Short seller makes scathing accusations against popular tech company
Short seller makes scathing accusations against popular tech company originally appeared on TheStreet.
Culpepper Research has levied harsh accusations at a popular digital technology company, and not for the first time this year.
The activist short-selling firm recently laid out a detailed case against Applovin () , a fast-growing company in the mobile technology space that has enjoyed explosive growth over the past year. Culpepper revealed a short position in APP stock, though, alleging that the tech company is engaged in highly nefarious activity.
💵💰💰💵
While APP stock is up almost 400% for the year, it has struggled recently, dipping 10% over the past week. This is likely partially due to the company being excluded from the most recent S&P 500 quarterly rebalance.
However, Applovin may have bigger problems if the harsh accusations made by Culpepper Research turn out to be true. The short-seller doesn't just see the tech firm as a poor investment; it believes it may be a national security risk.
Applovin is a company focused primarily on digital apps, specifically helping businesses connect with new customers through various digital platforms. Its services measure apps' performance, as well as user acquisition and monetization. The stock offers investors exposure to multiple tech markets, including digital game development and in-app advertising.TheStreet has reached out to Applovin for a statement on the short report's accusations. As of this writing, the company has not responded, nor issued any public statement.
While its shares have risen steadily over the past year, Culpepper Research has been conducting an investigation, culminating in two detailed reports. In February 2025, the short-selling firm accused Applovin of illicit backdoor app installations, claiming that each one helped the company profit.
Now it seems to be doubling down on the short position. In its more recent report, Culpepper zeroed in on Applovin's alleged ties to Chinese investors, speculating that the company has misrepresented 'the scope of both its Chinese shareholders and its Chinese operations,' compromising U.S. national security.
'We believe AppLovin has been backed since at least 2017 by Chinese national Hao Tang, who – through a web of offshore shell companies and aided by AppLovin's vague if not deliberately obfuscated disclosures – controlled up to 28% of AppLovin Class A shares ahead of the Company's 2021 IPO, and continues to control at least 9.8% of Class A shares,' the short report states.
It adds that 'undisclosed to AppLovin investors, Tang has entered into various margin loan agreements and share forward transactions that our checks indicate remain open as of at least May 2025.'
Culpepper also points out that Applovin CEO Adam Foroughi has repeatedly denied any claims of Chinese ownership or operational ties regarding his company. It cites an April 2025 Fox News interview in which he stated, 'I don't know any [investors] that make up a material part of our cap table. Everyone's small."
More Tech Stock News:
Tech IPO smash reveals something shocking
Broadcom could blow past Nvidia, expert predicts
Veteran analyst unveils bold price target for Tempus AI stock
The short report's authors state, though, that in their view, the company's history disproves the CEO's claims regarding his knowledge of any investors, Chinese or otherwise. In their eyes, it is clear that under his leadership, Applovin has been less than truthful with the disclosures it provides for investors.
The bulk of Culpepper's bearish thesis centers around Hao Tang and his alleged ties to Applovin, specifically his controlling stake. However, it also highlights Applovin's quest to acquire TikTok's former China assets, which Foroughi framed earlier this year as an opportunity ripe with potential.In any case, the short-seller sees Applovin's ties to Tang as the most concerning element of its business. As the report states:
"Tang's network is involved in money laundering, human trafficking, illegal gambling, and data-harvesting. These are all activities the U.S. government has time and time again called out in China. In our view, Tang's background disqualifies AppLovin's pursuit of TikTok's ex-China business, and AppLovin's misleading disclosures around Tang's ownership suggests a cover-up."
Culpepper adds that it believes federal regulators will need to assess if a major tech company can be trusted with the data of many Americans if it harbors ties to actors like Tang, who are connected to the Chinese Communist Party.Short seller makes scathing accusations against popular tech company first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 13, 2025
This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 13, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is This Market-Thumping Stock-Split Stock a Buy Right Now With $10,000?
