US lawmakers honor Dalai Lama with bipartisan resolution ahead of 90th birthday
This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission.
Ahead of the Dalai Lama's 90th birthday on July 6, U.S. lawmakers have introduced bipartisan resolutions in both chambers of the U.S. Congress to honor the Tibetan spiritual leader and designate the anniversary as 'A Day of Compassion.'
The resolution – introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday and in the Senate on Tuesday – reaffirms that only the Dalai Lama himself should determine his successor and that any attempt by Beijing to select or appoint one would be an 'invalid interference' and violation of religious freedom rights.
China has sought greater control over Tibetan Buddhism since invading the independent Himalayan country in 1950 and forcing the Dalai Lama into exile in India in 1959. In 2007, Beijing announced it would oversee the recognition of all reincarnate Tibetan lamas, including the next Dalai Lama.
Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon), who co-introduced the Senate resolution with Todd Young (R-Indiana), emphasized the broader stakes. 'As the Chinese government continues to ignore the rights of Tibet under international law, we're sending the message that we must protect these fundamental freedoms,' Merkley said.
In the House, Representatives Michael McCaul (R-Texas) and Jim McGovern (D-Massachusetts) introduced a similar resolution recognizing the Dalai Lama's 'outstanding contributions to peace, nonviolence, human rights, and religious understanding.'
'Despite having faced persecution, oppression, and unspeakable violence at the hands of the CCP, His Holiness the Dalai Lama has maintained inner peace and continues to preach compassion – inspiring not only his own people, but the entire world,' said McCaul. CCP refers to the Chinese Communist Party.
McCaul last year led a bipartisan Congressional delegation to Dharamsala, India, where he presented the Dalai Lama with a framed copy of a U.S. bill, that was later signed into law, in support of Tibetan people's right to self-determination.
'The people of Tibet have an inalienable right to self-determination, and our resolution reaffirms the United States' commitment to Tibetans by supporting their basic human rights, religious freedom, culture, and language,' said Merkley.
In recent years, China has sought to control the reincarnation process of Tibetan religious leaders in an apparent attempt to appoint the Dalai Lama's successor.
But in his new book titled 'Voice for the Voiceless,' the Dalai Lama has said that his successor would be born in the 'free world,' which he described as outside China.
'The new Dalai Lama will be born in the free world so that the traditional mission of the Dalai Lama – that is, to be the voice for universal compassion, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, and the symbol of Tibet embodying the aspirations of the Tibetan people – will continue,' the Dalai Lama said in the book.
The latest resolution reiterates that the selection and installation of Tibetan Buddhist religious leaders are within the authority of the Tibetan Buddhist community.
'I'm proud to stand with the Dalai Lama and the people of Tibet in their struggle for freedom and peace against the Chinese Communist Party's continued aggression. The CCP's status quo – both in Tibet and elsewhere – is not acceptable,' said Young.
The resolution is co-sponsored by a group of bipartisan lawmakers including Reps. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), and Young Kim (R-Calif.), and Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), John Curtis (R-UT), and Dan Sullivan (R-AK).
Both resolutions have to be approved by committee and then voted on by each chamber before passage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump says the U.S. has too many holidays. How it compares to other countries
President Trump on Thursday said American employees have too many holidays off work in his latest criticism of U.S. commemorations. Why it matters: The U.S. is among the least generous of its global counterparts for paid time off policies. Driving the news: "Too many non-working holidays in America," Trump said in a Juneteenth post on Truth Social. Former President Biden signed a bill designating Juneteenth a federal holiday in 2021, after it unanimously passed in the Senate and passed 415-14 in the House. "The workers don't want it either!" Trump added. "Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" He claimed that the days off cost the country billions of dollars. Reality check: The U.S. has no statutory minimum requirement for what employers need to offer in terms of paid vacation days, according to Justworks, a human resources company. Ten public holidays are normally celebrated in the U.S., though employees are not guaranteed to have the days off depending on their employer and job sector. Most private firms offer paid vacation leave, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But the lowest paid workers in hourly jobs often are the ones who miss out. State of play: European countries typically offer the most paid time off, thanks in part to labor movements. Austria ranks first with 25 days of mandatory paid vacation leave plus an additional 13 paid public holidays off. Employees in France and Spain each receive 36 days off. Germany requires 30 days, and the UK requires 28 days. Zoom out: South Korea requires 31 vacation days off, and Japan mandates 26 days. In Canada, employees are entitled to two weeks of vacation annually after they've completed one year with an employer. That jumps up to three weeks for five consecutive years of employment and four weeks for 10 years. In Mexico, employees are entitled to at least 12 days of vacation after a year and a bonus of 25% of their salary for vacation time. They receive two days for every additional day of employment. Zoom in: "Most countries around the world mandate that employees take a vacation each year and use all of their paid time off," the 2023 Justworks report said. "This helps create a better work-life balance, encourages employees to spend time with their family, and shows that employers are committed to seeing employees as individuals." By the numbers: In the U.S., one in four workers don't receive any vacation time or holiday pay, per Justworks.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
