Norway seizes Russian-crewed ship over suspected cable damage
The vessel's owner has rejected any wrongdoing.
Nations around the Baltic Sea have scrambled to bolster their defences since the suspected sabotage of undersea cables in recent months, with some observers blaming Russia.
The Norway-flagged cargo ship, the Silver Dania, was sailing between Saint Petersburg and Murmansk when a Norwegian coast guard ship stopped it on Thursday evening off the coast of Tromso in northern Norway.
"The ship is suspected to have been involved in serious damage to a fibre cable in the Baltic Sea between Latvia and Sweden," police said.
"Police are now on board the ship to search, carry out interrogations and secure evidence," it said, adding that the crew and shipowner were cooperating with police.
"The entire crew on board is Russian," they added.
Sweden and Latvia announced on January 26 that a fibre optic cable -- owned by Latvia's state radio and television centre (LVRTC) and linking the Swedish island of Gotland to Ventspils in Latvia -- had been damaged.
The Silver Dania is owned by Norwegian shipping company Silver Sea.
The shipowner told AFP the vessel had nothing to do with the damaged cable.
"We sailed near Gotland," Silver Sea boss Tormod Fossmark said, "but we did not cast anchor."
"We did nothing wrong," he added. "Norwegian authorities have brought us into port to clear us of any involvement."
Fossmark said the Russian crew had "sailed for us for a long time".
"They did nothing wrong," he insisted, saying he was "100-percent sure".
- Bulgarian ship under investigation -
The Swedish coast guard seized a Bulgarian ship, the Malta-flagged Vezhen, off Sweden's southeastern coast on January 26.
It is suspected of damaging the cable in question.
Swedish prosecutors opened an investigation into "aggravated sabotage".
Images of the vessel published by Swedish media appeared to show one of Vezhen's anchors had a broken arm.
Alexander Kalchev, CEO of Navibulgar, the Bulgarian maritime shipping company that operates the Vezhen, denied any involvement in the damaged cable.
"I am convinced that we cannot say... that this was a malicious act," he said.
But the Swedish prosecutor in the case, Mats Ljungqvist, told Swedish news agency TT on Friday he was confident the Vezhen was involved.
"I think I can say, on very solid grounds, that it is this ship that has damaged the cable," he said.
"Our work is continuing. We're working hard. The ship is still seized and there are various investigative measures being taken, including technical examinations," he said.
The incident is the latest in a series of cases of cables being damaged in the Baltic Sea, amid heightened tensions between Russia and the West since Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Since the invasion, Finland and Sweden, which both border the Baltic Sea, have dropped decades of military non-alignment to join NATO as concern about the region's security mounts.
In September 2022, a series of underwater blasts ruptured the Nord Stream pipelines that carried Russian gas to Europe, the cause of which has yet to be determined.
In October 2023, an undersea gas pipeline between Finland and Estonia was shut down after it was damaged by the anchor of a Chinese cargo ship.
In November 2024, two telecom cables in Swedish waters were severed, and on December 25, the Estlink 2 electricity cable and four telecom cables linking Finland and Estonia were damaged.
In mid-January, NATO launched a Baltic Sea patrol mission to secure critical underwater infrastructure.
Frigates, maritime patrol aircraft, submarines and drones are involved in the Baltic Sentry patrols.