Stock splits might drive a lot of attention from investors, but they don't change anything fundamentally about a business. There's a thriving niche retailer that just implemented a massive stock split, which could continue its impressive historical share price gains. Instead of buying $10,000 worth of stock at once, dollar-cost averaging might be a better idea. 10 stocks we like better than O'Reilly Automotive › It's not a surprise that investors want to own companies whose stocks soar. However, an issue can arise when a business has done so well over a long period of time that its share price becomes nominally high. This makes it extremely difficult for investors with small sums of capital to buy whole shares. Here's where a stock split comes into play (more on this below). Investors looking to put money to work in the market appreciate these rare opportunities because it could lead to strong portfolio gains. There's greater excitement surrounding a particular company. There's one dominant retail stock that has climbed 509% just in the past decade, crushing the S&P 500 index. And it's up 14% in 2025 (as of June 10). Plus, it just put in place a massive stock split. Should you buy the business with $10,000 right now? It's important that investors first develop a basic understanding of how exactly a stock split works. Boards of directors and executive teams want shares of their companies to be accessible to the most investors, as this can grow demand. A stock split is conducted to artificially lower the stock price. On the flip side, there is a proportionate increase in the number of outstanding shares. On March 13, O'Reilly Automotive's (NASDAQ: ORLY) board of directors voted to approve a 15-for-1 stock split. Shareholders also approved this decision, and the stock split was implemented on June 10. O'Reilly's share price went from about $1,350 to $90 overnight. O'Reilly's outstanding share count expanded by a factor of 15, while the stock price was divided by 15. While a stock split gets a lot of attention from investors, it's worth pointing out that nothing changes with the company on a fundamental or operational basis. Undergoing a stock split won't change O'Reilly's corporate strategy, revenue, profits, or market cap. This fact can get lost in all the noise. Shares of O'Reilly have significantly outperformed the broader index in the past decade. If we zoom out further, the numbers are even more impressive. Since the company's initial public offering in April 1993, the stock has skyrocketed 56,350%. This must be a wonderful business if it has taken care of its shareholders like that. As of March 31, O'Reilly had 6,416 stores (6,298 in the U.S.) that sell aftermarket auto parts, like brakes, batteries, and motor oil, to both DIY customers and professional mechanics. What's noteworthy about this business is that demand is relatively stable. In both good and bad economic times, consumers need the stuff that O'Reilly sells. That's because having a working automobile is an urgent need for people that's not up for negotiation. People tend to drive more in robust economic times, increasing wear and tear on cars. And when there's a recession, these consumers might hold off on buying a new vehicle, instead choosing to spend money maintaining their existing cars. This supports demand. O'Reilly generates meaningful profits. It raked in $2 billion in free cash flow in 2024, before reporting $455 million in Q1. The leadership team has a history of plowing this cash into share buybacks. Just in the last five years, O'Reilly's diluted outstanding share count was reduced by 24%, which boosts earnings per share. However, the valuation isn't cheap. The stock trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 33.3. This is 38% more expensive than the trailing-10-year average. My view is that investors should wait for a pullback before adding this outstanding company to their portfolios. If you're bullish on O'Reilly, then I can understand why a dollar-cost average strategy might make sense to buy $10,000 of this stock-split stock over the next year or so. Before you buy stock in O'Reilly Automotive, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and O'Reilly Automotive wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is This Market-Thumping Stock-Split Stock a Buy Right Now With $10,000? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
No More Student Visas? No Problem.
Just how mad is Beijing about President Donald Trump's decision to revoke student visas for Chinese nationals? Not as mad as it says, and not as mad as one might expect. Publicly, China's leadership will likely complain that Trump's action is yet another attempt to thwart the country's rise. But in reality, Beijing would probably just as soon keep its smartest kids at home. Late last month, the U.S. State Department announced that it would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,' and that it would 'enhance scrutiny' of the applications it received in the future. The new visa policy, a spokesperson said, is meant to prevent China from exploiting American universities and stealing intellectual property. A spokesperson for the foreign ministry quickly registered Beijing's objection to the new policy. But when Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke with Trump by phone last week, either he didn't raise the new visa policy or his foreign ministry didn't regard his comments on the matter worth including in its official summary of the call, which suggests that the issue is not a top priority in Beijing's negotiations with Washington. One reason for this underwhelming response may be that re-shoring its university students serves Beijing's current agenda. China first opened to the world in the 1980s; in the decades that followed, securing a Western education for its elite helped the country bring in the technology and skills it needed to escape poverty. China was 'sending people out, learning from other places, finding the best quality wherever it was, and bringing that quality back to China,' Robin Lewis, a consultant for U.S.