Tick Experts Reveal The 6 Things They'd Never, Ever Do Outdoors
'Ticks themselves are not particularly dangerous to humans, it's just, unfortunately, the diseases that they can carry can be transmitted to humans [and] end up causing them harm,' said Dr. Christopher Bazzoli, an emergency medicine physician at Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
Lyme disease is the tick-borne illness that gets the most attention. 'Right around 90,000 cases of Lyme [disease] are reported to the CDC every year here in the United States, but probably more like [300,000] to 400,000 people contract the Lyme infection annually here in the United States,' Bazzoli noted. That means most infections are not reported to the CDC.
Other, less common diseases that ticks also transmit, Bazzoli said, include Rocky Mountain spotted fever, babesiosis and ehrlichiosis.
Ticks don't bite you and fly off like a mosquito. Instead, it takes hours and hours for them to cement themselves onto your skin and feed, said Dr. Eugene Shapiro, a professor of pediatrics at Yale School of Medicine in Connecticut. An infected tick (and not all ticks are infected) has to be on for 24 to 36 hours to transmit an infection, Shapiro noted.
'If you identify the tick and can pull it off, usually in less than 36 hours, it's unlikely it's going to transmit Lyme disease,' Shapiro said.
There are other infections that can be spread more quickly, but it's generally the tick that you don't see and don't pull off that's most dangerous, Shapiro added.
'Because those can be on for a long time, and most people who do develop Lyme disease don't identify the tick that transmitted it, because if they'd seen it, more likely than not, they'll pull it off and it wouldn't have transmitted infection,' said Shapiro.
The solution to avoiding ticks and tick-borne illness isn't spending your summer indoors. But ticks and tick-borne illnesses are becoming more prevalent because of climate change, which makes tick prevention strategies even more valuable.
Below, doctors and tick researchers share their guidance for what not to do or overlook when it comes to ticks.
Ticks are generally dark brown or black, which means they can easily blend into dark-colored attire.
To more easily spot ticks on yourself or your loved ones, Dr. Daniel Solomon, an infectious disease physician at Mass General Brigham in Boston, recommends that folks wear light-colored clothing when they're out and about.
'So, if you see a dark speck crawling around on the clothes, it's much easier to identify on white or khaki color than dark colors,' said Solomon.
It's also a good idea to wear long-sleeved shirts and long pants when you're out in wooded or grassy areas, said Shapiro. While that isn't ideal for 95-degree weather, it can be the thing that keeps ticks from biting.
You can also consider tucking your pant legs into your socks, which makes it harder for ticks to get in contact with and bite your skin, Shapiro said.
Bug repellent is most associated with keeping away mosquitoes, but certain bug sprays can also keep ticks from biting.
'We have a number of repellents that we can apply [that last] hours at a time,' Bazzoli said. These repellents typically protect folks for four to six hours, unless you're sweating a lot – in that case, they'll need to be reapplied more often, he added.
When looking for an insect repellent to keep ticks away, 'the big three as far as repellents to choose from — DEET, picaridin-based repellents and then repellents with IR3535 — those are the big three worth recommending,' said Bazzoli.
For both DEET and picaridin, look for formulations that have 20% concentrations, he added.
'And then folks will probably be seeing more products with IR3535, that's a product that was developed and has been used in Europe for the last decade or two, and is now kind of starting to make its way over to the States and seeing it in some combined products, like sunscreen and insect repellent,' noted Bazzoli.
To deter ticks even more, a bug repellent that can be sprayed onto your clothes will kill ticks on contact, according to Shapiro. It's called permethrin and can be found online at stores like Amazon, in addition to outdoor gear stores like REI.
'The spray is not toxic to humans, but it can actually kill ticks when they get onto the clothes, and so that's an extra layer of prevention. If the ticks get onto the clothes, then they can be prevented from getting onto the skin and attaching,' Solomon added.