EV tax credits are out in budget bill, but House and Senate clash on how fast to kill key incentive
President Donald Trump is moving forward on his promise to end the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids, but it's up to Republicans in Congress to decide whether the cutoff date comes at the end of 2026 or much earlier that year. Competing versions of the incentive rollback in the House and Senate are now up for negotiation, with the House version offering to continue the credit for smaller EV and PHEV makers through the end of 2026 while cutting off bigger ones at the end of this year. The provisions are part of proposals for Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill. The Senate version, released from the Finance Committee on June 16, treats all automakers the same by ending the EV tax credit within 180 days of the bill's passage. That proposal would also cut the EV leasing credit immediately for vehicles that don't meet local content rules and in 180 days for those that do. A $7,500 incentive would end this year for automakers that reach a quota of 200,000 electric vehicles or plug-in hybrids sold since 2010 under a House Republican proposal for the Trump administration's budget bill. Those under the cap remain eligible through 2026. S&P Global Mobility registration data from January 2015 to April 2025 gives a rough idea of where automakers stand. Manufacturers are listed as they appear on the IRS page. American Honda(Honda, Acura) 99,347 BMW of North America(BMW, Mini) 343,402 Ford Motor Co.(Ford, Lincoln) 406,786 General Motors(Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, GMC) 468,952 Hyundai Motor America(Hyundai, Genesis) 241,605 JLR(Jaguar, Land Rover) 19,749 Kia America 212,667 Lucid USA 19,991 Maserati North America 21 Mazda Motor America 33,969 McLaren Automotive 946 Mercedes-Benz USA(Mercedes, Smart) 140,194 Mitsubishi Motors North America 27,512 Nissan North America(Nissan, Infiniti) 166,303 Polestar Automotive USA 29,866 Porsche Cars North America 63,766 Rivian Automotive 126,322 Rolls-Royce Motor Cars N.A. 688 Stellantis 457,955 Subaru of America 36,638 Tesla 2,897,522 Toyota Motor Sales(Toyota, Lexus) 361,692 VinFast 5,174 Volvo Car North America 158,068 Volkswagen of America(VW, Audi, Bentley) 259,086 The Senate text suggests that the chamber is taking an even harder line than the House bill passed May 22 in eliminating Biden-era incentives for EVs. The Senate proposal would also end a $4,000 used-vehicle EV tax credit after 90 days. 'I think the Senate version is worse, totally cold turkey, and the lease thing is so important,' said Mike Murphy, a Republican political consultant and CEO of the American EV Jobs Alliance, a pro-EV lobbying group. 'Bottom line is the Senate is really trying to put a stake in the heart of EV subsidies.' While both rollback plans will likely reduce consumer demand and automaker investments by also phasing out credits for battery production, the House version gives some automakers more time to build on their modest EV sales, analysts say. Sign up for the weekly Automotive News Mobility Report newsletter for the latest developments at the intersection of transportation and technology. The House proposal does that by returning to the quota-based program from 2010 to 2022 that phased out the credits once an automaker reached sales of 200,000 electric models, including battery-electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids. With the proposed revival of that mechanism, automakers exceeding that threshold would lose access to the credit Dec. 31 while those still under the cap would have until the end of 2026. The result could be a short-term rush by consumers to take advantage of the tax break, followed by a decline in demand. 'Although some brands may have a longer runway with the House's proposal for discontinuing the EV credits, the cap would eliminate EVs from many of the industry's most popular brands,' said Brent Gruber, executive director at J.D. Power's EV practice. 'The Senate's version may spur EV sales in the short term, but it, like the House's version, ultimately may jeopardize EV adoption.' The current tax credit, signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022 as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, doesn't use quotas. It does impose North American content rules and battery-material requirements, but leased EVs get the credit without having to comply with those rules. EV makers already exceeding 200,000 in U.S. registrations include Tesla, General Motors, Ford Motor Co., Hyundai, Volkswagen, BMW and Stellantis, according to data from S&P Global Mobility that covers the period from January 2015 to April 2025. EV makers who are safely under the quota include startups Rivian Automotive and Lucid Motors, electric vehicle latecomers Honda and Subaru, low-volume brands such as Mazda and Mitsubishi, and sports car manufacturers including Porsche, McLaren and Maserati. The registration data from S&P Global Mobility does not include the years 2010 to 2014 when EV and plug-in hybrid sales were still relatively modest. Ultimately, it would be up to the IRS to determine which automakers would get cut off at the end of this year and which would still be eligible in 2026, analysts said. Also, the House and Senate could negotiate a different set of rules from their original proposals for the EV credit phaseout. In response to questions from Automotive News, Mercedes-Benz said its cumulative EV and PHEV sales in the U.S. were approaching 150,000 as of mid-June. Mercedes said interest in 'sustainable mobility' remains strong, and it will offer a variety of powertrains to meet consumer needs. 