New Research Reveals New Zealand's Natural Resource Footprint
Press Release – Parliamentary Commissioner For The Environment
Four basics, food, housing, infrastructure and transport, accounted for 72% of natural resource use. Around 60% of the resources consumed in New Zealand were extracted overseas and imported.
New research from the office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment reveals that about 107 million tonnes of natural resources were required to produce the goods and services consumed by New Zealanders in 2019 – approximately 21 tonnes per person on average.
This 'natural resource footprint' is detailed in a research note released today by the office of the Commissioner. Entitled, Resource use and waste generation in Aotearoa New Zealand: filling (some) gaps, the note summarises the next stage of a major investigation into how natural resources are used and disposed of in New Zealand. This work involved in-house and contracted research on New Zealand's natural resource production and consumption.
'The footprint produced for 2019 is based on research that analysed how many tonnes of natural resources were extracted domestically, and how many tonnes were used in the production of huge variety of goods and services that New Zealand imports every year,' the Commissioner, Simon Upton explains.
'This research enabled my office to create the most complete picture, to date, of the quantity of natural resources required to support a 'typical' New Zealand lifestyle – regardless of where in the world those resources originated,' he says.
This research is one of five pieces of work commissioned by the Commissioner to fill information gaps in resource use and waste generation identified in the first stage of the investigation. The other research looks at plastic waste, metal requirements for the green energy transition, soil vulnerabilities and the environmental pressures of resource use.
The Commissioner hopes that releasing this information now will support evidence-based discussions on resource use and waste generation in New Zealand.
'Further work, including on what the future might bring, is needed before I can draw any conclusions about what this all means for environmental management in New Zealand or how we might shift the dial towards a more environmentally sustainable economy,' the Commissioner says.
The Commissioner's final report on natural resource use and waste generation is hoped to be published within the next 18 months.
The natural resource footprint for 2019 found that:
107 million tonnes of natural resources (such as sand, gravel, meat, dairy, oil) were used in the production of the goods and services consumed by New Zealanders, equating to approximately 21 tonnes of natural resources per person on average.
Four basics, food, housing, infrastructure and transport, accounted for 72% of natural resource use.
Around 60% of the resources consumed in New Zealand were extracted overseas and imported. Available data suggests the share of our resource needs imported from other countries has increased over recent decades.
130–135 million tonnes of natural resources were extracted from New Zealand (excluding water), 90% of this was organic materials (food, wood, crops) and non-metallic minerals such as limestone, coal and clay.
One third of domestically extracted resources were consumed here, while two thirds were exported either as raw commodities (e.g. logs or coal) or 'embedded' within processed products (e.g. meat or steel).
New Zealand's resource use has almost doubled in the last 25 years, growing roughly in line with incomes.
Note:
Water has not been included in the natural resource footprint as current deficiencies in data means it is not possible to compile a nationally consistent account of New Zealand's water use.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Concerns KiwiSaver Is Being Used As ‘Piggy Bank' To Solve Financial Woes
Article – RNZ A growing number of New Zealanders are making hardship withdrawals from their retirement savings. , Money Correspondent KiwiSaver is in danger of being considered a 'piggy bank' to solve all of New Zealanders' financial woes, one provider says, and too many people are tapping into their savings on hardship grounds. Founder of Kōura KiwiSaver scheme Rupert Carlyon was wary of calls for settings to be changed to allow people to use their money to buy farms. He said KiwiSaver was already being called on to solve the country's housing and infrastructure crises. Carlyon said changing the rules to allow more withdrawals sent the wrong message to people, who should be using KiwiSaver for their retirement. Instead, they were tapping into KiwiSaver in growing numbers. In April, 4220 people withdrew savings for financial hardship reasons, up from 3700 in April 2024. They withdrew a combined $37.6 million. 'It encourages more and more people to think about it like a piggybank. It's scary what's happening in that space,' he said. He said he saw people making repeated hardship withdrawals, depleting their balance. 'People come back multiple times with the same claims… it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not.' He said it would now not be possible to close the 'hardship loophole' because people expected it to be available and any change could dent confidence in the scheme. But he said it should be tightened up so there was a limit on the number of withdrawals that could be made within a certain timeframe. 'The other part is it's very resource intensive. We spend on average up to six hours per financial hardship claim… It's hard on staff because they often have to say no when they want to say yes.' A spokesperson for Public Trust, one of the KiwiSaver supervisors, said people were not required to repay hardship withdrawals if it was found they were not necessary. 'Their future self might not thank them for dipping into their retirement savings. We see situations of real and urgent need… there are strict rules and checks in place to help ensure withdrawals are only approved for genuine financial hardship, and applicants need to sign a legal declaration confirming their situation. 'If someone doesn't use funds as intended, it could affect their ability to make another hardship withdrawal in the future.'
