logo
U.S. State Department softens criticism of some countries in human rights report

U.S. State Department softens criticism of some countries in human rights report

Japan Times2 days ago
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has scaled back a key government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some countries that have been strong partners of the Republican president, such as El Salvador and Israel, which rights groups say have extensive records of abuses.
Instead, the U.S. State Department in its widely anticipated 2024 Human Rights Report sounded an alarm about the erosion of freedom of speech in Europe and ramped up criticism of Brazil and South Africa, countries Washington has clashed with over a host of issues.
Any criticism of governments over their treatment of LGBTQ+ rights, which appeared in editions of the report from the administration of former President Joe Biden, appeared to have been largely omitted. Washington referred to Russia's invasion of Ukraine mainly as the "Russia-Ukraine war."
The report's section on Israel was much shorter than last year's edition and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in the Gaza Strip. Some 61,000 people have died, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, as a result of Israel's military operations in response to an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023.
The report was delayed for months as Trump appointees altered an earlier State Department draft dramatically to bring it in line with "America First" values, according to government officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The report introduced new categories such as "Life" and "Liberty," and "Security of the Person."
"There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses," the 2024 report said about El Salvador, in sharp contrast with the 2023 report that talked about "significant human rights issues" and listed them as credible reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, torture, and harsh and life-threatening prison conditions.
Washington's bilateral ties with El Salvador have strengthened since Trump took office, as the administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from President Nayib Bukele, whose country is receiving $6 million from the U.S. to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison.
Critics said the report was politically driven.
"The report demonstrates what happens when political agendas take priority over the facts," said Josh Paul, a former State Department official and director of nongovernmental organization A New Policy. "The outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda release than of a democratic system."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio in April wrote an opinion piece that said the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor had become a platform for "leftwing activists." |
AFP-JIJI
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the report was restructured to improve readability and that it was no longer an expansive list of "politically biased demands and assertions."
Bruce declined to respond to specific questions about countries and did not say why a list of rights abuses in El Salvador was removed.
The Trump administration has moved away from the traditional U.S. promotion of democracy and human rights, seeing it as interference in another country's affairs, even as it criticized countries selectively, consistent with its broader policy toward a particular country.
One example is Europe, where Trump officials repeatedly weighed in on European politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-leaning leaders, including in Romania, Germany, and France, and accused European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration.
For decades, the State Department's congressionally mandated Human Rights Report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy.
This year's report was prepared following a major revamp of the department, which included the firing of hundreds of people, many from the agency's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, which takes the lead in writing the report.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio in April wrote an opinion piece that said the bureau had become a platform for "leftwing activists," saying the Trump administration would reorient the bureau to focus on "Western values."
In Brazil, where the Trump administration has clashed with the government, the State Department found the human rights situation declined, after the 2023 report found no significant changes. This year's report took aim at the courts, stating they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of former President Jair Bolsonaro, among others.
Bolsonaro is on trial before the Supreme Court on charges he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Trump has referred to the case as a "witch hunt" and called it grounds for a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods.
In South Africa, whose government the Trump administration has accused of racial discrimination toward Afrikaners, this year's report said the human rights situation significantly worsened. It stated that "South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country."
In last year's report, the State Department found no significant changes in the human rights situation in South Africa.
Trump, earlier this year, issued an executive order that called for the U.S. to resettle Afrikaners, describing them as victims of "violence against racially disfavored landowners," allegations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by South Africa's government.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia intensifies offensive ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Russia intensifies offensive ahead of Trump-Putin summit

