5 ways teens are using AI companions, from flirting to serious advice
More than half said they use companions regularly, and some rely on them for serious advice.
Almost 10% those who use companions try to learn "romantic" skills.
The era of AI-generated pick-up lines is here for some teens.
A study from the nonprofit organization Common Sense Media published on July 16, 2025, asked teens nationwide about whether and how they use AI companions, especially in their social lives. The survey defined AI companions as "digital friends or characters you can text or talk with" that "are designed to have conversations that feel personal and meaningful."
In total, 1,060 teens between the ages of 13 and 17 responded during April and May, and their answers shed light on how adolescents are using the technology in their social lives. At the end of the report, Common Sense Media reaffirmed its previous suggestion that nobody younger than 18 should use AI companions.
Business Insider combed through the results for some of the most interesting takeaways.
More than half said they're regular users
While 72% of respondents said they've used AI companions at least one time, 52% use the technology at least a few times per month. For some, AI companions are a regular part of their day — 13% of respondents said they use the technology daily.
More than a quarter of respondents said they'd never used an AI companion.
8% have used AI to flirt
When the 758 teens who said they use AI companions were asked what skills they practice, 8% said romantic or flirtatious ones.
AI could reshape dating apps as we know them, BI previously reported, as some companies have created chatbots that people can date. Some people have even developed romantic relationships with AI partners.
Leaked documents reviewed by BI show that Meta has trained its AI to accept "flirty" prompts, as long as they are not sexually explicit.
Younger teens are more likely to trust the AI's advice
Half of those surveyed said they trust the advice and information from their AI companion at least "somewhat," but there are age discrepancies within that group. Younger kids are much more trusting — 27% of respondents ages 13-14 compared to 20% of respondents aged 15-17.
Of those who said they trust their AI companions, 23% said they trust them "quite a bit" or "completely."
Many find the interactions as or more satisfying than conversations with humans
Nearly 1/3 of those surveyed said they find conversations with AI companions as or more satisfying than those they have with real, human friends. Of the teens who responded, 10% said the conversations were more satisfying, and 21% ranked them as satisfying.
Still, the teens surveyed largely prioritize time with their friends over their AI buddy — 80% said they spend more time with friends, and only 6% said they spend more time with the AI.
Some prefer AI for serious advice
Among the 758 teens who said they use AI companions, one-third said they've talked about "important or serious" subjects with the bot instead of real friends, but only 4% said they do that frequently.
Have you used AI in your dating life? Contact this reporter via email at atecotzky@insider.com or Signal at alicetecotzky.05. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Axon Enterprise (AXON) Sees Q2 Revenue Rise To US$669 Million
Axon Enterprise recently reported its second-quarter 2025 earnings, showcasing a revenue growth to $669 million, up from $503 million a year ago, while net income experienced a decline to $36 million from $41 million. Concurrently, the company upgraded its full-year revenue guidance, suggesting optimistic future sales expectations. These events, coupled with a generally positive market environment, where the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite posted solid gains while digesting various earnings and global trade developments, likely provided a backdrop that supported the company's 26% share price surge over the past quarter. The market's robust performance perhaps added momentum to Axon's share price movements, complementing the company's adjusted forward guidance. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 2 possible red flags for Axon Enterprise you should know about. Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value. The recent earnings announcement and revenue guidance upgrade could enhance Axon's narrative by underscoring its potential for continued growth, particularly through international expansion and AI-driven products. Despite the quarterly net income decline, the revenue jump to US$669 million points to successful product rollouts and market demand, which may positively influence future revenue and earnings forecasts. However, political and competitive risks could still introduce volatility in their earnings potential. Over the long term, Axon's shares have delivered a very large total return exceeding 982% over five years, suggesting significant value creation and growth beyond short-term fluctuations. This impressive performance contrasts with its one-year return, which exceeded the broader US market's 22.4% and the Aerospace & Defense industry's 40% return, highlighting Axon's robust market position. With the stock currently priced at US$863.65, its alignment with the analyst price target of US$873.67 suggests limited immediate upside, reflecting a modest 1.16% discount to the price target. This relatively small difference indicates analysts believe Axon's shares are fairly priced, and future price movements may depend on the company meeting or exceeding revenue and earnings expectations spurred by current positive developments and strategic initiatives. Assess Axon Enterprise's future earnings estimates with our detailed growth reports. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include AXON. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data


TechCrunch
26 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
The Browser Company launches a $20 monthly subscription for its AI-powered browser
The Browser Company has launched a Pro subscription plan for Dia, its new web browser that heavily integrates AI features. The plan costs $20 per month and provides unlimited access to Dia's AI-powered chat and skills features. The introduction of a paid tier means free users will now face usage limits on AI features. While The Browser Company hasn't specified exact limits, CEO Josh Miller told The New York Times in July that the browser will remain free for those who use AI features 'a few times a week.' Image Credits: Screenshot by TechCrunch Miller also indicated that the startup plans to offer multiple subscription tiers, ranging from $5 per month to hundreds of dollars monthly. The current $20 plan appears to be one of several options based on different feature sets. Earlier this week, users on Reddit and Threads noticed that The Browser Company had quietly made the Pro plan available online. However, the company quickly removed the page. Now the subscription option has been restored and can be accessed through Dia's settings page. Screenshot The Browser Company, which previously made the Arc browser, has raised $128 million from investors, including Pace Capital, Next Play Ventures, and notable tech execs like LinkedIn's Jeff Weiner, Medium's Ev Williams, Figma's Dylan Field, Notion's Akshay Kothari, and GitHub's Jason Warner. This Pro plan represents the company's first revenue-generating subscription service. The startup faces growing competition when it comes to AI-enhanced browsers. Perplexity's Comet browser is gaining steam, Opera is also prepping its Neon browser, and incumbents like Google and Microsoft are also integrating their AI assistants into their browsers.


Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Is Zero Click And Why Is It Turning Marketing On Its Head?
For a long time, marketers have chased clicks. These digital interactions are used to interpret intent and behavior, with the ultimate aim of understanding us in order to sell to us better. But now the emergence of zero-click is turning this on its head. Thanks to AI and the appearance of generative search results, snippets and info boxes, a growing number of searches result in no clicks at all. So, if marketers are no longer able to track website visitors in order to collect email addresses and push us along funnels, or optimize content for appearance in search results, what should they do instead? Here, I'll break down what zero click really means, how it will affect the ability of businesses to connect to new customers, and what marketers themselves should be doing now to make sure they're ready. What Is Zero Click? A zero-click search for information is one where the user finds what they're looking for without having to click a link from the search engine results page. Increasingly, it can also refer to other forms of search that don't lead to a Search Engine Results Page (SERP) at all, like voice search, and in-app searches using social media apps, shopping apps or tools like Google Maps. Here, businesses are having their tried and tested strategies disrupted by the integration of generative AI into search results. In fact, according to research by Bain & Company, 80 percent of consumers rely on zero-click answers to at least 40 percent of their searches. What does this mean in the real world? Well, consider a typical user journey for someone looking for financial advice. A traditional click-based user journey might involve them searching for 'improve my credit score'. They would find a page of results offering sponsored links to credit agency tools, as well as blogs that answered basic questions and referred visitors to advertisers. All opportunities that businesses pay for to connect them with customers. A zero-click journey, on the other hand, might simply list five tips for improving a score, directly on the SERP page, as an AI Overview. Or someone looking to buy a new toothbrush might search through Amazon reviews or look for specialist blogs covering the subject. While in a zero-click world, they could just tell an AI assistant to find and buy the best toothbrush within their budget. Here's another example: customers are increasingly able to find out anything they want to know about a business through Google Maps, such as its opening hours or nearest store. This means they are less likely to visit a website where they can sign up for an email newsletter and receive personalized promotions. What we're seeing today is just the tip of the iceberg, and as more of our information seeking is done away from browsers entirely and on an ever-growing range of devices and wearables, the shift will become even more dramatic. So, if you want to make sure you're still able to reach potential customers with your products and services, what's the solution? What Does It Mean For Marketers? Put simply, zero click is a total rewire of the way customers find information and make buying decisions in the digital domain. As a result of changes to the way we find information, search engine traffic is falling, which often means conversions are falling, too. AI overviews and snippets frequently resolve queries with no need to interact with brands. This means that customer journeys are shortening in many cases, and marketers have a narrower window of opportunity to put their brand in front of the customer at the point of decision-making. SEO strategies need rethinking, too, because simply placing highly on a SERP is no longer a guarantee of clicks. Branded content might be taken out of context, as AI tools synthesize words and images from multiple sources in response to queries. This could lead to reputational damage if it's used inappropriately. Attribution strategies might become more difficult, as it becomes harder to determine where sales and leads are coming from. In fact, the effects of this shift have been labelled a 'traffic apocalypse', and many marketers have been caught entirely unprepared. New York Magazine's Intelligencer blog writes, 'The whole premise of Internet publishing — that you could reach audiences far and wide — is starting to crumble.' Start Preparing Now This may sound gloomy if you're a marketer, but it's actually an opportunity. Being among the first in your niche to work out how to make zero-click work will be akin to being an early adopter of SEO and SEM strategy back in the early days of the web. In other words, potentially very lucrative. One piece of advice that's emerging is to structure content in a way that effectively answers questions. This means clear headings, body text and structured data such as charts or tables, where appropriate. Tests seem to show that the algorithms that gather data for 'snippets' and AI Overview are more likely to be attracted to this sort of information, possibly because it makes it simple for the LLM to process into direct answers to user questions. Some principles of SEO marketing will continue to apply and may even take on new relevance, such as the significance of short versus long-tail keywords. AI tools may be more likely to favor your content if it contains answers to more specific, in-depth queries like 'best electric toothbrush under $100' rather than broad terms like 'best toothbrush'. In SEO terms, these are called "long-tail" and "short-tail" keywords, and reports suggest AI overviews are more likely to include articles that score highly for the former. In short, a marketer's understanding of the difference between the way traditional search algorithms and AI bots answer user queries is increasingly critical to whether they can make zero-click work. Successfully navigating these changes will leave businesses better able to predict and influence the results of marketing campaigns in the AI age and ready to build stronger connections with their audiences.