Trump endorses Paramount merger with David Ellison's Skydance
President Trump has endorsed David Ellison's takeover of Paramount Global - an $8-billion merger that has been complicated by his $20-billion lawsuit over CBS' "60 Minutes."
On Wednesday, Trump was asked about the hold-up in the federal review of Skydance's takeover of the storied entertainment company. The question came as reporters clustered around the president on the White House lawn to watch the installation of a flagpole.
The Paramount-Skydance deal has been pending at the Federal Communications Commission since late last fall.
Trump said he hoped the deal goes through.
"Ellison is great. He'll do a great job with it," Trump said.
Then he appeared to connect the merger-review delay to his lawsuit against CBS and its parent Paramount over last fall's "60 Minutes" interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris.
Trump has maintained since last October that the Harris interview was edited to burnish her chances in the November election. CBS has denied the allegations, saying the edits were routine. The raw footage showed Harris was accurately quoted, but Trump's team said he suffered "mental anguish" from the broadcast.
"They interviewed Kamala. Her answer was horrendous," Trump said Wednesday. "I would say election-threatening. ... Her answer was election-threatening it was so incompetent."
1st Amendment experts have called Trump's case frivolous, but Paramount wants to avoid waging an extensive legal fight. Paramount's leaders have pursued a settlement to help clear a path for the company's sale to Skydance - a deal that needs the approval of the FCC.
The mediation process to resolve the lawsuit, filed in a Texas court, has become protracted.
"They're working on a settlement," Trump said Wednesday. He mentioned that two high-level CBS executives - the head of CBS News and the executive producer of "60 Minutes" - had abruptly departed as the merger review dragged on.
"They're all getting fired," he said.
Late last week, Trump's legal team filed court documents asking for a deadline extension in the discovery process, disclosing the two sides were working to reach a resolution.
Earlier this month, Ellison met Trump briefly while the two men were sitting ringside at a UFC fight in New Jersey, according to video footage shared online. Skydance declined to discuss Ellison's interaction with Trump.
It marked the second time this year that Ellison chatted with the president at a UFC match. The first was in April.
It's been nearly a year since Paramount's controlling shareholder Shari Redstone and fellow Paramount directors approved the two-phased $8-billion deal that will hand the company to the son of tech billionaire Larry Ellison, who is a Trump supporter. The deal will also see the Ellison family buy the Redstone investment vehicle, National Amusements Inc.
Santa Monica-based Skydance intends to consolidate the company that boasts the Melrose Avenue Paramount film studio, Paramount+ streaming service, CBS and cable channels including Comedy Central, Showtime and BET.
Skydance operations and personnel will be folded into Paramount.
The deal faces one final regulatory hurdle: FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's consent to transfer 29 CBS television station licenses to the Ellisons from the Redstones. This week, the Senate approved Trump's second Republican appointment to the panel, Olivia Trusty.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Korea Plans $22 Billion Extra Budget as Tariffs Hit Growth
(Bloomberg) -- South Korea unveiled an extra budget worth billions of dollars, in a bid to support an economy struggling with sluggish consumption and mounting trade headwinds from Donald Trump's tariffs. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports The 30.5 trillion won ($22.2 billion) proposal includes 15.2 trillion won for economic stimulus and 5 trillion won for supporting livelihoods like small businesses, the finance ministry said in a statement. Another 10.3 trillion won is set aside to cover revenue shortfall for this year's existing budget, as taxation income fell due to weaker corporate performance and consumer spending. The proposal comes after President Lee Jae Myung took office earlier this month, vowing to boost growth and improve livelihoods. He had pledged over 30 trillion won in fresh spending through extra budgets to support small businesses and offset trade shocks. Before the election, 13.8 trillion won had already been approved as part of the first supplementary budget. Lee has inherited an economy already under pressure from weakening demand, compounded by months of political turmoil triggered by former President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law bid. The country's gross domestic product shrank in the first quarter, prompting the Bank of Korea to slash its 2025 growth forecast to 0.8% from 1.5%. The central bank also cut its key interest rate to 2.5% and signaled more easing may follow. Of the 10.3 trillion won tax revenue shortfall, nearly 9 trillion won stemmed from declines in corporate and value-added taxation income. The figures point to deepening economic strain, and help explain why policymakers are leaning more heavily on fiscal stimulus. As a leading semiconductor manufacturer and a key player in global supply chains, South Korea remains particularly vulnerable to trade risks from US tariffs. Exports are equivalent to more than 40% of the country's GDP, and are a key driver of the the country's growth rate. Trump's across-the-board tariffs for South Korea, which are set to jump to 25% in early July from a baseline 10%, are among the highest imposed on US allies. Other sector-specific levies by the Trump administration threaten key South Korean industries, including semiconductors, cars, steel, and aluminum. 