logo
South Korea, US militaries will stage large-scale drills this month to address North Korean threats

South Korea, US militaries will stage large-scale drills this month to address North Korean threats

Arab News3 hours ago
SEOUL: South Korea and the United States will launch their annual large-scale military exercise this month to bolster readiness against North Korean threats, the allies said Thursday, in a move likely to irritate Pyongyang amid a prolonged stalemate in diplomacy.
The exercise also comes against the backdrop of concerns in Seoul that the Trump administration could shake up the decades-old alliance by demanding higher payments for the US troop presence in South Korea and possibly move to reduce it as Washington puts more focus on China.
Ulchi Freedom Shield, the second of two large-scale exercises held annually in South Korea, following another set of drills in March, typically involves thousands of troops in computer-simulated command post training and combined field exercises.
The Aug. 18-28 exercise may trigger an angry reaction from North Korea, which calls the joint drills invasion rehearsals and often uses them as a pretext to dial up military demonstrations and weapons tests aimed at advancing its nuclear program.
Doubling down on its nuclear ambitions, North Korea has repeatedly rejected Washington and Seoul's calls to resume diplomacy aimed at winding down its weapons program, which derailed in 2019. The North has now made Russia the priority of its foreign policy, sending thousands of troops and large amounts of military equipment to support Moscow's war in Ukraine.
About 18,000 South Korean troops will take part in this year's Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff spokesperson, Col. Lee Sung Joon, said during a joint briefing with US Forces Korea, which did not disclose the number of participating US troops.
Both Lee and US Forces Korea public affairs director Col. Ryan Donald downplayed speculation that South Korea's new liberal government, led by President Lee Jae Myung, sought to downsize the exercise to create momentum for dialogue with Pyongyang, saying its scale is similar to previous years. However, Col. Lee said about half of the exercise's originally planned 40 field training programs were postponed to September due to heat concerns.
The threat from North Korea's advancing nuclear and missile programs will be a key focus of the exercise, which will include training to deter North Korean nuclear use and respond to its missile attacks, Lee said.
The exercise will also incorporate lessons from recent conflicts, including Russia's war in Ukraine and the clash between Israel and Iran, and address threats from drones, GPS jamming and cyberattacks, Lee and Donald said.
'We look across the globe at the challenges we may face on the battlefield and incorporate that so we can challenge the participants in the exercise,' Donald said. 'We are focused on ensuring the alliance is sustainable and credibly deters aggression from the DPRK and addresses the broader regional security challenges,' he said, using the initials of North Korea's formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
The announcement of the exercise came a week after the powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un rebuffed overtures by Lee Jae Myung's government, saying that Seoul's 'blind trust' in its alliance with Washington and hostility toward Pyongyang make it no different from its hard-line conservative predecessor.
Kim Yo Jong later issued a separate statement dismissing the Trump administration's intent to resume diplomacy on North Korea's denuclearization, suggesting that Pyongyang — now focused on expanding ties with Russia — sees little urgency in resuming talks with Seoul or Washington.
On the other side of Seoul's security concerns is whether its alliance with Washington will see dramatic shifts during the second term of President Donald Trump, who has rattled allies and partners with tariff hikes and demands that they reduce their reliance on the US and spend more for their own defense.
Dating back to his first term, Trump has regularly called for South Korea to pay more for the 28,500 American troops stationed on its soil. Recent comments by key Trump administration officials, including Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby, have also suggested a desire to restructure the alliance, which some experts say could potentially affect the size and roles of US forces in South Korea.
Under this approach, South Korea would take a greater role in countering North Korean threats while US forces focus more on China, possibly leaving Seoul to face reduced benefits but increased costs and risks, experts say. During Thursday's news conference, Donald did not provide a specific answer when asked whether US and South Korean troops during their combined exercise will train for any possible realignment of US troops to face broader regional threats.
The future of the alliance will possibly be a topic in a summit between Trump and South Korean President Lee, which is expected this month. In a recent interview with the Washington Post, Lee's foreign minister, Cho Hyun, downplayed the possibility of significant changes to the US military presence in South Korea.
'We are talking with the United States, but there is no concern about the US forces in Korea. We believe that they will remain as such and their role will remain as of today,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelenskyy calls for Putin meeting to end war
Zelenskyy calls for Putin meeting to end war

Al Arabiya

time12 minutes ago

  • Al Arabiya

Zelenskyy calls for Putin meeting to end war

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Thursday called for a face-to-face meeting with Vladimir Putin to end war, after Donald Trump's special envoy held talks with the Russian leader in Moscow. Trump one day earlier hailed talks between his envoy Steve Witkoff and Putin as 'highly productive' but US officials still vowed to impose sanctions on Moscow's trading partners. Zelenskyy said later that he had spoken by phone with Trump, who said he could meet with Putin 'very soon,' and that European leaders had been on the call. 'We in Ukraine have repeatedly said that finding real solutions can be truly effective at the level of leaders,' Zelenskyy wrote on social media. 'It is necessary to determine the timing for such a format and the range of issues to be addressed,' he added. The Ukrainian leader said Thursday morning that he had planned to hold 'several' conversations throughout the course of the day including with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, as well as French and Italian officials. 'There will also be communication at the level of national security advisors,' Zelenskyy added. 'The main thing is for Russia, which started this war, to take real steps to end its aggression,' Zelenskyy added.

