Waste, fraud and abuse may increase at schools after Trump cuts
Waste, fraud and abuse may increase at schools after Trump cuts Fired Education Department workers and former high-ranking officials say the Trump administration's vow to increase government efficiency flies in the face of major cuts.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
'Makes me cry': Teachers, students react to Education Dept. cuts
Former students and teachers are reacting to the Trump administration's funding cuts and layoffs at the Department of Education.
In his first two months back at the White House, President Donald Trump has railed against rampant 'waste, fraud and abuse' across the government.
That criticism, based in many cases on false and misleading claims about federal workers and programs, has fueled sweeping cuts. Another dramatic round of layoffs came last week when Trump staffers announced they'd slashed the workforce in half at the U.S. Department of Education.
Linda McMahon, the newly installed education secretary, said Tuesday the cuts will eliminate 'bureaucratic bloat.' Experts predict they'll significantly impact students and teachers nationwide.
'Today's reduction in force reflects the Department of Education's commitment to efficiency, accountability, and ensuring that resources are directed where they matter most,' McMahon said in a statement last week.
Gutting the agency may actually have the opposite effect, according to laid-off workers and former high-ranking officials. In interviews and social media posts, they argued that firing the watchdogs whose job is to hold schools accountable will hurt students who need help the most, while opening the door to predatory behavior.
'If there is waste, fraud and abuse, this administration has now eliminated the very agency that would provide oversight for that,' said attorney Sheria Smith, one of the hundreds of employees fired from the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights on Tuesday.
Last week offered a troubling glimpse into what critics view as the potential fallout. The Federal Student Aid office, which disburses federal student loans and Pell Grants, lost over 300 people to layoffs, a preliminary union tally shows (that estimate doesn't include nonunion members or supervisors). Student loan experts, technology specialists and people who investigate colleges were dismissed.
The day after the losses, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, experienced a massive outage. The Education Department said the glitch wasn't related to the cuts.
Read more: Education Dept. layoffs by the numbers: Which staff were ousted, where cuts hit hardest
In addition, the office that tracks student progress and administers funding for studies about the effectiveness of federal education programs was eliminated 'wholesale,' Smith said.
Trump officials have promised those key offices can still fulfill their functions, which are mandated by Congress. Yet it's unclear to employees and concerned observers how that will be possible. Democratic state attorneys general and disability rights advocates have sued, saying the cuts breach the limits of the executive branch under federal law.
As schools enter a new era with less oversight, the implications for students may be hard to monitor, said Brittany Coleman, a Dallas-based civil rights attorney who was laid off.
'We're now about to be on the honor system,' she said.
FAFSA outage: 'These issues could continue'
As the Education Department's workload has grown, Congress hasn't meaningfully increased its budget, prompting longstanding concerns about understaffing. For that reason, officials at the agency often turn to outside contractors to carry out much of their work.
That reliance can create problems. Last year offered a prime example: A series of issues with the FAFSA prompted massive delays in the enrollment process for both colleges and students.
Under former President Joe Biden, the Federal Student Aid office, which oversees the FAFSA, was reorganized. The goal was, in part, to help make the form function more smoothly. And the revisions worked, Miguel Cardona, Biden's education secretary, told USA TODAY in January. The FAFSA got back on track.
Last week, the newly reformed office was gutted. James Kvaal, Biden's top higher education official, was alarmed to learn important divisions had been reduced to skeleton staffs or scrapped, jeopardizing the entire federal financial aid system.
Read more: On his way out the door, a top Biden official has worries
'All of our efforts to ensure those kinds of mistakes are not made again have been reversed,' he said.
"These issues could continue to happen," said Edward James, a laid-off Federal Student Aid staffer who is vice president of the local union representing Education Department workers.
His colleagues, he said, were "the glue that helps hold things together."
How the Education Department prevents fraud and abuse
The Education Department plays a significant role in ensuring that schools are deterred from taking advantage of students or discriminating against them. Fulfilling those dual missions will be tough with fewer personnel, employees said.
On Tuesday, one key office that regulates colleges dropped from 192 staffers to 29 in minutes, a laid-off employee posted on social media. Kevin Roberts, an institutional review specialist dismissed last week, called it a 'guaranteed fact' that some colleges will be forced to close or lose eligibility for federal financial aid because of the downsizing.
