
Yuvraj Singh lauds Shubman Gill's performance in England tour: ‘There were a lot of question marks over his overseas record'
'There were a lot of question marks over his overseas record. The guy (Gill) became the captain and scored four Test hundreds. It's just unbelievable that when you're given responsibility, how you take it,' Yuvraj told ICC Digital.
Gill, who had faced a lot of questions for his overseas numbers before the tour commenced, shut all naysayers when he slammed four centuries and finished as the leading run-scorer with 754 runs. It also made him the first Asian batter to score 700-plus runs in a Test series in a SENA country.
'It's just fantastic because I felt when you have a young team going to England, it's a lot of pressure. You're filling the boots of somebody like Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, it's not easy. The guys took it head-on,' he said.
'The moment in the tournament was when India drew the Test series. I've never seen, in a very long time, Washington and Jadeja got hundreds and drew a Test matc. That speaks volumes. Obviously Jadeja has been there for a long time. But I think Washington Sundar, as a youngster coming into the team, it was incredible to do what he did,' added Yuvraj.
India, who had to contend with injuries to Rishabh Pant, Akash Deep, Nitish Kumar Reddy and Arshdeep Singh throughout the campaign as well as missing Jasprit Bumrah's services for 2 out of 5 Tests due to the pacer's workload management, won the 2nd and 5th test while drawing the 4th after losing the 1st and 3rd Test.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Sachin Tendulkar blasted for allowing India legend's honour be 'degraded': 'Sunil Gavaskar poore India ko hila deta'
Former India all-rounder Karsan Ghavri has taken aim at Sachin Tendulkar over not 'putting his foot down' after the decision to rename the 'Pataudi Trophy' as the 'Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy', calling it a 'degrading' act for Pataudi's cricketing legacy. The renamed trophy was contested for the first time in July-August this year, with the series ending in a 2-2 draw. Ghavri questioned how such a move was cleared in the first place and labelled it a disrespect to the memory of the Nawab of Pataudi, whose name had been synonymous with the contest for decades. The Pataudi Trophy was renamed to Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy before the start of the series in June(PTI) 'That is very wrong. Number one, the Australia-West Indies series is always called the Frank Worrell Trophy. The India-Australia Trophy is always called the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. If its name changed, Gavaskar poore India ko hila ke rakh dega (Gavaskar will shake the whole of India),' Ghavri told Vicky Lalwani on the latter's YouTube channel. Ghavri squarely held the BCCI responsible for failing to oppose it. He questioned how the board could stay silent when the Pataudi Trophy's name was removed. 'The BCCI should've put its foot down with the MCC and the ECB. Tiger's name shouldn't have been removed,' said Ghavri. Ghavri criticising Tendulkar While Sachin Tendulkar did object to the decision at first, Ghavri was unimpressed with the cricketing great for not being firm enough on his stand. 'In the same context, when it came to Sachin Tendulkar, that this trophy would be changed, and this trophy would be named after you and Anderson, Sachin should've said no. Objection is different,' said the former all-rounder, who represented India in 39 Tests. 'In the first place, you should've put your foot down and should've said 'No, I don't want to use my name because Tiger Pataudi's name is already there. He's a legend of Indian cricket. If you want to give medals, use our name. Trophy's name should remain the same'. 'First of all, this question should've never been raised. You're degrading somebody of a great stature.' The first Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy saw an excellent display of cricket from both sides, with Shubman Gill, leading in his maiden series, showcasing incredible form to smash 754 runs in five Tests, while Mohammed Siraj leading the pace attack with a series high 23 wickets in nine innings.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
How three images during England tour captured Indian cricket's seamless transition into Shubman Gill era
