon Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent got into a heated argument recently, but denied it turned violent, as The Washington Post had reported this past weekend.
Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked the president if he ever saw the former Department of Government Efficiency boss and Bessent 'get physical' at the White House. 'No I didn't,' the president responded, before saying 'they did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there.'
BREAKING: President Trump says he is not going to sell his Tesla and will also keep using Starlink service at the White House.He added "Starlink is a good service."pic.twitter.com/vaF16EaFgB
— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) June 9, 2025
The president's comment comes after The Washington Post said Musk threw his shoulder into Bessent 'like a rugby player' during an argument in mid-April — a move that led to the treasury secretary fighting back. The Washington Post's story was based on a conversation with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, who has been one of Musk's biggest critics on the right.
His other comments on Monday indicate the Trump-Musk feud that blew up last week is simmering down. If you somehow missed it, the Tesla and SpaceX boss accused President Trump of being named in the Epstein Files and said he supported his impeachment during a flurry of X posts on June 5.
President Trump, on his end, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk and questioned whether the U.S. government should end its contracts with SpaceX, the rocket company Musk runs. The battle was good for X, the social platform Musk owns, and the president's Truth Social platform, though, with the latter enjoying a record day for traffic amid the back-and-forth.
On Monday, President Trump said the two 'had a good relationship' and that he wished him 'very well,' echoing comments he made over the weekend. Musk has also looked to cool down the battle on his end by deleting the X post in which he insinuated the president was a pedophile.
The post Trump Confirms Musk-Bessent Argument, Denies Fight: 'Didn't See a Lot of Physicality' appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Daily Show' Makes X-Rated Example Out Of Republican's L.A. Protests Gaffe
'Daily Show' correspondent Desi Lydic roasted Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) Tuesday after his not-safe-for-work gaffe while naming a law that experts warn may complicate Donald Trump's military deployment to Los Angeles protests. Lydic warned that Trump sending the military to demonstrations against his immigration policies could put him on the 'wrong side of the law' before flagging concerns tied to the Posse Comitatus Act — a law which, with some exceptions, bars troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil. Lydic called for more details on the 'very serious legal principle' before turning to video of Nunn's wild on-air fumble during a CNN segment. 'Look, I believe strongly in pussy comitatus...,' Nunn appeared to say in the clip. The comedian, after pausing for laughter and applause from the 'Daily Show' crowd, pressed on. 'Indeed, Trump is truly in violation of 'pussy cum-in-tatas.' That's to say nothing of his violations of the Snatch Act,'' she joked. She went on to emphasize that Trump is taking an 'extreme measure' in Los Angeles. 'The last time 'pussy cum-in-tatas' was used it was on your mom last night,' quipped Lydic while the sound of an air horn went off. Watch more of Lydic's Tuesday monologue on '' below. Jon Stewart Busts Biggest Right-Wing Myth About 'F**king Pussies' Trump And Elon Musk 'Look At His Dumb Face!': Stephen Colbert Trolls Trump Over Truly Awkward Moment Seth Meyers Spots The Grandest Of Ironies In Trump's Latest Online Meltdown
Washington Post
15 minutes ago
- Washington Post
A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction
NEW YORK — President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The 2nd Circuit should 'determine once and for all that this unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current President of the United States belongs in federal court,' Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court. Trump's Justice Department — now partly run by his former criminal defense lawyers — backs his bid to move the case to federal court. If Trump loses, he could go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump was convicted in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to upend his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump denies her claim and said he did nothing wrong. It was the only one of his four criminal cases to go to trial. Trump's lawyers first sought to move the case to federal court following his March 2023 indictment, arguing that federal officers including former presidents have the right to be tried in federal court for charges arising from 'conduct performed while in office.' Part of the criminal case involved checks he wrote while he was president. They tried again after his conviction, arguing that Trump's historic prosecution violated his constitutional rights and ran afoul of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling , which was decided about a month after the hush money trial ended. The ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president's unofficial actions were illegal. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied both requests, ruling in part that Trump's conviction involved his personal life, not his work as president. In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court's ruling affected his prior conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump's case 'were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.' Trump's lawyers argue that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while president in 2018. Trump's former criminal defense lawyer Todd Blanche is now the deputy U.S. attorney general, the Justice Department's second-in-command. Another of his lawyers, Emil Bove, has a high-ranking Justice Department position. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, rejected Trump's requests to throw out the conviction on presidential immunity grounds and sentenced him on Jan. 10 to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact but sparing him any punishment. Appearing by video at his sentencing, Trump called the case a 'political witch hunt,' 'a weaponization of government' and 'an embarrassment to New York.'