'Ticks love high grasses, wooded areas, especially the interface between wooded and more open areas,' said Bazzoli. Shapiro added that ticks tend to get on the 'ends of blades of grass, and they have sensor organs under their legs, and they clamp onto warm-blooded things that pass by.'
They also live in leaf litter, such as piles of leaves, and shrubbery, added Shapiro. If you have leaf piles in your yard, try to get rid of them, he noted.
'It turns out that most people get infected in their own backyard when they're gardening or something like that,' Shapiro said.
Once again, you shouldn't be avoiding nature this summer to keep ticks away. You can enjoy your outdoor adventures and stay safe from ticks by following a few rules when you get back inside.
'When you come back indoors, taking off those clothes and throwing them in the dryer on high heat for 10 minutes can kill any ticks that might be freely crawling around,' Solomon said.
Since ticks do not attach right away, you can also jump in the shower to wash off any ticks that may be crawling on your body, he added.
When you come in from time outside, you should conduct tick checks with your family members, said Solomon.
'Usually [ticks] like dark, moist areas — behind the knee, in the groin, in the belly button, under the arms or the nape of the neck,' Solomon said.
'Now, they can attach anywhere, but those are the places where they like to attach, and those are also the places that are hard to see, so you really have to, with a family member, make sure that you're looking in the dark areas that you might not look when you're going about your regular day,' said Solomon.
If you do find a tick attached to your body, get a pair of fine-tip tweezers, grab as close to your skin as possible, and pull the tick out, Shapiro said.
It's also important to be mindful of where your pet goes outside.
'Just because we're not walking in the woods, if we're letting the dog out to run through the woods, in the park or whatever, she or he may pick up a tick and carry it inside,' said Bazzoli.
You should chat with your vet about the best tick prevention strategies for your furry friends, he noted. Not only will this protect them from tick bites and infection, but it will protect you, too.
'If you do remove a tick, we can prescribe an antibiotic for post-exposure prophylaxis, so a single dose of doxycycline can be given,' said Solomon.
You can call your doctor or visit urgent care to get this medication.
'If it's given within the first 72 hours after tick removal, it can dramatically decrease the risk of Lyme disease,' Solomon noted.
Throughout the summer, you should also be aware of the signs of tick-borne illness. When it comes to Lyme disease, keep an eye out for a red rash, whether it's a bullseye or any other shape, said Bazzoli.
Beyond a rash, folks with tick-borne illnesses also report flu-like symptoms such as fever, chills or body aches, added Solomon. So, you shouldn't brush these things off as a 'summer flu,' he noted.
'In the spirit of trying not to make people nervous, they're really treatable, so if you have those symptoms, getting the right testing, getting the right treatment, can help resolve symptoms fairly quickly,' Solomon said.
Not all ticks carry disease, and where you live and when you find a tick can determine if you're at risk of tick-borne illness. To help you decide what you should do if you find a tick in your home, on yourself or on a loved one, you can use the CDC's tick bite bot.
'The CDC actually has a tick bot where you can actually answer a series of questions to see what you need to do if you've been bitten by a tick or had a tick on you,' Bazzoli noted.
'It'll kind of guide you, whether you need to see the doctor or if you're doing OK,' Bazzoli said.
A Rare Tick-Borne Disease Is On The Rise. Here's How To Tell If You Have It.
