&w=3840&q=100)
iPhone users can now set Google Translate as their default translation app
Google is reportedly rolling out an update to its Translate app that allows iPhone users to set it as their default translation tool—replacing Apple's built-in Translate app. The change follows the release of iOS 18.4, which introduced the ability for users to set default apps for specific functions such as navigation, music, and translation. According to a report by 9to5Mac, the latest version of Google Translate supports this new iOS setting, enabling it to be selected as the primary translation app on iPhones. Previously, translation features were handled through Apple's Translate app, whether through Siri or system-level interactions like text selection pop-ups.ALSO READ: Apple working on AI version of Siri with ChatGPT-like capabilities: ReportHowever, to access this feature, the iPhone must be running iOS 18.4 or later, and the latest version of Google Translate must be installed via the App Store. The functionality is rolling out gradually and may take some time to appear for all users.Apple allowing third party apps to be set as defaultApple first introduced the ability to set third-party apps as default options in iOS 18.2, released in November last year. At launch, users could customise default apps across eight categories, including calling, messaging, keyboard, and password management. With the release of iOS 18.4, Apple expanded this functionality further to include new categories such as navigation, music, and translation, giving users greater control over their preferred app experience. ALSO READ: Google's Gemini AI gets search history for rediscovering past chats: ReportHow to set Google Translate as default translation app on iPhoneTo make Google Translate your default translation app, follow these steps:Open the Settings app on your iPhone.Scroll down and tap on Apps.Select Default Apps from the menu.Tap on Translation.Choose Google Translate from the list of available apps.Once configured, system-wide translation actions—such as those initiated by Siri or text selection—will automatically open in Google Translate.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
The judge's data dilemma in the Google search case
Data played a starring role in the government's successful antitrust suit against accusing it of illegally protecting its monopoly in online search. Now, steps to force Google to unlock its data trove could figure prominently in a ruling on how to address the tech giant's dominance, antitrust experts say. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On Friday, the federal judge overseeing the case, Amit P Mehta, heard closing arguments in federal court in Washington on what corrective measures, known as remedies, he should order to restore competition. The government's requests include forcing Google to share its search engine results and advertising data with rivals. Justice Department lawyers have repeatedly described data as "the oxygen" for search engines. And in his ruling against Google in August, Mehta recounted in detail how the company harvests vast amounts of data from user searches and web crawling, then stores and analyzes the data to rule the lucrative market for internet search. Google, he noted, collects nine times as much user search data every day as all its rivals combined. And as more data is fed into Google's software, the results that the search engine returns on everything from biology to bluejeans become more accurate and relevant to the person seeking information. Better search performance, in turn, attracts more users and more advertisers, Mehta wrote. It's a flywheel that steadily enhances Google's search and acts as a barrier to competition. "At every stage in the search process," the judge wrote, "user data is a critical input that directly improves quality." His decision on how to fix Google's monopoly has the potential to reshape competition on the internet, particularly as a new age of generative artificial intelligence takes off and is expected to overhaul the way people search for information online. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Tech companies are racing to win consumers over with chatbots and other tools that can answer more sophisticated questions, drawing from vast pools of data. Mehta has already indicated that AI may factor into his deliberations, noting during a recent hearing the rapid development of the technology since the lawsuit went to trial in the fall of 2023. To fix Google's search monopoly, the Justice Department and the group of states that brought the case have recommended a range of sanctions, from simply prohibiting anticompetitive deals with companies that Google pays to make it the automatic search engine to forcing the company to sell off its market-leading Chrome browser. The government's data-related proposal falls somewhere in between. It includes requiring Google to share user search information and license its search index, a database of hundreds of billions of webpages scored by popularity, quality and relevance. In