
Home Insurance Claim Hassle? Here's How To Come Out On Top
A damaged home after a large tree fell on it.
getty
If you have ever filed a homeowners insurance claim, you know it can feel more like an endurance test than a straightforward process. The savvy financial advisor Rick Kahler, president of Kahler Financial Group in Rapid City, S. D., tells us how to navigate this treacherous path.
Larry Light: Trying to get paid for damage to your dwelling sounds like torture.
Rick Kahler: While insurers are legally required to honor valid claims, they have strong financial incentives to delay, underpay or deny them whenever possible.
Over the years, I've learned this the hard way. The most recent lesson started when a hailstorm hit my home in June 2023. I promptly filed an insurance claim. I relied on a roofing contractor to handle the whole claim, including the gutter and siding damage. That was my first mistake.
About 15 months later, my roof and gutters were replaced, but the siding repairs and painting remained undone. Every time the insurance company reassigned my claim to a new adjuster, I had to start over. When I called the contractor after a period of inactivity, they said the adjuster had ghosted them, so they'd given up—and I still owed them the full roofing bill.
Light: What did you do then?
Kahler: At that point, I had two choices: pay out of pocket for the unfinished work or escalate. I chose the latter. I filed a complaint with the state insurance division, contacted my agent, reached out to the last adjuster, hired my own painter and withheld final payment to the contractor. I also made it clear that I was prepared to take legal action if necessary. That was not a bluff.
Within a week, things started moving. Seven days later, the insurance company reinspected my home and sent a check covering all but $3,000 of the painting costs. After nearly two years of delays and excuses, progress finally happened when I took matters into my own hands.
Light: What should one look out for?
Kahler: Delay is a common insurer tactic. They'll repeatedly ask for more documentation, take months to respond or swap adjusters to force you to restart the process—all in hopes that you'll give up or accept a lower payout.
Another common tactic is the lowball offer. Insurers often rely on software that underestimates damages or send adjusters unfamiliar with actual repair costs. Accepting their first offer without question can be a costly mistake. It's wise to get independent repair estimates or even hire a public adjuster who works for you rather than the insurance company.
Insurers also deny claims based on fine print, arguing that damage was pre-existing, caused by poor maintenance or excluded under some obscure clause. Knowing your policy inside out and keeping pre-loss photos can help you counter these claims.
Light: What other tricks are there to be aware of?
Kahler: Another one is steering homeowners toward "preferred" contractors who work at discounted rates and may prioritize the insurer's interests over yours. Getting independent estimates ensures repairs are done properly.
For homeowners stuck in an insurance battle, persistence is key. Withholding final payment until work is complete, filing a complaint with the state insurance division and even considering small claims court can help push a claim forward. If the dispute is within your state's small claims limit—often between $10,000 and $25,000—filing may push the insurer to settle.
Assuming my contractor would handle everything was my biggest mistake, and it cost me nearly two years of frustration. Even though progress happened quickly once I took control, my claim isn't over. I suspect I will be filing legal action in small claims court against the insurance company, contractor and insurance agent.
Light: So, what can a policyholder do?
Kahler: If you need to navigate an insurance claim, be persistent and attentive. Keeping records, pushing back on delays and escalating when necessary can mean the difference between being shortchanged and getting the settlement you deserve.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
Bodycam video shows police shooting that killed man at South Side Chicago assisted living center
Newly released body camera video shows a deadly confrontation between Chicago police officers and a man with a knife at an assisted living facility in the South Side's Grand Crossing neighborhood. It all started around 2:50 a.m. Monday, May 6, when officers responded to a call responded to a call of a person with a butcher knife threatening residents inside Grand Regency of Jackson Park Supportive Living, at 1448 E. 75th St. Grand Regency of Jackson Park is advertised online as a program for adults between the ages of 22 and 64 with physical disabilities who need help maintaining their independence. Officers went to the unit where the man lived, and opened the door with a key when the man would not open the door himself. When the officers saw the man with a knife, they used Tasers. Police said when those Tasers were not effective, officers shot the man and killed him. The man, identified as 47-year-old Alfonzo Wright, died at the scene. None of the officers were hurt. A few hours later, police found another man, 58-year-old Keith Harding, stabbed to death in the same building. Police believe the suspect with the knife killed Harding before he was killed by police.