'The pace of transformation is determined by market conditions and the needs of our customers,' Mercedes said. 'Into the 2030s, we can flexibly offer vehicles with both fully electric drivetrains and electrified high-tech combustion engines.' Mercedes said it supports 'a more orderly phase out of the existing federal EV incentives,' a stance shared by the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents most automakers selling vehicles in the U.S. According to J.D. Power survey data, a majority of EV buyers cited tax credits and incentives as a key reason for purchasing a new electric vehicle in 2024 and this year. 'For customers of Honda and Volkswagen, on average, the tax credit was the No. 1 purchase reason. For brands like Tesla, Cadillac and Chevrolet, among others, tax credits were amid the top three most influential purchase reasons,' Gruber said. Nissan, an EV pioneer with the Leaf hatchback in 2010, said EV adoption will continue to grow despite the loss of the federal tax credit. 'We anticipate continued growth in the EV market, driven by strong demand and the many benefits that EVs provide,' Nissan said. 'However, we acknowledge that the pace of growth may slow compared to earlier projections.' In addition to targeting the consumer EV tax credit, the Trump administration has taken steps to roll back federal emissions standards and withhold funding for a nationwide charging network. 'If tax credits are abolished, the price competitiveness of BEVs and PHEVs relative to internal combustion engine vehicles is generally expected to decline,' Mazda said. BMW said that a change in the tax credits wouldn't affect its strategy of offering different powertrains for different consumer needs. 'From the start, BMW's strategic approach has been one of 'technology openness,' where we offer our customers the ability to choose the vehicle that best suits their lifestyle — whether that be a highly efficient internal combustion vehicle, plug-in hybrid electric vehicle, or battery electric vehicle," the automaker said. Toyota, which has focused on hybrids over fully electric vehicles, said the loss of the EV and PHEV tax credits would not have a significant impact on its business. 'While there may be a small impact on leases in the short term, the impact to our business will not be substantial,' Toyota said. 'We feel a strong, competitive product with a more robust national charging infrastructure will drive sales when consumers are ready to purchase a BEV.' Some EV fans expect sales to suffer without the tax credit but mostly on lower-cost electric vehicles where the credit allows monthly payments similar to gasoline vehicles and hybrids. Some buyers will still prefer EVs even at a higher price. 'I don't want to say the tax credit had no impact. Clearly it did,' said Loren McDonald, chief analyst at EV consultancy Paren. 'But I've always believed that it was 10 percent, 20 percent maximum of the market where it actually converted people to EVs.' Some EV skeptics welcome the return to a more level playing field where consumers, not government regulations, drive the auto business. 'Once the smoke clears and the incentives clear, I think you'll see a pullback from how much the automakers are investing in this technology and the number of consumers who are buying EVs,' said Karl Brauer, executive analyst at iSeeCars. He said EVs have advantages in refinement, but range and charging limit their appeal. 'I believe that financial viability is supposed to be a cornerstone of capitalism, which is supposed to be the cornerstone of the U.S. economy,' Brauer said. 'You shouldn't have cars that are drastically losing money with no real long-term horizon on when they're going to be profitable.' Hans Greimel, Urvaksh Karkaria, Carly Schaffner and Larry P. Vellequette contributed to this report. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Arizona Moves Closer to Creating Bitcoin Reserve as Bill Passes Final Senate Vote
Arizona moved closer to establishing a bitcoin BTC reserve fund after the state's Senate voted in favor of the bill at its third reading. Arizona's Senate passed House Bill 2324 (HB2324) in a 16-14 vote on Thursday, sending it back to House for a final decision. The legislation would update Arizona's laws on forfeiture, allowing the state to hold abandoned digital assets as unclaimed property. It also creates a "Bitcoin and digital assets reserve fund" to manage the forfeited assets. It follows House Bill 2749 (HB2749), enacted in April, which amended unclaimed property frameworks to integrate digital assets. The bill is distinct from Senate Bill 1025 (SB1025), which proposed using seized funds to invest in BTC. That passed the House 31-25 before being vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs, who referred to cryptocurrency as an "untested investment." The only state to have completed the legislative process for creating a BTC reserve is New Hampshire. Like Arizona, a bill in Texas is also in its final stages.