late April, Mehta said he looked at his job as weighing actions across a "remedy spectrum." At one end was a breakup order, he said, while at the minimalist end was a ban on illegal deals with browser and smartphone companies. In the middle were "forward-looking remedies," he said, without elaborating on his thinking. Given the evidence in the case, a data-sharing order would be "a conceptually appropriate remedy," since the exclusive deals increased Google's data advantage, said Douglas Melamed, a former senior official in the Justice Department's antitrust division and now a visiting fellow at the Stanford Law School. Still, a data-sharing project raises its own set of questions. In court testimony, Google emphasized the privacy concerns of passing user search data along to other companies. The government's data proposal also calls for access to software that uses data as an ingredient but was built by Google's engineers. "It looks like an administrative headache -- how much data, how often, and access to Google's crown jewel?" said John Yun, an economist at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University. Google has described the government's data-sharing plan as the equivalent of a breakup -- a forced surrender of its intellectual property, allowing competitors to reverse-engineer its technology. "The proposal on data sharing is so far-reaching, so extraordinary," that it "feels like de facto divestiture of search," , CEO of Alphabet, Google's parent company, testified in court last month. The history of forced asset sharing as a solution for monopolistic behavior is mixed. In 1956, as part of an antitrust settlement with the government, AT&T agreed to license its patents, including for transistors, the tiny switches that are the building blocks of electronic circuitry. That opened the door to an independent semiconductor industry in what became Silicon Valley. But the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which was intended to increase competition for local telephone service by mandating that companies share network capacity, didn't result in much innovation. Eventually, genuine competition emerged, but it came from mobile wireless and cable broadband companies, said Jon Nuechterlein, a telecom expert and former general counsel of the Federal Trade Commission. Landline voice service has fallen from nearly 100% of households in 1996 to about 25% today. "Outside competition emerged independent of all the regulatory churn," said Nuechterlein, a distinguished scholar at George Washington University's Competition Law Center. Today, AI is the big unknown in search. Chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude, the AI-powered search engine Perplexity, and others are potential Google disrupters. Google itself is investing heavily in AI-enhanced search, which Pichai recently described as "a total reimagining of search." While Mehta has more recently acknowledged the rapid advance of AI, his ruling in August noted that the technology had yet to overtake traditional search. "AI has not supplanted the traditional ingredients that define general search," he wrote. "Importantly, generative AI has not (or, at least, not yet) eliminated or materially reduced the need for user data to deliver quality search results." Some antitrust experts say Mehta's decision could affect search and AI. "The explosion of AI makes it even more important to have strong data-sharing remedies," said Gene Kimmelman, a former senior official in the Justice Department's antitrust division. "AI and search overlap, and both ride on data."
New Indian Express
5 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Top 4 Best-Selling Smartphones in Q1 2025 Are All iPhones
Apple secured the top four spots in the list of best-selling smartphones worldwide during the first quarter of 2025, with the iPhone 16 emerging the highest-selling device globally. According to Counterpoint Research, iPhone 16 was followed by iPhone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 15. This quarter also marked the return of the base iPhone model with Apple keeping its presence in the global top-10 list. iPhone 16e made a strong debut, securing sixth place in the global top-10 list for March 2025—its first full month of availability. Despite its higher price point compared to the iPhone SE 2022, the 16e is expected to outperform its predecessor over the course of its first year, thanks to significant technological upgrades and an expanded feature set. Top-Performing Countries The iPhone 16 performed well in Japan and the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region, with Japan registering the highest growth in sales of the base variant. Improved economic conditions and revised subsidy regulations supported Apple's pricing strategy and ecosystem, further enhancing its appeal in the Japanese market. The iPhone 16 Pro Max and iPhone 16 Pro took the second and third spots, respectively. However, the Pro series faced headwinds in China due to government subsidies favouring devices priced under CNY6,000 ($833) and intense competition