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
4-H federally funded camps under fire for cabining kids, adult counselors by 'identity'
EXCLUSIVE: Some federally supported youth programs still have policies in place permitting attendees and adult camp counselors to stay in overnight housing based on their self-identified gender rather than their biological sex – despite the fact that the policy these rules are derived from has since been rescinded by the Trump administration, according to one nonprofit group. The Washington-area Center for Practical Federalism is calling on the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which oversees 4-H youth programs that federally funded public universities across the country administer, to evaluate the programs' gender ideology standards. The 4-H programs offer a host of activities for youth through more than 100 public universities across the country in areas including health, science, agriculture and civic engagement. The Center for Practical Federalism is an arm of the nonprofit organization the State Policy Network, and seeks to provide resources to the American public and policymakers to educate them about federalism, and the balance between state and national politics to prevent government overreach. The issue originated in 2017, when the National 4-H Council and USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture shared a "4-H Guidance for Inclusion of Individuals of all Gender Identities, Gender Expressions, Sexual Orientation and Sexes" on a USDA-managed website. That guidance has since been rescinded, and the Trump administration issued an executive order in January instructing agencies to take "appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity." But policies that allow 4-H attendees and adult chaperones to stay in overnight accommodations based on their gender ideology – rather than their biological sex – remain in place in multiple states, according to the Center for Practical Federalism. "Now that the Trump administration has rescinded all prior federal policies advancing gender ideology and replaced them with a clear biological framework through Executive Order, it is essential to ensure that federal grantees, including land-grant universities running 4-H programs, bring their practices into alignment with the law," Tony Woodlief, the Center for Practical Federalism's senior executive vice president, said in a letter to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, obtained by Fox News Digital. Specifically, the Center for Practical Federalism pointed to several instances where states have prioritized gender identity over biological sex for their 4-H programs. For example, the group alleged that, in 2022, the Rock Springs Ranch 4-H Camp in Kansas housed a person who was born a male but identified as a female in a cabin with preteen girls – without alerting the parents beforehand for consent. The Sentinel, a nonprofit news site that is a subsidiary of the free market think tank Kansas Policy Institute, also reported on the incident. The Kansas 4-H Foundation has not updated its gender policy online since then, which claims to ban gender discrimination based on "gender identity" in areas including housing, according to the Center for Practical Federalism. "The persistence of gender identity-based policies in 4-H programs shows how rescinded guidance can continue to shape policy and practice in violation of current federal directives," Woodlief said in the letter. "The situation at Rock Springs Ranch 4-H Camp in Kansas is a clear example of how these policies can conflict with parental rights and children's safety." The Kansas 4-H Foundation did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. Other states have similar policies, according to the Center for Practical Federalism. For example, California and Oregon both espouse policies in official documents or in training materials for their 4-H programs that place participants and adult chaperones in overnight housing based on their gender identity, rather than biological sex, the group said. The University of California's 4-H Youth Development Program did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital, nor did Oregon State's 4-H Youth Development Program. As a result, the Center for Practical Federalism is requesting that the USDA conduct a review of all federally funded 4-H programs, land grant institutions and 4-H facilities to determine where rescinded gender ideology policies are still being enforced. Likewise, the group urges the USDA to institute formal standards "to prevent subregulatory guidance from circumventing lawful rulemaking." "We also recommend that the Department use this case as a springboard for a broader, agency-wide audit of existing guidance documents, rescinding those that bypassed the regulatory process or are no longer necessary," Woodlief said in the letter. The USDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Marjorie Taylor Greene sounds alarm over AI provision in One Big Beautiful Bill Act: 'I would have voted NO if I had known'
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who voted to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in the House last month, slammed a provision of the proposal on Tuesday, noting that if she had realized it was in the measure, she would have voted against passage. The provision Greene is sounding the alarm about would significantly restrict states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. "Except as provided in paragraph (2), no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce, during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, any law or regulation of that State or a political subdivision thereof limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce," the provision reads, in part. Greene disclosed in a post on X that she did not know about that provision of the proposal when she voted to pass the measure last month. "Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years. I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there," she noted in the tweet on Tuesday. "We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous. This needs to be stripped out in the Senate. When the OBBB comes back to the House for approval after Senate changes, I will not vote for it with this in it. We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around. Especially with rapidly developing AI that even the experts warn they have no idea what it may be capable of," Greene added. Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., responded to Greene's post by tweeting, "You have one job. To. Read. The. F[---]ing. Bill." "Maybe instead of doing this you should have read the bill," conservative commentator Dana Loesch tweeted in response to Greene's comments. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act runs a bit more than 1,000 pages long. Greene told Fox News Digital during a phone call on Wednesday that if she ever ceases to be "humble as a representative and willing to publicly admit that maybe I've made a mistake … then I shouldn't be a representative." But the congresswoman explained that she believes that "this is a far more important discussion than Marjorie admitted that she missed reading a little clause" lodged within the lengthy bill. Greene said that she believes she should have "been able to trust Republicans, that we wouldn't be destroying federalism in the One Big Beautiful Bill. That was what I didn't expect. Because, state rights, that's federalism. And Republicans are focused on reducing federal government power and protecting state rights. However, this bill literally destroys state rights for 10 years … destroys federalism." She said that regardless of which party is "in charge … this is something that we just can't allow to happen." On Tuesday, business tycoon Elon Musk blasted both the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and the lawmakers who voted to pass it. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he tweeted.