Three arresting images, during the 50-day chase of the Indian team all over England, came with a reminder of life's transient nature and the fleeting nature of fame. It also underlined the futility of overthinking potential problems. But before talking about the frames worth many thousand words, a bit of background. At the start of the five-Test series, India worried themselves silly. They weren't sure about dealing with the trauma of watching cricket without the two recently retired stars Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma on the field. For over a decade, Virat and Rohit had decided the biorhythm of a nation, their batting form dictated a million moods. Early reports from England said that the usual fan frenzy was missing when India, under new captain Shubman Gill, landed in England. Very few turned up at the airport, not many were checking where they were staying. Did the 25-year-old with the face and voice of a teenager have it in him to lead India in a long away Test series against the tough-talking Bazballers? How all those fears turned out to be unfounded. Though the human race keeps forgetting, life keeps posting periodic reminders of its cyclic nature and the impermanence of things. There would be departures that threaten doom but this England tour was a reminder they could well be a false signal and turn out to be the foreword to a story of some grand arrival. Given Indian cricket's acrimonious succession history, this one was surprisingly without intrigue or public heartburn. Prince Shubman would settle on the throne with ease, as if he was born to rule. King Kohli, if reports are to be believed, called the new captain at his London home, for a meal. He would tweet a small loving note when he scored the double hundred. 'Well Played Star Boy. Rewriting history. Onwards and upwards from here. You deserve all of this.' Rohit Sharma would land up at The Oval on the penultimate day of the final Test and cheer for the team from the VVIP boxes. Everybody seemed happy, at peace with the role they were playing, or not playing. Indian cricket's transition was so seamless and smooth that it took some time for it to sink in. The three images helped. First was a chance sighting. The intention, at the time of getting into the London tube, was to shop for shoes at an Oxford Circus shop that is known for deals to die for. Stepping out of Green Park station you run into the crowd flowing out of Hyde Park – London's sprawling meadow that's a melting pot of runners, walkers, joggers, picnickers, families with young kids and all kinds of outdoor enthusiasts. Among the wave of happy smiling humanity was Rohit with his wife, kids and nannies. Bending to speak to his daughter, he seemed to be enjoying his family time. He was dragging a plastic kiddie scooter while wife was pushing a pram. Headed towards their place of stay, they had to pass the point where the tube commuters and those leaving Hyde Park converged. It was something very mildly, just as a concept, similar to the Churchgate terminus where the sea of office-goers meet the Azad maidan regular. Rohit could do in London and what he could never experience in Mumbai. The mega stars seemed pleased to be one of the many enjoying a lovely day with their loved ones. The second picture is of Virat at Yuvraj Singh's charity dinner, again in London. He landed at the venue after the Indian team left early. Before he was invited on the stage, he seemed pleased to interact with other former Test cricketers like him. Around him were mostly his seniors, Virat seemed to be pleased to catch up with them. In the past there have been reports of bad blood between Yuvraj and Kohli. There were allegations that Kohli didn't want Yuvraj in the team on fitness grounds. But those seemed like bygones. Everyone had grown up and was ready to move on. Kohli too seemed happy with his life in London, he too has spoken about family time, parks and kids. Was he missing the Indian team? – the show's MC would ask him. 'I just coloured my beard two days back… when you start doing that after every four days, it is time,' he said, stroking his chin wisely. One of the greatest batsman to have played the game had found his closure. VIDEO | Here's what India's batting icon and former skipper Virat Kohli (@imVkohli) said about his retirement from Test cricket at Yuvraj Singh's fundraiser event: 'I just coloured my beard two days ago. You know it's time when you're colouring your beard every four days.'… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 9, 2025 London seems to be the perfect getaway, and permanent home, for Indian cricket stars perpetually under threat to be mobbed when in Indian public spaces. Celebrated painter Stuart Pearson Wright, who painted Sachin Tendulkar's stunning portrait that hangs at the Lord's museum, had a chat with the batting great on this issue. 'There is one thing in our conversation that has stuck in my mind. He started by asking me where I was from. And at the time I lived in London. He said, 'I love London because when I'm there I can walk in the park with my children. It gave me a snapshot of his life in Mumbai,' recalled Stuart. 