Nato leaders set to back Trump defence spending goal at Hague summit, World News
THE HAGUE — Nato leaders gather in The Hague on Wednesday (June 25) for a summit tailor-made for US President Donald Trump, with European allies hoping a pledge to hike defence spending will prompt him to dispel doubts about his commitment to the alliance.
The summit is expected to endorse a higher defence spending goal of 5 per cent of GDP — a response to a demand by Trump and to Europeans' fears that Russia poses an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Nato officials are hoping the conflict between Israel and Iran, and the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend, will not overshadow the gathering, hosted by alliance Secretary General Mark Rutte in his home city.
Trump has threatened not to protect Nato members if they fail to meet spending targets and he raised doubts about his commitment again on his way to the summit by avoiding directly endorsing the alliance's Article 5 mutual defence clause.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said there were "numerous definitions" of the clause. "I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there," he said.
The new target — to be achieved over the next 10 years — is a big increase on the current goal of 2 per cent of GDP, although it will be measured differently. It would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars in extra annual spending.
Countries would spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence — such as troops and weapons — and 1.5 per cent on broader defence-related measures such as cyber security, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle military vehicles.
All Nato members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal. Madrid says it can meet its military commitments to Nato by spending much less — a view disputed by Rutte.
But Rutte accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his intense efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly. Unusual insight into summit diplomacy
Trump gave an unusual insight into those efforts on Tuesday by posting a private message in which Rutte lavished praise on him and congratulated him on "decisive action in Iran".
"You will achieve something no American president in decades could get done," Rutte told Trump.
"Europe is going to pay in a big way as they should, and it will be your win."
To satisfy Trump, Rutte has also kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge.
The text is expected to cite Russia as a threat and reaffirm allies' support for Ukraine but not dwell on those issues, given Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance towards Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor, Joe Biden.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening rather than a seat at the main meeting on Wednesday, although Trump said he would probably meet with Zelenskiy separately.
Zelenskiy's plans for a meeting with Trump in Canada last week were dashed when the US president left a G7 summit early, citing a need to focus on the crisis in the Middle East.
Zelenskiy and his aides have said they want to talk to Trump about buying US weapons including Patriot missile defence systems and increasing pressure on Moscow through tougher sanctions.
The Kremlin accused Nato of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defence spending.
[[nid:719217]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Amid Iran-Israel's fragile truce, Trump and Netanyahu battle to control war narratives
A ceasefire is now in force in the Middle East, and it appears to be holding, says the writer. PHOTO: AFP - There is little doubt that US President Donald Trump has emerged much strengthened as a result of his handling of what he calls the '12-Day War' between Israel and Iran. By ordering US jets to bomb Iranian nuclear installations, Mr Trump has reaffirmed America's close strategic bonds with Israel. Yet the US leader also managed something all his immediate predecessors in Washington had failed to achieve: get Israel to stop fighting at a time of America's choosing. After what a visibly angry Mr Trump described as an 'extraordinarily tough and direct' phone call with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on June 24, the Israeli leader ordered his jets to turn around in mid-flight and stop hitting Iranian targets. A ceasefire is now in force in the Middle East, and it appears to be holding. So, the American leader can claim with some justification that his immediate strategic objectives were met. 'It was my great honour to Destroy All Nuclear facilities & capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!' Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social, his favourite platform. The snag for Mr Trump is that at least some people in the US intelligence community do not believe that Iran's nuclear capabilities have been destroyed. And the current ceasefire is unlikely to give the US much respite, either. The US administration is embarrassed by a leaked report apparently compiled by the Defence Intelligence Agency, a branch of the American military, which seemingly suggested that Mr Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were 'obliterated' was overstated. US and Israeli raids on Iran's nuclear facilities – the leaked report allegedly concludes – may have succeeded only in delaying Iran's quest for nuclear weapons by around six months. Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House spokeswoman, rushed to dismiss such claims as 'flat-out wrong' and as 'a clear attempt to demean President Trump'. The administration has promised to provide the US Congress with detailed briefings on the impact of the US attacks on Iran. Yet, almost regardless of what it does, the Trump White House is likely to remain on the back foot. It probably matters very little when the full bomb damage assessment on the US attacks is released, or what that assessment will say, for the Washington administration is certain to be accused of 'doctoring' the intelligence information to suit its political needs, and no assessment is likely to be accepted as either definitive or accurate by supporters or critics of the US government. Either way, the struggle to control the narrative about the latest war will plague Mr Trump for a long time. Meanwhile, Mr Netanyahu is struggling with his own battle to control the political narrative. Mr Trump's decision to name the Iran-Israel confrontation as the '12-Day War' represents a shrewd nod to Israel. The name evokes another brief previous conflict, the Six-Day War, which occurred in June 1967, when Israel decisively defeated the armies of all its immediate neighbours. That episode is regarded in Israel as a pivotal moment in the emergence of the Jewish state as a modern, technologically superior actor, able to reshape not only its immediate surroundings, but