logo
Minister says ‘listening and consulting' on supervised drug site continues

Minister says ‘listening and consulting' on supervised drug site continues

Manitoba is 'forging ahead' with plans to establish its first supervised consumption site, in Winnipeg, this year, says the minister leading the charge.
'This is something that's still top of mind and something we're forging ahead on,' Housing, Addictions and Homelessness Minister Bernadette Smith said Monday.
The NDP campaigned on a promise to establish a supervised consumption site in the 2023 election because the Tory government at the time refused to consider it.
'This is very personal for me,' the minister said in an interview. 'I've met with far too many loved ones who've lost someone to an overdose and this is about getting it right.'
The province hasn't yet 'landed' on a proposed site but is 'moving toward' on having a site up and running by year's end, Smith said.
On July 12, 2024, the Manitoba government announced $727,000 to support the development of an Indigenous-led supervised consumption site in partnership with the Aboriginal Health and Wellness Centre of Winnipeg. The Indigenous organization applied in November to Health Canada for a licence to operate the harm-reduction service in Point Douglas; its staff would be trained to respond to accidental overdoses and other emergencies, and help patients access health and social services.
In April, community members at a public consultation meeting raised concerns about a proposed site at 200 Disraeli Fwy., and how it could affect the safety of their neighbourhood.
'We're listening to everyone that's coming to the table with ideas, whether that's for or against. We want to listen to both and we've certainly heard from both.'– Housing, Addictions and Homelessness Minister Bernadette Smith
'We're still listening and consulting with folks,' Smith said. 'We're listening to everyone that's coming to the table with ideas, whether that's for or against. We want to listen to both and we've certainly heard from both.'
The NDP government's spring budget includes $1.3 million for Shared Health to contract with the Aboriginal Health and Wellness Centre to operate the site. It would be the first Indigenous-led facility of its kind in Canada, the province says.
Each proposed supervised consumption site requires an exemption under section 56.1 of the federal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, Health Canada says.
A completed application must include key information related to policies and procedures, personnel, local conditions, community consultations and finances. Health Canada lists the Winnipeg application as being in the 'review' stage and 'awaiting key information before decision can be taken.'
Related Articles
Many parts to fighting addictions crisis
944 needles in 16 parks over 10 days
Harm reduction, not handcuffs
Law-enforcement part of supervised-consumption site plan, police say
Minister on hot seat over supervised drug site
Opponents of supervised consumption sites need to do their research
Skyrocketing opioid calls take toll on first responders
Minister reassures Point Douglas safety top concern in rollout of supervised drug site
'We got lucky': Sunshine House, WFPS save 10 from overdoses
Think twice before rejecting Disraeli proposal for safe consumption site
Weekday Mornings
A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day.
'We're not rushing this by any means,' Smith said.
'We've listened to experts, we've listened to community members, we've listened to folks on the front lines, those who are in their addictions and we're going to continue to do that work,' Smith said.
'We've also gone and looked at other jurisdictions. We want to make sure that we're creating a made in Manitoba model (where) safety and security is No. 1' with treatment and recovery supports in place.
carol.sanders@freepress.mb.ca
Carol SandersLegislature reporter
Carol Sanders is a reporter at the Free Press legislature bureau. The former general assignment reporter and copy editor joined the paper in 1997. Read more about Carol.
Every piece of reporting Carol produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion: Pharmacist advocates for easier access to Health Canada-approved nicotine pouch
Opinion: Pharmacist advocates for easier access to Health Canada-approved nicotine pouch

Calgary Herald

time13 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Opinion: Pharmacist advocates for easier access to Health Canada-approved nicotine pouch

Article content As a pharmacist, I take my individual patients' health seriously. I've dedicated my career to helping people make safer, healthier choices. Lately, I've felt the need to speak up, not just as a health-care professional, but as someone who works directly with smokers trying — often desperately — to quit. Article content Last week, Manitoba pharmacists were quoted in a media article saying no pharmacist is feeling frustrated that people must access the only Health Canada-approved NRT nicotine pouch (ZONNIC) from pharmacists. Article content Article content Article content That doesn't reflect my sentiment, or that of many of my colleagues. Many pharmacists don't understand or agree with the federal ministerial order that singled out the only Health Canada-approved nicotine pouch, requiring it to be sold only by a pharmacist from behind the counter. Article content Article content ZONNIC is a legitimate stop-smoking product. It's approved by Health Canada as a nicotine replacement therapy, just like gums, lozenges and patches. It contains the same ingredient — nicotine — used to reduce cravings and feelings of withdrawal when a person cuts back or stops smoking. Most people attempt to quit smoking several times before they are successful. Having a wider range of NRT products available means people who smoke have more options to help them quit. Article content Widespread availability of a variety of NRT products is also crucial to achieving Canada's tobacco strategy (five per cent or less of the population smoking by the year 2035). Article content Article content As pharmacists, we understand that new and innovative products need to be adequately researched and tested before being offered for sale to the public. The nicotine pouch ZONNIC met all the clinical and regulatory requirements for it to be classified as a natural health product. It is much safer than any other nicotine pouch, as it is the only one that has been through the regulatory approval process with Health Canada. Article content All other nicotine pouches are illegal products, many of them being sold in higher strengths, youth-attractive packaging and flavours, and with no oversight on ingredients or age verification. These potentially dangerous, unregulated nicotine pouches are easier to purchase than the legally approved ones, and that isn't right. Article content Limiting access to regulated products has unintended consequences. It encourages people to seek out unregulated products that may not be properly age-verified and have not been vetted by Health Canada.