The 4 Biggest Early Warning Signs Of Lyme Disease
Vets Share The Most Common Signs Of Lyme Disease In Dogs
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DEA Cannabis Poisoned, Zero Oversight-Massachusetts Lab Scandal: A Case Study in DEA's Regulatory Collapse
Poisoned Cannabis, Zero DEA Oversight The DEA's mission statement is a sham under Thomas Prevoznik's watch. Americans are being poisoned by untested state cannabis operators while terminal patients are denied potential cures. WASHINGTON, D.C. / / July 6, 2025 / The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) exists to "prevent, detect, and investigate the diversion of controlled substances while ensuring an adequate and uninterrupted supply for legitimate medical, commercial, and scientific needs". Yet under the leadership of Deputy Administrator Thomas Prevoznik, the DEA's Diversion Control Division has catastrophically failed this mission. Instead of protecting public health, the agency has allowed contaminated cannabis to flood state markets-poisoning consumers-while simultaneously blocking federally compliant pharmaceutical research that could save lives. This is not just bureaucratic incompetence; it is systemic negligence bordering on malpractice. 1. DEA's Mission Failure: Poisoned Cannabis, Zero Oversight The Massachusetts Scandal: A Case Study in Regulatory Collapse In Massachusetts, Assured Testing Laboratories-a facility responsible for testing 25% of the state's cannabis-was caught falsifying safety reports, concealing contamination, and approving products that should have failed for yeast, mold, and microbial toxins. Thousands of tainted products reached consumers, yet the DEA: Took no enforcement action Issued no national recall Failed to intervene despite its mandate to prevent diversion and ensure safety. This is not an isolated incident. Across the U.S., unregulated cannabis markets operate like the "Wild West"-with no federal quality control, no uniform safety standards, and no accountability. The DEA, under Prevoznik, has abdicated its duty, leaving Americans exposed to dangerous products while offering no recourse. 2. Blocking Medical Breakthroughs: The DEA's War on Science While turning a blind eye to contaminated street cannabis, the DEA has actively obstructed federally approved pharmaceutical research. MMJ BioPharma, a company developing cannabis-based treatments for Huntington's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis, has faced seven years of bureaucratic sabotage despite: Holding FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) approvals Securing Orphan Drug Designation for Huntington's therapy Passing DEA security inspections. Yet, Prevoznik's division refuses to grant MMJ a bulk manufacturing license, citing a retroactive "Bona Fide Supply Agreement" (BFSA) requirement that creates an impossible Catch-22: No supplier will sign a contract without DEA approval. DEA won't approve without a signed contract. This obstruction is not just regulatory failure-it's deliberate stonewalling. As MMJ's legal filings reveal, DEA Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) operate in a structurally biased system, where registrants win only 20-25% of cases, and the DEA overturns nearly all pro-registrant rulings. 3. The Human Cost: Patients Suffer While Illicit Markets Thrive The DEA's hypocrisy is staggering: Patients with epilepsy, cancer, and neurological disorders are denied access to standardized, pharmaceutical-grade cannabis112. Meanwhile, unregulated THC products-laced with pesticides, mold, and heavy metals-flood the market, making consumers sick 15. Prevoznik's DEA has created the worst of both worlds:No protection for consumers from tainted pathway for research into life-saving medicines. 4. Time for Accountability: Fire Prevoznik, Overhaul the DEA The solution is clear: Remove Thomas Prevoznik for gross negligence and regulatory malpractice. Transfer cannabis oversight to the FDA/NIH, where science-not stigma-guides policy. Investigate DEA's Diversion Control Division for systemic bias and corruption. As MMJ BioPharma CEO Duane Boise stated: "The DEA's Diversion Control Division, under Prevoznik's leadership, has failed to protect the public, failed to uphold science, and failed to meet even the most basic standards of competence." Fire Thomas Prevoznik: A Call to Action The DEA's mission statement is a sham under Prevoznik's watch. Americans are being poisoned by untested cannabis while terminal patients are denied potential cures. Congress must intervene, the courts must act, and the public must demand accountability. Enough is enough. It's time to end the DEA's obstructionism and put public health over bureaucracy. MMJ is Represented by Attorney Megan Sheahan and Associates CONTACT:Madison Hiseymedia@ SOURCE: MMJ International Holdings View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Wall Street Journal
33 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The MAHA Movement Loves Psychedelics. Should Wall Street?
