logo
Pressure mounts on Texas Democrats as walkout stretches into a second week

Pressure mounts on Texas Democrats as walkout stretches into a second week

Washington Post3 days ago
The redistricting standoff in Texas is stretching into its second week with increased threats between red and blue states and fresh doubts about what will end an impasse that will shape which party controls Congress after next year's midterm elections.
The fight goes far beyond Texas. President Donald Trump is pushing several other Republican-led states to draw new congressional maps to help protect Republicans' narrow House majority, which stands at 219-212 with four vacancies.
Democrats are threatening counterattacks. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) sent Trump a letter Monday asking him to halt the red-state efforts and warning him he would establish new lines in his state if Trump persists.
'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' Newsom wrote.
The escalating fight shows no sign of abating, with both sides dug in as Republicans try to ensure their party controls Congress for all of Trump's four-year term. Democrats see 2026 as crucial to thwarting Trump's agenda and launching investigations of the president.
The dispute could reach a crescendo this week or next. Democrats in California plan to begin adopting their plan next week by scheduling a ballot measure that will allow voters to sign off on new maps this November. To get the plan on the November ballot, California lawmakers must act by Aug. 22. Their plan could shift five congressional seats from Republicans to Democrats.
California lawmakers will be considering their plans as Texas's 30-day special legislative session winds down and Texas Democrats decide whether to return to the state after fleeing it a little over a week ago to block passage of a new map there. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) said he would continuously call 30-day sessions, forcing Democrats to return from blue states or commit to staying away for the long haul.
They would need to remain out of state off and on for months to prevent the plans from being passed for the 2026 elections. Texas Democrats have not said whether they have the will to do that and have sidestepped answering how long they will hold out. New lines must be set in the lead-up to the March primary.
Republicans in Texas are applying legal and financial pressure to get the Democrats to return as soon as possible. They have asked the state Supreme Court to declare that 13 of them no longer hold office because they have abandoned their jobs. They have issued civil arrest warrants for them, and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) is seeking court approval to make the warrants valid in California and Illinois, two of the states the absent Democrats have visited.
Paxton has also sued to prevent Democratic former congressman Beto O'Rourke's political group from funding the Texas Democrats' travel costs, and a judge on Friday issued a restraining order barring it from doing so for the time being. Top Republicans in the state House last week declared that lawmakers would need to pick up their paychecks in person, effectively preventing the Democrats from collecting a salary while they are away.
Texas state House Minority Leader Gene Wu (D) on Monday called the legal filings against the Democrats 'bizarre' and 'frivolous.'
'Any cursory look at everything they're filing, from the stuff in California to the stuff in Illinois — even the stuff in Texas — is nonsense,' he said. 'They're just treating our country and our system of government like it's a joke.'
The GOP plan in Texas, taken up at Trump's behest, would shift five districts significantly right, giving Republicans a chance to claim 30 of the state's 38 seats, up from the 25 they hold now. Trump won all 30 of the proposed districts by 10 percentage points or more. Trump is also urging Republicans in Indiana, Missouri and Ohio to draw new maps.
The Texas Constitution requires at least two-thirds of state lawmakers to be present to act on maps and other legislation, and Democrats in the state House have stymied the proposal by leaving.
The Texas State Senate will consider the new map on Monday. The Democrats in that chamber have remained in the state, so enough members should be available to pass the measure. But the map will remain stalled in the state House as long as the Democrats in that chamber remain away.
In an appearance on 'Fox News Sunday,' Abbott noted he could repeatedly call special sessions to try to get Democrats to return. 'As soon as this one is over, I'm gonna call another one, then another one, then another one, then another one,' Abbott said.
Democrats have said they will stay away long enough to kill the map for the current special session but have not said what they would do after that. The standoff could last months if Democrats remain firm.
In recent days, state troopers have visited the homes of the absent Texas lawmakers, Democrats said Monday at a news conference with Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) in Chicago. Many of the Texas Democrats have been staying in the area since they left Texas last week. They planned to hold their event with Durbin last week but canceled after the Democrats faced the first of two bomb threats at a hotel they were staying in the suburbs.
'We will not be intimidated,' Texas state Rep. Mihaela Plesa (D) said. 'We will not be bullied into silence and we will not surrender, like the governor has, to corrupt D.C. politicians.'
Texas state Rep. Mitch Little (R) has called for a state House investigating committee to look into Democrats who broke quorum. Like Paxton and Abbott, he has argued Democrats may be violating an anti-bribery law by relying on O'Rourke's group and others to bankroll their travel expenses using political funds. Democrats have said they are following the law and engaged in ordinary campaign fundraising.
Little said he is confident the Democrats will eventually return, paving the way for Republicans to approve a new map.
'They will come back,' he said. 'It's just a question of when. They do not have the will to make this go away.'
He called the map essential to accomplishing the GOP's national agenda. 'This is about imperiling a Trump presidency and him having the votes to do what he needs to do,' Little said. 'We want these seats, and we're going to have them.'
Molly Hennessy-Fiske, Maeve Reston, Yvonne Wingett Sanchez, Mariana Alfaro and Hannah Knowles contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats Plan Nationwide Protests Over Redistricting
Democrats Plan Nationwide Protests Over Redistricting

