Tate Liverpool gallery gets £12m cash boost to reopen by 2027
A gallery that has been shut for two years due to problems finding funding has been given a £12m grant that could help it reopen by 2027. Tate Liverpool has been handed the cash boost from the Department of Culture, Media and Sport to continue its refurbishment of the gallery on Royal Albert Dock.Curators said the funding, alongside donations from the Garfield Weston Foundation, and the Ross Warburton Charitable Trust, will help the project stay on track for its 2027.Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said: "The transformation of Tate Liverpool will mean this amazing cultural venue can continue to flourish for future generations."
Tate Liverpool's renovation will see the gallery "reimagined for the 21st century" by opening up spaces to display its collection and host world-class exhibitions, those behind the project have said.Designs include a new public 'Art Hall' on the ground floor of the site, which first opened in 1988, and a greener gallery to reduce running costs and end the building's reliance on fossil fuels.Helen Legg, Tate Liverpool director, said the "bold transformation" would help boost the visitor economy and act as a catalyst for regeneration on the waterfront. In May, Tate Liverpool announced the first major exhibition of artist Chila Kumari Singh Burmanm, focused on celebrating the rich culture of the North, will form part of the reopening programme.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Casement Park in Spending Review: Will UK government announce funding?
The government will announce later on Wednesday whether it will make a financial contribution towards the redevelopment of Casement the west Belfast stadium is estimated to cost about £260m - of which £120m in funding is jointly in place from the Stormont Executive, the Irish government and the has been building on the government to make a decision, which is now anticipated as part of the Spending review will allocate money to day-to-day public services for the next three years. It will also set infrastructure budgets for the next four review will directly affect what Stormont ministers have to spend on public services in Northern are also expected to find out if they have succeeded in persuading the Treasury that Stormont's finances require a more generous "needs-based" top-up. Last week, Finance Minister John O'Dowd said he believed the Treasury was in "solution-finding mode" when it came to reaching agreement on funding for Casement Park. Days later, a senior figure in the GAA said the association was "cautiously optimistic" that an announcement on funding was coming this Stormont executive is contributing £62.5m to the project, the GAA will pay £15m, while the Irish government has pledged about £ GAA has acknowledged it will need to increase its commitment."We are prepared to step up. It would be premature to start mentioning figures here. I think it will be higher than £15m", said Stephen McGeehan, the project lead for the stadium Park, with a proposed 34,500 capacity, had been earmarked to host football games at the Euro 2028 football tournament but, with the project on hold, the plan was shelved. Stormont's Communities Minister Gordon Lyons has defended his handling of the planned Casement redevelopment and insisted the hold-up is not his has said the GAA will need to make its plans for the stadium more affordable if the government fails to cover the gap for the current proposed rebuild."What we do need to make sure is that any additional public funding that comes forward for sport is done on a fair and equitable basis," he said. Could Stormont get a bigger top-up? When devolution was restored in 2024, Stormont ministers persuaded the Treasury that Northern Ireland's public services were being funded below an objective level of a result any additional funding Stormont gets from Westminster now comes with a top-up - an additional 24p for every will be worth more than £800m over five years, the independent Fiscal Council has Treasury also left the door open for a bigger top-up if there was credible, independent evidence to support ministers believe they have provided that evidence in the form of an analysis by the devolution finance expert Prof Gerry Treasury's response to that will come as Chancellor Rachel Reeves lays out the government's Spending Review in the Commons on Wednesday afternoon.