'Bold and timely fiscal support is essential for the economy to return to a solid upward trajectory,' second Vice Minister of Finance Lim KiKeun said in a briefing Wednesday. 'While the supplementary budget cannot solve all challenges at once, it represents the first crucial step forward.' The government plans to fund the extra budget through a mix of spending cuts and debt issuance. About 5.3 trillion won will come from restructuring existing outlays, while 2.5 trillion won will be drawn from surplus balances in public funds. Another 3 trillion won will come from changes to foreign exchange stabilization bonds, while the bulk — 19.8 trillion won — will be financed through new sovereign bond sales. The fiscal push will raise the nation's debt-to-GDP ratio to 49% this year, from 47.4% in 2024, as total government spending climbs 6.9%, the ministry said. Even before the election, the need for more fiscal stimulus was clear. BOK Governor Rhee Chang-yong warned that additional measures would likely be required in 2025, underscoring the challenges facing Asia's fourth-largest economy. As part of the stimulus package, the government plans to distribute vouchers worth between 150,000 and 500,000 won per person. The payments will be provided to the general population rather than targeted groups. The issuance of regional gift certificates will also be expanded to encourage spending, with policymakers hoping the combined measures will deliver a swift injection of cash into the real economy. The proposal still needs parliamentary approval, and opposition lawmakers have raised concerns about the rapid debt buildup and potential inefficiencies in spending. Song Eon-seog, a lawmaker from the People Power Party, warned that 'reckless extra budgets' could actually harm both livelihoods and the broader economy. Earlier this month, the central bank stressed the importance of swiftly drafting and implementing an extra budget to boost domestic demand, saying the stimulus would have only a limited impact on inflation. --With assistance from Seyoon Kim and Shinhye Kang. Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Miami Herald
27 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Zillow says it's fighting for buyers. Compass says it's fighting for sellers. What if neither is fighting for you?
As two real estate giants escalate a war over how homes should be listed for sale online, both sides say they're acting in the interest of consumers. Both sides also stand to make a lot of money if they win. The issue intensified at the end of 2024, when Compass, the country's largest brokerage by sales volume, began advising its sellers to use a three-phased marketing approach - making their homes visible only to Compass agents and clients as a "private" listing, making them viewable only via and reserving the option to later make them public on popular house-hunting sites like Redfin and Zillow. In the real estate industry, listings are currency. Faced with thousands of them disappearing from its site, Zillow punched back. The Seattle-based company, starting at the end of June, plans to block any former private listings from appearing on its site - an ultimatum it hopes brings an end to Compass's practice of selectively sharing listings before they appear on big search portals. Redfin will follow with a similar ban in September. Each of these players pitches itself as a pro-consumer brand. Compass says its selective marketing approach offers sellers privacy and control. Some sellers want to market to more exclusive groups before their home appears on big listing sites, which feature details like days on market and price cuts, which can signal a seller is willing to negotiate on price. Zillow and Redfin say they are for transparency in the market, which is good for both homebuyers and sellers. The only way to know a home's true price, they argue, is to advertise it as broadly as possible. But Brian Boero, chief executive of 1000watt, a marketing agency for residential real estate companies, says their pro-consumer stances are largely just messaging. "These companies are using the consumer as almost like a human shield here to protect their business interests," Boero said. "They may believe these things sincerely, but this is first and foremost about rational self-interest." Should Compass win the private listings war, it would upend the paradigm in home listings that buyers have grown used to over the last two decades. When Zillow and Redfin arrived in the mid-2000s, they promised to democratize the home search, pulling back the curtain on a market once controlled by agents and the local databases they operated called multiple listing services. For buyers, the experience changed overnight: Homes that were once buried in classified ads or hidden in books that could only be viewed alongside a broker were suddenly just a click away. Sellers' agents at first rejoiced - they didn't have to work as hard to advertise their properties, and listing on the sites was free. But someone was paying: buyers' agents. When a prospective buyer clicks a listing's "Contact an Agent" button, Zillow or Redfin sells that inquiry to a paying