logo
Are things finally about to be normal again for investors?

Are things finally about to be normal again for investors?

Investors' fever dream could soon be over.
Markets have been cast into the world of the bizarre over the last few weeks. An escalating trade war with China has led to a staggering 125% tariff on goods from one of America's biggest trading partners. Most countries worldwide were — and may still be, come July — subject to what President Donald Trump called "reciprocal" tariffs, which were calculated using a convoluted formula that sought to correct trade deficits. And Trump laid into Jerome Powell with his usual disregard for diplomatic tact, calling the Fed chair "a major loser" and floating the possibility of firing him.
Despite Trump's tough talk, however, things could increasingly be heading toward a reality that resembles something normal. That's because it appears the bond market has defanged the president.
On two occasions now — once on April 9 and again on April 22 — Trump has backed down from aggressive tariff proposals and suggestions that he could replace Fed leadership when Treasury yields have jumped, a signal that investors could be losing confidence in the US. Investors arguably don't have to pay as close attention to Trump's every word on trade and the Fed now that they can seemingly count on a Trump put, where he backs off extreme positions to assuage markets.
"I'm not saying the tariff headlines won't still move markets, but there are hints the markets are starting to view non-political-related headlines (threats, random thoughts, impromptu answers to tariff questions) as a type of 'white noise' that just goes on in the background," said Tom Essaye, the founder of Sevens Report Research, in a note earlier this month. "And if that continues, it should help calm the intraday volatility."
Another reason investors might expect a higher degree of normality going forward? Things are already just about as uncertain as they can get.
Economic policy uncertainty — a gauge that tracks news coverage of economic uncertainty, differences among forecasters, and more — in March hit the highest levels since May 2020. While that sounds foreboding, history shows that significant spikes like this don't last very long, and much of the uncertainty may already be priced into stocks.
David Lefkowitz, the head of US equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a client note on Friday that uncertainty topping out would be positive for the equity-market outlook.
"We think we may be reaching peak policy uncertainty. If so, that would be an important inflection point. Stocks tend to move inversely with policy uncertainty," Lefkowitz said. "So if uncertainty declines, it will be a key tailwind for stocks."
He continued: "While we expect equity markets to remain choppy, the risk-reward for stocks is looking more appealing, especially now that we know that Trump is attuned to the risks from his tariff policies. We maintain our year-end 2025 S&P 500 price target of 5,800."
Of course, there's a large caveat to a potentially normalizing market environment: the possibility of recession.
Trump hasn't reached an official deal with any US trading partners to reduce his "reciprocal" tariffs before his 90-day deadline. No agreement has been reached with China, either. Plus, 10% baseline tariffs on all imports are still in place.
The ongoing uncertainty for business leaders and the concrete effects of tariffs on profits, consumer prices, and spending remain to be seen. Many economists see elevated recession risks in the months ahead, a scenario that likely sends investors fleeing from stocks.
But if the economy hangs tough after all, investors could soon see a return to the calmer seas of a few months ago.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will $50,000 Invested in Nvidia Stock Be Worth $1 Million in 10 Years?
Will $50,000 Invested in Nvidia Stock Be Worth $1 Million in 10 Years?

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Will $50,000 Invested in Nvidia Stock Be Worth $1 Million in 10 Years?

Nvidia shares are up 850% since ChatGPT sparked the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, but most Wall Street analysts still recommend buying the stock. The company is the market leader in AI accelerator chips, but its true strength lies in vertical integration that spans hardware and software products. Seven stocks in the S&P 500 generated such colossal returns in the last decade that they would have turned $50,000 into $1 million. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a cornerstone of the artificial intelligence (AI) trade for several years. Its share price has increased 850% since January 2023, a period that roughly coincides with the launch of ChatGPT. But Wall Street is still overwhelmingly bullish on the semiconductor company. Angelo Zino at CFRA Research thinks Nvidia "will be the most important company to our civilization over the next decade." More broadly, among 73 analysts following Nvidia, the median 12-month target price is $175 per share. That implies 25% upside from its current share price of $140. Could Nvidia stock turn $50,000 into $1 million over the next decade? Here are my thoughts. What sets Nvidia apart is vertical integration. The company has over 90% market share in data center graphics processing units (GPUs), chips that accelerate complex workloads such as artificial intelligence (AI). But the company supplements its GPUs with adjacent hardware like CPUs, interconnects, and networking equipment. Nvidia also develops software products. AI Enterprise is a suite of tools, code libraries, and pretrained models that streamline the development of AI applications for use cases like autonomous robots, conversational agents, and optimization systems. CrowdStrike uses those tools to power threat detection capabilities on its cybersecurity platform. Similarly, Omniverse is a software platform that supports 3D application development. It also serves as a simulation engine that lets engineers generate synthetic data for developing machine learning models. Amazon uses the Omniverse platform to optimize warehouse design and train fulfillment center robots. Nvidia frequently sets performance records at the MLPerf benchmarks, objective tests that evaluate AI systems on training and inference workloads. That is an important competitive advantage: Nvidia builds the best AI accelerators on the market. But vertical integration reinforces that advantage by letting the company design entire data center systems with the "lowest total cost of ownership," according to CEO Jensen Huang. Grand View Research says spending on AI hardware, software, and services will increase at 35.9% annually through 2030. Nvidia has a good shot at matching that growth rate. Indeed, Wall Street expects earnings to grow at 40% annually through the fiscal year ending January 2027. That makes the current valuation of 44 times earnings seem fair. Nvidia shares would need to increase 1,900% (20-fold) in the next decade to turn $50,000 into $1 million. Returns of that magnitude are theoretically possible in that time frame. In fact, seven stocks currently in S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) hit that mark in the last decade, as listed: Nvidia: +25,700% Advanced Micro Devices: +4,980% Axon Enterprise: +2,380% Texas Pacific Land: 2,110% Arista Networks: 1,950% Tesla: 1,920% Fair Isaac: 1,900% However, while 20-fold returns are theoretically possible, Nvidia has virtually no chance of hitting that mark in the next decade. The company is already worth $3.4 trillion, meaning its market value would hit $68 trillion if the stock increased 20 times. That seems highly unlikely when the entire S&P 500 is only worth $48 trillion today. Nevertheless, Nvidia is still a worthwhile investment. AI will likely be the most transformative technology in history, and the company is well positioned to benefit as demand for AI infrastructure increases. Potential catalysts include generative AI, autonomous vehicles, and humanoid robots. Also, Nvidia has a burgeoning software business that may evolve into a significant source of revenue as those catalysts take shape. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Trevor Jennewine has positions in Amazon, Arista Networks, Axon Enterprise, CrowdStrike, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Arista Networks, Axon Enterprise, CrowdStrike, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Fair Isaac. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Will $50,000 Invested in Nvidia Stock Be Worth $1 Million in 10 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks
Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks