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs seen lifting underlying US consumer prices in May
By Lucia Mutikani WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. consumer prices likely increased moderately in May amid relatively cheaper gasoline, but the Trump administration's import tariffs probably started filtering through to other goods and potentially raising underlying inflation pressures. The Consumer Price Index report from the Labor Department on Wednesday could show the CPI less the volatile food and energy components rising by the most in four months. Economists said the increase in the so-called core CPI would be attributable to higher prices from President Donald Trump's sweeping import duties. May would mark the start of tariff-related high inflation readings that could last through year end, they said. Walmart last month said it would begin raising prices in late May and June. Economists said inflation has been slow to respond to tariffs as most retailers were selling merchandise accumulated before the duties took effect. "Retailers showed remarkable restraint in April," said Stephen Stanley, chief U.S. economist at Santander U.S. Capital Markets. "May should bring the leading edge of price increases, with the maximum impact coming in June and July." The CPI likely increased 0.2% last month after advancing by the same margin in April, a Reuters survey of economists showed. Gasoline prices were mostly lower in May as concerns over global economic growth curbed crude oil prices. In the 12-months through May, the CPI was forecast increasing 2.5% after rising 2.3% in April. Some of the rise in the year-on-year CPI would reflect last year's low readings dropping out of the calculation. Core CPI is forecast to have climbed 0.3%, which would be the biggest gain since January, after rising 0.2% in April. In the 12 months through May, core CPI inflation is estimated to have increased 2.9% after rising 2.8% in April. The Federal Reserve tracks different inflation measures for its 2% target. The U.S. central bank is expected to leave its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range next Wednesday while policymakers monitor the economic impact of the tariffs. STAFFING CRUNCH The CPI data will come under close scrutiny in the months ahead after the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Labor Department's agency that compiles the report and other economic releases including the closely watched employment report, announced last week the suspension of CPI data collection in three cities because of resource constraints. The BLS like all government agencies has been severely affected by mass firings, voluntary resignations, early retirements and hiring freezes, which are part of an unprecedented campaign by the White House to drastically reduce the size of government and remake it. The BLS has also announced that it would, effective with the release of the July Producer Price Index data in August, end the calculation and publication of about 350 indexes. That would include data from PPI industry, commodity, final demand-intermediate demand and special index classifications. Economists said that the BLS had with the CPI data reported a rise in the share of categories for which prices were calculated using a method called different cell imputation, which some viewed as less accurate. The BLS said on Tuesday its published data met rigorous standards, but did not address staffing issues. "Data quality is evaluated through measures of variance, bias studies, and assessments of survey methods," the agency said in a statement to Reuters. "BLS continues to evaluate data quality." A former BLS commissioner told Reuters that staff levels were considerably low at the agency. "I understand that BLS staffing is down by at least 15% now, that's not reflected in any official numbers yet, because many of them are still being paid," said Erica Groshen. "They are not at work and it is impinging on the agencies. Also the hiring freeze means that they can't be replaced." Groshen said the CPI report remained reliable, noting an increased shift towards electronic collection of data. "At a national level, the standard errors aren't really affected very much, and the reliability is still good, but it's really disaggregated at the granular level, where you're starting to see some real losses," she said. "It's just not aiding publication standards, and so they're not putting it out, but they can still use it as input to the national numbers." Other economists agreed, noting that the collection suspension only affected a small area. "I don't see that as being a deal breaker," said Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Boston College. "The problem would be, if they start to have to suppress more of them or drop them out of the survey, then that could be more problematic." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