agent. They also take as much as 40% of the agent's commission if they close the sale. Brokerages like Compass have long bristled at the steep fee. But as home sales drag for a third straight year, Compass is trying to change the game. By publishing listings exclusively on it cuts out the referral middlemen. "Organized real estate has been implementing rules that have been stripping homeowners and their agents of flexibility and choice," Rory Golod, president of Growth and Communications at Compass, said in an interview. "They are trying to monopolize where inventory goes and how people sell." Redfin and Zillow, of course, have their own interests to protect - as well as the model that's come to shape the modern home-buying experience. "This isn't just about Zillow or Redfin - the internet has changed home search for the better, where every buyer can have access to all of the inventory," said Joe Rath, Redfin's head of industry relations. "Gatekeeping in any form is antithetical to the internet." Matt Kreamer, Zillow's spokesperson, said that transparency is core to Zillow's philosophy: "We believe that home listings that are available to some buyers should be available to all buyers," he said. Their calls for openness also happen to preserve their business: more listings, more traffic, more fees. Ultimately, Boero, the marketing chief, believes that Zillow's market power will force Compass to blink. "Zillow is the most powerful brand in the history of housing," Boero said. "You just can't imagine not having your home on Zillow as a home seller - it sounds like a stupid thing to have happen." But others see an opportunity for Compass to prevail in bringing traffic directly to its site. "Southwest Airlines didn't sell tickets on any of the online aggregators for years, and they're doing great," said Mike DelPrete, a real estate tech consultant. "People look at multiple sources." The dispute appears to be heading toward a compromise that would allow both Compass and the listing aggregators to uphold their business models, rather than a solution centered around buyers and sellers. Redfin's Joe Rath said his company would be open to hiding certain data, like days on market and price drops, if that's what it took to keep listings public. "We would much rather give ground there and have the listing," he said, "than not have the listing at all." Because all of these companies are paid a percentage of a home's ultimate sales price, it benefits both the brokerages and the search portals to keep buyers in the dark about details that might lead to a lower price. The battle over transparency, it seems, has limits. Whether Compass or the search portals win, both victories would also preserve an as-yet unshakable status quo in real estate: a 2% to 3% commission for buyers' agents. A landmark legal settlement earlier this year threatened that fee structure paradigm - but so far, traditional models have held, although a few flat-fee agencies have broken the mold. So why are the rules governing home listings decided by two major corporations that stand to benefit from pushing prices as high as possible? "With how important housing is to our economy, society and individuals, there is a question of why the information about homes for sale isn't federally regulated," Boero said. But government intervention in home sales isn't likely to happen at the federal level under President Donald Trump, who has promoted deregulation and free markets. The state's regulator, the California Department of Real Estate, lacks the legal authority to make a ruling on private listings that would tip the scales toward either Compass or Zillow. But it can, for example, require agents to give sellers adequate warning on the financial consequences of not appearing on the major home listing sites, said Summer Goralik, a former investigator with the department who now works as a compliance consultant to brokerages. "They'll need to explore whether brokers are breaching fiduciary duty to sellers," Goralik said. "Are they giving all of the information that seller needs to make an informed decision about listing privately?" For her part, Goralik doesn't believe the push for private sales and putting listings back into the brokerages' hands helps buyers or sellers. "A wide-scale campaign for private listings seems to do more harm than good," she said. "It seems like we'd be going back in time. I'm for the future." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Miami Herald
27 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump's immigration crackdown straining labor force for Minnesota ag, food operations
As agricultural and canning operations are ramping up for the summer, they are trying to figure out the possible repercussions of stepped-up immigration enforcement. The workforce for these businesses has become tighter over the past few years, and many were worried that the threat of raids coupled with increased security at the Mexican border would further deplete summer help. "It's kind of a freak-out time [for the agriculture supply line]," said Fernando Quijano, economics educator with the University of Minnesota educator in Moorhead. "We're talking about agriculture, man, some of the most serious business we have in the United States." This week many farm groups and commodity associations are staying quiet about the latest guidance from the Department of Homeland Security. Just a week ago, DHS reportedly paused raids on rural areas, after pressure from those same