-China education programs and a former associate dean at Columbia University, told me. Now that period has given way to one of nationalism and self-reliance, which means promoting China's own companies, products, technologies—and universities. Rose Horowitch: Trump's campaign to scare off foreign students Xi has consistently stressed the importance of education in sustaining China's rise. His government has invested heavily in China's schools and lavished resources on science and technology programs, with some success. Some of China's top institutions, such as Tsinghua University in Beijing, have gained international recognition as serious competitors in scientific research. China would like to have its own Harvards, rather than sending its elite students to the United States, for political and cultural reasons as well as economic ones. Chinese authorities have long worried that the hundreds of thousands of students it exports to America will absorb undesirable ideas about democracy and civil liberties—and that they will access information about China that is suppressed at home, such as the story of the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. In fact, many young Chinese who study in the United States seem to enjoy American freedoms and seek to stay rather than return to serve the motherland. Beijing has tried to deal with this in part by monitoring the activities of its students in the U.S. and attempting to hold them firmly to the party line, including by harassing the families back home of those who stray. Within China, authorities can more easily confine students inside the government's propaganda bubble, which in recent years has become more airtight. Domestic media seek to portray the U.S. as unsafe, especially for Asians, by highlighting incidents of racial discrimination, violence, and disorder. One story published last year by the state news agency Xinhua, under the headline 'Chinese Students' Dreams Turned Into Nightmares at U.S. Doorstep,' tells the harrowing tale of a Chinese student detained and deported at an airport and claims that others had suffered the same fate. China's top spy agency, the Ministry of State Security, warned Chinese students at universities abroad against being recruited as foreign agents, and told of one such unfortunate national who was discovered and punished. Even before Trump's announcement, this climate of mutual distrust had led to a drop-off in Chinese students enrolled in American universities. The number had reached an all-time high during the 2019–20 academic year, topping 372,000, according to the Institute of International Education. But that figure has fallen since—by a quarter, to 277,000, in the 2023–24 academic year. Now India, with more than 331,000 enrolled, sends more students to American institutions than China does. The Trump administration appears to believe that curtailing Chinese access to American technology, money, and, in this case, education will give the U.S. the edge over its closest competitor. In some areas, this might work: Restricting the export of advanced U.S. semiconductor technology to China seems to have helped hold Beijing's chip industry back. So why not do the same with higher education? A case can be made that keeping Chinese students out of some of the world's top research institutions will hold back their skills acquisition and, with it, the country's progress. Adam Serwer: Trump is wearing America down In practice, though, the effect of this policy could be hard to gauge. The engineers behind the Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, which wowed Silicon Valley by developing a competitive chatbot on the cheap, were mainly locally trained. And the skills that Chinese students can't find at home they can seek in any number of places. There may be only so many Harvards, but Chinese students can receive a good education—and a warmer reception—in countries other than the United States. Universities in Japan and Hong Kong are already trying to capitalize on Trump's harassment of international students to lure them. The idea that any American policy can effectively dampen Chinese ambition may be far-fetched. 'People wake up in the morning and it's all about education here. There is nothing more important,' James McGregor, the chair for China at the consulting firm APCO, told me. 'You're going to stop Chinese people from learning the top skills in the world? No. They'll just deploy them somewhere else.' For now, the Trump team can't seem to decide whether it wants to get tough on China or make deals with China, and the new student-visa policy reflects this confusion. 'Chinese students are coming. No problem,' Trump said in a briefing after his call with Xi. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly.' China's leadership surely knows that many Chinese families still aspire to send their young-adult children to American universities. But Beijing is much more single-minded than Washington about the future of relations between the two countries: Xi appears to see Washington as the primary impediment to China's rise, and ties to the U.S. as a vulnerability best eliminated. From that viewpoint, relying on Harvard to train China's most promising students is a national-security risk. That means that Trump may be doing Xi a favor.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
America's deepest inflation fears are starting to fade
Americans are feeling better about the path forward for inflation. The latest University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey released Friday showed pessimism over the inflation outlook lessened in June, as one-year inflation expectations plunged to 5.1% from the more than four-decade high of 6.6% reached in May. Long-run inflation expectations, which track expectations over the next five to 10 years, also fell, hitting 4.1% in June, down from 4.2% in May. The broader consumer sentiment index rebounded as well, rising to 60.5 in June, above the 52.2 seen in May, which had been one of the lowest readings on record. "Consumers appear to have settled somewhat from the shock of the extremely high tariffs announced in April and the policy volatility seen in the weeks that followed," Survey of Consumers director Joanne Hsu wrote in the release. Our Chart of the Week shows inflation expectations coming off the boil. Put simply, expectations for price increases are more tempered than they were a month ago, but they are still not as optimistic as they were six months ago. But this framing — "better than feared" — is the story of what's brought the S&P 500 (^GSPC) back near all-time highs. Like consumers, investors made peace with these disappointments and welcomed the improvements that followed. Tariffs are still higher than Wall Street expected coming into the year, but not as high as the peak fears seen in April. The Federal Reserve is expected to cut interest rates later this year, but not by as much as hoped last year. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Strategists are growing more bullish on stocks, though the median S&P 500 target among strategists sits at 6,100, well below the 6,500 seen in December. However, no fewer than 11 Wall Street firms cut their S&P 500 targets as markets sold off in April; at least eight of these firms have since raised their outlooks again. Both groups, consumers and investors, ultimately ask themselves the same two-part question: Are things going well now? And are they getting better or worse? It's the latter that usually moves the needle. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
