Employers gain flexibility in choosing EAP demographics for employment equity plans"
The Department of Employment and Labour is forging ahead with the implementation of the Employment Equity Amendment Act.
Image: Leon Lestrade/ Independent Newspapers
EMPLOYERS will have the option to use the applicable national or regional Economically Active Population (EAP) population as an instrument when developing employment equity (EE) plans.
At a recent EE workshop held in Sandton, Department of Employment and Labour deputy director, Masilo Lefika said employers will have this option when developing EE Plans and setting annual numerical targets in their workplaces.
He added that when developing EE Plans and setting annual numerical targets in their workplaces in terms of legislation, designated employers must take into account the workforce profile, the relevant five-year sectoral numerical targets, and the applicable EAP.
'The five-year sectoral numerical targets are key milestones towards achieving the equitable representation of the different designated groups within the four upper occupational levels in an employer's workforce in relation to the demographics of the applicable EAP, and for persons with disabilities,' said Lefika.
This comes as the Department is forging ahead with legislative amendments to the Employment Equity Act (EEA).
These amendments have their origins in 2019, when the Department, in collaboration with the Commission for Employment Equity (CEE), began sector-specific engagements aimed at setting employment equity (EE) targets. The goal was to accelerate transformation in the workplace. These efforts culminated in the Employment Equity Amendment Act No. 4 of 2022, which officially came into effect on January 1, 2025.
However the changes have been met with mixed reactions as the DA has taken government to court to challenge the amendments, while others have raised concerns about applying national targets at the expense of regional demographics.
According to Lefika, a designated employer will incur "no penalty or any form of disadvantage if there are reasonable grounds to justify its failure to comply with any target".
Trade union federation Cosatu welcomed the option for employers to choose which demographics to apply when setting their targets.
'Cosatu engaged with the Department of Employment and Labour extensively on the 2023 amendments to the Employment Equity Act at Nedlac as well as with Parliament. We support these amendments, in particular the provisions recognising regional demographic diversity and enabling employers to utilise them or national demographics depending on their own footprint as an employer. This is critical as the demographics of Limpopo differ widely from those of the Western and Northern Cape and those differ significantly from KwaZulu-Natal.
'Enabling employers to utilise regional demographics is important to ensure local workers enjoy full worker opportunities and also to ensure workplaces represent South Africa's full diversity. This is especially important for provinces like the Western and Northern Cape where coloured workers are the largest demographic group and similarly in provinces like Gauteng and KZN. Employment equity includes all South Africans, of all racial, gender and disability categories,' Cosatu Parliamentary Coordinator, Matthew Parks said.
The National Coloured Congress (NCC), which had called to meet with minister Nomakhosazana Meth over the issue, added that without proper consideration of provincial demographics, it risks the further marginalising of Coloured communities.
'The Constitutional Court has ruled you can't implement national demographics, regionally. All the labour department is doing is making it easier for businesses with vested interests to discriminate. As the custodian of employment equity, the labour department should do its job,' NCC leader, Fadiel Adams said.
Cape Times
National Coloured Congress (NCC) leader Fadiel Adams.
