logo
Investment groups call for exemption of passive income from US tax bill

Investment groups call for exemption of passive income from US tax bill

Reuters8 hours ago

NEW YORK, June 24 (Reuters) - Six investment groups representing sectors including fund managers, venture capital and real estate in a letter to two Senate Republicans over the tax and spending bill now under debate asked that passive investments be exempt from a provision of the bill that targets foreign investors.
The proposal would allow the imposition of new taxes on residents, businesses and other entities from countries that are found to impose "unfair foreign taxes." It targets, for instance, income from investments, rents and dividends.
The investment groups said the levy, which includes the possibility of imposing a progressive tax burden of up to 20% on foreign investors' passive income, could spook investments in the U.S.
The new tax "would significantly disrupt U.S. public and private debt and equity markets," the associations said in the letter, which was sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo on Monday evening.
The groups said there would be the risk of investors selling portfolios in advance of the new levy. "This unnecessary sell-off will cause U.S. asset values to fall," they said in the letter.
Although Senate Republicans proposed changes to the tax and spending bill that the House of Representatives passed last month, the Senate kept the provision of a tax targeting foreign investors. Under the Senate version, however, the tax would take effect in 2027, one year after the House version.
The letter was jointly submitted by the Managed Funds Association, American Investment Council, Investment Company Institute, Loan Syndications and Trading Association, National Venture Capital Association and the Real Estate Roundtable.
In notes to clients, many Wall Street analysts have cautioned that the levy could end up weighing on demand for U.S. assets. Multinational companies have said they could shut down operations in the U.S.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thinking Allowed  Russian Propaganda
Thinking Allowed  Russian Propaganda

BBC News

time43 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Thinking Allowed Russian Propaganda

Laurie Taylor talks to Nina Khrushcheva, Professor of International Affairs at The New School in New York City about her research into the propaganda formulas deployed by Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin over the last two decades. As the great granddaughter of Nikita Khrushchev, the Prime Minister of the Soviet Union between 1958 and 1964, she offers personal, as well as political insights, into these developments, drawing on previous periods of oppression in Russian history. She argues that Russia's invasion of Ukraine has intensified 'hard' propaganda, leading to a pervasive presence of military images in every day life and the rehabilitation of Josef Stalin, the former dictator of the Soviet Union, as a symbol of Russian power. She suggests that lessons from past eras, described by such Soviet classics as Alexander Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago, can offer small grounds for optimism and hope, as ordinary people absorb alternative narratives. How else to explain the fact that George Orwell's dystopian novel, 1984, has been a bestseller for many years and has seen a surge in popularity since the start of the war in Ukraine? Producer: Jayne Egerton

US judge blocks Trump's elimination of union bargaining for federal workers
US judge blocks Trump's elimination of union bargaining for federal workers

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US judge blocks Trump's elimination of union bargaining for federal workers

June 24 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the administration of President Donald Trump from eliminating union bargaining for hundreds of thousands of federal workers. U.S. District Judge James Donato in San Francisco agreed with the American Federation of Government Employees and other unions that Trump's March 27 executive order, opens new tab exempting many federal agencies from obligations to bargain with unions was likely illegal. Donato blocked about 20 agencies from implementing Trump's order pending the outcome of the unions' lawsuit. Eliminating collective bargaining would allow agencies to alter working conditions and fire or discipline workers more easily, and it could prevent unions from challenging Trump administration initiatives in court. In April, a judge in Washington, D.C., blocked Trump's order from being implemented at seven agencies including the departments of Justice, Treasury, and Health and Human Services. A federal appeals court on May 16 paused that ruling while it considers the Trump administration's appeal. Donato's ruling applies to those agencies and the departments of Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, State and Labor, among others. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's executive order exempted agencies that he said "have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work," from collective bargaining obligations, significantly expanding an existing exception for workers with duties implicating national security, such as certain employees of the CIA and FBI. The order applies to the departments of Justice, State, Defense, Treasury, Veterans Affairs, and Health and Human Services, among other agencies. It affects about 75% of federal workers currently represented by unions, according to filings in the unions' lawsuit. The lawsuits challenging the executive order say it was meant to punish federal worker unions that have sued over Trump's other efforts to overhaul the government, including the mass firings and layoffs of agency employees. Unions also argue that the vast majority of workers covered by the order do not perform national security or intelligence work. The Trump administration filed a pair of lawsuits against AFGE and another union seeking to invalidate existing bargaining agreements in light of Trump's order shortly after he issued it. A judge in Kentucky on May 20 said the Treasury Department lacked standing to sue over a union contract covering thousands of Internal Revenue Service employees and dismissed the agency's lawsuit. A separate case that eight agencies filed against AFGE is pending in Texas federal court.

Trump administration expects deal with Harvard by end-June, Washington Post reports
Trump administration expects deal with Harvard by end-June, Washington Post reports

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Trump administration expects deal with Harvard by end-June, Washington Post reports

WASHINGTON, June 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is ramping up negotiations with Harvard University and expects a deal by the end of June to resolve the White House's campaign against the country's oldest and richest university, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. On Friday, Trump said a deal could be announced "over the next week or so" to end a months-long battle with the Ivy League school, which sued after the administration terminated billions of dollars in grants and moved to bar the school from admitting international students.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store