Indigenous trust loses millions in failed plan to turn El Caballo equine resort into social housing
The Spanish equine theme park El Caballo in Wooroloo was purchased in 2020 for $12 million, in order to provide a "proof of concept" of a social housing model to tackle homelessness for members of Western Australia's Noongar community.
An additional $1.5 million was then spent on repairs, trying to turn it into liveable social housing.
Three years later, with the property still sitting empty, the accommodation portion of the site was sold for $4 million, at a loss of $4.5 million.
The resort portion of the property remains on the market.
The purchase was funded out of the Noongar Charitable Trust, established in 2011 by the South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council (SWALSC), as a way to distribute funds to projects supporting members of the Noongar claimant group in Western Australia.
But the purchase was referred to the WA Ombudsman after concerns were raised by community members.
These included that the property was acquired without independent market valuation, evidence of a credible business plan or assessment of the ongoing operational funding requirements.
The purchase at the time represented around 50 per cent of the trust's value.
According to the ombudsman's investigation, headed up by WA's Charitable Trusts Commissioner Bevan Warner, a "scoping" report on the El Caballo site valued the property at $32 million, but it was unclear how this figure was obtained.
A retrospective valuation undertaken found it was worth just $5.9 million at the time of purchase, leaving a shortfall of more than $6 million on the $12 million purchase price.
ASX-listed Equity Trustees (EQT) was responsible for distributing the funds on behalf of the Noongar trust.
In a report tabled in WA's parliament yesterday, Mr Warner found EQT "breached its duties as trustee" in authorising the purchase, and has ordered the firm to pay restoration.
Mr Warner found EQT relied too heavily on the representations of a former chief executive officer of the SWALSC who proposed the plan, and did not "independently and impartially" consider the viability of the project.
"The trustees owed to the Noongar people the obligation of examining the proposal in some depth," Mr Warner wrote.
The investigation came about after the national charity regulator, the Australian Charities Not-for-Profits Commission (ACNC), found governance needed to be improved at EQT, but did not take further action.
The WA attorney-general then referred the matter to the ombudsman.
Concerns were raised by EQT about the proposed purchase at the time, including querying why the property had remained on the market for so long.
The organisation also questioned whether an independent valuation should have been obtained.
But according to Mr Warner's investigation, these concerns were addressed by a consultant possibly arranged by the then SWALSC chief executive Wayne Nannup, writing to EQT that "we believe that this purchase price represents excellent value of the site" and it was "better off saving the cost of obtaining an independent valuation".
The investigation found EQT did not carry through with seeking further assessment of the property's value, choosing to rely on valuations provided by consultants arranged by the SWALSC.
"The Commission considers the suggestion that the trustee forgo obtaining an independent valuation in relation to the purchase of an asset purportedly worth in excess of $12 million and requiring an application of half of the corpus of the trust fund, to avoid the cost of those valuations, which are likely to be modest compared to the purchase price, is unreasonable in the circumstances," Mr Warner wrote.
EQT has always maintained it undertook sufficient due diligence.
It told Mr Warner's office that the uniqueness of the El Caballo property meant a standard property valuation could not be obtained, and that it relied on experts put forward by the SWALSC.
"We carefully considered the housing project put forward by the [SWALSC] and notably the social value it would bring to the Noongar people in the years to come," EQT said.
In a statement to the ABC, a spokesperson for Equity Trustees said they remained committed to the intent of the Noongar trust, to support projects directly benefiting the Noongar community.
"At its heart, these funds were always intended to enable and support a community-driven social housing strategy to contribute to the alleviation of homelessness, support domestic violence victims, and provide rehabilitation and aged care facilities for the Noongar community," the statement said.
EQT has until mid-September to respond to the commission's decision that they owe reparations.
The commission has also referred matters relating to the SWALSC to the federal regulator of Indigenous organisations.
"Throughout the Commission's investigation various concerns have been raised by community members and on the information at hand about the conduct of current and former office-holders of [SWALSC]," the report states.
"The Commission has determined that information obtained during its investigation warrants a proactive referral to ORIC (the Office of the Registrar of Indigenous Corporations), and this will be undertaken once this report is provided to the Attorney-General."
