
A phone call has shaken Thailand, but could it also spell the end of a political dynasty?
This could bring to a premature end Ms Paetongtarn's short-lived political career – she only became prime minister last August. But the bigger question is: does this herald the beginning of the end for the whole Shinawatra dynasty?
For the last 25 years, the family, headed by Thaksin Shinawatra, who was prime minister from 2001 to 2006, has almost completely dominated electoral politics in the country. He was ousted in a coup backed by Thailand's powerful army, and his sister Yingluck was also forced from office in 2014 after three years as prime minister.
But time after time, when elections were held, Thaksin-backed parties kept on winning. In 2023, Mr Thaksin returned from self-imposed exile, on the same day a new government led by his supporters' party, Pheu Thai, was formed. Since the new coalition included parties aligned with the royalist-military establishment previously deeply opposed to Mr Thaksin – whose critics have accused him of irresponsible populism and corruption – it seemed that an accommodation had finally been reached between the country's two most important blocs.
On his arrival in Thailand, Mr Thaksin was arrested and taken into custody, but the convictions to which he had been sentenced in absentia were reduced days later to just one year in jail, and after spending six months in a luxury hospital he was released on parole. Appearances were satisfied. Mr Thaksin was home. And months later, his youngest daughter Paetongtarn became prime minister.
The rapprochement between Mr Thaksin's supporters and the country's conservative institutions may have been a shaky alliance of convenience. But it could not last after details of Ms Paetongtarn's call with Hun Sen came out. In the conversation, which both sides have confirmed as authentic, Ms Paetongtarn referred to her country's military as 'the opposite side' and accused a general at the border of just wanting 'to look cool and saying things that are not useful'. Cambodia's longtime former prime minister, whose son Hun Manet succeeded him in 2023, has since gone further.
According to the Khmer Times, this week Hun Sen accused the Thaksins of insulting their country's king in private conversations with him and said Ms Paetongtarn 'conspiring with foreigners to denigrate one's own military', as he put it, was tantamount to treason.
For the last 25 years, the family headed by Thaksin Shinawatra has almost completely dominated electoral politics
Why did Hun Sen make such incendiary comments and release a full recording of the phone call, especially since he had been close to Mr Thaksin for decades? The border issue is highly sensitive – a Cambodian soldier was killed in clashes with Thai forces in May – and some speculate it was an attempt to rally patriotic sentiment around Hun Manet. The former Cambodian leader also accused the Thaksins of having a history of saying one thing to him about the border disputes and then another in public.
Either way, the damage has been done. And it's not just Ms Paetongtarn who's in trouble. On the same day that she was suspended from office, her father was in a Bangkok court to hear prosecution testimony over a lese-majeste charge he faces relating to an interview he gave in South Korea in 2015. Mr Thaksin may have thought this would just be a formality, given the understanding he believed had been reached with the royalist-military forces.
But as the Thai academic Pavin Chachavalpongpun wrote in a prescient analysis published on Monday: 'The lese majeste case against Thaksin, or [the] Constitutional Court case against Paetongtarn, could be strategically used to neutralise their influence, putting them in jail or (more likely) letting them flee.'
In that event, could the Thaksins still make another comeback in the future? It can't be completely ruled out, and it may be just possible that the current governing coalition holds on, as it still has a majority in Parliament. But many believe that the Thaksin coalition – low-income workers in the country's north and north-east, plus progressive-minded urban middle classes – has been irretrievably weakened.
Pheu Thai has been outflanked by the social democratic Move Forward Party, which beat them into second place in the 2023 election, and severely disillusioned their progressive supporters by allying with the conservative forces who kept ousting Mr Thaksin and his successors from power. Younger voters don't remember Mr Thaksin's glory years, when he instituted universal health care and a raft of polices that helped rural voters. Paetongtarn Shinawatra is a novice who plainly owed her job solely to her surname. Her approval rating was at a meagre 9.2 per cent in March.
Mr Thaksin is still a giant of Thai politics. But he's not the figure he once was, and he has run out of family proxies to take the country's top job while he remains a power behind the curtain. No one would accept one of his other two – politically inexperienced – children as prime minister. And, in any case, it's not clear they, or Pheu Thai, could command a majority in Parliament.