Trump says US to levy 100 percent tariff on imported chips, but some firms exempt
Trump says US to levy 100 percent tariff on imported chips, but some firms exempt

Al Arabiya

time2 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Trump says US to levy 100 percent tariff on imported chips, but some firms exempt

President Donald Trump said the United States will impose a tariff of about 100 percent on imports of semiconductors but offered up a big exemption –it will not apply to companies that are manufacturing in the US or have committed to do so. The move is part of Trump's efforts to bring manufacturing back to the United States, and his remarks on Wednesday were made in tandem with an announcement that Apple would be investing an additional $100 billion in its home market. For companies like Apple, which have committed to build in the United States, 'there will be no charge,' he told reporters in the Oval Office. He warned, however, that companies should not try to wrangle out of pledges to build US factories. 'If, for some reason, you say you're building and you don't build, then we go back and we add it up, it accumulates, and we charge you at a later date, you have to pay, and that's a guarantee,' Trump added. The comments were, however, not a formal tariff announcement, and much remains unclear about how companies and countries around the world will be impacted. Trump's mention of the proposed 100 percent rate for chips came in just ahead of US levies of 10 percent to 50 percent kicking in on Thursday for many goods from dozens of trading partners. Rates on semiconductors and other key tech goods have been the subject of a US national security probe – the results of which are expected to be announced by mid-August. Trump's Wednesday remarks produced an immediate flurry of reactions from concerned countries and business lobbies. South Korea's top trade envoy said on Thursday that major chipmakers Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix will not be subject to 100 percent tariffs, and South Korea will have the most favorable levies on semiconductors under a trade deal between Washington and Seoul. Samsung and SK Hynix declined to comment. On the other end of the spectrum, the president of the Philippine semiconductor industry, Dan Lachica, said Trump's plan would be 'devastating' for his country. In Malaysia, which is a big player in chip testing and packaging globally, trade minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz warned parliament his country 'will risk losing a major market in the United States if its products become less competitive as a result of the imposition of these tariffs.' Survival of the biggest Taiwan's National Development Council Minister Liu Chin-ching told reporters on Thursday that Taiwanese companies have been building US plants or buying US firms with local factories as well as collaborating with US chipmakers to counter potential chip tariffs. Taiwanese chip contract manufacturer TSMC is expected to be relatively unscathed as it has US factories, so key customers such as Nvidia are unlikely to face increased tariff costs for US-made chips. Nvidia, which makes cutting-edge AI graphics processing units, also plans to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the US TSMC did not immediately reply to a request for comment, and an Nvidia spokesperson declined to comment. 'Large, cash-rich companies that can afford to build in America will be the ones to benefit the most. It's survival of the biggest,' said Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at investment advisory firm Annex Wealth Management. Congress created a $52.7 billion semiconductor manufacturing and research subsidy program in 2022. The Commerce Department under President Joe Biden last year convinced all five leading-edge semiconductor firms to locate chip factories in the US as part of the program. The department said the US last year produced about 12 percent of semiconductor chips globally, down from 40 percent in 1990. 'There's so much serious investment in the United States in chip production that much of the sector will be exempt,' said Martin Chorzempa, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. He added that chips made by China's SMIC or Huawei are unlikely to be exempt, but noted that chips from these companies entering the US market were mostly incorporated into devices assembled in China. 'If these tariffs were applied without a component tariff, it might not make much difference,' he said. The EU has said it agreed to a single 15 percent tariff rate for the vast majority of EU exports, including cars, chips and pharmaceuticals. Japan has said that the US agreed not to give it a worse tariff rate than other countries on chips. Shares in Asian chipmakers with big US investment plans climbed on Thursday, with TSMC and Samsung up 4.4 percent and 2 percent respectively. Silicon wafer producer GlobalWafers, which has a plant in Texas, jumped 10 percent. GlobalWafers said it has proactively implemented cost reduction strategies and believes it has an opportunity to maintain competitiveness.