The ABC has approached the SWALSC for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Can't always get rid of a mortgage': Aussie reveals apartment ‘hell'
Buying your own home is sold to most of us as the Aussie dream, but one woman has claimed purchasing her first property was the worst financial decision she's ever made. Nicole Sherwin bought a small apartment in Melbourne in 2019. At the time, she felt relieved that she'd managed to crack Australia's incredibly tough property market. The 37-year-old always knew that buying an apartment wasn't going to be the 'best investment', but she feared that if she didn't buy in 2019, the property market would keep increasing and she'd miss out forever. 'I felt like I needed to do it,' she told Within a few short years though, Ms Sherwin was locked in a financial nightmare, and her apartment became more of a liability than investment. Ms Sherwin wasn't convinced buying a new apartment was the best investment but decided to take a measured 'gamble' and purchase it anyway. At the time, she was pregnant, and she explained to that, due to societal expectations, she felt buying was the right decision. 'I was pregnant, and once you have a baby and you're on maternity leave, I knew it'd be harder. I figured it was now or never,' she said. In hindsight, Ms Sherwin concedes she was thinking too short-term with her property purchase. She wanted a place near Melbourne's CBD that was convenient for her current situation and wasn't prepared to shake up her lifestyle to buy a better investment. 'Hindsight is 20/20. I should have sucked it up and bought a place further out and it might have appreciated in value,' she said. When Ms Sherwin bought the apartment it didn't feel like a bad decision, and for two years it wasn't. She and her partner lived in the small apartment happily but then their family expanded. 'It was amazing. It was a great location and a great apartment but the downfall was the car stacker,' she said. The young mum explained that the car stacker wasn't working in their favour. It only fit smaller cars, and they were a growing family, battling car seats, which became the bane of their existence. 'We got to the point where we outgrew it,' she explained. The family decided to become rent investors. They rented out the apartment and then rented a bigger place to live, but this strategy didn't work out because the property was negatively geared. 'I got a tenant in and figured we'd be rent investors but that only works when properties appreciate and it wasn't appreciating,' she said. The apartment's value had been decreasing because other apartment blocks were built around it after they purchased in 2019, and suddenly supply outweighed demand. The timing compounded the financial problem. It was right in the middle of when interest rates were rising and Ms Sherwin got slammed with rate rises. The body corporate fees also went up by $200 a month. 'My home loan had gone from 2 per cent to 6.8 per cent. Homeownership was hell for me,' she said. Ms Sherwin then made the decision to put her apartment on the market, sell it, and invest her money elsewhere, but even that didn't provide financial relief. 'We put it in the market and people were coming through every weekend but it just wouldn't budge. People were saying the size was a problem because it was a small apartment,' she said. The property languished on the market for two years, and Ms Sherwin said they couldn't sell it, despite going through multiple real estate agents, as she was desperate to offload it. Even though rents were rising at the time Ms Sherwin couldn't even afford to risk increasing the rent on her tenant because she feared they would move out. Ultimately, her tenant was paying below market value for the apartment, which was better than the alternative of having to cover a mortgage and rent. 'If she left I'd have an empty apartment that no one would want to move into because it was on the market,' she said. 'I needed to get rid of it so I could move on with my life.' The apartment finally sold this year for $30,000 less than Ms Sherwin paid for it. By the time the sale went through, the mum-of-two believes she lost around $65,000 all up. The $65,000 figure factors in the cost of maintaining an apartment that was losing value. Even though she lost money, Ms Sherwin was so relieved to get rid of the property that by the time she sold it, she felt more relief than stinging regret. 'By the end I was just accepting of it,' she said. The 37-year-old said what she's learned from the experience is that you can't 'always get rid of a mortgage' but she argues her story isn't unique. Ms Sherwin claimed that she's heard from plenty of friends and acquaintances who have made the same mistake, bought near the CBD to avoid the 'outer suburbs' and watched in horror as their property decreased in value. 'If I had known this would have happened, of course, I wouldn't have done it. I think people think property is a safe bet but it absolutely isn't,' she said.


