Natural disasters may be shaping babies' brains
Climate stressors, and the effect they have on pregnant people, appear to affect the brain development of their babies, according to the study published in PLOS One on Wednesday, which relied on brain imaging conducted years after 2012's Superstorm Sandy hit the New York City metro area.
The study evaluated a sample of 34 children, 11 whose parents were pregnant during Superstorm Sandy. By the time of assessment, the kids were roughly eight years old. Those who had been exposed to Sandy in utero had a significant enlargement in a part of the brain known as the basal ganglia. Parts of the basal ganglia were as much as 6% larger than in unexposed children, a change that could have negative implications for the children's behavior. The parents living through the disruptions from a storm that displaced more than 23,000 people and suspended electric services in the area for days to weeks may have affected their offspring's neurodevelopment, the researchers say.
The findings signal how new generations of children may be marked by climate crises that occur before they were born, and speak to a need to better evaluate and educate pregnant people about climate risks, the researchers say. They contribute to a growing consensus about pregnant people's vulnerability to climate change, with extreme heat, air pollution and natural disasters posing risks like preterm births.
"This is something which people who are going to get pregnant should know and be prepared,' says Yoko Nomura, an author of the PLOS One research and a professor at Queens College at the City University of New York. "Society as a whole has to have a strategy to protect those pregnant people.'
Non-climate-related stress can affect pregnancies and influence fetal brain development. But studies typically haven't examined how natural disasters may work in the same way. Project Ice Storm, a project examining the aftermath of a devastating 1998 storm in Canada, found that stress had an effect on everything from kids' temperament to their IQ.
Superstorm Sandy, which hit New York and New Jersey in October 2012, devastated coastal areas, leading to around 120 deaths and billions in damages. Queens College, in Flushing, New York, served as a shelter. Nomura, who was already on the faculty there at the time, observed how distressed storm evacuees in the on-campus gym were. Many of them were pregnant, and facing stressors like losing power and being displaced from their homes. That inspired Nomura to look into how the experience might affect their unborn babies.
While the team hasn't yet determined how the changes they observed in the basal ganglia may affect participating children in the day-to-day, that part of the brain is involved in functions including emotional regulation. Other studies have linked the basal ganglia to conditions like depression and autism.
Demonstrators, including mothers and babies, take part in a protest in London in October 2019. |
Reuters
"We do think that those changes we're seeing could lead to negative outcomes for the children's behavior,' says Donato DeIngeniis, the study's lead author and a doctoral student in clinical neuropsychology at the CUNY Graduate Center.
For a subset of seven children whose parents had been exposed to Sandy and separately, over the course of their parent's pregnancy, extreme heat, the brain differences were more pronounced. Researchers observed that one portion of the basal ganglia was enlarged while another was reduced. "That might mean one area is impaired, which might lead the other to have to work harder to compensate,' DeIngeniis says, which is common in the brain in instances of brain damage or injury.
The cohort of children examined in the study is small, reflecting the cost of brain imaging and the fact that the study's recruitment was interrupted by the COVID-19 crisis. Even after recruitment resumed in 2021, participants were reluctant to visit for in-person imaging.
Burcin Ikiz, chair of the Neuro Climate Working Group, part of Columbia University's Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education, calls the study "small but mighty.'
It's increasingly important to understand how different climate stressors may together affect human health, she says. For instance, children in New Delhi are experiencing both air pollution and extreme heat. "And this is one of the first studies — that's why it's a trailblazing study — that looks at these joint things,' she says.
But she added that additional work still needs to be done to address limitations of the study such as the small sample size, and to examine the effect of heat with more depth. While the researchers used statistical methods to ensure the accuracy of their findings, it's still possible that other factors could explain the differences seen in the kids' brains, like genetic variability or socioeconomic status.