NHK

time2 hours ago

  • NHK

Russia intensifies offensive ahead of Trump-Putin summit

An aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin has provided more details about the upcoming summit with US President Donald Trump. The leaders will discuss ways to end the fighting in Ukraine. The meeting is scheduled for Friday in Alaska, which shares a maritime border with Russia across the Bering Strait. Presidential aide Yury Ushakov confirmed that the leaders will meet at a military facility called Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson and that the summit will start at around 11:30 a.m. local time. It will be the first in-person meeting between Putin and a US leader since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. They will begin with a one-on-one discussion with only interpreters present before being joined by other delegates. Ushakov added that the meeting has no set duration and will followed by a joint press conference. Trump told reporters on Thursday in Washington that he would like to see a summit between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. He said, "I would say that tomorrow, all I want to do is set the table for the next meeting, which should happen shortly." Putin briefed his top officials ahead of the talks. He said the Trump administration is making "sincere efforts" to end the conflict. He also suggested they may reach a deal on nuclear arms control. Meanwhile, the fighting in Ukraine shows no sign of letting up. A Ukrainian research group called DeepState says Russian forces are intensifying their attacks in the eastern region of Donetsk. The AFP reported that, on August 12, they made their largest advance since late May of last year.

Trump says Putin ready to make deal on Ukraine, U.S. hopes to include Zelenskyy
Trump says Putin ready to make deal on Ukraine, U.S. hopes to include Zelenskyy

Japan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Japan Times

Trump says Putin ready to make deal on Ukraine, U.S. hopes to include Zelenskyy

U.S. President Donald Trump said he believes his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin is ready to end his war in Ukraine, speaking on the eve of Friday's summit between the men, but that peace would likely require at least a second meeting involving Ukraine's leader. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the U.S. and Russia emerging from Friday's summit in Alaska that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. "I think President Putin will make peace, I think President Zelenskyy will make peace," Trump told reporters at the White House. "We'll see if they get along." Trump has downplayed talk of a ceasefire emerging from the summit and speculated about a possible second meeting to come, involving more leaders. "I think it's going to be a good meeting, but the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelenskyy, myself, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along. Maybe not. I don't know that." Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for a meeting with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War II. In televised comments, Putin said the U.S. was "making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict." Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a meeting with members of Russia's top leadership in preparation for the upcoming Russia-U.S. summit in Alaska, at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Thursday. | Sputnik / Pool / via REUTERS This was happening, Putin said, "to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole — if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons." His comments signaled that Russia will raise nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Trump would also discuss the "huge untapped potential" for Russia-U.S. economic ties. A senior Eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. "We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians; he understands all (these) dangerous things," the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Trump said there would be a news conference after the talks, but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said in an earlier interview with Fox News that there would be "a give and take" on boundaries and land. "This meeting sets up like a chess game," Trump said. "This (first) meeting sets up a second meeting, but there is a 25% chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting," he said. Trump said it would be up to Putin and Zelenskyy to strike an agreement, saying: "I'm not going to negotiate their deal." Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine, and Zelenskyy and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer walk out of 10 Downing Street, in London, on Thursday. | REUTERS An EU diplomat said it would be "scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe, but that was yesterday." Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Zelenskyy on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Friday's summit, the first Russia-U.S. summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump had said the transatlantic NATO alliance should not be part of any security guarantees designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. However, Trump also said the U.S. and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees, Macron added. Expanding on that, a European official said that Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. It "felt like a big step forward," said the official, who did not want to be named. It was not immediately clear what such guarantees could mean in practice. On Wednesday, Trump threatened "severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting on Friday proves fruitless. Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands and has previously said its stance had not changed since it was first detailed by Putin in June 2024.

Trump Is Pushing India-US Ties to the Brink for Personal Gain
Trump Is Pushing India-US Ties to the Brink for Personal Gain