Western Intelligence Tracks Iranian Efforts to Acquire Sensitive Nuclear Material from Russia
Western Intelligence Tracks Iranian Efforts to Acquire Sensitive Nuclear Material from Russia

Asharq Al-Awsat

time2 hours ago

  • Asharq Al-Awsat

Western Intelligence Tracks Iranian Efforts to Acquire Sensitive Nuclear Material from Russia

A group of Iranian scientists, including nuclear specialists and a military intelligence member, secretly visited Russia in August 2024 to seek out dual-use technologies with potential military applications, the Financial Times reported Tuesday, citing internal documents, correspondence and travel records. The five-member delegation included nuclear physicist Ali Kalvand and a nuclear scientist who, according to Western officials, works for Iran's SPND (the Defense Innovation and Research Organization), a secret military research unit that has been described by the US government as 'the direct successor to Iran's pre-2004 nuclear program.' FT said some members of the delegation also worked for DamavandTec, a sanctioned Iranian procurement firm. The Iranian delegation travelled to Moscow on a diplomatic service passport. FT said the Iranian delegation sought access to radioactive isotopes such as tritium, an isotope used in both civilian and military applications, including boosting the yield of nuclear warheads. It wrote that in a letter sent prior to the visit, DamavandTec requested tritium, strontium-90 and nickel-63 from a Russian supplier. The report came one week after the FT published an interview with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said Tehran was committed to a peaceful, civilian program, and that it would not change its doctrine and would abide by a two-decade old fatwa issued by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei forbidding the development of nuclear weapons. The name of the SPND was mentioned in April 2018, when then-Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented documents seized in a Mossad operation, saying Iran's nuclear weapons program continued under the Organization, after the prior AMAD project was shuttered. Ian Stewart, a former UK Ministry of Defense nuclear engineer who is head of the Washington office of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, told FT: 'While there could be benign explanations for these visits, the totality of the information available points to a possibility that Iran's SPND is seeking to sustain its nuclear weapons-related knowhow by tapping Russian expertise.' SPND Established in 2023, DamavandTec presents itself as a civilian scientific consultancy. On its website, it claims to have 'an experienced team in the field of technology transfer' and aims to 'develop scientific communication' between academic and research institutions. The trip of the Iranian delegation to Russia came at a time when Western governments had observed a number of suspicious activities by Iranian scientists, including efforts to procure nuclear-related technology from abroad. In early 2024, Kalvand received a request from Iran's defense ministry — to use his small company DamavandTec to arrange a sensitive delegation to travel to Moscow, according to correspondence seen by the FT. SPND was established in 2011 by Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, a physicist who was sanctioned by the United Nations in 2007 for being 'involved in Iran's nuclear or ballistic missile activities.' Fakhrizadeh was widely regarded as the architect of Iran's pre-2003 nuclear weapons program, known as the Amad Plan. Iran has long denied the existence of Amad or any nuclear weapons activity. In 2020, Fakhrizadeh was assassinated in a roadside ambush widely attributed to Israel, using a remote-controlled, AI-guided machine gun. In 2024, Iran's parliament officially recognized SPND under Iranian law for the first time, placing it under the control of the defense ministry, and ultimately the personal authority of Iran's Supreme Leader. Hi-Techs According to FT, the Iranian delegation that visited Russia in 2024 included Javad Ghasemi, 48, who was previously the CEO of Paradise Medical Pioneers, a US-sanctioned nuclear weapons-related company in Iran. Also, the delegation included Rouhollah Azimirad, an associate professor at Malek Ashtar University of Technology, which the US and UK have said is under the control of Iran's ministry of defense and Soroush Mohtashami, an expert on neutron generators — a component that can trigger detonation in some nuclear weapons. FT said the delegation stayed in Russia for four days and visited Russian nuclear and electronics research centers including facilities connected to Oleg Maslennikov, a physicist known for his work on klystrons — devices used in both particle accelerators and nuclear diagnostics. Also, the Iranian delegation visited Toriy, a research facility located a short walk from the premises of the Polyus Science and Research Institute. Polyus is a subsidiary of sanctioned state conglomerate Rostec, and was sanctioned by the US in the late 1990s for reportedly supplying missile guidance technology to Iran. Experts say it is highly unlikely the Iranians could have visited the Russian sites without approval from the FSB, Russia's main security agency. For more than a decade, SPND has attempted to covertly acquire such technology by circumventing western export controls, according to the US, as well as public comments by intelligence agencies in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. The technical offerings of the Russian companies they met, suggest the delegation may have been pursuing information relevant to diagnostic tools for nuclear weapon tests. It's likely that the Iranian delegation was interested in high-powered X-ray tubes for flash X-rays which are used for diagnostic tests of a nuclear weapon's implosion mechanism, FT said. The documents seen by FT also suggest that the delegation's interest extended beyond technical expertise to something far more sensitive: radioactive materials. Two former western officials told the FT that the US had last year picked up signs that SPND had engaged in dual-use knowledge transfers with Russia, as well as procuring physical items, that could be relevant to nuclear weapons research. Other western officials said that they had become aware of the SPND expressing an interest in acquiring various radioactive isotopes — not including tritium — but that the motivations for this interest had been unclear. Much of Iran's nuclear infrastructure may have been destroyed or damaged after the Israeli and US attacks in June. But some experts believe that the system SPND built — the personnel, the training, the technical continuity — is harder to eradicate. 'Israel can't totally destroy Iran's nuclear program,' says Nicole Grajewski, a fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'Because one of the things Iran has done is have those involved in the Amad plan train a cadre of younger scientists.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store