groups. But on Monday, the Trump administration reversed course. DHS officials said there would be "no safe spaces" for companies that use undocumented labor. The policy whipsaw came after a meatpacking plant raid in Nebraska last week and heavy lobbying of U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and other officials by farm and food companies. The mixed signals carry another level of worry for those who rely on immigrant labor, say Minnesota rural economic experts. Most of these dairy and pork farms, meat processors and vegetable canneries are in rural Minnesota, where support for President Donald Trump remains close to 50%. Still, many believed last week the behind-the-scenes pleadings had softened the administration's stance, Quijano said. "It seems to me Trump is realizing that we need some sort of protections (for farm workers)," he said. Tracking undocumented labor is difficult. Minnesota was home to anywhere between 50,000 to 70,000 unauthorized immigrant workers in 2022, according to estimates from the Center for Migration Studies and the Pew Research Center. A large share of them work on farms or food and meat processing. But those numbers are down significantly from previous estimates a decade ago. Immigration policies have affected how willing undocumented laborers are to seek jobs in the state, and businesses hiring those labors are struggling to make up the difference. "A lot of those industries have been dealing with a really tight labor market since 2017," said Cameron Macht, a regional labor analyst manager for the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. "Constraining the number of available workers is a challenge ... they're already looking for more workers and so not having access to a portion of workers is going to create an extra challenge." Only 27% of farms hire outside help in Minnesota, according to the USDA census, said Lauren Heers, a University of Minnesota extension educator for the central part of the state. A good number of those workers are immigrants. "Depending on who you ask, you'll hear different experiences - many migrant workers, documented or not, report fears of workplace immigration raids," she said. "Some operators are seeing this reflected in day-to-day labor availability, while some operators report this isn't an issue." In southwestern Minnesota's Lyon County, farmer Dennis Fultz, 78, said Trump's change of course regarding the food and ag industries is another example of how inconsistent federal government policies are this year. "It's frustrating," said Fultz, who describes himself as a lifelong Republican who voted for Kamala Harris last November. But he also said that he and other farmers in Lyon County, which is home to a turkey processing site among other food operations, are finding the workers they need. Yet for areas in the state starting to see a tightening, the anxiety immigrants have felt this year is another barrier to finding enough workers. And in Minnesota, fear is spreading that the first, big raid of a packing house or farm site could be near. "The Trump administration's whiplash approach to immigration enforcement is creating uncertainty all across rural communities," said Sen. Tina Smith, the Democrat from Minnesota. "Families, farmers and food workers deserve stability, not political stunts that disrupt lives and hurt rural economies." Last week, Immigrations and Custom Enforcement agents detained 100 workers at a JBS meatpacking plant outside Omaha. In Worthington, Minn., home to a large pork slaughterhouse owned by JBS, the Brazilian-owned meat giant, residents reported ICE knocking on doors. Of the 120,448 job openings in 2024, according to a state website, over 18,000 were in food preparations. Fewer than 500 were in farming. When the HyLife pork plant in Windom, Minnesota, shuttered two years ago, roughly half of its 1,000-person workforce was on foreign labor visas, including many from the same hometown of Salvatierra, Mexico. As of 2024, Minnesota has around 4,000 ag workers with H-2A visas, meaning they're temporarily employed for seasonal work as farmers and ag concerns can't find enough domestic workers. H2A visa records in the state show Stevens County, home to mega dairy farms, as the largest recipient of H2A labor. But experts say these populations often are different. H2A workers may come from eastern Europe or South Africa. Meanwhile, a majority of undocumented workers, often those working livestock operations, hail from Mexico or Central America. Various statewide business and community groups are lobbying for immigration and visa reform to bring in more foreign workers, arguing Minnesota won't be able to continue growing without foreign-born labor. A Minnesota Chamber of Commerce report in February highlighted how the state's immigrant population is driving population and labor gains. Employment among immigrant workers increased by 7% between 2019 and 2023, compared to less than 1% for native Minnesotans. "Over the past 10 years, half of the new labor force in the state has come from foreign-born workers," said Macht, the DEED analyst. "The match with job vacancies and available openings in the state and the industries that they have helped fill jobs in is just incredibly important to the vitality of the state." Nationwide, the number of certified H-2A workers grew by 64.7%, from 224,965 to 370,628, according to numbers from the Washington-based American Immigration Council. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