phy/po/gil
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
NZ soldier sentenced to two years' detention for attempted espionage
A military court sentenced a New Zealand soldier on Wednesday to two years' detention for attempting to spy for a foreign power. The soldier, whose name has been suppressed, admitted to attempted espionage, accessing a computer system for a dishonest purpose and knowingly possessing an objectionable publication. He was ordered into military detention at Burnham Military Camp near Christchurch and will be dismissed from the New Zealand Defence Force at the end of his sentence. His admission and its acceptance by the court marked the first spying conviction in New Zealand's history. The soldier will be paid at half his previous rate until his dismissal at the end of his sentence, the defence force told AFP. According to information provided to the court, he previously earned NZ$2,000 (US$1,600) a fortnight. The court martial at Linton Military Camp near Palmerston North heard the soldier gave military base maps and photographs to an undercover officer posing as an agent for a foreign nation. During the investigation, he was also found to have copies of a livestreamed video of the March 2019 killing of 51 worshippers at two mosques in Christchurch by white supremacist Brenton Tarrant. - 'Harm to the world' - The soldier became a person of interest after the Christchurch attack because he was a member of some right-wing groups that police were cracking down on, the court heard. While monitoring him, the New Zealand government became aware he had "made contact with a third party, indicating that he was a soldier who was wanting to defect", according to an agreed summary of the facts read out by the prosecution. The military court has permanently suppressed the identity of the foreign nation. Chief Judge Kevin Riordan said the soldier "intended to prejudice the security and defence of New Zealand". A military panel agreed the worst of his offences was the sharing of passwords, an identity card, and access codes to Linton Military Camp and the air force's Base Ohakea, the judge said. "You were actively searching for things to supply to someone you thought was a foreign agent," Riordan said. Of the man's video of the Christchurch killings, the judge said: "Keeping the message of a gross murderer is a harm to the world in itself." The court martial was held in a large, cold hall at Linton, with banners carrying New Zealand Army slogans of "courage", "commitment", "comradeship" and "integrity". "You have comprehensively breached all of these values," Riordan told the soldier. The chief judge expressed concern over how the sentence would be perceived given that military detention is widely considered to be easier than civilian prison. - 'No remorse' - The military panel determined a starting point of between 3.5 and 4 years prison and gave deductions for the man's guilty plea and time spent under open arrest. "We spent more time over this decision than any other," Riordan said. The panel decided military detention was appropriate given the rehabilitation it would provide. Crown lawyer Grant Burston had earlier told the court the soldier's sentence should start at between 4.5 and 5 years in prison. "There is no apology," Burston said, referencing the soldier's affidavit, which was read to the court. "There is just expressed regret and a well-established expression of grievance. "There is no remorse for betraying... his country." Defence lawyer Stephen Winter said that although the offences were serious, they were "at the bottom end of offending for this particular charge". "He has grown out of that phase of his life. He is now a husband... a father," he said. The soldier was arrested in December 2019 and had spent all but six days since then under what the New Zealand Defence Force called open arrest. He was required to live on an army base in a military house and was subject to a curfew. The soldier had been suspended on full pay, earning nearly US$204,000 (NZ$350,000) since his arrest. During that time, he married and had two children. His wife is expecting a third child. The New Zealand Defence Force declined to say whether his family would be provided housing during his detention. bes/sft/djw/cwl Solve the daily Crossword
Washington Post
18 hours ago
- Washington Post
Son of Norway's crown princess charged with rape, sexual abuse
The eldest son of Norwegian Crown Princess Mette-Marit has been indicted on multiple charges of rape and sexual abuse, Norwegian prosecutors announced Monday. Prosecutors accuse Marius Borg Hoiby, the 28-year-old stepson of the heir to the throne, Crown Prince Haakon, of raping four women over the span of six years and filming the assaults. Hoiby, who was indicted on 32 criminal counts, has been charged with abuse in close relationships, making death threats and committing traffic violations. He faces up to 10 years in prison if convicted, Oslo state attorney Sturla Henriksbø told reporters during a news conference Monday.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Korean posts misrepresent Trump's Washington takeover as 'declaration of martial law'