in the premium segment from local OEMs such as Huawei. Despite these challenges, the Pro models accounted for half of Apple's total iPhone sales for the third consecutive quarter. Samsung Meanwhile, Samsung had one fewer model in the top-10 compared to the same period last year. Although the overall share of the top 10 smartphones in global sales remained steady, there was an uptick in the share of low-end smartphones (below $100) within the list. Samsung's flagship Galaxy S25 Ultra ranked seventh in Q1 2025, down from fifth place held by the S24 Ultra in Q1 2024. According to Counterpoint, the drop was due to a shorter sales window for the S25 Ultra during the quarter. Despite this, the S25 series delivered stable performance, contributing one-fourth of Samsung's total smartphone sales during its launch month. The Galaxy A16 5G claimed fifth place in Q1 2025. The A16 5G recorded a 17% year-over-year (YoY) growth, supported by broader availability in markets like North America, where it launched in January 2025. North America accounted for one-third of its total global sales. Additional momentum came from the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Latin America (LATAM), and MEA regions, where it gained popularity in the budget 5G segment. The Galaxy A06 also experienced strong growth in Q1 2025, rising four spots in the top-10 list compared to its predecessor in the same period in 2024. This was part of a broader surge in low-end smartphone demand across regions. MEA, APAC, and LATAM together contributed to three-fourths of global sales in this segment. As the supply of low-cost components improved, the low-end segment became the fastest-growing in Q1 2025, capturing nearly 20% of total global smartphone sales.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Google says it will appeal court's decision in Search case: Read company's 6-point response to remedies proposed by justice department
Google has announced that t plans to appeal a US antitrust ruling after a federal judge proposed milder remedies than those sought by antitrust regulators to address the company's dominance in online search. The update follows a Friday (May 30) hearing in Washington, where US District Judge Amit Mehta heard closing arguments on how to remedy Google's illegal monopoly in search and related advertising. What remedies DOJ has demanded and what the judge said The Department of Justice (DOJ) and a group of state attorneys general are seeking strong corrective measures, including forcing Google to share search data and stop paying billions to Apple and other smartphone makers to remain the default search engine on their devices. Judge Mehta, however, has suggested less aggressive options than the DOJ's proposal for a 10-year regulatory regime. The DOJ has expressed concern that Google's dominance in search also boosts its competitive edge in emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through products such as Gemini. The DOJ's proposed remedies go miles beyond...: Google by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Homeowners can claim a free boiler upgrade if they live in these postcodes Eco Green Tips Apply Now Undo Google, in a statement posted on X (formerly Twitter), said that it will wait for the decision and believes "the Court's original decision was wrong". Yesterday, we made closing arguments in the DOJ search remedies trial. The DOJ's proposed remedies go miles beyond the Court's decision & would harm consumers, businesses and America's tech leadership. Here are a few key points from our arguments. ⬇️ 1/ DOJ waved off very real privacy issues, saying they'd be resolved later on. In fact, one DOJ lawyer said 'the only thing we can do is give [rivals] more data.' 🤔 2/ When confronted with significant questions left open by their proposals (i.e. how much data should Google be forced to share?), DOJ just said it could all be worked out by a 'Technical Committee' of mostly govt-appointed experts. 3/ The DOJ's proposal reserves the right for the government to decide who gets Google users' data. Not the Court. 4/ The DOJ spent many hours trying to convince the Court to remake the tech sector. Meanwhile it's very clear the AI space is highly competitive today: Countless rivals in the AI space are growing fast & gaining users & distribution without government intervention. 5/ While we heard a lot about how the remedies would help various well-funded competitors (w/ repeated references to Bing), we heard very little about how all this helps consumers. 6/ We will wait for the Court's opinion. And we still strongly believe the Court's original decision was wrong, and look forward to our eventual appeal. Previously in a separate case, the DOJ sought Google's divestment of parts of its ad tech business, specifically Google Ad Manager , which includes its publisher ad server and ad exchange platform. A federal judge ruled that Google unlawfully controlled key parts of the digital advertising market. Powerbeats Pro 2 – Apple's Most Powerful Workout Buds Yet! AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