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Joint Statement On Use Of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) In Retail Settings
Press Release – Joint Media Statement We are firmly of the opinion that FRT, when used fairly and accurately, can be a valuable intervention to help keep customers and employees safe. The undersigned major New Zealand retailers strongly support the use of fair and accurate technology to protect our workers and customers. We support the option for retailers to use Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) to reduce harm and proactively combat retail crime. Our teams face high rates of verbal and physical abuse from repeat offenders who pose a risk to our employees, customers and other visitors to our stores. They are often responsible for significant violence, stock loss or damage. We are firmly of the opinion that FRT, when used fairly and accurately, can be a valuable intervention to help keep customers and employees safe. It is a powerful and effective tool alongside other crime prevention resources such as security guards, fog cannons, staff training, body cameras, panic alarms, CCTV and other technology solutions. We acknowledge Foodstuffs North Island for their leadership in trialling this new technology, and also the oversight provided by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in assessing FRT's suitability for use in New Zealand. The trial clearly showed that the technology made a measurable impact in reducing crime, and improving safety in stores. A survey of 1000 New Zealanders found 89% support the use of FRT if it reduces harm by 10%. Keeping our people safe at work and keeping our customers safe is of paramount importance. A significant proportion of retail crime is committed by repeat offenders. It is these recidivist offenders that we are able to target with FRT. FRT offers the opportunity for us to quickly identify individuals of interest as they enter the store. Staff and/or security personnel are then able to respond quickly and decide how to manage each situation. Intervention is not required for every situation but FRT helps our teams to prevent or de-escalate incidents and offences. We recognise that technology must be used in a fair and accurate way. Guardrails are needed to support customers' privacy, and to guard against potential bias and discrimination. We collectively make a commitment to work with Retail NZ to develop best practice to ensure FRT is used only to keep our people safe, and in line with our obligations under the Privacy Act. The use of FRT in the right settings with the right controls will provide positive benefits and outcomes for customers, retailers and workers, while not impeding on the privacy of New Zealanders. The vast majority of customers will be able to go about their business as usual and will in fact be safer in those stores where FRT is used.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Concerns KiwiSaver Is Being Used As 'Piggy Bank' To Solve Financial Woes
KiwiSaver is in danger of being considered a "piggy bank" to solve all of New Zealanders' financial woes, one provider says, and too many people are tapping into their savings on hardship grounds. Founder of Kōura KiwiSaver scheme Rupert Carlyon was wary of calls for settings to be changed to allow people to use their money to buy farms. He said KiwiSaver was already being called on to solve the country's housing and infrastructure crises. Carlyon said changing the rules to allow more withdrawals sent the wrong message to people, who should be using KiwiSaver for their retirement. Instead, they were tapping into KiwiSaver in growing numbers. In April, 4220 people withdrew savings for financial hardship reasons, up from 3700 in April 2024. They withdrew a combined $37.6 million. "It encourages more and more people to think about it like a piggybank. It's scary what's happening in that space," he said. He said he saw people making repeated hardship withdrawals, depleting their balance. "People come back multiple times with the same claims… it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not." He said it would now not be possible to close the "hardship loophole" because people expected it to be available and any change could dent confidence in the scheme. But he said it should be tightened up so there was a limit on the number of withdrawals that could be made within a certain timeframe. "The other part is it's very resource intensive. We spend on average up to six hours per financial hardship claim... It's hard on staff because they often have to say no when they want to say yes." A spokesperson for Public Trust, one of the KiwiSaver supervisors, said people were not required to repay hardship withdrawals if it was found they were not necessary. "Their future self might not thank them for dipping into their retirement savings. We see situations of real and urgent need… there are strict rules and checks in place to help ensure withdrawals are only approved for genuine financial hardship, and applicants need to sign a legal declaration confirming their situation. "If someone doesn't use funds as intended, it could affect their ability to make another hardship withdrawal in the future."
