Assaults on prison staff reach highest level in a decade
Some 10,605 assaults on staff in male and female jails were recorded in 2024, up from 9,204 in 2023 and nearly three times the 3,640 in 2014.
The rate of assaults on staff stood at 122 per 1,000 prisoners last year, up from 108 in 2023 and 43 a decade earlier.
The figures come after several incidents in prisons have raised concerns over staff safety and the standard of protective equipment at work.
Four officers were attacked with hot oil and homemade weapons by Manchester Arena bomb plotter Hashem Abedi at HMP Frankland in County Durham on April 12.
Convicted killer John Mansfield was also found dead after suffering a head injury at HMP Whitemoor on April 13, with another inmate arrested on suspicion of his murder.
Data from the Ministry of Justice also shows the number of serious assaults on prison staff in England and Wales reached 974 last year, up from 853 in 2023 and the highest in a decade.
The rate of serious assaults stood at 11 per 1,000 prisoners, up from 10 in 2023 and six in 2014.
Reacting to the figures, Prison Officers' Association national chairman Mark Fairhurst said: 'These truly appalling statistics demonstrate the gravity of the situation brave prison officers face on a daily basis.
'The time for platitudes has passed and it is now time for action.
'We need to take back control of our violent and chaotic prisons and ensure staff safety is paramount.'
A total of 30,490 assaults of all kinds were recorded in prisons last year, the equivalent of a rate of 351 per 1,000 prisoners.
This is up from 26,924 in 2023 and a rate of 315 per 1,000.
It is the highest number of assaults in a calendar year since 32,539 were recorded in 2018, while it is the highest rate since 368 per 1,000 in 2019.
The overall rate of assaults last year was higher in female jails, at 560 per 1,000 prisoners, than in male establishments, where the rate was 342 per 1,000.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced the use of Tasers will be trialled in prisons and confirmed the prison service will conduct a 'snap review' of the use of protective body armour for prison officers.
The Lord Chancellor met with Mr Fairhurst on Wednesday, in what he described as a 'positive and constructive' meeting as he presses for staff to be issued stab proof vests and other safety measures.
A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: 'These statistics once again lay bare the extent of the crisis facing our prisons – with levels of violence, assaults on staff and self-harm far too high.
'We will do whatever we can to protect our hardworking staff. The Lord Chancellor has announced a review into protective body armour and a trial of tasers in jails to better respond to serious incidents.
'But it is clear fundamental change is needed, which is why we're also reforming our jails so they create better citizens, not better criminals.'
The Ministry of Justice also announced on Thursday that prison officers in public young offender institutions (YOIs) will start using synthetic pepper spray from this summer to combat rising violence from inmates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Mudtown review — in a legal fix with Newport's very own Tony Soprano
If you felt like bailing out of Mudtown (U&Alibi) after the first episode because, despite a very good cast, it sometimes felt like being slapped on the head by a magistrate's handbook, then I hear you. I cringed when Claire (a magistrate played by an otherwise compelling Erin Richards) lectured her fellow magistrates that 'we're all innocent until proven guilty' and must not 'judge a book by its cover'. (You don't say? If actual officials on the actual bench need telling this, then God help us.) It was also clunky when Claire's mentor reminded her that the job was 'justice without fear or favour, affection or ill will'. Do magistrates po-facedly quote the oath to each other in their downtime? I can't lie and say that I didn't hate it when the magistrates in their private room joked about animal cruelty cases, bantering about a 'cat in a trouser press' and a 'hamster in a blender'. They were dealing with a lout who had thrown a chihuahua off a high balcony. One defended him, saying he'd had a tough start in life. Another said: 'I don't like those little dogs.' What? Bar that man from the bench. Put him in a cell! However, it would be a pity if you did choose to bail on this (I've just realised that's a terrible pun), because it gets much better after that expositional first episode. Mudtown, named because of the muddy riverbanks in Newport, South Wales, also deserves credit for being a crime drama that — praise be — isn't about the police. And it features the excellent Tom Cullen (John 'Goldfinger' Palmer in The Gold) as Saint Pete, a brooding, scary crime boss dubbed 'Newport's very own Tony Soprano'. Well, he's certainly charismatic. • Tom Cullen interview: 'I've worked with some nefarious characters' Pete is a childhood sweetheart of Claire, the duo having grown up together and got into trouble on the same estate. Now Claire is studying to be a lawyer at night school while also working as a manager filling shelves in a warehouse. She is a woman of the people, aiming to provide a better life for her young son, dozy, debt-ridden husband and wayward teenage daughter, Beca (a talented Lauren Morais). Though there was more clunky dialogue at the warehouse when a fellow worker told Claire: 'I don't know how you juggle being our manager and volunteering as a magistrate. You're like a superhero!' OK, we get it. The intrigue centres on an arson attack at a derelict building during which £2 million of Saint Pete's hidden money was either burnt or stolen and he isn't too happy about it. Cue a series of events featuring beatings, guns and extreme violence, though for light relief we get debt collectors knocking on Claire's door. • Read more TV reviews, guides about what to watch and interviews There are some good performances here (the Welsh-language version of the series was shown last year with the title Ar y Ffin), particularly from Richards, Cullen, Morais, Matthew Gravelle as Claire's hapless husband and Lloyd Meredith as the local ne'er-do-well and dog chucker with a secret. You may find it hard to swallow lines such as, 'The kid's in over his head!' or the idea of a magistrate actually investigating things herself, but this series is trying something different. It's worth a few hours of your time.★★★☆☆ Love TV? Discover the best shows on Netflix, the best Prime Video TV shows, the best Disney+ shows , the best Apple TV+ shows, the best shows on BBC iPlayer , the best shows on Sky and Now, the best shows on ITVX, the best shows on Channel 4 streaming, the best shows on Paramount+ and our favourite hidden gem TV shows. Don't forget to check our comprehensive TV guide for the latest listings