Just about everyone in the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement seems bullish on psychedelics. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has spoken favorably about the treatments, and President Trump's surgeon general pick, Casey Means, has described psilocybin therapy (known as magic mushroom) as 'one of the most meaningful experiences of life.' That kind of political enthusiasm might suggest a ripe buying opportunity for investors. But Wall Street and pharmaceutical companies have largely stayed on the sidelines. Questions remain. Chief among them is how to commercially scale treatments that leave patients high for several hours.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Air Pollution 'Strongly Associated' With DNA Mutations Tied to Lung Cancer
Lung cancer cases are on the rise in non-smokers around the world, and air pollution could be an insidious, contributing factor. A genome study has now found that outdoor smog and soot are strongly associated with DNA mutations related to lung cancer – including known drivers seen in smokers, and new ones unique to non-smokers. The more pollution someone was exposed to, the more mutations scientists found in their lung tumors. The findings don't mean that air pollution is directly causing lung cancer, but they do contribute to evidence suggesting that possibility. Related: "We're seeing this problematic trend that never-smokers are increasingly getting lung cancer, but we haven't understood why," explains biomolecular scientist Ludmil Alexandrov from the University of California San Diego (UCSD). "Our research shows that air pollution is strongly associated with the same types of DNA mutations we typically associate with smoking." The extensive international analysis examined the cancer genomes of 871 individuals from four continents, all of whom had lung cancer despite never having smoked and who had not yet received cancer treatment. Those who lived in regions with high levels of air pollution were significantly more likely to have TP53 mutations, EGFR mutations, and shorter telomeres. Abnormal TP53 and EGFR genes are hallmarks of lung cancers, especially those driven by the SBS4 DNA mutation, and shorter telomeres are linked to accelerated aging. In the current study, non-smokers who lived in areas with higher air pollution were nearly four times more likely to exhibit SBS4 signatures as those who lived in regions with cleaner air. By contrast, exposure to secondhand smoke, which is a known cancer risk, showed only a slight increase in genetic mutations. "If there is a mutagenic effect of secondhand smoke, it may be too weak for our current tools to detect," says geneticist Tongwu Zhang from the US National Cancer Institute (NCI). Not so for air pollution or tobacco smoking: both were strongly linked to DNA mutations. Today in the United States, people who have never smoked or who have smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lives make up about 10 to 20 percent of lung cancer cases. Scientists have long suspected that air pollution could be a contributing factor, but exactly how fine particulate matter in the air compares to tobacco smoking or secondhand smoke exposure remains unclear. Some studies suggest that breathing polluted air is on par with smoking a pack a day, and yet these conclusions are mostly based on observational analyses. The current study digs further by looking at some of the molecular mechanisms that may be at play. It compared the lung cancer genomes of the 871 non-smokers with tumors from 345 smokers, to find similarities and differences. The majority of non-smokers with lung cancer had adenocarcinomas (the most common type of lung cancer), and nearly 5 percent of those tumors showed the SBS4 mutational signature. In addition, 28 percent of non-smokers showed a new signature called SBS40a, which wasn't found in tobacco smokers. Strangely, the cause of this particular mutational driver was unknown, but doesn't seem to be environmental in nature. "We see it in a majority of cases in this study, but we don't yet know what's driving it," says Alexandrov. "This is something entirely different, and it opens up a whole new area of investigation." The current research relied only on regional air pollution levels, which means it can't say how much any one individual was directly exposed to fine particulate matter in the air. Participants who said they had never smoked may have also smoked more than reported. These limitations notwithstanding, the overall findings align with other evidence indicating that soot or smog may trigger tumor growth in a similar way to cigarette chemicals. "This is an urgent and growing global problem that we are working to understand regarding never-smokers," says epidemiologist Maria Teresa Landi from the NCI. The team now hopes to expand their study to include cancer genomes from a more diverse, global cohort. The study was published in Nature. FDA Issues Warning Over Dangerous 'Gas Station Heroin' Substance Mysterious Leprosy Pathogen Has Lurked in The Americas For 4,000 Years Massive Review Finds No 'Safe' Level of Processed Meat Consumption