The research team is now in the process of conducting a similar, larger study, with around 80 participants so far. But rather than wait to release those results, Nomura says the team felt it was important to release earlier findings more quickly to raise awareness among the public.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
11 hours ago
- Japan Times
RFK Jr.'s mRNA decision may be his worst yet
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to cancel $500 million in grants and contracts for mRNA vaccine development jeopardizes the health and safety of Americans — both now and for years to come. The Nobel Prize-winning technology enabled the first COVID-19 vaccines to be developed with breathtaking speed during the first year of the pandemic, ultimately saving millions of lives. Yet Kennedy spent years undermining confidence in mRNA, a misinformation campaign that he continued after he took office. Now, he's systematically dismantling the very infrastructure we need to respond to a future pandemic. The secretary justified the decision to abandon mRNA in a video full of falsehoods that was posted on his social media. He opened by claiming that the vaccines "don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.' In fact, we have plenty of evidence, both from randomized controlled clinical trials and real-world studies, that COVID-19 shots save lives and reduce hospitalizations. And although we need to see more data, early signs suggest that Moderna's flu vaccine is comparable to — or even more effective than — existing flu vaccines based on older technologies. Of course, we'd love to have vaccines that work better — longer-lasting protection would be nice, as would the complete prevention of infections. But pulling funding for a proven technology like mRNA isn't the way to achieve those goals. Kennedy also claims that the design of mRNA vaccines — which expose the immune system to proteins the virus uses to infect us — is rendered useless by single mutations and that they encourage new mutations that can prolong pandemics. Both claims are false. All viruses accumulate tiny genetic changes over time, regardless of whether a vaccine exists. He ends by saying that scientific "experts' within the Department of Health and Human Services have determined that mRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for respiratory viruses — another claim that public health experts strongly dispute. "I've been in the business for 50 years, and I've never seen a more dangerous decision made by a government agency related to public health,' says Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. Says Osterholm, who has advised several administrations on pandemic preparedness, "There's no factual basis for what he's said.' Kennedy's hostility toward mRNA technology is no surprise. During the pandemic, he was cited by the Center for Countering Digital Hate as one of the "Disinformation Dozen,' a group of influencers responsible for the majority of the anti-vaccine content on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter — where he spread false claims about the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under his leadership, health agencies have already terminated a $766 million contract with Moderna to use mRNA technology to develop vaccines against flu viruses, including H5N1. He also unilaterally changed the recommendations for who should receive COVID-19 shots. This latest move has far-reaching implications for public health. First, he has enormous influence over a segment of the public: a recent poll by KFF found that 70% of Republicans trusted Kennedy to provide reliable information about vaccines. In other words, his misinformation-laden social media posts could meaningfully shape public attitudes about mRNA vaccines. More troubling, though, is how Kennedy is undermining the country's ability to address current and future pathogens. Abandoning mRNA vaccines will put Americans at a disadvantage if another pandemic occurs. "In a biological emergency, time is our greatest weapon,' says Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health. The faster we respond, the fewer the harms - whether in terms of people dying or damage to economic prosperity and national security, Nuzzo says. The technology offers exceptional speed compared to conventional vaccine manufacturing methods such as whole-virus vaccines, which Kennedy says will be the focus of future development. Whole-virus vaccines are typically produced by growing the virus in chicken eggs, then extracting, inactivating and purifying it — a process that can take up to six months to complete. And the world also lacks sufficient egg-based manufacturing capacity. According to Osterholm, we can produce only about 2 billion shots in the first 18 months of a pandemic. In contrast, mRNA vaccines can go from concept to mass production in just a few months — and we've already seen that it's possible to produce enough to serve the global population within a year, he adds. To be clear, other countries are continuing to invest in mRNA, which means those vaccines will still be developed if another scary virus emerges. The next time around, however, Americans could be last in line to receive them. "Preparedness is a deterrent,' Nuzzo says. Walking away from an investment in mRNA also "sends a message to our adversaries that the United States is uncommitted to preparing for future health emergencies — that the United States is now more vulnerable than it has ever been because we are systematically taking off the table multiple approaches to protect ourselves.' What a terrifying thought. Lisa Jarvis is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering biotech, health care and the pharmaceutical industry.