So, is this the end for the Shinawatra dynasty? Thai politics is too unpredictable to tell. If it is the beginning of the end, however, Thailand's perennial problem will remain: how to square the views of the royalist-military establishment, who see themselves as guardians of the country, with populist or left-leaning parties that keep topping the polls. That's the democratic conundrum that has been both the blessing, and the misfortune, of the Shinawatra family.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Khaleej Times
6 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Watch: Philippines president Marcos gets ceremonial welcome during India state visit
Philippines President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos Jr, who is on a five-day state visit to India, on Tuesday morning received a ceremonial welcome at the forecourt of Rashtrapati Bhawan. President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi were present on the occasion. This is the first visit by the president of the Southeast Asian country to India since he assumed office in 2022, marking a significant milestone, as his visit aligns with the celebration of the 75th anniversary of diplomatic ties between the two nations. #WATCH | Delhi: Philippines' President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos being accorded a ceremonial welcome at the forecourt of Rashtrapati Bhawan. (Video: DD News) — ANI (@ANI) August 5, 2025 On Monday, the Philippines President met with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar in the national capital. "Delighted to call on President of the Philippines this evening in Delhi at the start of his state visit. Confident that his talks with PM Narendra Modi tomorrow will significantly deepen our bilateral partnership," Jaishankar stated on X. According to a post on X by the MEA, Marcos was welcomed with a warm reception by the Minister of State for External Affairs, Pabitra Margherita. "Mabuhay, President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.! President Bongbong Marcos has arrived in New Delhi on his first state visit to India. Received by MoS Pabitra Margherita and accorded a warm welcome. India and the Philippines are celebrating the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties. This visit will lead to further strengthening of India-Philippines relations," the MEA stated on X. He was accompanied by First Lady Louise Araneta Marcos and a high-level delegation, including several ministers from his cabinet. #WATCH | Delhi: Philippines' President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos Jr and his wife Louise Araneta-Marcos, lay a wreath at the Rajghat and pay tribute to Mahatma Gandhi. — ANI (@ANI) August 5, 2025 Diplomatic relations between India and the Philippines were established in November 1949. Both countries have since developed a strong partnership across a broad spectrum of areas, including trade and investment, defence and security, maritime cooperation, agriculture, healthcare, pharmaceuticals and digital technologies. On Tuesday, he will lay a wreath at Rajghat, followed by talks with PM Modi at the Hyderabad House. Exchange of Memoranda of Understanding and Press Statements will take place thereafter. The Philippines President will then meet Union Minister of Health and Family Welfare JP Nadda and thereafter President Droupadi Murmu. He will then travel to Bengaluru and meet Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot. His visit came following an invitation by PM Modi, an MEA statement stated on Thursday.


Khaleej Times
5 days ago
- Khaleej Times
Myanmar junta ends state of emergency, spokesman says
Myanmar's junta ended the country's state of emergency on Thursday, ramping up preparations for a December election being boycotted by opposition groups and criticised by international monitors. "The state of emergency is abolished today in order for the country to hold elections on the path to a multi-party democracy," junta spokesman Zaw Min Tun said in a voice message shared with reporters. The military declared a state of emergency in February 2021 as it deposed the civilian government of democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi, sparking a many-sided civil war which has claimed thousands of lives. The order gave junta chief Min Aung Hlaing supreme power over the legislature, executive and judiciary — but he has recently touted elections as an off-ramp to the conflict. Opposition groups including ex-lawmakers ousted in the coup have pledged to snub the poll, which a UN expert last month dismissed as "a fraud" designed to legitimise the military's continuing rule.


The National
5 days ago
- The National
Why did the Thailand-Cambodia conflict erupt suddenly and end swiftly?
