US B-2 bombers, bunker-busters and alternatives: How US strikes Iran's nuclear sites
The US B-2 costs about US$2.1 billion (S$2.7 billion) each, making it the most expensive military aircraft ever built. PHOTO: REUTERS
US B-2 bombers, bunker-busters and alternatives: How US strikes Iran's nuclear sites
WASHINGTON - The US Air Force's B-2 Spirit stealth bombers were involved in strikes on Iran's nuclear sites on June 21 .
Three Iranian nuclear sites were struck in a 'very successful attack', President Donald Trump said on June 21 , adding that the crown jewel of Tehran's nuclear programme, Fordow, is gone.
The B-2 is one of America's most advanced strategic weapons platforms, capable of entering sophisticated air defences and delivering precision strikes against hardened targets such as Iran's buried network of nuclear research facilities.
B-2 spirit specifications:
The US B-2 costs about US$2.1 billion (S$2.7 billion ) each, making it the most expensive military aircraft ever built.
Made by Northrop Grumman, the bomber, with its cutting-edge stealth technology, began its production run in the late 1980s but was curbed by the fall of the Soviet Union.
Only 21 were made after the Pentagon's planned acquisition programme was truncated.
The bomber's range of over 11,112km without refueling enables global strike capabilities from continental US bases.
With aerial refuelling, the B-2 can reach virtually any target worldwide, as demonstrated in missions from Missouri to Afghanistan and Libya and now Iran.
Its payload capacity of more than 18,144 kg allows the aircraft to carry a diverse array of conventional and nuclear weapons.
The bomber's internal weapons bays are specifically designed to maintain stealth characteristics while accommodating large ordnance loads which could include two GBU-57A/B MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator), a 13,607kg precision-guided 'bunker buster' bomb.
Reports said six bunker buster bombs were used on Iran's Fordow research site.
The B-2's two-pilot crew configuration reduces personnel requirements while maintaining operational effectiveness through advanced automation systems.
The B-2's stealth technology incorporates radar-absorbing materials and angular design features that minimise detection by enemy air defence systems. Its radar cross-section is reportedly comparable to that of a small bird, making it nearly invisible to conventional radar.
Massive ordnance penetrator (MOP):
The 13,607kg MOP represents the largest conventional bomb in the US arsenal, specifically engineered to defeat hardened underground bunkers. Its massive size requires the B-2 to carry only one or two MOPs per mission, but provides unmatched bunker-penetration capability.
The weapon's 6.25m length and GPS-guided precision targeting system enable accurate strikes against specific underground facilities. Its penetration capability of over 61m through hardened concrete makes it effective against the world's most protected underground installations.
Conventional payloads:
Joint Direct Attack Munitions provide the B-2 with precision conventional strike capability against fixed targets. These GPS-guided weapons can be deployed in large numbers, with the bomber capable of simultaneously engaging multiple targets with high accuracy.
Joint Standoff Weapons extend the aircraft's engagement range while maintaining stealth characteristics during approach. These glide bombs allow the B-2 to strike targets from outside heavily defended airspace perimeters.
Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles offer long-range precision strike capability with their own stealth features. The extended-range JASSM-ER variant provides strike options against targets over 805km away.