The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
Katie Price's high fashion ad BANNED for ‘objectifying and sexualising women'
AN ad for clothing brand Diesel featuring Katie Price was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women, a watchdog has ruled. The ad in question included an image of Katie wearing a bikini and holding a handbag in front of her chest. She appeared as part of the clothing giant's SS2025 collection. Katie stripped off to a tiny denim bikini for the shoot as she showed off her body tattoos. Her boyfriend JJ Slater also starred in the Diesel campaign, posing as a waxer in a chaotic salon. But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 13 complaints that the ad objectified and sexualised women and featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin. The advert was shown all around the world to over 100 countries with Katie appearing skinny and dressed in a glittering bikini while holding up a Diesel handbag to cover her stomach. It was first featured on the Guardian website on 26 March this year and then shared widely across social media, including on Katie's own accounts. Diesel said the ad was part of a brand campaign called 'The Houseguests', which was designed to challenge stereotypes and support diversity and inclusion in the fashion industry by reflecting a wide range of body types. They argued it showed Katie in 'an active and dynamic pose where she proudly showed off her body and the handbag." Diesel added she "was well-known for her exaggerated appearance and larger-than-life personality and her large lips and breasts formed part of her curated public image. That exaggerated, eccentric and altered appearance formed part of the creativity of the campaign.' They believed the image was a "celebration of Katie's sexuality and empowerment and was not objectifying, degrading or sexualising" and further stated that Katie "was slender, she had excellent muscle tone and was not unhealthily underweight". Partly upholding the complaints, the ASA said the bikini only partially covered Price's breasts, and it considered the positioning of the handbag, in front of her stomach with the handle framing her chest, drew viewers' attention to, and emphasised, that part of her body. The ruling from the ASA said: "While we acknowledged that Ms Price was shown in a confident and self-assured pose and in control, we considered that because of the positioning of the handbag, which had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts, the ad sexualised her in a way that objectified her. "We therefore considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence, was irresponsible and breached the Code." However, the ASA did not uphold complaints about Katie appearing to be unhealthily thin, and concluded that the ad was not irresponsible on that basis. They said: "Her hair had been styled away from her face in a beehive style, in such a way as to elongate her face and her head was slightly tilted downwards which added to that effect, but we did not consider she appeared gaunt. "None of her bones were obviously protruding." The watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: "We told Diesel to ensure their future ads were socially responsible and did not cause serious or widespread offence." Katie Price's Surgery: A Timeline 1998 - Katie underwent her first breast augmentation taking her from a natural B cup to a C cup. She also had her first liposuction 1999 - Katie had two more boob jobs in the same year, one taking her from a C cup to a D cup, and then up to an F cup 2006 - Katie went under the knife to take her breasts up to a G cup 2007 - Katie had a rhinoplasty and veneers on her teeth 2008 - Katie stunned fans by reducing her breasts from an F cup to a C cup 2011 - Going back to an F cup, Katie also underwent body-contouring treatment and cheek and lip fillers 2014/5 - Following a nasty infection, Katie had her breast implants removed 2016 - Opting for bigger breasts yet again, Katie had another set of implants, along with implants, Botox and lip fillers 2017 - After a disastrous 'threading' facelift, Katie also had her veneers replaced. She also had her eighth boob job taking her to a GG cup 2018 - Katie went under the knife yet again for a facelift 2019 - After jetting to Turkey, Katie had a face, eye and eyelid lift, Brazilian bum lift and a tummy tuck 2020 - Katie has her 12th boob job in Belgium to correct botched surgery and a new set of veneers 2021 - In a complete body overhaul, she opts for eye and lip lifts, liposuction under her chin, fat injected into her bum and full body liposuction 2022 - Katie undergoes another brow and eye lift-and undergoes 'biggest ever' boob job in Belgium, her 16th in total 2023 - Opting for a second rhinoplasty, Katie also gets a lip lift at the same time as well as new lip filler throughout the year 2024 - Katie has her 17th boob job in Brussels after revealing she wanted to downsize. She performed at Dublin Pride just days later and surgeons warned the lack of recovery posed a risk of infection 2
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Amazingly there are 12% of voters who think Rachel Reeves does a GOOD job! Survey gives damning insight into Chancellor's policy backlash
Barely one in ten voters believe that Chancellor Rachel Reeves is doing a good job, a poll has revealed. The YouGov survey, published on the eve of the Chancellor's spending review today, showed widespread disillusionment with her performance since taking office last year. Just 12 per cent of people said Ms Reeves is doing a good job, while 53 per cent said she is doing a bad job – giving her a net approval rating of minus 41. Ms Reeves even fared badly among Labour voters, with only 28 per cent voting in favour of her efforts, while 32 per cent condemned them. A separate poll by the think-tank More In Common found that confidence in Labour's ability to deliver on its promises has collapsed since the election. The survey also revealed that the public has become tired of Labour blaming the country's current problems on the previous Conservative government. Ms Reeves and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer have repeatedly blamed the Tories for their economic inheritance, including claims of facing a £22billion 'black hole' in the public finances on taking office. But the tactic seems to be wearing thin, with 54 per cent of voters saying Labour is wasting too much time blaming the Tories for its failures in office. The survey also found that 71 per cent of voters do not expect Labour to improve their lives, compared to just 29 per cent who do. When the same question was asked just days after last year's election, 54 per cent said they believed Labour would improve their lives, compared with 46 per cent who did not. In addition to this, the poll suggests just a third of Labour voters believe the changes announced by Ms Reeves in today's spending review will be good for the country. Among the wider public, that figure falls to just 15 per cent, compared with 26 per cent who believe the Chancellor's expected spending splurge will make little difference and 32 per cent who fear decisions announced in the spending review will be generally bad for the country. Civil Service hits 550,000 Civil Service headcount has hit a near 20-year high despite Labour vowing to crack down on numbers. Official figures show the workforce grew by 2,000 in the first three months of the year to 550,000. That was up from 544,000 in March 2024, and is the highest since 2006 when Tony Blair was in power. In March, the Chancellor promised running costs would be reduced by 15 per cent by the end of the decade. And in April ministers announced plans to squeeze numbers, including cutting 2,100 Cabinet Office staff.