By last week, tensions on the borders between Thailand and Cambodia had reached levels unseen for decades. The BBC reported that at least 32 soldiers and civilians had been killed and about 200,000 displaced in the two South-East Asian countries in the series of skirmishes and conflicts that started at the end of May. Martial law was declared in several Thai provinces. The Cambodian side sent rockets over the border, while Thailand responded with F-16 strikes. Thailand's acting Prime Minister, Phumtham Wechayachai, warned that the situation 'could escalate into a state of war'. This was not only shocking for the two countries and the region. It was potentially disastrous for the Association of South-East Asian Nations. One of the express purposes of forming the regional bloc in 1967 – which today includes all South-East Asian countries apart from Timor Leste – was to stop war and to promote economic and security co-operation among its members instead. Asean's current chair, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, said in a speech to the Asean Secretariat in Jakarta on Tuesday: 'Two months ago, when we had the Asean-GCC-China summit, we were talking about the unique position of Asean – the most peaceful region in the world, the most vibrant economically in the world. And then there was this eruption on the border.' Fortunately, Mr Anwar was speaking the day after he had hosted a peace summit with the Thai leader and his Cambodian counterpart, Hun Manet, in Malaysia. Mr Anwar had contacted both men last Thursday. That could not stop hostilities straight away, but by 3pm the following Monday the two leaders were sitting in Mr Anwar's official residence, flanked by the US ambassador to Malaysia, Edgard Kagan, and the Chinese ambassador, Ouyang Yujing. At the end of the talks, Mr Anwar was able to announce an 'unconditional ceasefire' that would start at midnight the following day – an agreement that won him praise from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas and Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong, among others. Credit also went to the US, as co-organiser of the meeting, and to President Donald Trump, who had warned Cambodia and Thailand that there would be no trade deals with either until they stopped the fighting. Parties in both countries may have sought advantage from ramping up the sabre-rattling, but they had no desire whatsoever for a full-blown war So what was the dispute about exactly, why did it escalate so quickly, and how was it apparently resolved with equal celerity? Nominally, the disputes go back to varying maps drawn around the Franco-Siamese treaties of 1904 and 1907, which defined the borders of Siam (now Thailand) and French Indochina, the western-most portion of which is modern Cambodia. The latter fought and won a case over ownership of the temple of Preah Vihear at the International Court of Justice in 1962, but that and other issues have never been settled to both parties' satisfaction. Clashes between 2008 and 2011 left scores dead until both sides agreed to withdraw military forces from an area near the temple. It is true that both Cambodia and Thailand have a historical sensitivity to loss of territory. Cambodia harks back to the glory days of the great Khmer Empire, centred around the temple complex of Angkor Wat; but over the centuries it lost most of its lands, and even Siem Reap province – where Angkor is located – had been ruled by Thailand in the past. The latter, meanwhile, lost lands to the east, including most of Laos, to the French, and four southern states to British Malaya. Politicians in the two countries have been accused of using these anxieties to stoke nationalist fervour for their own ends. In the recent conflict, both sides insist the other fired the first shot. Equally, there are parties on both sides that had something to gain from the fighting. Politicians from Thailand's ruling Thaksin Shinawatra-aligned Pheu Thai Party and Cambodian opposition leader Sam Rainsy allege Phnom Penh is unhappy with Bangkok's crackdown on Cambodia-based online scam centres and wanted to undermine the Thai government. So Hun Sen, Cambodia's long-time former leader, father of the current Prime Minister, and now president of the country's Senate, not only looked strong and bolstered the government's popularity domestically by taking a strong rhetorical stand militarily. He also undermined former Thai prime minister – and Thaksin's daughter – Paetongtarn Shinawatra and possibly her family, when he leaked a phone call in June in which she addressed him deferentially and criticised a commander in her country's powerful army. That led to Ms Paetongtarn herself being suspended as PM last month. That will have delighted the significant elements in the Thai royalist-military establishment who have long resented Mr Thaksin, and strengthened their position politically. While the Thai army has also gained from being seen to defend the country during the conflict, Hun Sen may also feel that in the long run his possible political destruction of the Thaksin family (hitherto his very close friends) may have set him and his son up for better relations with a future military-dominated government in Thailand. In short, parties in both countries may have sought advantage from ramping up the sabre-rattling, but they had no desire whatsoever for a full-blown war – and were thus extremely receptive to a face-saving path to de-escalation with honour. The above is a possible explanation; no one is one 100 per cent certain why such a long-running dispute blew up so furiously. It should also be pointed out that Monday's agreement has not solved the underlying issue. But it has brought peace for now, and that is cause for congratulations to Mr Anwar, Mr Trump, China, for its presence at the summit – and to Asean itself. For Mr Anwar was clear that credit lay with the association for its convening power and for its values of 'dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to stability'. As he said on Tuesday, referring to the previous day's meeting: 'I've chosen to invite not only the two leaders from Cambodia and Thailand, but to keep the US representative to my right, and China to my left. It was a remarkable feat that not many regional groups can do, but we did – the Asean way.' This conflict could have been a stain on Malaysia's chairing of Asean for 2025. Instead, it has been turned into a triumph. No wonder Mr Anwar was smiling as he spoke.