UK foreign investment falls as funding from US dries up, survey shows
Foreign investment in the UK declined last year as funding from the US slipped, new data shows, while the Government is ramping up efforts to attract more overseas spending.
The UK secured fewer investment projects than France for the fifth year in a row, according to EY's annual UK attractiveness survey.
The number of foreign direct investment (FDI) projects totalled 853 in 2024, down 13% on 2023's total.
It was also behind the 1,025 secured by France during the year, but ahead of Germany's 608.
FDI projects refer to funding from overseas that helps businesses create new facilities or jobs.
The technology sector attracted the most investment in the UK, followed by transport manufacturers which include carmakers and aerospace firms.
Big projects last year including India-based technology giant Infosys opening a new artificial intelligence (AI) lab in London, in partnership with the University of Cambridge.
Investment across Europe fell by 5% over 2024, marking the second consecutive year of decline, following a more pronounced dip in internationally-funded projects in France, the UK, and Germany.
This partly reflects low economic growth, high energy prices, and competition from other markets such as Asia and the US impacting investment, according to EY.
US spending on projects fell by 11% in Europe and 7% in the UK, helping drag on the overall total.
Meanwhile, the UK secured half of all Indian funding into projects in Europe.
The study comes hot off the heels of the UK securing a new trade deal with India, which slashed tariffs on goods exports and introduced tax exemptions that will make it easier for some Indian professionals to work in the country.
The Government has also been accelerating efforts to boost investment into the UK in a bid to stimulate economic growth.
Earlier this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves welcomed a commitment by pension funds to invest tens of billions in British infrastructure projects and businesses.
Peter Arnold, EY UK's chief economist, said: 'Economic growth across Europe has been relatively modest in recent years, which appears to be driving investors towards more competitive global destinations such as Asia and the US
'Global uncertainty makes it difficult to predict how investment numbers will change this year, but the UK does have some strong fundamentals that could set it apart.
'The UK tends to attract FDI from a more diverse range of countries outside Europe,' he said, adding: 'Rapidly expanding economies like India are also becoming increasingly important sources of investment for the UK in key sectors like technology.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 1 Time Queen Elizabeth Confronted ‘Difficult' Meghan Markle: ‘We Don't Speak to People Like That'
The reports about Meghan Markle have swirled since she and Prince Harry first announced their engagement, and depending on who you believe, it's all either an attempt to besmirch her character or totally factual. Either way, the media has jumped on every negative report to the point that it's sometimes hard to parse out what really happened or who is really feuding with whom. And that's complicated when it comes to the British Royal Family, particularly at a time where it seems like every day there's also speculation about the state of Prince William and Kate Middleton's marriage, not to mention concerns about Prince Harry's relationship with his father, King Charles, and his brother, Prince William. More from StyleCaster Meghan Markle Reveals Life Is Not How She 'Envisioned' as Prince Harry 'Crossed the Line' Once & for All With the Royal Family Meghan Markle Not on Speaking Terms With Another British Icon Amid Update to Kate Middleton Fallout Related: William Is 'Done' With Harry After His 'Abhorrent' Behavior Toward Charles—He Caused 'Irreparable Harm' Now, new reports indicate that Meghan Markle 'berated' one of her wedding caterers so badly that the late Queen Elizabeth II had to intervene, according to royal biographer Katie Nicholl. 'On one occasion in the run-up to the wedding, Meghan went to Windsor Castle for a menu-tasting and ended up having a tense exchange with a member of staff,' Nicholl claimed in her book The New Royals, per the Daily Mail. 'Meghan was at the castle to taste some of the dishes, and told one of the caterers she could taste egg,' a source told Nichols. The story goes that Markle got upset because 'the dish was meant to be vegan and macrobiotic.' The incident reportedly got back to the Queen, who intervened. 'Suddenly the Queen walked in and said: 'Meghan, in this family we don't speak to people like that,'' the source claimed. British journalist Tom Quinn claimed Markle had earned the nickname 'Duchess of Difficult' before she and Prince Harry stepped away from their royal duties. 'She could be difficult because she was finding life difficult — trying to feel her way and work out the intricacies of a positively medieval, labyrinthine system,' an anonymous palace staff reportedly told Quinn. Markle has also had to deal with accusations of bullying the staff before. The new reports don't paint her in the same light, but are also not totally favorable, with the insider claiming she was called 'Mystic Meg' because of her 'new agey' views, which were considered 'so woke.' 'Through absolutely no fault of her own, Meghan wasn't always great with her staff — she just wasn't used to it as Harry was,' the source continued. 'One minute she would be really friendly, perhaps overfriendly, hugging staff and trying to make friends with them, and the next she would be irritated by the fact they wouldn't respond instantly at all times of the day and night.' Recently, there have been new reports about Markle's relationship with Kate Middleton, as well. The reports specifically reference an incident between the two where it was reported that Markle made Middleton cry. An anonymous Royal staffer told Tom Quinn for his book Yes, Ma'am: The Secret Life of Royal Servants that the media blew the situation out of proportion. 'Whenever this sort of thing happens in the royal family, traditionally no one says anything publicly about it, so it rarely reaches the media, but on this occasion, all sorts of other grievances meant that what was really nothing but a storm in a teacup reached the media and became a big issue. I can tell you that all the papers and commentators got this wrong, the truth is that as with many of these spats between sisters, brothers or even sisters-in-law, both sides were really upset.' Best of StyleCaster The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meghan Markle's Neighbors Slam Her as ‘Distant'—She Doesn't ‘Fit in' Compared to ‘Charming' Prince Harry