Epoch Times

timea few seconds ago

  • Epoch Times

Democrats Plan Nationwide Protests Over Redistricting

US Politics Organizers say rallies in more than 30 states aim to counter Trump-backed efforts to redraw congressional maps before 2026 elections. Democrats and allied advocacy groups are set to launch a series of protests on Saturday, Aug. 16, targeting Republican-led redistricting plans they say are designed to secure long-term control of the U.S. House. The 'Fight the Trump Takeover' National Day of Action, organized by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Texas for All coalition, and dozens of national and state partners, will feature nearly 150 rallies in at least 34 states.

Trump's debanking order could create headaches for banks, sources say
Trump's debanking order could create headaches for banks, sources say

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's debanking order could create headaches for banks, sources say

By Nupur Anand, Pete Schroeder and Saeed Azhar NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order requiring banks not to discriminate against clients on political or religious grounds could create uncertainty and administrative headaches for the industry, sources said. Trump signed an executive order on Thursday directing the Treasury Department and bank regulators to ensure lenders do not have policies in place that deny services to customers based on political or religious beliefs, a practice known as "debanking." Any wrongdoing uncovered could result in fines, disciplinary measures, and even referrals to the Justice Department. The order came days after Trump accused JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America last week of debanking him, and alleged that lenders discriminate against conservatives. Large banks have denied rejecting clients on political grounds, and instead blamed unclear rules for some of the account closures. Banks have earlier said that certain decisions to close accounts were based on rules around reputational risk, a criterion that has been banned by Trump's order. The order also gave regulators about 180 days to conduct their review. While some lenders welcomed the order for its potential to streamline processes, they also expressed concerns about how onerous it could be to comply with the order. The scope and zeal with which regulators carry out Trump's directions are still unclear and causing some trepidation, experts and industry officials said. "There are words in the executive order which can be open to interpretation," said Matt Bisanz, a partner at Mayer Brown. "We will have to see what meaning the regulators attach to it, and what is the scope of the activities that they focus on." "It's not even clear if there will be regulations or just guidance, which will be enforced through the bank exam process or will be handled in a quiet, non-public manner," Bisanz added. Trump's criticism echoed longstanding debanking complaints from Republicans, who have accused Wall Street banks of "woke capitalism," in denying services to gunmakers, fossil-fuel companies and others perceived to be aligned with the political right. "Fair access to financial services is a fundamental principle of the U.S. banking system," said Jonathan Gould, the Comptroller of the Currency, in a statement in response to the new order. "It is unacceptable for banks to discriminate against any customer on the basis of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities." The OCC, which oversees national banks, is currently reviewing banks for improper policies and will take remedial actions "as appropriate." Spokespeople for the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation declined to comment on how they plan to implement the order. Industry executives say there are many questions about the executive order that may only be clarified if regulators publish rules on debanking, said three sources who declined to be identified because the discussions are private. It is too early to tell how onerous it will be to comply with the order given the lack of details so far, another industry source said. Banks could also face myriad challenges if they are forced to review and potentially renew client relationships over debanking, said Stephen Gannon, partner at Davis Wright Tremaine. Reinstating or modifying arrangements, as the order suggests, would require banks to analyze large volumes of data on client activities and products, he said. Regulators are unlikely to hand out penalties for any historic account closures, but they could be asked to disclose reasons for past debanking, two sources said. Now that the order has been announced, banks could face regulatory penalties if debanking guidelines are not properly implemented, said Ed Mills, an analyst at Raymond James, a financial services firm. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

White House's Navarro says pharma tariffs likely under Section 232 probe
White House's Navarro says pharma tariffs likely under Section 232 probe

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

White House's Navarro says pharma tariffs likely under Section 232 probe

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said on Thursday that the Trump administration is likely to levy tariffs on pharmaceutical imports under a "Section 232" trade investigation because it's "very clear that we have a national security crisis" due to U.S. reliance on foreign producers in the sector. In an televised interview with CNBC, Navarro did not provide any details on the timing of the Section 232 probe. He said that President Donald Trump's executive order to shore up supply chains will provide price floors for domestic producers of drug ingredients through long-term strategic contracts that will ensure sufficient demand. At the same time, tariffs will deter dumping of pharma precursors from India and China, he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store