also the rest of the Middle East. Mr Trump evidently wants to flatter Israel into believing that the latest clashes with Iran are just as significant as the war fought more than half a century ago. And to some extent, the brief war between Israel and Iran is transformative for the Middle East. The Israelis not only hit hard Iran's nuclear installations but also destroyed Iran's air defences, the bulk of Iran's missile stocks and Iran's regional proxies, including the much-feared Hezbollah, until recently considered the world's most potent non-state militia. And, conversely, Iran is at its weakest since the establishment of the Islamic Republic back in 1979. So, soon after the ceasefire in the Iran-Israel war took hold in the early hours of June 24, Mr Netanyahu rushed to claim 'a historic victory' for Israel, and rumours spread that he may well dissolve the current Israeli Parliament and call early elections. But political euphoria in Israeli government circles soon subsided for at least three reasons. First, the fact that Israel was forced to stop the fighting under the direct and very public orders of Mr Trump reduced Mr Netanyahu's ability to claim a complete victory and his claims that he enjoyed a close strategic bond with the US President. Furthermore, although the Israeli Prime Minister's popularity ratings have risen as a result of the war with Iran, most of his new votes appear to come from the electorate of the far-right smaller parties in his current governing coalition, rather than at the expense of the centre-left opposition parties. So, although Mr Netanyahu is more popular at the moment, he still risks losing a snap election, because he has not succeeded in shifting the fundamental electoral balance. And then, there is the awkward fact that, try as hard as he may, Mr Netanyahu cannot ignore Gaza, where the Israeli military remains bogged down in a cruel war which continues to inflict untold suffering on Palestinian civilians, but does nothing to gain the release of the 50-odd Israeli hostages still kept by Hamas, the militant Palestinian organisation. Seven Israeli soldiers were killed in southern Gaza on June 24 – this was the single largest Israeli military loss in many months, and a sober reminder that the Gaza war remains one conflict in which Mr Netanyahu cannot claim any victory, let alone a supposedly 'historic' one. The received wisdom in Israeli political circles is, therefore, that Mr Netanyahu will not hold snap elections and continue in office until the end of his current electoral mandate in October 2026. The problem for the Israeli Premier is that, soon enough, whatever he claims to have achieved by striking Iran will be forgotten by his electorate. Ordinary Israelis are beginning to cast doubt on their country's legendary missile defence systems. While these worked well, intercepting around 90 per cent of all incoming Iranian rockets and drones, the missiles that got through inflicted quite a bit of damage in Israeli cities, and shattered many illusions about Israel's supposedly impregnable defences. Meanwhile, Iran's nuclear chief Mohammad Eslami has announced that his country will soon restart its nuclear programme. In the Middle East, a ceasefire remains a very relative and perishable concept. Jonathan Eyal is based in London and Brussels and writes on global political and security matters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Spain expects no repercussions from not meeting Nato's 5% spending target
Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo added that Madrid would meet all its commitments on its military capabilities despite spending less than 5 per cent of GDP. PHOTO: EPA-EFE MADRID - Spain said on June 25 that it did not expect any repercussions from its decision not to meet a defence spending target of 5 per cent of gross domestic product that North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) member states are expected to set at a summit in The Hague. "Spain will be a responsible ally," Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo told Bloomberg TV in an interview, adding that Madrid would meet all its commitments on its military capabilities despite spending less than 5 per cent of GDP. "No repercussions should derive from making good on our commitments and from being a reliable Nato ally, covering for the capabilities that we did commit to and that are necessary to defend Nato." Nato leaders meeting in The Hague on June 25 were expected to endorse the higher defence spending goal of 5 per cent of GDP in response to a demand by US President Donald Trump. Doing so would also address the security concerns of European countries over Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said on June 22 that Madrid would not spend more than 2.1 per cent of its GDP on defence because its commitments towards Nato on its military capabilities did not require more. Mr Cuerpo also told Spanish radio station RNE that Spain would review its spending when or if the Nato capabilities requirements are revised. "Spain will certainly be up to the task when these necessary capabilities are updated," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Spain expects no repercussions from not meeting NATO 5% spending target
FILE PHOTO: Spain's Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo poses after talking to media at the G20 finance leaders meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 25, 2024. REUTERS/Tita Barros/File Photo MADRID - Spain said on Wednesday it did not expect any repercussions from its decision not to meet a defence spending target of 5% of gross domestic product that NATO member states are expected to set at a summit in The Hague. "Spain will be a responsible ally," Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo told Bloomberg TV in an interview, adding that Madrid would meet all its commitments on its military capabilities despite spending less than 5% of GDP. "No repercussions should derive from making good on our commitments and from being a reliable NATO ally, covering for the capabilities that we did commit to and that are necessary to defend NATO." NATO leaders meeting in The Hague on Wednesday were expected to endorse the higher defence spending goal of 5% of GDP in response to a demand by U.S. President Donald Trump. Doing so would also address the security concerns of European countries over Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said on Sunday that Madrid would not spend more than 2.1% of its GDP on defence because its commitments towards NATO on its military capabilities did not require more. Cuerpo also told Spanish radio station RNE that Spain would review its spending when or if the NATO capabilities requirements are revised. "Spain will certainly be up to the task when these necessary capabilities are updated," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