The Diplomat

time4 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

Trump Is Pushing India-US Ties to the Brink for Personal Gain

U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi as he is introduced to the podium at a rally in honor of Modi at NRG Stadium in Houston, Texas, Sep. 22, 2019. U.S. President Donald Trump has almost single-handedly brought the India-U.S. partnership to its lowest point in two decades. On August 6, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods in a bid to punish India for its continued purchase of Russian oil. The move came a few days after he reported his displeasure over India's trade with Russia, claiming that he would substantially raise tariffs on India. This brings the total duty on India to 50 percent. Adding insult to injury, Trump offended many in India with his remarks, saying, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' This trade spat has roiled the India-U.S. relationship, which is arguably at its lowest point thus far in the 21st century. The current tensions appear surprising to many because of the positive trajectory of the India-U.S. partnership in the last couple of decades. However, the relationship is laden with significant fault lines, the chief one being India's ties with Russia. Trump is compounding this fault line for political gain. For Washington, a stronger partnership with India rested on the rationale of leveraging India as a counter to China's rise, and because of that, the divergence on Russia was largely kept aside for a long time. However, the United States today is distracted by the conflicts in Europe and the Middle East. Consequently, countering China in the Indo-Pacific is not the U.S. foreign policy's most predominant and pressing objective for now. If 'countering China,' is not a priority for Washington, then India is not an important partner for the United States. India is neither a critical nor a major trading partner of the U.S., unlike China, which dominates the critical minerals sector. This explains why China has been given a 90-day extension for tariff negotiations, even though it is the largest buyer of Russian oil and gas. Realizing that China has emerged unscathed from Trump's tariffs while the U.S. is heavily dependent on China for critical minerals, the Trump administration has been trying to reach an accommodation with China. Therefore, Chinese containment in the Indo-Pacific appears to be fading away for now – and with it, the need for a robust partnership with India. Due to this, Trump has targeted tariffs on India alone for the purchase of Russian oil and gas. For its part, India has asserted that the demand to halt trade with Russia remains totally unjustified and unreasonable. In 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, the United States itself encouraged India's energy purchases, India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement, 'because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict.' Even today, the U.S. still continues to import fertilizers, chemicals and uranium and palladium from Russia, the MEA pointed out. On the other hand, India has drastically increased its energy purchases from the United States, with crude oil imports surging 51 percent in the first half of 2025. India's liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports from the U.S. have nearly doubled from $1.41 billion in FY2023-24 to $2.46 billion in FY2024-25. In February, Prime Minister Narendra Modi pledged to boost U.S. energy imports to $25 billion from $15 billion in 2024 – and thus reduce the trade deficit, which is a constant concern for Trump. In accordance with that, Indian oil and gas companies are discussing long-term purchases of U.S. oil and gas with their U.S. counterparts. India has been endeavoring to reduce its reliance on Russian energy purchases by increasing its U.S. energy imports. Why, then, did Trump decide to hit India with 50 percent tariffs over the issue of Russian oil? Trump is clearly frustrated that he has been unable to achieve his promise of striking a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. The tariffs on India for Russian oil and gas purchases thus look more like a personalistic attack – Trump's way of acting out his frustration over not achieving his geopolitical goal of halting the Russia-Ukraine war. Indeed, Trump's beloved self-image as the world's biggest dealmaker underlies the current tensions with India. He has made repeated public claims about brokering the India-Pakistan ceasefire post-Operation Sindoor – a claim that India has vehemently denied at all official levels, including Modi himself. Therefore, tariffs may also have an element of punishing India for denying his claims of brokering the ceasefire. On the other hand, Pakistan – which embraced Trump's claim of mediation, even nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize – is enjoying a renewed warmth in its relationship with Washington. The United States has not reached an agreement with India even after five rounds of trade negotiations, despite India's reported willingness to make substantial trade concessions. This suggests that the tariffs were political – or personal, in Trump's case – retaliation rather than economic. India is not the only country to be hit with high tariffs due to Trump's personal grievances. He imposed 50 percent levy on Brazil because of judicial proceedings in the Brazilian Supreme Court in which Trump's ally, former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, was charged with staging a coup against current President Lula. Trump has not shied away from threatening tariffs if he finds any country's actions, policies, and statements unacceptable. If compelling India to move away from the purchase of Russian oil and gas was one of the aims of the tariffs, it is unlikely to achieve this. Instead, India is going to double down on its multialignment foreign policy in light of the increased distrust towards the United States. Modi's planned visit to China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit at the end of August, and the upcoming visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India for the annual India-Russia summit at the end of the year, reflect that. The current trade tensions are expected to instill and intensify India's distrust toward the United States. It remains to be seen whether India and the U.S. will be able to contain and then repair the damage inflicted by Trump; trust is hard to build, harder to sustain, and hardest to rebuild once it evaporates.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store