The Courier
an hour ago
- The Courier
Prisoners like Angus killer Tasmin Glass could have fewer freedom bids under parole reform proposals
Prisoners like Angus killer Tasmin Glass could be forced to spend longer periods behind bars in between parole hearings. A consultation on parole reforms has been launched by the Scottish Government, considering transparency and communication issues that plague victims in the current process. The consultation comes in the wake of The Courier's A Voice for Victims campaign which has called for these much-needed reforms. We have worked with the family of Glass' victim Steven Donaldson, Linda McDonald who survived an attack by Dundee murderer Robbie McIntosh, and the family of Barry Smullen who was stabbed to death in Perth. Justice Secretary Angela Constance spoke exclusively to The Courier as the parole consultation was launched, saying she believes the process must have victim wellbeing at its heart. The consultation considers 43 questions, which collectively have the potential for important reforms to improve the lives of victims and increase transparency. Potential areas for change include how long a criminal should have to wait between parole hearings after being denied by the board. Currently, for prisoners like Tasmin Glass it is 12 months, and for prisoners like Robbie McIntosh it is two years. Glass is a long-term prisoner while McIntosh is on an order of life restriction. That could be increased depending on the results of the consultation. Victims and their families have long pointed to this aspect of parole as one of the most traumatising, as they feel like they are constantly being forced to engage with the process. Another question raises the possibility of more people attending parole hearings. It asks if victims should have an automatic right to be there, or if media could watch proceedings. Other options include more detail being given by the parole board around its decisions to release or not release. One long-sought reform that is not in the consultation is the current automatic right for long-term prisoners to be considered for parole halfway through their sentence. The Justice Secretary said that question would need to come through a different part of legislation. The Justice Secretary spoke with The Courier in Dundee on Wednesday afternoon, the day of the launch. She applauded The Courier's campaign to help drive these reforms forward. 'I am determined that the parole system, at its very heart, has to have victims and their families and their interests,' said Ms Constance. She added: 'That's crucial to the deliberations that the parole board has to make that's ultimately about public safety as well as rehabilitation. 'The Courier has been a great advocate for victims and their families and has led a campaign that is driven on improvements. 'So while there are some really important fundamental questions about how we improve that overall openness, transparency, information, (and) treatment of victims. 'There are also issues that are important in terms of process and management. 'There's an appetite for us to be looking at all of that. 'This is an attempt by the government to be open and its built on the engagement that we've had with victims, and the advocacy that victims themselves, and papers like The Courier, and victims support organisations have championed.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump admin better-placed than courts to release Epstein files, judge says
NEW YORK, Aug 20 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge said on Wednesday that the Trump administration is in a better position than federal courts to release materials that would satisfy public curiosity about the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. In rejecting the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted Epstein in 2019, Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Richard Berman wrote that the 70-odd pages of materials the grand jury saw paled in comparison to the 100,000 pages the government has from its Epstein investigation but is not releasing. The judge said the bid to persuade him to unseal the records was an apparent distraction from the Justice Department's decision in July not to release its files and directly cited another judge's decision earlier this month not to release similar materials from the grand jury that indicted Epstein's longtime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. "The instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession," Berman wrote. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump has faced criticism from his conservative base of supporters and congressional Democrats over the Justice Department's decision not to release the files from its Epstein investigation. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. To try to quell the discontent, Trump in July instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Justice Department investigations typically collect more material than prosecutors ultimately present to grand juries. Some of that evidence is sometimes eventually disclosed to the public during criminal trials. The Justice Department does not routinely disclose its evidence in cases where a defendant pleads guilty or, like Epstein, never faces trial, but it would not require judicial approval to release such materials. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and saw a PowerPoint presentation and call logs, Berman wrote. On Aug. 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from Maxwell's case, writing that the material was duplicative of public testimony at her 2021 trial. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein. "A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion - aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such," Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review her case.
