&w=3840&q=100)
Colombia's former President Uribe petitions Supreme Court to lift house arrest after conviction
Colombia's former president Alvaro Uribe, the country's first previous leader to be convicted of a crime, petitioned the Supreme Court on Monday for his release while appealing his sentence of 12 years house jail.
Uribe's conviction and punishment last Friday marked the end of his long career as one of Colombia's most contentious politicians.
The 73-year-old, who is still popular and powerful among conservatives, conducted a rigorous military battle against drug traffickers and the FARC rebel group as president from 2002 to 2010.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Uribe was found guilty of tampering with witnesses in a separate inquiry investigating his suspected involvement with right-wing paramilitaries responsible for atrocities while fighting leftist guerrillas.
He was also found guilty of impeding justice.
At his sentencing the trial court judge declared him to be a flight risk and ordered him to be placed under house arrest at his home in the town of Rionegro, near Colombia's second city of Medellin.
Uribe's lawyers petitioned the Supreme Court on Monday to set him free, assuring he had no intention of leaving his homeland.
A law-and-order hardliner, Uribe was a close ally of the United States and retains ties to the American right.
He claims his conviction is a political witch hunt by the administration of left-wing President Gustavo Petro.
He has until August 13 to appeal his conviction.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has decried the case against Uribe, saying it represented 'the weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
SC slams Rahul over remarks against Army
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the proceedings in a criminal defamation case against Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi over his alleged remarks against the Indian Army over the 2020 Galwan clash with the Chinese. The top court was hearing Gandhi's appeal challenging the Allahabad High Court judgment refusing to stay the proceedings initiated in a Lucknow trial court against him over his comments that 'Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel'. As per the complainant, Uday Shankar Srivastava, the former director of the Border Roads Organisation (BRO), the comments made on December 16, 2022, during Gandhi's Bharat Jodo Yatra, defamed the Army. Presiding over a two-judge bench, Justice Dipankar Datta told Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, who appeared for the Congress leader, 'We have read the comments… Tells us… How do you get to know that 2000 square kilometres of Indian territory have been occupied by the Chinese? Were you there? Do you have any credible material? Why do you make these statements without having any…?' 'If you are a true Indian, you would not say all these things,' Justice Dutta said. Singhvi said the comments were in 'public interest', and added, 'It is also possible that a true Indian will say look, our 20 Indian soldiers were beaten up and killed. This is also a matter of concern.'
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
California has filed 37 lawsuits against Trump's 'illegal actions': Gavin Newsom
California Governor Gavin Newsom is ramping up his legal offensive against US President Donald Trump, boasting that the state has filed 37 lawsuits in just seven months to block what he calls "an avalanche of illegal actions" by the Trump administration."We've been the first and last line of defence," Newsom said. "Trump doesn't care about rigging the system to win. He doesn't care about lighting democracy on fire, bending the rules, and playing dirty to get what he wants," he to Newsom, the lawsuits span issues from environmental rollbacks to immigration, public health, and voting rights. The governor framed the legal blitz not as partisan resistance but as necessary protection against executive overreach. "This is an attack on our American rights," Newsom said. "And California won't stand for it."While many of the lawsuits are still pending, judges have already issued preliminary or permanent orders favouring the state in a majority of the cases that have moved forward. "As long as Trump keeps ignoring the rule of law," Newsom said, "California will continue to fight against his recklessness."Speaking at a press conference on Monday, Newsom added California had "secured favourable court orders in most of the cases judges have acted on" and had already protected more than $168 billion in federal SLAMS JULY JOBS REPORTEarlier, Newsom called out President Donald Trump and his economic policies, blaming them for "crashing our economy" following the release of the July jobs report on called the July jobs report 'way below expectations' in a Friday post on X, adding, 'May and June revised down as well.' The Bureau of Labor Statistics noted, 'Revisions for May and June were larger than normal,' and stated, 'With these revisions, employment in May and June combined is 258,000 lower than previously reported.'Newsom and Trump have clashed, particularly over the federal deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles during immigration protests.- EndsMust Watch
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
AIADMK seeks action against two top bureaucrats for contempt of court
CHENNAI: AIADMK, the principal opposition party, on Monday moved a contempt of court petition, seeking the Madras High Court to punish two senior bureaucrats of Tamil Nadu for launching the 'Nalam Kaakum Stalin' scheme, carrying chief minister's name, and thereby disobeying the interim orders of the court that cited Supreme Court's guidelines to restrain the use of names of living personalities in government schemes. The contempt petition was moved by AIADMK's Rajya Sabha member and former law minister C Ve Shanmugam. It was on his public interest litigation petition that the court had pronounced the interim orders on Thursday. While the contempt petition is yet to come up for hearing, the first bench of the court headed by Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava on Monday adjourned the hearing of the modification petition moved by the state government on Friday regarding the interim orders issued in Shanmugam's PIL. The bench decided to adjourn the hearing after it was brought to its notice that the DMK, the fourth respondent in Shanmugam's PIL, had moved the Supreme Court on Monday with a special leave petition (SLP) against the interim orders. The apex court is expected to hear it on Wednesday. Although senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing TN government, wanted to place his arguments, irrespective of the SLP, the bench said it would be better to wait till the SC hears the SLP and adjourned the hearing to August 7 (Thursday). The Nalam Kaakum Stalin scheme, under which 1,256 camps are planned across TN to offer the public comprehensive health check-ups, was launched here on Saturday by CM M K Stalin.