'He can't even leave his house without a team of people … it's something that most of us take for granted, just the freedom to wander … particularly with our families, our children. I didn't have children at that stage. So, I've got two kids now. Okay. And that resonated with me.' London parks and kids – it seems Virat and Rohit have found their own new meadows and teammates. They would help them to get over the pain of missing the stadium, dressing room and green pitches. What about Shubman, the new inheritor of the crown of thorns? The third frame is of him from Manchester, midway through the series with England leading 2-1. In the previous Test at Lord's the skipper had lost his cool during the tense final minutes of the Day 4 when India wanted wickets and the English players were trying to waste time to avoid facing Jasprit Bumrah under fading light. That's when Shubman snapped and shouted at opener Zak Crawley. He told him to show some guts but in his utterance he mentioned 'balls' and how he needs to grow them. The English press had a field day. They headlined Shubman's sledge, not even missing the 'f*%&king' that the Indian captain had thrown in for impact. At the next press conference, Shubman knew what was coming. An English reporter did rake up the issue and the Indian captain's eyes lit up like he had spotted a ball that was well short of good length. 'A lot of people have been talking about this so let me clear the air for once and for all' – it was the emphatic and authoritative 'enough is enough' prelude to his strong statement about English players abusing the spirit of the game that perked the ears of the reporters. Shubman's eyes blank and the nostrils flared, this was not the boy with dimples and rom com star looks. This was a batsman who had broken records, played a match-winning innings and stared the opponents in their eyes. This was a moment when doubts flew out the window and got lost in the muggy Manchester air. It was when you realised that you were watching a captain who would be at the helm for a long time. A relaxed Rohit at the park, a satisfied Virat on stage and Shubman's show of gravitas at the press conference helped to process the change. It helped convince the mind that Rohit isn't the captain, Kohli isn't the King. And henceforth, Shubman will do everything that Rohit and Kohli used to do.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
'Tu kab se mera baap ban gaya?' Irfan Pathan's 'dog meat' retaliation silenced Shahid Afridi's 'barking'; Razzaq shocked
Former India all-rounder Irfan Pathan recounted a past episode where he had a heated exchange with Shahid Afridi during a flight. Pathan and Afridi shared several memorable battles on the field, where the former emerged victorious on several occasions, including the 2007 T20 World Cup final, where he dismissed the former Pakistan all-rounder for a golden duck. The left-handed all-rounder relished clashes against Pakistan, picking up 67 wickets across formats and amassing 807 runs with the bat, including a memorable century. The fierce India-Pakistan rivalry added extra intensity to the clash between Pathan and Afridi. Irfan Pathan recalled heated altercation with Shahid Afridi.(X Image) Pathan revealed that when Team India was on a tour of Pakistan in 2006, both teams were travelling together on the same flight from Karachi to Lahore, and that's where he had a heated argument with Afridi. The veteran Indian all-rounder elaborated on the matter and said that it was Afridi who started it by messing up his hair and calling him a kid. "During the 2006 tour, we were travelling by flight from Karachi to Lahore. Both teams were travelling together. Afridi came and placed his hand on my head, messing up my hair. He asked me, "How are you kid?" I said, "Since when have you become my father?". The childish behaviour was actually his. He was not my friend. After that, Afridi said some abusive words to me. His seat was right next to mine," Pathan said on Lallantop. "Shahid Afridi has eaten dog meat" Pathan, the Player of the Match in the 2007 T20 World Cup final, added that Abdul Razzaq was seated next to him during the flight, and he casually asked him about the different kinds of meat available there, which shocked the Pakistan all-rounder. 'Abdul Razzaq was sitting with me then. I asked him what kind of meat is available here. He told me about the different kinds of meat. Then I asked if dog meat was available. Afridi was sitting right there. Razzaq was shocked to hear this and said, 'Hey Irfan, why are you saying this?',' he added. Pathan revealed that he didn't hold back and said Afridi had eaten the dog's meat, which is why he had been barking. "I said, "He (Afridi) has eaten dog meat, he has been barking for a long time" After that, Afridi couldn't say anything. Whatever he might have said, I would have just said, 'Look, he is barking again.' After this, he remained silent throughout the flight. From this incident, he understood that he could not win against me verbally. That's why he never said anything to me again," he added.