Image: Supplied
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Employers gain flexibility in choosing EAP demographics for employment equity plans"
The Department of Employment and Labour is forging ahead with the implementation of the Employment Equity Amendment Act. Image: Leon Lestrade/ Independent Newspapers EMPLOYERS will have the option to use the applicable national or regional Economically Active Population (EAP) population as an instrument when developing employment equity (EE) plans. At a recent EE workshop held in Sandton, Department of Employment and Labour deputy director, Masilo Lefika said employers will have this option when developing EE Plans and setting annual numerical targets in their workplaces. He added that when developing EE Plans and setting annual numerical targets in their workplaces in terms of legislation, designated employers must take into account the workforce profile, the relevant five-year sectoral numerical targets, and the applicable EAP. 'The five-year sectoral numerical targets are key milestones towards achieving the equitable representation of the different designated groups within the four upper occupational levels in an employer's workforce in relation to the demographics of the applicable EAP, and for persons with disabilities,' said Lefika. This comes as the Department is forging ahead with legislative amendments to the Employment Equity Act (EEA). These amendments have their origins in 2019, when the Department, in collaboration with the Commission for Employment Equity (CEE), began sector-specific engagements aimed at setting employment equity (EE) targets. The goal was to accelerate transformation in the workplace. These efforts culminated in the Employment Equity Amendment Act No. 4 of 2022, which officially came into effect on January 1, 2025. However the changes have been met with mixed reactions as the DA has taken government to court to challenge the amendments, while others have raised concerns about applying national targets at the expense of regional demographics. According to Lefika, a designated employer will incur "no penalty or any form of disadvantage if there are reasonable grounds to justify its failure to comply with any target". Trade union federation Cosatu welcomed the option for employers to choose which demographics to apply when setting their targets. 'Cosatu engaged with the Department of Employment and Labour extensively on the 2023 amendments to the Employment Equity Act at Nedlac as well as with Parliament. We support these amendments, in particular the provisions recognising regional demographic diversity and enabling employers to utilise them or national demographics depending on their own footprint as an employer. This is critical as the demographics of Limpopo differ widely from those of the Western and Northern Cape and those differ significantly from KwaZulu-Natal. 'Enabling employers to utilise regional demographics is important to ensure local workers enjoy full worker opportunities and also to ensure workplaces represent South Africa's full diversity. This is especially important for provinces like the Western and Northern Cape where coloured workers are the largest demographic group and similarly in provinces like Gauteng and KZN. Employment equity includes all South Africans, of all racial, gender and disability categories,' Cosatu Parliamentary Coordinator, Matthew Parks said. The National Coloured Congress (NCC), which had called to meet with minister Nomakhosazana Meth over the issue, added that without proper consideration of provincial demographics, it risks the further marginalising of Coloured communities. 'The Constitutional Court has ruled you can't implement national demographics, regionally. All the labour department is doing is making it easier for businesses with vested interests to discriminate. As the custodian of employment equity, the labour department should do its job,' NCC leader, Fadiel Adams said. Cape Times National Coloured Congress (NCC) leader Fadiel Adams. Image: Supplied
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Cosatu says debate on B-BBEE is needed for beneciaries' benefit
Cosatu calls for reform of B-BBEE to ensure real empowerment for workers and disadvantaged communities, not just political elites and business insiders. The debate about the broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) is needed on how to ensure it benefits the beneficiaries. This is according to union federation Cosatu spokesperson Matthew Parks, who was reacting to the ongoing debate on whether the B-BBEE policy is aimed at being biased against whites. Inequality persists 'While we support the B-BBEE Act, we believe a debate is needed on how to make sure it reaches its intended beneficiaries, in particular historically disadvantaged individuals and communities,' he said. 'We support the objectives of B-BBEE. These are necessary given three and a half centuries of systematic discrimination and disempowerment under colonial and apartheid rule. South Africa is 31 years into democracy but remains the world's most unequal society.' Parks said the policy was a necessity to help historically disadvantaged persons and communities to enter the economy, not only as wage earners but also as owners of businesses. He said Cosatu cannot remain satisfied with progress when the colour of one's skin still largely determines one's economic status. ALSO READ: Minister extends date for comments on R100 billion transformation fund 'Ticking time bomb' He added the majority of shares on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange are owned by whites, similarly with regards to ownership patterns of businesses. 