Saturday's letters: Secret research on puppies horrifies
Saturday's letters: Secret research on puppies horrifies

Edmonton Journal

time15 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Saturday's letters: Secret research on puppies horrifies

Article content I just finished reading the article in your Aug. 7th paper about the use of dogs in a secret research lab and I am totally aghast. I had no idea that this inhumane research was still being done in Canada. Thankfully, a couple of whistleblowers were able to get the information out even though staff is warned never to speak to anyone about this, even to people they work with unless they are in the facility. Article content Article content Article content The image in my mind of a dog, motionless after a procedure, whimpering in a cage with no bed, is a nightmare. And to top it off, Frank Prato, the founder of the Lawson Imaging Research Program, has received $500,000 in grants since 2020 from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (publicly funded through federal tax dollars). Article content Article content A few years ago, my husband drove me to the Misericordia after I was experiencing disorientation and confusion. I left the emergency room, without having any care, after an eight-hour wait. This scenario is far too common and is frankly, disgusting. In 2023, Danielle Smith promised to build a new, state-of-the art hospital in the Ellerslie area. Now, she claims there's no money in the budget to continue with construction, even though the land had already been purchased by the NDP. Article content Article content The billions of dollars in the Alberta Heritage Fund can easily pay for a new hospital and other infrastructure needs. Smith seems to have her own petty agenda and is not working for the people of this province. It seems she and Trump a have a lot in common. Article content Where was I when the traffic laws became a joke? It's deadly out there folks. Buses, trucks and cars stream through red lights like we are a Third World country. Stop signs are an absolute joke in Edmonton and be wary if it is a four-way stop because one of the four drivers gambles that the other three will actually be stopping as they blast through. Article content Ever been tailgated? The posted speed is irrelevant, be it 40, 60, 70 or a hundred. The self-entitled, self-important drivers don't care about safety, the law or you. Crosswalks, watch out and make yourself very seen. Vehicles with modified mufflers, yikes! Where was I when traffic laws became discretionary? Oh, let's change the insurance statutes. That will help, not.

A long-standing problem needs a Plan B
A long-standing problem needs a Plan B

Winnipeg Free Press

time18 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

A long-standing problem needs a Plan B

Opinion In his column Public patience wearing thin waiting for NDP health fix of Aug. 1, Tom Brodbeck outlines the NDP failure to address the health care 'disaster' the Conservatives left behind. His criticism is unfair to both parties. There were significant problems in Manitoba's health care system for years before Brian Pallister was elected in 2016 and before Gary Doer in 1999 and so on. Serious problems in surgical capacity, emergency roo, wait times and primary care access, among others, continue to this day — just like they do in every other province, no matter which party is in power. David Foot's 1996 book 'Boom, Bust and Echo' outlined the impact the baby boom generation has had at various life stages on education, housing, employment and health care and how Canada has largely been reactive rather than proactive in dealing with it. The median baby boomer turns 70 this year and with a 15 year life expectancy, aging Boomers' extensive, and expensive health care needs will continue to be a major challenge until at least 2040. Waiting for the Boomers to die off isn't much of a plan. Tossing money at the health care problems hasn't worked — there hasn't been enough money and won't be in the future, given deteriorating economic conditions and government debt at the national and provincial levels. Mr. Brodbeck's Aug. 6, 2025 column NDP, living in fiscal fantasy world, must face reality accurately describes the dilemma we face. Restructuring the health care system and bureaucracy hasn't worked either. The seemingly never-ending reorganizations give the appearance of taking action but in the end, most have produced marginal net improvements, or worse. A shortage of doctors in Canada has been part of the problem since the 1990s when all governments in Canada agreed to restrict medical school enrolments as part of a deliberate strategy to reduce the number of doctors (which was intended to reduce health care costs). We have never fully recovered from that mistake. However, positive changes are being implemented to make better use of doctors' time, including the introduction of virtual appointments, increased use of technology (e.g. AI note-taking during patient visits) and initiatives to reduce the administrative work required of doctors (e.g. eliminating most 'doctor's notes'). The creation of Minor Illness and Injury Clinics has diverted some patients from doctors' offices and ERs. The clinics are excellent and more are needed. But it will take years to obtain and, as importantly, retain more doctors especially in the areas of practice and locations where they are needed most. Fortunately, pharmacists, nurses, paraprofessionals, technologists, clinical assistants, physician assistants and others have extensive training, plus an interest in and aptitude for health care. Expanding the medical work these groups do can free up doctors for work that cannot be downloaded to others. While voters are clear that they want the problems in the health care system resolved, they reject any solutions that involve privatization and in doing so, work against their own interests. The question is not whether there will be private health care. It already exists — 30 per cent of health care costs in Canada are paid by patients or private insurance companies. Private health care has evolved differently in each province in the absence of a coherent national policy with for example, some types of surgeries provided in private clinics in various provinces but not others. In Manitoba, it can take over a year to get joint replacement surgery leaving patients in pain and with limited mobility for a lengthy period of time. The delay can cause or exacerbate clinical depression, chemical dependency and musculoskeletal issues arising from prolonged periods of restricted movement. We should not allow that to become the standard of treatment that a patient just has to accept. Mr. Brodbeck is correct when he suggests a need for benchmarks of service. But for benchmarks to be meaningful, there must be a Plan B. So the question really should be this: 'If the delay in providing service in the public system is serious enough, will we use private health care to alleviate patient pain and suffering?' A Plan B that involves a commitment to use out of province and even out of country medical services at government expense is required — regardless of whether those services are provided by the public or private sector in that jurisdiction. To be clear, this is not a slippery slope on the way to privatization. We can have it both ways. A public system with a stop-gap measure that may involve the private sector if required is part of humane treatment of patients. It does not undermine Canadians commitments to public health care. Robert Pruden writes from Winnipeg.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store