Nuclear payload capabilities:
The B-2 Spirit serves as a key component of America's nuclear triad, capable of delivering strategic nuclear weapons with stealth and precision. The aircraft can carry up to 16 B83 nuclear bombs. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Ukraine fighting 10,000 Russian troops in Kursk region, Ukrainian commander says
FILE PHOTO: Colonel general Oleksandr Syrskyi, Commander of the Ukrainian Ground Forces, attends an interview with Reuters, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kharkiv region, Ukraine January 12, 2024. REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko/File Photo KYIV - Around 10,000 Russian soldiers are fighting in Russia's Kursk region, about 90 square kilometers (35 square miles) of which is controlled by Ukraine, Ukraine's top military commander said. "We control about 90 square kilometers of territory in the Hlushkov district of the Kursk region of the Russian Federation, and these are our preemptive actions in response to a possible enemy attack," Oleksandr Syrskyi said without elaborating, in remarks released by his office for publication on Sunday. The Ukrainian military said the activity in this area prevented Russia from sending a significant number of its forces to Ukraine's eastern region of Donetsk, where some of the heaviest fighting has taken place in the more than three-year-old full-scale invasion. Syrskyi's troops are repelling Russian forces along the frontline, which stretches for about 1,200 km, where the situation remains difficult, the Ukrainian military said. Russian gains have accelerated in May and June, though the Ukrainian military says it comes at a cost of high Russian casualties in small assault-group attacks. While the military says its troops repelled Russian approaches toward Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region borders last week, the pressure continues in the country's eastern and northern regions. The Russian military also continues its deadly drone and missile attacks on the Ukrainian cities further from the front, prompting Ukraine to innovate its approaches to air defence. Ukraine's military said it currently destroys around 82% of Shahed-type drones launched by Russia but requires more surface-to-air missile systems to defend critical infrastructure and cities. The military said the air force was also working on developing the use of light aircraft and drone interceptors in repelling Russian assaults which can involve hundreds of drones. Ukraine also relies on its long-range capabilities to deal damage to economic and military targets on Russian territory, increasing the cost of war to Moscow. Between January and May, Ukraine dealt over $1.3 billion in direct losses in the Russian oil refining and fuel production industry, energy and transport supplies as well as strategic communications, the Ukrainian military said. It also dealt at least $9.5 billion more of indirect damages through the destabilization of the oil refining industry, disruption of logistics and forced shutdown of enterprises, it added. It was not clear whether the Ukrainian military included the damages from its operation "Spider's Web" which damaged Russian warplanes -- and Ukraine said cost billions in losses -- in the estimates. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
19 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Filipinos see politicians as top source of disinformation, says Reuters study
Philippine Senator Ronald dela Rosa (front) drew flak from social media users after fact-checkers found evidence that a video he shared was a deepfake. PHOTO: REUTERS Why Filipinos see politicians as the top source of disinformation – A study that found Filipinos see politicians as the top source of disinformation online has underlined the rise in distrust towards the country's leaders, amid intensifying rivalry between the Marcos and Duterte camps. A 2025 Reuters Institute Digital News Report released on June 17 found that Filipinos are more likely than people in other countries to blame politicians for the spread of false information online According to the survey, 55 per cent of Filipino respondents identified politicians as major sources of disinformation, ahead of online influencers (48 per cent), activists (38 per cent), journalists (37 per cent), foreign governments (34 per cent), and others. This is higher than the global average, where respondents generally identified both politicians and influencers as the biggest culprits in spreading disinformation, at 47 per cent each. The Reuters report polled 97,055 people in 48 territories in total, including 2,014 Filipinos. The report noted that disinformation 'surged in the Philippines over the past year – fuelled by the widening political rift between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and Vice-President Sara Duterte'. 'The fallout peaked with Duterte's impeachment in February, followed a month later by the arrest of her father, former president Rodrigo Duterte, who faces charges of crimes against humanity before the International Criminal Court (ICC) over his bloody war on drugs,' it said. Associate Professor Danilo Arao, who teaches journalism at the University of the Philippines, told The Straits Times that Filipinos may have grown weary of what he described as a 'sustained, organised' operation of disinformation networks, which often parrot statements made by Filipino politicians. He cited a probe by local newspaper Philippine Star in March, which found that about 20 seemingly unconnected Facebook accounts had posted identical texts framing former president Rodrigo Duterte's arrest by the ICC as 'kidnapping'. These were similar to the statements made by Mr Duterte's children, several of whom hold elected posts in the Philippines, including the Vice-President. 'Of course this went beyond the period of review of the Digital News Report, but these are continuing patterns of disinformation,' Dr Arao said. 