Associated Press

time12 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks

BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — Vice President JD Vance said Elon Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after President Donald Trump in a storm of bitter and inflammatory social media posts after a falling out between the two men. But the vice president, in an interview released Friday after the very public blow up between the world's richest man and arguably the world's most powerful, also tried to downplay Musk's blistering attacks as an 'emotional guy' who got frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Vance said. Vance's comments come as other Republicans in recent days have urged the two men, who months ago were close allies spending significant time together, to mend fences. Musk's torrent of social media posts attacking Trump came as the president portrayed him as disgruntled and 'CRAZY' and threatened to cut the government contracts held by his businesses. Musk, who runs electric vehicle maker Tesla, internet company Starlink and rocket company SpaceX, lambasted Trump's centerpiece tax cuts and spending bill but also suggested Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. 'Look, it happens to everybody,' Vance said in the interview. 'I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours.' Vance made the comments in an interview with ' manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the U.S. Navy when he opened for Trump at a military base in Qatar. The vice president told Von that as Musk for days was calling on social media for Congress to kill Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the president was 'getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon, but I think has been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk.' 'I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine,' he added. Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. The interview was taped Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Von showed the vice president Musk's claim that Trump's administration hasn't released all the records related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. 'It's totally insane. The president is doing a good job.' Vance called Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, which sought to cut government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good.' The vice president also defended the bill that has drawn Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'It's a good bill,' Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.' He also said it was ridiculous for some House Republicans who voted for the bill but later found parts objectional to claim they hadn't had time to read it. Vance said the text had been available for weeks and said, 'the idea that people haven't had an opportunity to actually read it is ridiculous.' Elsewhere in the interview, Vance laughed as Von cracked jokes about famed abolitionist Frederick Douglass' sexuality. 'We're gonna talk to the Smithsonian about putting up an exhibit on that,' Vance joked. 'And Theo Von, you can be the narrator for this new understanding of the history of Frederick Douglass.' The podcaster also asked the vice president if he 'got high' on election night to celebrate Trump's victory. Vance laughed and joked that he wouldn't admit it if he did. 'I did not get high,' he then said. 'I did have a fair amount to drink that night.' The interview was taped in Nashville at a restaurant owned by musician Kid Rock, a Trump ally.

Trump hails court ruling allowing White House to restrict AP access
Trump hails court ruling allowing White House to restrict AP access

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump hails court ruling allowing White House to restrict AP access

President Trump celebrated a federal appeals court's ruling that allows the White House, for now, to restrict The Associated Press (AP) from the Oval Office and other limited spaces when reporting on the commander-in-chief. 'Big WIN over AP today,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday. 'They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!' The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia temporarily blocked, in a 2-1 decision on Friday, an early April order from a district court judge that allowed the AP to regain its access to key White House spaces. The ruling blocked an April 8 order by U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden that found that the news wire's exclusion from the press pool, a small cadre of reporters reporting on the president's whereabouts, was unlawful. 'The White House is likely to succeed on the merits because these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora opened for private speech and discussion,' Judge Neomi Rao said in the Friday opinion, joined by Judge Gregory Katsas. AP's spokesperson Patrick Maks said the organization is 'disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing our options.' The White House's decision to exclude the AP originated from the news wire not wanting to use Gulf of America in its industry stylebook. The three-judge panel did not halt the part of McFadden's April order that provides AP access to the East Room. Judge Cornelia Pillard said in her dissent that being able to be in the press pool never relied on the news outlet's viewpoint until this year. 'The panel's stay of the preliminary injunction cannot be squared with longstanding First Amendment precedent, multiple generations of White House practice and tradition, or any sensible understanding of the role of a free press in our constitutional democracy,' Pillard wrote. Days after McFadden ruled in favor of AP in April, the White House removed a spot in the press pool normally occupied by wire services.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store