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are always giving people something to talk about. In many ways, it is a byproduct of who they are. It's impossible to avoid it. But there's also the fact that the British royal family is going through some tough times, with King Charles sick, succession plans in place, and Prince Harry feuding with both his father and his brother, Prince William. Throw on top of that constant rumors about the state of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's marriage, and there's always something to talk about. Their marriage appears to be quite well, with Markle herself dispelling rumors on a recent podcast appearance, saying about Prince Harry, 'He's such a great partner. I feel that every day in how supportive he's been and is,' and adding, 'That man loves me so much and, you know, look what we've built. We've built a beautiful life, and we have two healthy, beautiful children.' More from StyleCaster Prince Harry Is 'So Disappointed' by Princess Diana's Sisters After He Was Accused of 'Betraying' the Royal Family King Charles Sends Telling Sign He'll Never Reconcile With Harry Amid Reports His Son Is Making His Final Years a 'Misery' Related: Did William really cheat on Kate? But rumors about Markle's supposed problematic behavior have plagued Markle for years, and now comes a new report from a neighbor of hers in Montecito, claiming she doesn't really fit in. Richard Mineards, who lives in the area, spoke to the Daily Mail about Markle allegedly turning away a local elderly historian who wanted to gift her a copy of his documentary about the area when she and Prince Harry first moved in. 'The old man never got past the gate,' Mineards said, citing it as an example of Markle being distant. 'She pays attention to every appearance, every word, every gesture,' Mineards said. 'And here in Montecito, we appreciate simple people, even famous ones.' 'Meghan doesn't play the community game,' he claimed, adding that she's 'never tried to fit in.' Meanwhile, the man had nothing but praise for Prince Harry, who, one would think, because of his upbringing, wouldn't be as good at getting along with his neighbors. 'He is always charming, approachable, with that very recognizable Windsor accent. He smiles, shakes hands, willingly exchanges a few words,' Mineards told the ourlet. 'We've seen him at the beach, in an organic coffee shop, or cycling in the hills.' Basically, Prince Harry has translated the public politeness of the royal family to his new community. This comes on the heels of British journalist Tom Quinn claiming Markle had earned the nickname 'Duchess of Difficult' before she and Prince Harry stepped away from their royal duties. 'She could be difficult because she was finding life difficult — trying to feel her way and work out the intricacies of a positively medieval, labyrinthine system,' an anonymous palace staff reportedly told Quinn. Recent reports also indicate that Meghan Markle 'berated' one of her wedding caterers so badly that the late Queen Elizabeth II had to intervene, according to royal biographer Katie Nicholl. However, all of these reports are coming from the same people who have criticized Meghan Markle from the beginning, and who Prince Harry has denounced were part of a campaign against her. The same Tom Quinn, for example, spoke about Markle's relationship with Kate Middleton in his book and wrote that the media blew the issues between the two out of proportion before the wedding, and there was no bullying involved. 'Whenever this sort of thing happens in the royal family, traditionally no one says anything publicly about it, so it rarely reaches the media, but on this occasion, all sorts of other grievances meant that what was really nothing but a storm in a teacup reached the media and became a big issue. I can tell you that all the papers and commentators got this wrong, the truth is that as with many of these spats between sisters, brothers or even sisters-in-law, both sides were really upset,' Quinn said. Best of StyleCaster The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Chagos Islands: Starmer's 'lousy deal'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. "Keir Starmer has secured his legacy," said The Daily Telegraph: his "shameful surrender of the Chagos Islands will go down as this nation's foreign policy nadir". Last week, the PM signed a long-dreaded treaty that officially hands control of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius – effectively ceding a strategically vital territory that sits in an area of interest for China. To add insult to injury, once the treaty is ratified by MPs, we will pay Mauritius £101 million a year for the next 99 years to rent back a key UK-US military base on the largest island, Diego Garcia. "This lousy deal essentially amounts to a massive gift from British taxpayers to the Mauritian government," said Andrew Tettenborn in The Spectator. So why sign it? The answer, I'm afraid, "is legalism": the UN's top court had issued a non-binding ruling calling on the UK to give up control of Chagos – and the PM, ever the lawyer, eagerly bowed to international law. Perhaps he was hoping to set a "shining example" to other countries; instead, they will "regard us with contempt for being a pushover". The deal looks "odd" on the face of it, said James Landale on BBC News. But there were plenty of "practical" reasons to sign the treaty. Multiple UN bodies have ruled that the islands belong to Mauritius; had the UK continued to ignore those rulings, the operation of the base could have become "unworkable". Diego Garcia's satellite communications would have been threatened because the UK relies on a UN agency in Geneva to maintain access to a particular electromagnetic spectrum; aircraft might not be able to fly in or out, for fear of breaching international law. As for national security, said Sean O'Grady in The Independent, without this deal, Mauritius could have lawfully granted China permission to establish a military base on another of the islands, sparking a serious crisis. The deal specifically forbids it. This is all true in theory, said John Rentoul in the same paper. But in reality, Mauritius' claim to the islands was "weak" – Chagos has never been part of its territory – and UN courts have "no powers of enforcement". The base wasn't threatened in any meaningful way. And yet Starmer's government doubled down on a deal that will outrage the British public, given the nation's dire finances. I suspect the biggest driver of this decision was "postcolonial guilt", said Matthew Syed in The Sunday Times – that sense that, as a nation, we must self-flagellate to atone for the sins of the empire. But Starmer's conscience-cleansing comes at "extravagant expense" – and will help "no one but our rivals".