'Linda McMahon has basically given 4,000 institutions plus foreign schools the green light to waste, abuse, and create fraud with Federal Financial Aid dollars with zero oversight,' he wrote on LinkedIn.
The Office for Civil Rights, a vital watchdog for abuse, shuttered seven regional offices across the country, from New York City to San Francisco. It's a huge deal, said Catherine Lhamon, who led civil rights enforcement in schools in the Biden administration.
Those regional offices exist, she said, so that attorneys can develop relationships with school lawyers, administrators and communities. The on-the-ground support ultimately speeds up investigations, solving students' problems more quickly.
'The department has so gutted the offices that they're a sham now,' she said.
Three days after Trump officials fired hundreds of staffers in the civil rights division, the Education Department ordered sweeping new investigations of six colleges accused of offering 'impermissible race-based scholarships.'
The new cases represent a 'dangerous' reorientation of the office Lhamon led for years, she said. In her view, its sole focus now seems to be "pet projects for political leadership.'
Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@usatoday.com. Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @zachschermele.bsky.social.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Breakdown of U.S. tariffs on China since Trump's first term
BEIJING (Reuters) -Billions of dollars of Chinese goods have been impacted by additional U.S. tariffs since 2018, initially under the first Donald Trump presidency and later under the Biden administration. Returning to the White House this year, Trump has imposed even more duties on China. The U.S. tariffs range from those imposed under Section 301 of its trade act due to what Washington claims are unfair Chinese trade practices, to duties under Section 232 levied for national security reasons. This year, Trump has imposed another 20% levies on all Chinese goods, saying Beijing has not done enough to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States. So-called reciprocal tariffs, under which the U.S. will match duties imposed by other countries, have also been levied in a bid to rebalance trade flows. Below are the U.S. tariffs on China effective as of June 12, 2025: Tariff Rate Products Effective date Reciprocal 10% All Paused for 90 days until Aug 10, 2025 Fentanyl 20% All Mar 4, 2025 Section Up to List 1: Pharmaceuticals, July 6, 2018 301 25% iron and steel, aluminium, vehicles and aircraft, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 2: Vehicles, Aug 23, 2018 railway or tramway locomotives, aircraft and their parts, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 3: Prepared May 10, 2019 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, wood products, textiles, precious and base metals, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, machinery and mechanical appliances and more. List 4A: Prepared Feb 14, 2020 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, footwear, wood products, ceramic products, glass, textiles, precious and base metals, machinery and mechanical appliances, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, art, antiques and more. In September 2019, the U.S. imposed 15% tariffs on more than $120 billion of Chinese goods under Section 301, which it then halved to 7.5% less than six months later. The 25% U.S. tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods under the earlier List 1-3 remain unchanged. In September 2024, the U.S. Trade Representative under the Biden administration announced additional tariffs of 25-100% on 14 product groups following a four-year review of the Section 301 tariff actions. The levies were imposed on strategic Chinese sectors or sectors where the United States has made significant domestic investments. Additional tariffs on goods under Section 301: Effective date EVs 100% Sep 27, 2024 Solar cells, syringes and 50% needles Non-lithium-ion battery parts, 25% lithium-ion electrical vehicle batteries, other critical minerals, ship-to-shore cranes, steel and aluminium products, facemasks Semiconductors 50% Jan 1, 2025 Lithium-ion non-electrical 25% Jan 1, 2026 vehicle batteries, medical gloves, natural graphite, permanent magnets In addition to the above duties, the first Trump administration in 2018 imposed a range of tariffs under Section 232 aimed at restricting goods deemed a threat to national security, including all aluminium and steel imports, shutting most Chinese suppliers out of the U.S. market. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How Project 2025 Compares With Trump's Los Angeles Response
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's response to protests in Los Angeles is in keeping with suggestions put forth in Project 2025, a political commentator has said. Allison Gill, who worked at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, said on Wajahat Ali's the Left Hook Substack that the president's military response was "spelled out in Project 2025," a conservative policy dossier. She did not specify how. Newsweek has contacted the Heritage Foundation and Gill for comment by email. The Context Protests against immigration enforcement began in Los Angeles on Friday and have continued, with some isolated incidents of violence and looting. In response, Trump announced the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to restore order, without California Governor Gavin Newsom's consent. While the president has said the move was necessary to prevent the city from "burning to the ground" amid protests and riots, officials in California have accused Trump of exacerbating the situation in an "unprecedented power