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Nissan Ariya: First examples of Japanese Tesla Model Y rival en route to Australia
The Nissan Ariya is finally on its way to Australia almost five years after it was revealed, with first examples of the mid-size electric SUV having been loaded onto a ship bound for our shores. After opening its order book on July 25, Nissan Australia has now shared images of Australia-bound Ariya vehicles ahead of their official on-sale date at the beginning of September. They're manufactured in Nissan's Tochigi Plant in Japan, yet the Ariya significantly undercuts its fellow Japanese-built rivals on price. Starting at $55,840 before on-road costs, the Ariya is more than $10,000 cheaper than the most affordable Toyota bZ4X ($66,000 before on-roads) and Subaru Solterra ($69,990 plus on-roads). CarExpert can save you thousands on a new Nissan. Click here to get a great deal. It also manages to undercut the popular Tesla Model Y (priced from $58,900 plus on-roads), the best-selling vehicle in this segment, though it's more expensive than the second-placed BYD Sealion 7 (from $54,990 before on-roads). Nissan Australia will offer four variants of the Ariya: the front-wheel drive Engage and Advance, which use a 63kWh battery and a 160kW/300Nm electric motor; the Advance+, which upgrades to an 87kWh battery and 178kW/300Nm motor; and the all-wheel drive Evolve flagship, which uses the larger battery but has two electric motors both producing 160kW. The Ariya is backed by Nissan's 10-year, 300,000km warranty, provided you service the vehicle at Nissan Australia dealerships. Otherwise, Nissan's standard warranty is five years with no mileage cap. Nissan also backs the Ariya's battery with an eight-year, 160,000km warranty, including a guaranteed minimum battery capacity of at least nine bars out of the 12 visible on the vehicle's battery capacity level gauge. The Ariya was revealed in concept form in 2019, before the showroom version was unveiled in 2020 and entered production in 2021. An Australian launch was first planned for 2023 but its arrival was postponed – something which Nissan Australia blamed on Australian Design Rules (ADRs) as well as limited supply for our market. The Ariya's belated arrival in Australia means it avoided an EV price war across the Australian auto industry, led by aggressive price cuts from market-leading EV brand, Tesla. 'I think we've been smart with the timing,' Nissan Australia boss Andrew Humberstone told CarExpert in September 2024. 'Or else we would have had to respond to the market conditions and our pricing would have been catastrophic. I think we've read that one well.' He told CarExpert the final push to have Ariya in showrooms came with the arrival of the federal government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which came into effect on January 1, 2025. The Ariya is far from the only vehicle in its segment to face significant delays in coming to Australia, with the Toyota bZ4X and Ford Mustang Mach-E also arriving here much later than in other markets.


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Nissan Ariya: First examples of Japanese Tesla Model Y rival en route to Australia
The Nissan Ariya is finally on its way to Australia almost five years after it was revealed, with first examples of the mid-size electric SUV having been loaded onto a ship bound for our shores. After opening its order book on July 25, Nissan Australia has now shared images of Australia-bound Ariya vehicles ahead of their official on-sale date at the beginning of September. They're manufactured in Nissan's Tochigi Plant in Japan, yet the Ariya significantly undercuts its fellow Japanese-built rivals on price. Starting at $55,840 before on-road costs, the Ariya is more than $10,000 cheaper than the most affordable Toyota bZ4X ($66,000 before on-roads) and Subaru Solterra ($69,990 plus on-roads). CarExpert can save you thousands on a new Nissan. Click here to get a great deal. Supplied Credit: CarExpert It also manages to undercut the popular Tesla Model Y (priced from $58,900 plus on-roads), the best-selling vehicle in this segment, though it's more expensive than the second-placed BYD Sealion 7 (from $54,990 before on-roads). Nissan Australia will offer four variants of the Ariya: the front-wheel drive Engage and Advance, which use a 63kWh battery and a 160kW/300Nm electric motor; the Advance+, which upgrades to an 87kWh battery and 178kW/300Nm motor; and the all-wheel drive Evolve flagship, which uses the larger battery but has two electric motors both producing 160kW. The Ariya is backed by Nissan's 10-year, 300,000km warranty, provided you service the vehicle at Nissan Australia dealerships. Otherwise, Nissan's standard warranty is five years with no mileage cap. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Nissan also backs the Ariya's battery with an eight-year, 160,000km warranty, including a guaranteed minimum battery capacity of at least nine bars out of the 12 visible on the vehicle's battery capacity level gauge. The Ariya was revealed in concept form in 2019, before the showroom version was unveiled in 2020 and entered production in 2021. An Australian launch was first planned for 2023 but its arrival was postponed – something which Nissan Australia blamed on Australian Design Rules (ADRs) as well as limited supply for our market. The Ariya's belated arrival in Australia means it avoided an EV price war across the Australian auto industry, led by aggressive price cuts from market-leading EV brand, Tesla. Supplied Credit: CarExpert 'I think we've been smart with the timing,' Nissan Australia boss Andrew Humberstone told CarExpert in September 2024. 'Or else we would have had to respond to the market conditions and our pricing would have been catastrophic. I think we've read that one well.' He told CarExpert the final push to have Ariya in showrooms came with the arrival of the federal government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which came into effect on January 1, 2025. The Ariya is far from the only vehicle in its segment to face significant delays in coming to Australia, with the Toyota bZ4X and Ford Mustang Mach-E also arriving here much later than in other markets. MORE: 2025 Nissan Ariya price and specs MORE: Explore the Nissan Ariya showroom