'This is a ticking time bomb that we must address. It's not racism against whites and, in fact, white women and white South Africans with disabilities are included. White South Africans and investors are not excluded,' he said. 'All the policy seeks to do is to boost the economic empowerment of those still disadvantaged. It has helped to begin the journey of building a nonracial society. While some progress has been made in building a black middle class and black industrialists, it is not enough given the inequalities still so prevalent.' Parks said more must be done to ensure 'it benefits workers and not just the elite and worker ownership and employee shareholder ownership programmes should be ramped up'. He added more must be done to ensure investors honour their B-BBEE shareholders and equity equivalents. Equity equivalents offer alternative for foreign investors When asked if Cosatu supports the equity equivalents, Parks agreed and said that has been one of two options under the B-BBEE Act for many years. He said they provide a useful option for international investors who are not able to do the B-BBEE shareholders' option. ALSO READ: DA transformation policies stance dents its image and may lose it votes, says expert 'Equity equivalent option allows investors to support local manufacturers, create jobs, skill workers or invest in local communities,' he said. 'These have benefited many local businesses, workers and communities. They have been successful in many sectors, including clothing and motor manufacturing. Many companies have utilised this option before.' Malatsi's draft policy Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi was recently criticised for unveiling a draft policy direction in the Government Gazette 'proposing an alternative to the B-BBEE ownership requirements for the ICT [Information and Communication Technology] sector'. 'The new model would allow companies to meet empowerment obligations through equity equivalent programmes rather than direct ownership transfers,' one critic said. The proposed amendment to the Act could facilitate the entry of investors such as Elon Musk's Starlink into South Africa's telecommunications market and contribute to the empowerment of the previously disadvantaged people without having done a direct transfer of ownership. Malatsi's critics said he was trying to pave a way for Starlink to do business in SA. Musk has previously criticised the B-BBEE policy, saying it was racist. NOW READ: Proposed Starlink deal 'wrong in principle and practice'
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
Minister receives report on George building collapse
The George building collapse was the result of systemic failures across various regulatory bodies and a lack of cooperation among key stakeholders, says Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson. He reiterated that accountability could not be optional when human lives were lost as a result of human error. The minister on Monday confirmed he has received the final report from the Council for the Built Environment (CBE), via its body the Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA) on the tragedy. On May 6, 2024, a five-storey building collapsed in George claiming the lives of 34 people and leaving 28 others injured. Macpherson said the report marked a critical step in the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure's commitment to uncover the truth behind what he described as a preventable disaster and to ensure those responsible are held accountable. 'As the Department, we will now carefully study the report to develop a pathway forward to ensure that a tragedy such as the George building collapse never happens again. As I have previously committed, after studying the report, I will personally return to George to present the findings of this report to the families affected by this tragedy. They deserve to hear directly from us, not through the media, about what went wrong and how we intend to rectify it,' Macpherson said. He emphasised that the collapse was the result of systemic failures across various regulatory bodies and a lack of cooperation among key stakeholders. He added that the Department will continue to work with the police, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and other relevant regulatory bodies to ensure accountability. 'As I have said before, the collapse of the George building was entirely preventable, and we will therefore work towards accountability and address any errors that may have been identified. By working together, we are ensuring a safe and secure construction sector for all stakeholders,' Macpherson said. Last week George councillor, Chantelle Kyd resigned from the Planning and Development Mayoral Committee over what she said was the DA-led municipality's lack of transparency over the confidential tabling of reports on the building collapse. The GOOD councillor tendered her resignation, saying it was not an easy decision but that she could not stay in an executive role where 'truth is suppressed' and 'accountability is avoided'. 'It is unacceptable that the DA would choose to table critical reports behind closed doors, bar the media, and deny coalition partners the opportunity to address the public truthfully.' DA Western Cape leader Tertuis Simmers said the position to table the item as confidential was a 'collective decision'. 'The position on the specific item in question was adopted by the Joint Coalition Caucus as all parties agreed to its recommendations. Furthermore, as GOOD communicated in recent weeks on the matter publicly, GOOD was informed that it could issue a party-political statement on the matter following the council meeting. So in no way were GOOD George sidelined, marginalised or censored while a member of the coalition government,' said Simmers.