Japan Times
2 days ago
- Japan Times
Death of a delta: Pakistan's Indus sinks and shrinks
Salt crusts crackle underfoot as Habibullah Khatti walks to his mother's grave to say a final goodbye before he abandons his parched island village on Pakistan's Indus delta. Seawater intrusion into the delta, where the Indus River meets the Arabian Sea in the south of the country, has triggered the collapse of farming and fishing communities. "The saline water has surrounded us from all four sides," Khatti said from Abdullah Mirbahar village in the town of Kharo Chan, around 15 kilometers from where the river empties into the sea. As fish stocks fell, the 54-year-old turned to tailoring until that, too, became impossible with only four of the 150 households remaining. "In the evening, an eerie silence takes over the area," he said, as stray dogs wandered through the deserted wooden and bamboo houses. Kharo Chan once comprised around 40 villages, but most have disappeared under rising seawater. The town's population fell from 26,000 in 1981 to 11,000 in 2023, according to census data. Khatti is preparing to move his family to nearby Karachi, Pakistan's largest city, and one swelling with economic migrants, including from the Indus delta. The Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum, which advocates for fishing communities, estimates that tens of thousands of people have been displaced from the delta's coastal districts. However, more than 1.2 million people have been displaced from the overall Indus delta region in the last two decades, according to a study published in March by the Jinnah Institute, a think tank led by a former climate change minister. Habibullah Khatti, a local resident, walks over the salt crusts deposited in Abdullah Mirbahar village in Kharo Chan town, in the Indus delta, south of Pakistan on June 25. | AFP-JIJI The downstream flow of water into the delta has decreased by 80% since the 1950s as a result of irrigation canals, hydropower dams and the impacts of climate change on glacial and snow melt, according to a 2018 study by the U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water. That has led to devastating seawater intrusion. The salinity of the water has risen by around 70% since 1990, making it impossible to grow crops and severely affecting the shrimp and crab populations. "The delta is both sinking and shrinking," said Muhammad Ali Anjum, a local WWF conservationist. 'No other choice' Beginning in Tibet, the Indus River flows through disputed Kashmir before traversing the entire length of Pakistan. The river and its tributaries irrigate about 80% of the country's farmland, supporting millions of livelihoods. The delta, formed by rich sediment deposited by the river as it meets the sea, was once ideal for farming, fishing, mangroves and wildlife. But more than 16% of fertile land has become unproductive due to encroaching seawater, a government water agency study in 2019 found. In the town of Keti Bandar, which spreads inland from the water's edge, a white layer of salt crystals covers the ground. Boats carry in drinkable water from miles away, and villagers cart it home via donkeys. "Who leaves their homeland willingly?" said Haji Karam Jat, whose house was swallowed by the rising water level. He rebuilt farther inland, anticipating more families would join him. "A person only leaves their motherland when they have no other choice," he said. Way of life British colonial rulers were the first to alter the course of the Indus River with canals and dams, followed more recently by dozens of hydropower projects. Earlier this year, several military-led canal projects on the Indus River were halted when farmers in the low-lying riverine areas of Sindh province protested. To combat the degradation of the Indus River Basin, the government and the United Nations launched the "Living Indus Initiative" in 2021. Muhammad Saleem, a local leader, shows newly planted mangroves in Keti Bandar town of the Thatta district near the Indus delta on June 25. | AFP-JIJI One intervention focuses on restoring the delta by addressing soil salinity and protecting local agriculture and ecosystems. The Sindh government is currently running its own mangrove restoration project, aiming to revive forests that serve as a natural barrier against saltwater intrusion. Even as mangroves are restored in some parts of the coastline, land grabbing and residential development projects drive clearing in other areas. Neighboring India, meanwhile, poses a looming threat to the river and its delta, after revoking a 1960 water treaty with Pakistan which divides control over the Indus basin rivers. It has threatened to never reinstate the treaty and build dams upstream, squeezing the flow of water to Pakistan, which has called it "an act of war." Alongside their homes, the communities have lost a way of life tightly bound up in the delta, said climate activist Fatima Majeed, who works with the Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum. Women, in particular, who for generations have stitched nets and packed the day's catches, struggle to find work when they migrate to cities, said Majeed, whose grandfather relocated the family from Kharo Chan to the outskirts of Karachi. "We haven't just lost our land, we've lost our culture."
NHK
2 days ago
- NHK
NASA moves up lunar nuclear reactor plan to counter China, Russia
NASA's acting administrator has directed the US space agency to be ready to run a nuclear reactor on the moon by the end of 2029. Sean Duffy issued the directive on a fission surface power program in internal documents. Duffy instructed that a nuclear reactor with a minimum output of 100 kilowatts be made operational on the lunar surface in order to secure power supplies necessary for activities there. NASA earlier planned to construct a 40-kilowatt nuclear reactor on the moon with the goal of completing it in the early 2030s. Under the latest directive, the planned output has been increased and the schedule has been moved up. The move demonstrates the US stance of countering China and Russia, which announced a joint plan to place a nuclear reactor on the lunar surface by the mid-2030s. Duffy told reporters on Tuesday that the United States is "in a race with China to the moon" and "to have a base on the moon, we need energy." However, the question now is whether the plan can be realized as scheduled, given the massive budget cuts for NASA proposed by the administration of President Donald Trump.