'And when you have the government, especially certain government officials, spreading disinformation, then naturally, people will become disappointed.' The Reuters survey, conducted from mid-January to late February in 2025, coincided with the start of the campaign period for the May midterm election in the Philippines. The percentage of Filipinos concerned about disinformation has gone up, the survey found, from 63 per cent in 2024 to 67 per cent in 2025. The use of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content to spread disinformation is a particular cause for concern. On June 15, two Duterte allies – Senator Ronald dela Rosa and Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, the Vice-President's brother – both shared on social media a video showing supposed interviews with male students condemning the moves of Marcos-allied lawmakers to impeach Ms Duterte. But Mr Dela Rosa later drew flak from social media users after fact-checkers from Philippine newsrooms such as Rappler and found evidence that the video he shared was a deepfake generated by AI. Defending himself, he said on June 16: 'I don't care if this post is AI-generated... because I am not after the messenger. I am after the message.' This is part of a worrying trend in the Philippines, where politicians may not understand the perils of sharing AI-generated content, said political scientist Jean Encinas-Franco from University of the Philippines. 'My sense is that very few politicians really understand what AI is all about. It's a little bit worrisome that they're not very concerned about the impact of how AI is used,' she said. Also contributing to public anxiety over disinformation in the Philippines, noted Dr Arao and Dr Franco, are narratives backing Beijing's position in the maritime dispute over the South China Sea, where both the Philippines and China have competing claims. In recent months, Philippine defence officials have raised concerns over alleged Chinese malign influence operations, including disinformation campaigns and suspected espionage activities in the country. In April, Filipino Senator Francis Tolentino accused the Chinese Embassy in Manila of orchestrating a 'hidden and sinister' disinformation campaign to influence public opinion with pro-Beijing narratives, targeting not only the South China Sea dispute but also midterm election candidates critical of Beijing's claims. China has denied the allegations. 'We're dealing with sovereignty issues, and it's also very emotional because it's intricately linked with patriotism and sense of nationhood,' Dr Franco said. 'If you're a Filipino, and you see fake news articles that are pro-Beijing, you'll get mad about these things'. Dr Arao said some Filipino content creators known to support the Dutertes often echo pro-China views, a holdover from the time Mr Duterte made a pivot towards Beijing during his presidency from 2016 to 2022. Still, both analysts said domestic disinformation fuelled by local politicians and their supporters remains a bigger concern than foreign influence for now. Mr Marcos has called for vigilance against disinformation amid his heated political rivalry with the Dutertes. Yet a 2022 study by researchers at the Philippine Media Monitoring Laboratory also found years-long disinformation attempts on social media to whitewash abuses during the nine brutal years of martial law under Mr Marcos' father, the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos Senior. The same researchers said Mr Marcos himself benefitted from these disinformation efforts when he ran successfully for president in 2022. Dr Arao and Dr Franco said Filipinos have to be more discerning of the information they consume on social media. They said newsrooms should continue fact-checking efforts. Dr Arao also suggested a revision of the school curriculum to integrate lessons on media literacy and fact-checking for students. 'We need critical thinking. We have to ensure that critical pedagogy will not be compromised and will not be discouraged in our educational system. That's how we fight disinformation,' he said. Mara Cepeda is Philippines correspondent for The Straits Times. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
19 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Ukraine army chief vows to expand strikes on Russia
Colonel general Oleksandr Syrskyi vowed to increase the 'scale and depth' of strikes on Russia in remarks made public on June 22. PHOTO: REUTERS KYIV - Ukraine's top military commander vowed to increase the 'scale and depth' of strikes on Russia in remarks made public on June 22. He said the strikes were proving effective and that Kyiv would attack only military targets. 'Of course, we will continue. We will increase the scale and depth,' Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky told reporters, including AFP. His comments came amid a lull in diplomatic efforts to end the three-year war. The last direct meeting between the two sides was almost three weeks ago and no follow-up talks have been scheduled. 'We will not just sit in defence. Because this brings nothing and eventually leads to the fact that we still retreat, lose people and territories,' Mr Syrsky said. In wide-ranging remarks, Mr Syrsky also conceded Russia had some advantages in drone warfare, particularly in making fibre-optic drones which are tethered and difficult to jam. 'Here, unfortunately, they have an advantage in both the number and range of their use,' he said. He also claimed Ukraine still held 90 square km in Russia's Kursk region, where Kyiv launched an audacious cross-border incursion in August 2024. 'These are our preemptive actions in response to a possible enemy offensive,' he said. Russia said in April it had gained full control of the Kursk region and denies Kyiv has a presence there. Moscow currently occupies around a fifth of Ukraine and has claimed four Ukrainian regions as its own since launching its invasion in 2022, in addition to Crimea, which it captured in 2014. Kyiv has accused Moscow of deliberately sabotaging a peace deal to prolong its full-scale offensive on the country and seize more territory. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