grab." A police officer firing a soft round near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on June 8. A police officer firing a soft round near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on June 8. AP Photo/Eric Thayer What To Know Gill, who served Trump a lawsuit in 2023 accusing him of conspiring to fire her from the Veterans Affairs Department during his first presidency, said sending in the Marines was "propaganda" because the protests were not severe enough to require them. Though she said Project 2025 predicted the president's response to the protests, she did not elaborate on how. Project 2025 is a 900-page document of policy proposals published by the Heritage Foundation think tank. It advocates limited government, border security and tough immigration laws among other conservative measures. The policy proposals have proved divisive, and the president's critics and supporters alike have debated their influence on him. While Project 2025 does not mention the Insurrection Act, a November 2023 report from The Washington Post, citing internal communications and a person involved in the conversations, said the Project 2025 group had drafted executive orders that would use the Insurrection Act to deploy the military domestically. Gill told Ali that she warned people of Trump's potential use of the military to curb protests before the presidential election. "We did everything that we could in leading up to the election in 2024 to tell everyone as loud as we can, they are planning to do this," she said, adding: "Saying he's going to call this an invasion. He's going to call this an insurrection. And he's going to use that to invoke emergency powers so that he can unleash the military on United States citizens and perhaps even suspend habeas corpus so that he can detain his political enemies without due process." "This is scary," Gill, who hosts the Mueller, She Wrote podcast, continued. "This is full-on fascism, full-on authoritarianism." "This is a test case for authoritarianism," Ali added. Before the 2024 presidential election, Democrats accused Trump of planning to implement Project 2025 if he won. While Trump initially called parts of the plan "ridiculous and abysmal," he told Time after his electoral victory that he disagreed with parts of it, but not all of it. He has since appointed a number of people linked to Project 2025 to White House positions. In an October interview with Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, Trump indicated that he would use the National Guard or the military if there were disruptions from "radical left lunatics" on Election Day. What Does Project 2025 Say? Project 2025 advocates for improved defense infrastructure and for the Department of Homeland Security to "thoroughly enforce immigration laws." The document added that DHS should "provide states and localities with a limited federal emergency response and preparedness." However, it did not say whether this would occur in the context of protests. What Trump's Advisers Have Said Trump's advisers have previously spoken about the use of National Guard troops in other contexts. According to a February 2024 report in The Atlantic, Stephen Miller, now the White House deputy chief of staff, said that Trump—if returned to office—would take National Guard troops from sympathetic Republican-controlled states and use them in Democratic-run states whose governors refused to cooperate with their mass deportation policy. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday: "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday: "We will always protect the constitutional right for Angelenos to peacefully protest. However, violence, destruction and vandalism will not be tolerated in our city and those responsible will be held fully accountable." What Happens Next The anti-ICE protests, which have spread to other cities, are likely to continue. Newsom has called on the Trump administration to remove federal troops from Los Angeles.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China affirms trade deal with US, says it always keeps its word
BEIJING (Reuters) -China on Thursday affirmed a trade deal announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, saying both sides needed to abide by the consensus and adding China always kept its word. The deal, reached after Trump and China's President Xi Jinping spoke on the telephone last week, brings a delicate truce in a trade war between the world's two largest economies. "China has always kept its word and delivered results," Lin Jian, a foreign ministry spokesperson, said at a regular news conference. "Now that a consensus has been reached, both sides should abide by it." The Trump-Xi telephone call broke a standoff that had flared just weeks after a preliminary deal was reached in Geneva. The call was quickly followed by more talks in London that Washington said had put "meat on the bones" of the Geneva agreement to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. Trump on Wednesday said he was very happy with the trade deal. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on Truth Social. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%." Still, specifics of the latest deal and details on how it will be implemented remain unclear. A White House official said the 55% represents the sum of a baseline 10% "reciprocal" tariff Trump has imposed on goods imported from nearly all U.S. trading partners, 20% on all Chinese imports associated with his accusation that China had not done enough to stem the flow of fentanyl into the U.S., and pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China put in place during Trump's first presidential term. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data