After Donald Trump announced a federal takeover of the police force in Washington, Korean-language posts shared unrelated photos alongside a false claim that the US president had declared martial law in the capital. Some also drew a comparison to former South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol's brief imposition of martial law in December 2024, but several experts told AFP that Trump's actions do not constitute a suspension of civilian rule. "Martial law has been declared in Washington. It is an exclusive presidential authority and an act of governance," reads a Korean-language post shared August 12, 2025 on Threads. The post includes an image of a military convoy crossing a bridge and a picture showing a group of soldiers riding the metro. A cut-out photo of Trump pointing forward is superimposed over the images. It surfaced after Trump said he would place the US capital's Metropolitan Police under federal control, which would be backed up by 800 DC National Guardsmen, to curb violent crime in the city of 700,000 (archived link). In June, Trump similarly deployed National Guard troops and US Marines in Los Angeles -- the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard against the wishes of a state governor. Unlike the 50 states, the District of Columbia operates under a unique relationship with the federal government that limits its autonomy and grants Congress extraordinary control over local matters (archived here and here). The overwhelmingly Democratic city faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. Data from Washington police, however, show significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024 after a post-pandemic surge (archived link). The same images spread elsewhere on Facebook and Instagram. Similar X posts also drew a comparison between Trump's actions and Yoon's, arguing it showed the impeached former South Korean president's martial law declaration did not amount to a crime (archived link). Yoon plunged South Korea into a political crisis when he sought to subvert civilian rule on December 3, sending troops to parliament in a bid to prevent lawmakers from voting down his declaration of martial law. Yoon -- who now faces charges of insurrection and abuse of power -- became the country's first sitting president to be arrested in January 2025. His brief imposition of martial law in South Korea differs from Trump's deployment of military and federal law enforcement to Washington, according to experts in both countries. "The regular civilian laws are in effect in DC," said John Yoo, a law professor at the University of California-Berkeley (archived link). "In fact, there is no federal statute for declaring martial law in DC, not to mention the United States as a whole." He added on August 18: "Someone could think that the use of troops in DC is somehow similar to what happened in Korea. But that would be incorrect as a legal matter." No suspension of civilian rule There is no established definition of martial law in the United States, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, but it "usually refers to a power that, in an emergency, allows the military to take the place of the civilian government and exercise jurisdiction over civilians in a particular area" (archived link). An announcement on the White House website, titled "Restoring Law and Order in the District of Columbia", makes no mention of the military taking the place of Washington's civilian government (archived link). The announcement, signed by Trump, reads: "I must also ensure that all citizens can avail themselves of the right to interact with their elected representatives, and that the Federal Government can properly function, without fear of being subjected to violent, menacing street crime." The District of Columbia filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's moves to install Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole as "emergency" police commissioner. District Judge Ana Reyes brokered a deal under which Cole agreed to give directives through the mayor's office (archived link). Legal experts in South Korea dismissed comparisons between Trump's actions and those of former president Yoon. Chung Tae-ho, a constitutional law professor at Kyung Hee University, told AFP that "Yoon Suk Yeol's declaration of martial law sought to dismantle the democratic constitutional order by mobilising the military" (archived link). "By contrast, Trump does not appear to have deployed the National Guard to destroy the democratic constitutional order, so the intent itself differs from the outset," he said August 15. Paik Eun-seok, a professor at Handong International Law School and a US-trained lawyer, told AFP there are "clear differences" between Trump and Yoon's actions (archived link). "On December 3, the president not only declared martial law but also sought to restrict or seize control of the functions of the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, and the courts, using military forces -- thus constituting a martial law situation," he said August 15. "While Washington's Metropolitan Police has been placed under federal control, the National Guard has not replaced them, and therefore it can be argued it is not martial law in the usual sense." Misused visuals Reverse image searches on Google also show the photos used in the false posts predate the federal takeover of Washington. The first image of tanks and military vehicles crossing a bridge was taken during a June 14, 2025 parade in Washington to honour the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Trump hosted the event on his 79th birthday, spurring protests across the country accusing him of acting like a dictator (archived link). "A tank drives past the Lincoln Memorial as other vehicles line up on the Arlington Memorial Bridge during the 250th Anniversary of the U.S. Army Grand Military Parade and Celebration on Saturday June 14, 2025 in Washington, DC," reads the photo's caption on the Getty Images website, which credits The Washington Post (archived link). The second image of soldiers sitting on a train was taken January 20, 2021 ahead of former US president Joe Biden's inauguration. "Soldiers with the North Carolina National Guard ride a Metro train that will get them to the station they will guard for the 59th Presidential Inauguration in Washington on Jan. 20, 2021," reads its caption on the National Guard website (archived link). More than 25,000 National Guard members from across the United States were deployed in the capital before and during the inauguration as part of an unprecedented security response after Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6 following a rally denouncing the election results. AFP has previously debunked other claims related to Yoon's declaration of martial law and the situation in Washington.
